> tripfag demanding the ban of another tripfag.

I lol'd.

Fuck off. You have no idea how quaint it is for Australians to have a libertarian. He's slightly below Scientology on the credibility scale, and keeping him around is worth it for teh lulz.

Also, given his incessant anonymous samefaggery, he's probably the OP.

>>2219845
>another tripfag thinking he's relevant
FUCKING CANCER FUUUUU

>>2219853

> he thinks i think i'm relevant.

Awww, how sweet.

>>2219845

You have to agree though. This is the worst tripfag on /new/.

I'm guessing his parents have Capitalist interests.

Fucking basement dwelling cunt, and his parents must have brainwashed him as child.

FUCK OFF FREEMARKET.

>>2219851
Because in your opinion the existence of government programs invalidates the entirety of libertarianism.

I never samefag and when I accidentally post without my trip I follow it up with another post.

>>2219862

No... i don't think i have to do anything you tell me...

>>2219864
Strawman followed by a straight-up lie. Like I said: for teh lulz, for teh lulz.

>>2219874

Freewill doesn't exist.

Only different dimensions of reality.

BTW While we're polarsing tripfags, I would like to say you're the only one here who makes any sense.

>>2219884

> polarising.

See, i don't believe people can be decidedly this or decidedly that, it conflicts with my understanding of free will.

For example, someone can be the very definition of the word stubborn, but that doesn't mean they won't change their mind at the least predictable moment.

For all i know, free market might just be trying out his debating skills.

>>2219905

This is day 4 of no sleep for me.

My brain is full of fuck.odc

Can we discuss this another time ;)

>>2219929

Sure we can, that's your choice.

:P

>>2219936

haha oh wow, so gifted in the subjectivity field.

I'm jelly.

This is the song playing when FREEMARKET is banned:
http://open.spotify.com/track/6BvtcJlv2kdlUodAt7PD6c

>polarsing
I'm going to make a deliberate attempt to employ that term in future.

Everyone in this thread should commit some form of honorable suicide because you're all a disgrace.

NOW I'M GONNA GO SLIT MY STOMACH OPEN THANKS TO YOU FUCKERS

>>2219947

I had a bit of a mindfuck to do with objectivity/subjectivity a few years back when i started looking into the mind and the various concepts that are attached to it in regards to the psycho-somatic derivatives, but this kind of talk tends to bore me.

Why can't you just leave free market alone, anyway, it's not like he (or she) is doing anything particularly bad, right?

>>2219980

>psycho-somatic derivatives

wat (I don't know what that means plurally, is that some of neologism? cbf googling)

It's just how some people are orientated (though I'm making an assumption because I don't know you and I'm new to 4chan)

MBTI might answer your dilemma.

>Why can't you just leave free market alone, anyway, it's not like he (or she) is doing anything particularly bad, right?

Because his opinions are impacting the general direction of our collective hivemind.

>>2220011

Probably.

What i know about it is self-taught, so there are plenty of gaps in my knowledge i have yet to address.

As if it's possible to address something you have no knowledge about.

:)

oh i get it.

not as economy derivatives.

>>2220022

> hivemind.

Oh lol.

I love it how people argue for anonymity and then try to attach an identity to it.

>>2220026

...

Think of it more as theoretical studies, i just use derivatives as a simplified term for it.

Self-teaching does that...

>>2220031

>>2220036

fucking HFA

how does it work.

>>2220079

Lol.

HFA is one of the derivatives of which i speak.

>>2220087

This is a matrix, you do realise that don't you?

I see synchronism on a daily basis, it doesn't even phase me anymore.

The night before 9/11 I dreamed about planes smashing into towers.

>>2220109

> the matrix.

No.

I try to avoid things like that when it comes to understanding the world, what you call synchronicity (i assume you're referring to wolfgang's perception of it and not einstein's) i simply see as a series of extraordinary coincidences.

If you wanted to disagree, you'd be straying into parapsychology there, which is where the real mind-fuck territory lies.

>If you wanted to disagree, you'd be straying into parapsychology there, which is where the real mind-fuck territory lies

brb parapsychology.

>>2220168

Enjoy re-evaluating your entire system of beliefs about reality, bro.

Do yourself a favour and take it at face value.

It would literally take up the whole capacity of the internet (in .txt form) to explain not only the neurological and physical side to our existenialism but the universe as well.

Our argument is invalid

/thread

tripfags should be banned for tripfaggotry

>>2220199

> implying you could explain the reality of neurology and physiology behind the universe using simple words or even mathematics and that it wouldn't blow our fucking brains apart if we didn't grasp even the slightest element of fact behind it.

Fair cop, guv.

>>2220210

I agree.

>>2220215

hahah i fucking lol'd out loud, still laughing

hahahaha

>>2220234

Actually, i was saying that your argument that the argument was invalid is invalid, because the idea that humanity could ever even give cause to a valid argument is invalid as of itself.

In otherwords, the fact we are even talking about it invalidates our entire existence.

>>2220248

Do you ever think that one day you'll snap?

I snapped once, it was the greatest feeling ever.

It was better than smoking meth.

I could play MP3 AND MP4 on demand.

Have you ever experience that?

>>2220269

> Do you ever think that one day you'll snap?

No, not really.

I suppose i should do.