| >> |
08/24/10(Tue)16:42 No.2099888  >>2099845
>This
is the fucking problem. You have essentially admitted that EVERY Muslim
in America is indirectly responsible for the attacks
No this is just your projection onto my words to create a strawman to attack. It's silly and you're silly for trying it.
no one hates muslims. It's just flat out wrong to build a mosque in a building hit by debris from Ground Zero.
I'm
a non religious person so I'd be saying the same thing if they were
Christians. Or Jews. Or Buddhists. Deal with it. Religion is for fags
and the Ground Zero mosque is just an attempt to convert Americans to
Islam by using the terrorist attacks on 9-11, which by the way was one
of Bin Laden's goals with the attacks, to convert Americans to Islam.
>Most American Muslims DON'T hate you or your freedoms
You're
right. Too bad it's not American Muslims who want to build this shrine.
Its one Imam with foreign backing who says on the one hand he wants to
build bridges, while on the other hand his wife is tweeting that every
single American against this mosque, including the 9-11 families, are
just rabid racists.
Sorry that shit don't pan out in the wash.
It's clear hypocrisy and double speak. The same sort of double speak
that leads an idiot to claim ITS NOT A MOSQUE when, clearly, it's a
mosque.
Unless you want to call the Mega Churches in California "Community Centers" too, which include everything on this list >>2099483 and are, in fact, churches.
Face
it. They want to build the equivalent of a Mega Church on Ground Zero
specifically to piss people off about 9-11. There won't be any bridges
being built around this.
If anything you or the Imam were saying were true, they'd take Patterson's offer to change locations by a few blocks.
You
realize I'm not saying it shouldn't be built, by the way, right? Only
that it shouldn't be built right there. Two more blocks, it's outta the
debris zone, then I'm fine with it. |
