Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1267821975.gif-(162 KB, 1024x768, chinese.gif)
    162 KB Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)15:46 No.284693  
    China must urgently address the physical fitness of the nation's youth or run the risk of raising a generation incapable of fighting the Japanese in a future war

    >future war

    oh China
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)15:47 No.284698
    "The physical fitness of the young is a matter of strengthening our country and our Chinese race."
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)15:48 No.284710
    >Japanese in a future war

    Fit people can't stop gundams.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)15:49 No.284721
    Reuters: US must keep it's strategic forces ready for the future nuclear exchange
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)15:50 No.284726
    >>284710

    Nor can they stop the inevitable US hard force intervention.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)15:50 No.284735
    This is what communism does. It makes you fail at politics.

    "We must practice raping women and torturing insurgents, for when we invade Taiwan. I mean, have you seen my car keys?"
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)16:25 No.285032
    >future war
    >people

    lol, future war will be fought with UAVs and UGVs, rarely will infantry play a major role
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)16:26 No.285041
    >>285032
    Not for a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG time.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)16:29 No.285071
    >>284693
    The Chinese are simply farming their own Sumos to counter the Japanese, its a cunning plan.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)16:32 No.285107
    Chinks, Gooks, and Japs

    Hate triangle.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:40 No.285643
    >>285107

    no, the all the asians hate the japs
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:43 No.285659
         File1267828988.jpg-(28 KB, 380x500, zapp.jpg)
    28 KB
    Have they not heard of brannigan's law
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:44 No.285668
    >>285643
    The feeling is mutual, mudpuppy.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:45 No.285676
    >>285643

    >the all the asians
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:47 No.285692
    >>285032
    That's only these pussy "anti-insurgency" wars. If there were a real full-scale war between major powers there would be more infantry.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:50 No.285704
    It's sad. I think China will take over Japan someday. Yurop is already forming the EU. It's like 1984, man. Eastasia, Oceania, and Eurasia.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:51 No.285715
    Here is the article
    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62353C20100304
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:53 No.285722
    Once China gets fully advanced stockpiles of ICBMs (even tho they already ones that can reach us), there's absolutely nothing we can do agianst them.

    WE HAVE TO ATTACK THEM NOW WHILE THEY'RE WEAK.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:55 No.285731
         File1267829740.jpg-(12 KB, 282x251, 1253295964349.jpg)
    12 KB
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)17:57 No.285743
    >>285722
    They'll never launch at the USA. They NEED a market for their goods. They will never allow the Chinese people the freedom for prosperity because that would cause the eventual overthrow of the bureaucracy. China is in it for the long haul. It's on the master plan devised over a thousand years ago man.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:01 No.285764
    >>285743
    There's a reason why China is investing so heavily on Africa and then Europe.

    China is gonna give a big FUCK YOU to America sooner or later.

    They have everything planned out, right down to holding our debt and their fucking XBAWKS HUEG currency reserves.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:02 No.285773
    >>285758
    America may very well at some point in the future hand over title of a large part of the country (not necessarily physical land, either. see the current tech trade controversy) to China. It will be done legally since China understands the superior nature of taking something with the consent of the victim.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:07 No.285808
    >>285758
    First of all China doesn't and will never give a fuck about Europe. That region is dead on a world political scale.

    Second, the fact that they're lending us so much money is because we are the only ones rich enough to fulfill their huge need. Currently it's becoming a better situation for us than for them because they're tying themselves to us and getting addicted on our purchasing power whereas we couldn't give a fuck which country builds our Macbooks. They have no choice but to empower us more and more because there is no other market large enough for them because their population still lacks not only the purchasing power BUT also the will to spend big and even go into debt.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:08 No.285814
         File1267830524.jpg-(199 KB, 400x574, future-war03.jpg)
    199 KB
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:41 No.286032
    Welcome to 1890, China!

    When you can turn that around and your poor are obese and your wealthy are fit, you will have arrived!
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:50 No.286095
    >>284693

    There's so fucking many chinks that they'll always have overwhelmingly more capable soldiers than any adversary, except maybe India. And they have no regard for human life - even their own. They have no qualms about sending wave after wave of their own blood crashing into enemy lines, being utterly annihilated in the process, as long as they can break through eventually. See the Korean War for example.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:52 No.286102
    >>286095
    >Korean War, Chinese...

    They were there only as advisers and with materiel help.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:52 No.286103
    >>286095
    That's what Sun Tzu believed in. Zerg-rush tactics will eventually exhaust enemy ability to fight so long as you don't exhaust too.

    That's all war is.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:53 No.286107
         File1267833229.jpg-(65 KB, 318x576, Future_war.jpg)
    65 KB
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:55 No.286116
    Chinese military has never been good at conquering anything... it is only good at keeping peace.

    In fact, China's tactic to claim regions is simple :

    1. Pour in Chinese immigrants
    2. Breed
    2. Give TVs and satellite dishes to the indigeneous people
    3. ???
    4. PROFIT

    The current young generation of Tibetans are already losing their culture. The elders are wondering how to defend it... but when one's culture and history cease to be unquestionnable, it is already too late.

