Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • Since I've been on a Q&A kick in /a/ and /r9k/ recently, I've decided to set up a formspring account for publicly answering 4chan related questions. You'll find it linked in the navbar as "?", and located here: formspring.me/4chan. Also, if you use Twitter, please follow @4chan. As always, I can be contacted via e-mail at moot@4chan.org (Despite the common misconception, I check it frequently and read every message I receive. Nobody seems to e-mail me about anything other than being banned though ;_;)
    EDIT: Site went down due to a hardware issue. Should be fixed now.

    File : 1267208637.gif-(16 KB, 324x67, 1264608037991.gif)
    16 KB Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:23 No.228868  
    Can somebody explain in two sentences what exactly the new health care bill will change?
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:26 No.228881
    Insurance companies will make more money. You'll be forced to pay them.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:26 No.228886
    Nothing. It will never get passed.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:28 No.228893
    I think it opens the insurance market to federal level instead of state level
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:28 No.228894
    Government spending on health care costs will be slashed by $1.4 trillion over the next 20 years and insurance companies will no longer be able to jerk their customers around, including those that are uninsured right now.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:29 No.228906
    United States Socialist Republic will replace United States of America.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:30 No.228914
    nobody knows anymore. Not even the people writing the health care bill.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:31 No.228926
    >>228894
    but it will cost 10 times as much as the savings to do

    so enjoy your taxes going up on well everything
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:33 No.228937
    >>228926
    Taxes are going up regardless, we are in a huge fucking hole (dug by both parties) and there is simply no way to slash enough spending to cover the gap. Taxes are going up regardless of who is in power.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:33 No.228938
    >>228868

    Biggest point is that companies will no longer be able to deny coverage based on medical history.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:34 No.228940
    >>228926

    It will cost more to the rich, not the middle class. Anyone making +250k a year in bank annuities gets a tax hike, but 95% of small businesses making ~250k a year get a tax exemption.

    Thank you rich people for helping out the country you love so much.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:35 No.228943
    The Democrats are working for the insurance companies.

    Their bill will require every American to become a customer of the insurance companies, giving the insurance companies billions and billions in new profits year after year.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:35 No.228946
    >>228938
    but how does that help poor people?
    >> [Goku] !i6MHlwIx1E 02/26/10(Fri)13:37 No.228948
    >>228943
    mittromney.jpg

    >>228946
    it doesn't. it's going to make health insurance more expensive.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:39 No.228955
    >>228948
    Democrats repeated over 9000 times yesterday that they want to give insurance to the 15-30m people who can't afford it so I really doubt there is nothing in the bill that will do that for them.
    >> [Goku] !i6MHlwIx1E 02/26/10(Fri)13:42 No.228970
    >>228955
    I dunno they can't seem to grasp the concept of making health care and health insurance cheaper so that more people can afford it
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:49 No.228993
    >>228970

    It will be cheaper. It will cut the premiums of poor and lower middle class households by 30%. It will not lower higher plans directly, but by the other initiatives in the bills everyone's premiums go down (no more ER fees of 1000 dollars per person means savings for everyone).
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:51 No.229006
    Government now provides just over half of the medical care in the country and is going broke.
    Private insurance covers the other half and is profitable. Government wants to close down the profitable part.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:52 No.229008
    >>228993
    it..doesn't..work..like..that..

    *smashes face into desk*
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:52 No.229012
    no preexisting conditions. no people without insurance
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:53 No.229013
    >>229006
    medicare advantage is doing alright...
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:53 No.229014
    >>229013
    And the bill ends it.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:54 No.229015
    Sounds exactly what Canada did
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:54 No.229016
    1) Impose a tax on not having insurance, make this tax less than the price of having insurance.

    2) Mandate that insurance cannot be turned down by anyone.

    3) ????

    4) HOLY SHIT WHY HAVE ALL OUR CUSTOMERS LEFT AND EVERYONE BUYING INSURANCE IS SOMEHOW MYSTERIOUSLY SICK?!

    5) Blame rising prices on evil companies.
    >> [Goku] !i6MHlwIx1E 02/26/10(Fri)13:55 No.229023
    >>229014
    they're getting rid of Part C? what? there is no way they could leave in that, but not get rid of D. no one is that fucking dumb.

    bullshit, I give me sources.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:56 No.229028
    >>229008

    Sure it does.

    >>229006

    Private insurance is profitable because they are jacking up premiums on existing customers and dropping millions of customers who get sick.

    >>229014

    Good. It's a waste of money subsidizing the insurance companies.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:57 No.229033
    >>229016

    You don't complain about having to buy auto insurance. Those that can't afford insurance will get gov subsidies.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:59 No.229038
    Hardly anyone is using two sentences to describe the health care bill.

