We already knew it. At least Muslims don't act like they love America.

>>1737953
Wait, doesn't that chart show they have the same political/religious leanings as Muslim Sharia?

How does that prove they're worse?

>>1737974

Because the shira don't lie about wanting to destroy America.

>>No fairness doctrine = Technology is evil

conservatives do NOT EQUAL republicans or religious affiliation, you are fucking retarded, DEMOCRATS DO NOT EQUAL LIBERAL ATHEISTS either!

>>1737974
Because Muslims actively try to help the poor and raise the standard of living.
Conservatives just damn them because they "don't have jobs" or "are lazy niggers"

>>1738016
What percentage of Conservatives are not part of the Religious right?
<1% would you say?

So why don't all the Liberals want to bend over backwards for Conservatives then? OH right, they hate whites.

wow, liberals are really getting desperate, huh?

>>1738016
But you'll vote for them for the tax cuts.
Face it, you're just as bad.

>>1738008
Yea I guess Net Neutrality would be a better one.
Good call.

>>1738042

...says the terrorist that wants to destroy America.

>>1738088
joke's on you, i'm not a republican. i'm not even american.

>>1738125

I didn't say you were. Interesting.

>>1738143
but you implied republicans/conservatives = muslim terrorists in this thread.

you liberals really amuse me.

American conservatives = muslims

What we know of the middle east today has become more "liberal" after the fall of the ottoman empire. Muslims are the extremist RIGHT, that see the cultural invation as an evil to their ancient culture.

>>1738177
Yes we did imply that.
Because it's true.
You haven't proven anything in the chart to be incorrect yet. Maybe it's too hard having all of your extremist views presented at once?

>>1738177
Where? I mearly stated my opinion that you're a terrorist, I did not "brand-name" you.

If you think that your hatred for the right is what I was talking about, that is you projecting your personal feelings, not me.

>>1738208
>You haven't proven anything in the chart to be incorrect yet.

for starters:
>implying sharia law is judeo-christian
>implying the fairness doctrine is about technology
>implying alcohol is illegal in even the most conservative states - you amerifags tried this once, and it didn't work, remember?
>implying corporal punishment only exists in sharia law and american conservative dreams

i mean, really now?

i could do a similar list with democrats/liberals, btw (christians are bad, everyone who doesn't agree with you should be punished, jews should be exterminated, etc.)

facefuckinpalm

>implying conservatives don't like drinking
>implying conservatives don't like fucking
>implying conservatives don't like gambling
>implying the "fairness doctrine" isn't bullshit
>implying quoting the bible means anything

>implying this isn't fail troll

>>1738250
>American conservatives confirmed for worse than Muslims.

checkmate.

>>1738283
>implying sharia law is judeo-christian
You clearly can't grasp the chart. It compares values shared between the two beliefs, and the things that they would implement in a second, given the chance.

>>1738283

>christians are bad

>everyone who doesn't agree with you should be punished

>jews should be exterminated, etc.

These are.... liberal positions now?

>>1738441
Dude, you are witnessing conservatives grasping at straws trying to prove they crock of shit bible thumping sheep that we know they are.

>Religious text is law
Look up the founding of the contituion, it was basically copy and pasted from several Christian sermons.
>God's law is immutable
Look above
>Marriage is only between men and women
Marriage was brought about religion.
>Gambling prohibitied
And you found this where?
>Drinking is probhitied
In ancient times alcohol was brought out because water was dirty and bland, it was never intended for inebriation.
>Technology is the work of Satan
Technology is not inheritantly good or evil, any advance in technology can be used for good or evil.
>Sodomy is illegal
It is considered an abominiation of nature by both religions, but God hates the sin not the sinner and neither do true Christians.

>>1738627
Continue
>Pornogrophy should be banned
Should it be? Porbably, but it will never happen, same with prostitution.
>Belive they are following god's wishes
If they weren't what is the point of religion?
>Women are second rate objects
Yes, because Christians hide their bodies, beat them to death, stone them,d rown them, and kill them frequently for not observing Sharia law. Try again.
>Execution is perfectly acceptable punishment
This is something left up the govorning bodies and it's concepts of Justice. Revenge is Mine say's the Lord.
>United Nations is evil
There is Muslims and Christian nations under the UN.
>The state should control all sexuality
I've yet to hear this from a Christian, however for me I don't care as long as it's not shoved in my face.
>Sex ed should be banned in school
It should be opt in, not opt out. Parents should take responsibility for sexual education.
>Sex is only for procreation
There is entire chapters romantacising the joining of husband and wife for reasons other then procreation, it is a union of two souls and perfectly natural.

>>1738629
Continue

>Second rate education
Text books do not lose their truth over the years, simply moe information becomes available. If new information becomes available that trumps older information then there would be need for updating textbooks, but these instances are rare.
>No seperation of chruch and state
The concept of the speration of church and state was taken from a private ltter from a founding father to a church, and historically the origional states had state supported religion. The concept of seperation of Church and State is to keep State out of Church, not Church out of Sate.
>Corpral punishment in classrooms
Parents alone should punish their children, it is their right and responsibility.

Thank you come again.

