Pretty much. Liberals hated them because they were wanted to control/build their own communities instead of just living off of the government.

>>1813977
How exactly were they socialist?

New Black Panthers are a disgrace to Old Black Panthers

THE FREE MARKET WILL FIX IT

>>1814012
>By paying the FBI to kill their leaders.

>>1814005
Well Maoists, close enough.

>>1814022


Maoists are socialists.

>>1814035
Maoists are dirty fucking fascist peasants.

>>1814035
And communists are socialists to, right?

>>1814051
>>bees.jpg

>>1814071
/b/s.jpg ?

The early 20th century Wobblies would like a work with you.

Maybe they should have gotten their nigger asses to Liberia quicker and niggers would actually have turned out to be a reasonable race.

Really why isn't there a modern black panthers? And no the New Black Panthers do not count.

>>1814179

Because COINTELPRO and government intervention

what did they do? prison, I've heard something about that, but what did they do for the poor and oppressed?

The FBI assassinated them.

FBI confirmed for the political police of America.

Black Panther Coloring Book!

>>1816015
>>1816009

i lol'd, i remember seeing this shit on rotten.com's library forever ago. that's sum nice CIA false-flagging right there

>>1816033

Too bad it's not false flagging. That's real deal black panther propaganda. When they got called on it, they tried to blame it on the CIA.

You actually think there's some dude at the CIA who's job was to draw racist coloring books?

>>1816043
Think, Cointelpro.

>>1816033
I, too, lol'd.

ITT: COINTELPRO still effective after a few decades.

>>1816057
There is zero evidence that the CIA made those.

destroy those evil pig monsters noble afro'd ones!

>>1816043
Yes, probably. The CIA pays people to do all kinds of stupid shit.

I love the Black Panthers because their existence is basically troll bait to basement dwelling neckbeards. I can't get enough of the lulz.

>>1816043

>confirmed for bootlicking fed wannabe

choke on a bowl of syphlitic dicks, fucking shitforbrains

>>1816080
there is no evidence that the black panthers made this

>>1816075

Yeah, the Klan doesn't seem half as powerful as it was in the '60s

>>1816099

It says "Black Panthers" on it, and was distributed at Black Panther Party HQ.

Care to cite any evidence that the CIA made this, other than a random black panther saying so?

>do shit about the oppressed and poor

As long as they were black

>>1816114
im not arguing one way or the other, just saying that i have black and white drawings at my place and i could pass them out to children in the neighborhood, doesnt mean i made them.

>>1816143

Yes, it is circumstantial evidence. But that's more evidence than there is for CIA authorship.

>>1816114
>Lies
>More lies

>>1814179
Really why isn't there a modern Ku Klux Klan?

>>1816115
They also had asian and hispanic members, and a sister organisation the White Panther Party.

Blacks were more oppressed, so took more of the focus.

>>1816152

so if i make a stack of posters stating that OP sucks dicks, and put your name/your business' logo on top, that makes it far more reasonable to assume you or your business was responsible for the content of the posters?

jesus fuck, summerposters are fucking retarded

>>1816206

Keep sucking black panther cock, libfag. They obviously put it out. It was made by them and distributed by them.

>>1816228
Yeah, why would the CIA lie about a group that wanted to overthrow the US government?

>>1816240

So everything that ever reflects negatively on black people is a secret CIA project? How's that tinfoil hat?

>>1813977
"do shit about the oppressed and poor"
I had to take a racial history course in my university, and had the chance to read a variety of articles on the panthers from the 1970's.

One article was written by Black feminists, who absolutely hated them. The panthers would blow up abortion clinics in black areas and make family planning harder. They would also claim to take care of the "future warriors" but as black feminists pointed out, there were hundreds of ignored darkies in orphanages which the panthers didn't take care of

>>1816249
>reflects negatively on black people

lol they do that enough for themselves.

even IF they made them, pictures of children shooting cops isnt exactly the best way to win public favor

>>1816249
It's not about them being black it's about them being a militantly leftist revolutionary organisation. Why do you think the mass industrial actions of unions like the IWW at the start of the century are completely glossed over or ignored by public education?

Take everything with a grain of salt.