    GG CHINA
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:56 No.286117
    >>286103

    There are other ways to attain rapid, overwhelming firepower besides just sending hordes upon hordes of young men recklessly to the front lines to die. Granted, China may not have had any other options, but the simple fact that they were able to get away without real public opposition just shows the advantages that a totalitarian society has in war.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)18:59 No.286129
    >>286116

    There is some truth to this. Most people don't realize that China's massive population(and its related internal chaos) means that China will always be limited in projecting power. It may be able to project more power than any other country(in time), but the amount it can project will always be less than what one would think for a nation of 1.3 billion.

    The truth is that China is not a stable country. At least not as stable as the hilarious CCP propaganda would have people believe.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:02 No.286152
    Mongolia will rise again.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:03 No.286158
    In this thread the patriotic fail of underage brats playing too many games can be seen.

    For one the fact that they didnt finish elementery yet is proven by the fact that they don't know what would happen if one drops a bomb with enough strength (no atomic force needed)
    into the San Andreas Fault

    For the second fact, even if it was proclaimed a non-nuclear/biological war, well...... USAfags fail enough with sandniggers armed by rocks,
    here we are talking for a change a few times bigger, equally equipped Chinese army,
    along with the fact that they have advanced military warfare to a point not known in the world due to the fact that everything is kept hidden
    from public eyes any way possible unlike the amerifags who use discovery enough as it is.

    Thirdly Chinese information gathering agencies
    and hackers are as proven time and time again
    better than most USA's got.

    Here we come to a difference, here USA isn't
    fighting a random sandnigger country after
    911 to seem like it has got things under control.
    Oh no, this is another story.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:06 No.286174
    >>286158
    So clearly, the counter to bullshit AMERICA STRONG posts is bullshit CHINA STRONG nonsense. Fuck off.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:08 No.286189
         File1267834104.png-(9 KB, 150x150, damninternet.png)
    9 KB
    >>286158

    the pendulum swings back and forth and back and forth and back and forth....

    i give humanity 600 more years at most before we blow each other off the planet.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:10 No.286201
    >>286158

    > along with the fact that they have advanced military warfare to a point not known in the world due to the fact that everything is kept hidden

    If its so secret, then I guess you can't talk with any authority on it, can you?

    > Thirdly Chinese information gathering agencies and hackers are as proven time and time again better than most USA's got.

    You need to learn to look past defense and agency managers jockeying for more funding. They exaggerate everything to get more money. The truth is that the USA knows just as much about China's military capacity as vice versa. An unbelievable amount of money has been spent to ensure this.

    > USAfags fail enough with sandniggers armed by rocks

    The USA fights the "sandniggers" with one hand tied behind its back; it doesn't want to cause excessive casualties. The war in Iraq and Afghanistan has almost no bearing on a hypothetical China/US war except to allow US soldiers to be more experienced and battle ready(an advantage that can't be understated). The Chinese have military leaders and commanders with decade-old battlefield experience(against Vietnam), but for the most part the Chinese army has been employed on just putting down frequent riots and disaster relief, they have hardly proven anything themselves.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:13 No.286222
    >>286158
    What do you think dropping a bomb of sufficient force would do to any area of land? This is a nonsensical statement on its face and proves your lack of factual knowledge on plate tectonics in particular the San Andreas, the most studied fault on the planet.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:15 No.286236
    >>286222

    Not to mention what the US could do to China by bombing the Three Gorges Dam and other massive Chinese hydrological projects.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:17 No.286247
    >>286189
    >i give humanity 600 more years

    Optimist, are you?
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:17 No.286251
    >>286129
    Of course it is not stable. Chinese philosophy revolves around the manner of maintaining its huge population in one country. Besides, let's not forget the 56 ethnicities thing, making stability harder to achieve.

    As I said, China may not be interested in a direct military intervention. Its military may only serve at maintaining cohesion and preventing a new Opium War.

    But my guess is that they will have to cope with the multuculturalism problem in some of their big cities, as China attracts more attention... in fact, I tend to view the new trend of migrating everywhere in the world as the new way of making war (WWIII ?) : go to a country, fuck their women, having babies which legitimate one's presence in someone else's country.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:22 No.286274
    >>286251
    Bingo! This is why the dream of Aztlan in America is so compelling. The only problem is that Mexicans are moving back to Mexico quicker than they can hop the fence. The dollar is worth more on the street in Mexico than it is in a US bank.
    >> Anonymous 03/05/10(Fri)19:22 No.286277
    >>286251

    > Besides, let's not forget the 56 ethnicities thing

    Well, China is 91.9% Han. It does not have anywhere near the ethnic diversity that, say, the US, Brazil, or India has. Though one can argue that "Han" is itself a very vague term, encompassing plenty of different groups of people.

    > Its military may only serve at maintaining cohesion and preventing a new Opium War.

    I tend to agree, along with the goal of reconquering Taiwan and asserting Chinese claims to the Spratly Islands.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]AnonymousWoman Tells Off...
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]AnonymousIndustrial Soci...
    [V][X]AnonymousObama policies ...