Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • /rs/ now processes MediaFire/MegaUpload/and a bunch of other links correctly (this had been broken for months). The old links should be updated in about a week (the checker is taking a while).
    UPDATE: Now you can search *by board* on /rs/. Check it out!
    Thanks to Popcorn Mariachi for spontaneously appearing and fixing this.

    Reminder: Ask questions here, e-mail me here (I read *every* one), and follow 4chan on the Twitter here.

    File : 1267641121.jpg-(33 KB, 635x340, crowded.jpg)
    33 KB States reduce prison populations as budgets shrink Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:32 No.268332  
    By Krissah Thompson
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Wednesday, March 3, 2010; 1:14 PM

    Many state governments continued last year to reduce their prison populations through sentencing reforms enacted because of shrinking state budgets, according to two reports released Wednesday by a research group that advocates for lower rates of imprisonment.

    In 2009, at least 19 states adopted criminal justice policies intended to cut down on the number of prisoners they house by shortening sentences, according to the Sentencing Project. For example, Minnesota, New York and Rhode Island each scaled back mandatory sentencing laws for some drug offenses.

    Three states -- Michigan, New Jersey and New York -- reduced their prison populations by at least 12 percent in the past decade by making similar changes, according to state public safety data cited by the report. Those states saw no increase in crime, according to the report.

    New York's prison population is down 20 percent, from 72,899 in 1999 to 58,456 in 2009. Michigan's had a 12 percent reduction, from 51,577 in 2006 to 45,478 in 2009. New Jersey's is down 19 percent, from 31,493 in 1999 to 25,436 in 2009.

    Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/03/AR2010030302154.html
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:34 No.268348
    half of them wouldn't be there if there were no drug prohibition
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:35 No.268353
    >>268348
    True, but it's too profitable to end the drug war.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:36 No.268361
    >>268348

    This.

    Time to legalize weed and cocaine.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:36 No.268363
    >>268348
    The other half wouldn't be there if they weren't murderers and thieves. What's your point?
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:36 No.268364
    We had 40,000 released in Riverside County, CA

    Already reports from all over that prisoners released have already committed crimes
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:38 No.268376
    >>268363
    one half are in jail for committing victimless crimes (or crimes against the state), the other half are there for committing actual crimes
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:39 No.268378
    States just need to speed up capital punishment. I mean, you're in prison, you shouldn't have the right to an appeal

    With a decrease in executions, 500 are still on death row in CA alone with 17 executed in 2009, it is just fodder for liberals and their anti-death penalty stance
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:39 No.268381
    >>268363

    That prison was invented to hold murderers and thieves, and not people who do the equivalent of getting drunk.

    But you know, smoking weed is just like raping a girl and cutting off her head. Totally similar.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:39 No.268383
    I'm so glad about this. I've had a a warrant out for my arrest for months. Failure/protest over DUI fines. Not likely to come knocking on my door any time soon are they?
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:40 No.268384
    >>268376
    >one half are in jail for committing victimless crimes
    >drug users

    They're committing crimes against themselves by using drugs
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:41 No.268391
    >>268361

    Legalize weed, and to all other drugs take the same approach Portugal is taking to the drug war.

    Half of the prison population from victimless crimes will go away, number of people seeking treatment will double & drug dealers will lose so much power it will be lulzy to laugh at them.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:42 No.268394
    >>268376
    >Implying there wouldn't be victims if they couldn't get their fix when they got desperateness and penniless after years of blowing all their money on drugs.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:42 No.268397
    >>268378
    It'd be hilarious if you where accused of a crime that resulted in the death penalty, here's the kicker, you are innocent.

    Faggots who want America to become like China just piss me off.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:42 No.268400
         File1267641777.png-(5 KB, 94x167, 1225246523403.png)
    5 KB
    >>268384
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:43 No.268402
    >>268384
    >implying you an commit a crime against yourself.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:44 No.268410
    >>268384

    Get off your fucking pulpit. Drug use laws need to change in this country.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:44 No.268413
    >>268397
    Well it shouldn't take 20+ years on death row before executing someone

    Plus, with today's technology, there should be no innocent people sentenced

    If you notice, all the innocent people that are being released were put in prison back in the 70's and 80's
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:44 No.268414
    >>268394

    >Implying that doesnt happen now for a variety of reasons. Like gambling debt

    Legalizing a substance doesn't legalize their actions. Assholes are always going to be assholes.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:46 No.268424
    >>268397
    buy more guns
    enjoy murderers near you.
    choose one.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:47 No.268429
    >>268391
    >number of people seeking treatment will double
    Oh yeah, that will be great, spending millions of dollars on treatment instead of on prevention
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:47 No.268430
         File1267642024.png-(6 KB, 400x400, coolface2.png)
    6 KB
    >>268384
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:47 No.268432
    >>268394

    >strawman argument
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:48 No.268439
    >>268397
    >Faggots who want America to become like China just piss me off.

    Well China does get shit done

    Plus, executing prisoners in from of thousands in a stadium is a great deterrent
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:48 No.268441
    >>268429

    See, the difference is the actual individual would pay for the treatment instead of the government blowing billions of dollars on ad campaigns that only make kids want to do drugs.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:49 No.268445
    >>268402
    Attempted suicide.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:49 No.268453
    >>268445

    Yeah and thats retarded too. Now name one more.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:49 No.268455
    >>268441
    >the actual individual would pay for the treatment

    Of course a druggie isn't going to have money, so they either commit crime to get it or get someone else, government, to pay for it
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:51 No.268462
    >>268453
    Teenage girl taking a picture of herself nude.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:51 No.268463
    >>268453
    I'm sure there are some loops holes in the law that makes ID theft/changing your identity illegal
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:52 No.268469
    >>268462
    She's a filthy pedophile.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)14:06 No.268535
    >>268455

    The people you are talking about are the same people who are the homeless alcoholics. There are already tons of people out there doing the drugs you think cause them to be retards who cant keep a job to support their habit, Most people realize they're going to need money for their habits. Most people also have the cognitive skills to work and do drugs without either interfering with the other.

    The ones robbing people on the streets are already there. Making things legal isnt going to change anything except cut down on the amount of people we arrest.

    And guess what, the guy who robs someone for drug money still goes to jail.
    >> Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)14:07 No.268542
    >>268462

    That's not illegal for the girl to do. Its illegal for the guy who has the picture of the naked girl. The naked girl is not reprimanded in anyways. Nice fail.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]AnonymousStates reduce p...
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]AnonymousU.S. Postal Ser...
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous