no your gay

>>2272436
>im a tea bagger, please rape my face

sure is 12 year olds in here

Yes, I agree.

/new/ - Conservatives run this bitch.

Come back when Europe is awake, then you will get some actual discussion going on.

America is awake right now, nothing good will come.

>>2272441
i rapped ur moms face last nite fag

OP = stupid kid who thinks he's cool for whipping up something after his math teacher at his high school bitched about republicans.

>>2272450
I don't see a flaw in the photo.

Are you watching or paying attention to American politics right now? That picture is absolutely true, why are you so quick to degrade one's observation by implying they are 12 years old?

I agree OP. Conservatives are disgusting people that would kill their own brothers to get ahead in life as well as destroy anything that doesn't agree with them or that they don't understand

>>2272428
I rather enjoy it, OP.

lol irony

>Look at me I can change quotes from "1984". I'm so smart.

>>2272457
/new/ is full of Nazis, libertarians, socialists, communists, and anarchists. You must be new.

>>2272468
this fag - fag who thinks that anyone that has issues with republicans are kids that are listening to adults bitch about them.

Not really. The adults tend to be the Republicans bitching about the Democrats.

congrats on reading 1984 OP, what's next on your fourth period english reading list, great expectations or oliver twist?

>>2272484
>look i can greentext to point out an action and claim that someone is using said action to feel smart, rather than talk about the picture and text in question.

Everyone is so quick to jump down OPs throat, but I honestly see no issue here. Although very extreme in nature, the general observations are true.

Rather than bitch about HURR he used 1984 DURR, why don't you say why these points are wrong?

if you ignore wilson, fdr, truman, jfk, lbj, carter, clinton, and obama sure

nice 1984/1984 reference though

had no idea conservative could be so mad

oh wait, yes i did.

>>2272485
this. strangely i think conservatives are one of the only non-existent ideologies here. we have a lot of standard american liberals though for some reason.

>>2272561
I am not a regular to /new/, but every time I am here it is FULL of Conservatives.

I even see them bragging about how they "own" /new/.

>>2272578
well i've been here since the day the board came back, and the only really 'conservatives' i've seen here are usually just various forms of right wingers, from facists like PRWN to anarchists like Diplomacy to moderates like Tomathy Jones, to libertarians minarchists like Rikudou, to psychotic nutjobs like StormTroll..

no standard conservatives though. in fact, the most anti-drug people I've seen on here are liberals who hate anything that isn't weed.

>>2272614
Maybe everyone just hates Obama.

DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH

+9000 internets

iit i laugh with with how americans oversimplified politics with the conservative-liberal bipole, you peeps are so funny :) and slightly retarded in the fact that you are given only two (maybe three) choicces and then attach your own ideal on these ppl where it is quite obvious to the external viewer that they are pretty much the same
this is why people outside the us think that the average joe is slightly retarded

Fukken saved.

Also, Reagan/GOP/conservative bashing thread.

>>2273312

>where it is quite obvious to the external viewer that they are pretty much the same

Not even close dimwit. Republicans realize that government is necessary to preform a few essential functions. National and local security, courts, international relations. Democrats think that government should have it's fingers in everything, oh, and by the way, these things should benefit them and be paid for by other people, preferably Republicans.

>>2273380
A private company could provide all those things.We would save billions privatizing the roads and safety services.
Wait till November Libs, we have the house and we are going to shut your bullshit down.I cannot wait till the Repubs defund Obmacare

>>2273390

Case in point.

If you can tell what a writer's exact political lean is from a single paragraph, that is a bad thing.

(Republican, you are one)

>trickle down

Most Tea Baggers are not overwhelmingly affected by taxes.

The truth is, conservative pull comes from other facets of their party, like the religious, homely subtext. It's the best way to feast on the ignorant crowd.

Liberals get the edgy want to change everything crowd.

The rest are the decisive swing voters who vote for whom their own pursuit will further. Often times, this is not a decision made based on economics and falls again, under the pretense of which rep is more likely to ban gay marriage or allow stem cell research.

I can't really comment until I know what grade you're in.

>>2273380
lol at that sign... CUT REVENUE - NOT SPENDING

>>2273450
racist

The only reason wages fell is because the CEO's made so much money that more cash had to be printed.People are still doing about the same or better even. We have more goods and services

>>2273421

When I was growing up kids didn't have to wear bicycle helmets. Today, the have to be in a booster seat until they are 4 foot 7 inches tall. (see www.boosterseats.gov)

Democrats want to control every little thing and don't care how much it costs, other people to pay for it. They are really bogging down society. Now kids who's parents can barely afford to feed them can't ride a bike without somebody buying them a helmet, which of course won't be so fashionable and just make them feel more like outcasts.

What happened to a little parental responsibility? Tell the kids to ride safely, we can't afford a doctors bill and I'll kick your ass if you hurt yourself!

If the kids are going to do BMX racing and jumps and stuff, a little extra protection is waranted. Fucking liberals want to control every little thing.

>>2273380

You forgot the government loan guarantees for their housing and the federal financial aid for their education.

Also the global influence (thanks in part to expensive things like wars, diplomacy, emergency aid, trade agreements, peacekeeping, etc) that makes their way of life possible.

>>2273490

Sure, if you ignore the fact that average debt has been going up and people have been working longer hours, life has never been better.

>>2273494
I love America, virtually no one will even consider cutting Defense spending

>>2273502
>until they are 4 foot 7 inches tall
what the fuck? is that federal law? i was riding in the -front seat- ever since I was six.

>Best healthcare system in the world

>>2273509
ALl i know is I can work 30 hours a week and make enough to keep the cable internet on and the rent paid. I am pretty happy,you can preach that class warfare crap all you like but the truth is that people who want to be rich, really want it, will usually find a way

>>2273502

>Has enough money to afford a bike, but not a helmet. Doesn't value child's life or well being.

LOLWAT HAPPEN TWO PARENTEL RESPONSIBILITY IN DIS COUNTRY?!

>>2273312

Defense spending has been around 20% of the US budget for the past 30 years. Our military does a fine job and justifies the expenditure, unlike most other government programs.

>Efficient and fair market mechanisms

>he thinks the Democrats aren't exactly the same
>laughinggirls.png

>>2273536

Why don't kids wear saftey helemts 24/7? You never know when they might fall down? Fucking, controlling Democrat liberal union idiot, leave us alone!

>>2273312

It's the 80-20 rule. 20% of people produce 80% of the results. It's why communism/socialism will never work.

If you took all of Bill Gates money, the NY State legislature would spend it in just over 4 months. Over taxing the rich is a stupid socialist plan.

>>2273587

It makes more sense to require use of safety equipment when there is a significant risk of getting hit by a car.

>>2273701
>20% of people produce 80% of the results. It's why communism/socialism will never work.

If you consider results to stem from the owner of a company rather than its employees, I'd have to agree with you. But in the case of economics, I'd say the 20-80 rule has more to do with effect (80% of the wealth goes to 20% of the people) than cause.

>2273757

A little styrofoam helmet isn't going to help much if you get hit by a car, fuckwit. Parents need to be sure their kids ride in safe places.

>>2273312

The purpose of companies is to make money, not employ people. If a company can produce the same product at less cost, it will succeed. If not, it will fail.

I'd rather work for a successful company, but that's just me.

>>2273860

But the purpose of the economy at large is to efficiently allocate resources. If part of the population is shut off from this allocation by unemployment, then the economy has failed.

>>2273896

The purpose of the economy at large is to produce godds and services that are in demand. If you can't contribute you'll be unemployed.

If you are unemployed, you better have friends and/or family that feel you contribute to their well being or are grateful for you past contributions, otherwise you are out of luck, except for charity, which there is plenty of.

Funny how liberals preach evolution and survival of the fittest, except when it comes to them or their unborn children. Having a family, community and church is more than just conservative wackyness, it's a way of life.

>>2273956

>The purpose of the economy at large is to produce godds and services that are in demand. If you can't contribute you'll be unemployed.

This was fine before the industrial revolution and one could be industrious working a traditional profession, be it farmer or shop keeper. Nowadays, one's economic productivity is almost entirely dependent on the market at large and the corporations that control it. Want to be a farmer? Enjoy competing with large companies that employ genetically modified crops, pesticides, and efficient corporate bureaucracy that will shut you out of the market. You must assimilate or go bankrupt. Want to start a small business? Enjoy being the financial sectors bitch. First sign of market turbulence and you're dead.

>>2274003

So? Because you are breathing somebody else has to give you a job? Because you got 13 years of free public education and can't make yourself useful in the economy?

Sorry, go read your Darwin again.

>>2274047
>Because you are breathing somebody else has to give you a job?

Because I am breathing, I have the right to support myself. If the current system can't accommodate this, then it has failed. I'm not talking about individual entrepreneurs cutting into their bottom-line to give me a job, but speaking of the system as a whole.

>Darwin

You obviously know nothing about Darwin if you keep using him to claim using him to justify the failures of the economy. If civilization was analogous to the way Darwin painted nature, I'd just go forcibly take some rich persons shit when I can't support myself through acceptable channels, and I'd be 'successful' in a Darwinian sense. Civilization is built on a social contract that we won't do that kind of thing for mutual benefit of each other.

Its morning in America again.

>government wants to help people be safer

THE GOVERRMENT IS TRYING TO CONTROL US!