    I, however, WILL, by using a run on sentence that quickly changes topic RIGHT NOW so anyway health care reform will change next to nothing by the time it passes because nobody really cares about it anymore and the Dems are more concerned about passing SOMETHING instead of nothing regardless of what that something is.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)13:59 No.229041
         File1267210774.jpg-(26 KB, 800x600, Picture646.jpg)
    26 KB
    Omg omg just look at this I got a papercut. But don't worry I've got government insurance and can see a doctor let the government pay for the visit!
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:00 No.229043
    >>229033
    liability insurance. and subsidies are bad. just as a general rule, they're bad economics.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:03 No.229053
    health care is good but the people using it are not
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:06 No.229058
    Why do the Democrats want to make the poor wait until 2015 to get the free medical care?
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:10 No.229072
         File1267211422.jpg-(67 KB, 750x600, 99probs.jpg)
    67 KB
    >>229043

    You will still be able to purchase liability insurance with this bill.

    >>229058
    >my face
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:17 No.229097
    >my face

    That's not an answer.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:21 No.229118
    >>229097

    They don't. They want to start it next year and they can if republicans stop filibustering. Then they can pass a Medicare buy-in for those +45 years old, and expand medicare to those +50 years old.

    Public Option would also speed up the benefits.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:24 No.229132
    >>229118
    if they do that, the country will go fucking bankrupt.

    why don't they just open up social security to 45 or 50 year olds while they're at it?
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:27 No.229151
    >>229132

    It'll be cheaper if they do expand Medicare, not more expensive. More people in =/= more sick people in. That's how pools work.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:29 No.229164
    >>228868
    Okay, listen, I get that you want this simple. But it's not. It's complicated. I don't want to tell you to not care, but if you're asking for this thing in two sentences, you're not gonna get any real understanding whatsoever about what the bill is intended to do. If you wanna know this sorta thing, stop being lazy and read up - don't go looking for two sentence answers on here.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:32 No.229182
    >>229151
    we ALL pay into medicare. the more people covered by it, the quicker it's going to go run out of money.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:35 No.229192
    >>229182

    Only without reform. The bills lower the cost of health care for those on Medicare.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:36 No.229198
    >>229182
    So let me get this straight. You think that if we all have medicare, we'd run out of money to pay for medicare?

    What about putting the amount of money we save buying private healthcare being put into taxes that ultimately cost us less to pay for medicare for all? Besides this, if that was the only form of healthcare, and it was mandated that we all had to have insurance or pay a fee, the situation would work itself to the point where insurance has to cost less. Why? Because broke people can't pay money - you need to lower prices sometimes. Somehow, a lotta free market cheerleaders seem to forget that.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:38 No.229205
    >>229198
    because private insurance is profitable, medicare isn't.

    medicare a isn't free, and medicare b doesn't nearly cover as much as private insurance, and it's -still- losing money
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:40 No.229210
    >>229205
    In a system with other corrupt and self-serving private entities, of course it would - and yet all old people seem to love medicare. Says something about that program, hm?
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:45 No.229232
    We pay into Medicare for 42 years and then they tell us its going broke. If I pay 42 years I should be able to get something?
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:47 No.229236
    >>229205

    Private insurance is profitable because they're jacking up premium rates on existing customers and dropping sick people from their books.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:48 No.229245
    >>229210
    medicare is welfare.
    medicare is welfare.
    welfare is not profitable, it's government mandated charity.

    i don't mind paying for people who are too old to work, or are disabled and can't work. we've set that age limit at 65, senior fucking citizen. get social security, get medicare. and tbh, the way things are looking, we oughta be setting that age -back- to 70 or something. bump it up one year every 5 years or something. not because i hate people 65-69, but shit is becoming unsustainable.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:51 No.229264
    >>229236
    then by that logic we're all fucked, and nobody can afford to pay for health care.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:52 No.229272
    >>229245

    It's becoming unsustainable because the baby boomers are all retiring now. Good luck getting elected to any office if you say you want to up the age to even 65. You'll get chewed out by a grandma with no teeth (you might even like it, I guess).
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:53 No.229277
         File1267214027.jpg-(143 KB, 786x1250, 1265236828350.jpg)
    143 KB
    >>229264

    Yep. Time for single payer like Canada has.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:54 No.229283
    >>229272
    of course it'd never pass, just saying, at this rate, we're kinda screwed. people are living longer and saving less. simple as that.
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:55 No.229285
    >>229277
    if we can't even pay for people over 65, how the fuck are we supposed to pay for everyone?
    >> Anonymous 02/26/10(Fri)14:55 No.229289
    >>229272
    In 1935 when Medicare started you had to be 65 to qualify, life expectancy was 62 for men, 63 for women.

    Today life expectancy is 74/78 so Medicare would start at 76/80.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]