-5/10

>>1738627

>religious text is law

Mike Huckabee wants to criminalise the 10 commandments and biblical verse.

Commit a sin, go to jail.

>And you found this where?
Read the source to the right. A link is on the bottom of the picture.
>everything else
Read the fucking quotes to the right. Everything is sourced. I don't pull shit like this out of my ass.

>>1738636
>>1738629
>>1738627
/thread

OP STATUS:

[] NOT TOLD

[] TOLD

[X] FUCKING DESTROYED

>>1738664
Source or gtfo

lol Liberals

>>1738670
Thank you.

>>1738636
>>1738629
>>1738627
Screencaped for future reference. Thanks for posting it.

The spelling errors scream trolololol

>>1738670
>Text books do not lose their truth over the years

They do when the textbook is a science book that starts "In the begenning, god created light.."

>>1737950

AS_ＰREＶiOＵＳLY_MｅｎtiONeＤ,_ＴｈｅSE ｍeSSＳaGes_WiＬｌ ｃONTIＮｕＥ_UＮTＩl ＹｏＵ_pEｒMａＮEnｔｌＹ ｓtＯｐ_ａTｔＡＣＫINg Ａｎｄ_FuｃKｉｎG WＩｔｈ Ｗww.ＡｎｏＮDｅRｐTalK.sＥ_(RｅＭoVe thＥ_ＤＥRＰ), ｒＥｍoＶＥ_ａＬＬ iＬlＥGＡＬ ＣｌOＮES of_Ｉt ＡｎＤ LIｅS AbOＵｔ_iT_ａnD ｄｏｎａtｅ_At_lｅASt Ａ MiｌＬioＮ_UＳＤ tO_SｙSOP_as_coｍｐeNSＡtｉoｎ_fＯr_ＴHE_MＡSSivE ｄaｍＡGE_ｙOU_RetａＲｄs_HＡｖe_cａUSｅＤ.
gelqbe dq ct cknzxdp azdwffwver h t

>>1738670
>If they weren't what is the point of religion?

Obediance.

>>1738627
>>1738629
>>1738636

Way to ignore separation between church and state, one of the most important principles of the founding fathers, and the Republican campaign against science

Also, your attitude of moral superiority about women's rights, made me lol

>>1738687
Your welcome.
>>1738689
I just didn't take time to edit, sorry for the mistakes.
>>1738665
My mistake. All the same, it's the same as pronography, prostitution, and alcohol, it will never go away totally.

Also try to remember that Republicans does not equal Christian. I dislike 90% of Republicans because they are simply the Democrats of ten years ago.

>>1738670
>>God's law is immutable

Rome: "IT IS WHATEVER I SAY IT IS".

>>1738711
>women's rights

>>1738726

Dude is saying American conservatives are morally superior to extremist Muslims because they don't occasionally kill women who step out of line

no

>>1738753

Dude is implying we wouldn't be better off if we did kill them.

hoho

>>1738711
>separation of church and state
The government isn't forcing you to attend church.
The government isn't forcing you to confess faith.
The government isn't forcing you to pray.
The government isn't preaching any one religion/denomination.
The government isn't preaching any religion at all.
The government isn't killing all the other religions/denominations.
The government isn't a theocracy.

Separation of Church and State hasn't been violated in the last 40 years, and anyone who disagrees is a moron.

"What students would learn in American schools above all else, is the religion of Jesus Christ. "
-George Washington in a speech to the Delaware Indian Chiefs May 12, 1779

Now I PERSONALLY disagree with that, but the fact remains that the Founding Fathers clearly did not intend the government to be so CALLOUSLY INDIFFERENT towards the religion of Jesus Christ.

So quit your bitching you unbelievable pussies, because quite frankly, nobody's listening (except those who already agree with you.)

SLASH FUCKING THREAD

>>1738764

Fortunately our political choices aren't limited to American conservatism and Islamist conservatism

>>1738788
I respect your understanding of the founding fathers even if you don't agree with them.

>>1738788

>CALLOUSLY INDIFFERENT towards the religion of Jesus Christ.

wat

Don't have pretty much have to be a Christian in order to have any chance of running for office?

The Texas textbook case is also a recent example of blurring the lines between Church and state

>>1738826
>texas textbook
Because removing the word "propaganda" from the WWI section means Jesus Christ is Lord.

Funny thing is that the source for this is two different documents.
The first is a state party platform, not the national party platform.
The second is that this used quotes from the bible and attributes it to the group that made the document as if the crafters of the policy believe that they should be legislated.

If fact, the fundamental difference between the muslems and the conservitives is that while the conservatives may belivr the parts with the bible quotes, they do not believe that they should be a part of public policy while the muslems do believe that it should be a formed in policy.

>>1738842

You need to read the other textbooks they edited.

>>1738826

Those are not violations of the "Separation of Church and State." They are however, sterling examples of why democracy is a terrible system. Theists and other morons are allowed complete control of the state just because they are in the majority (and thus, by democratic logic, always right.)

You're the reason people have less empathy for others today.

>>1738826
But the fact that the public prefers Christians is more of a reflection that democracies tend to reflect the general make of of it's populice rather than a law or regulation.

>>1738867
Yeah, we should allow the minority to control things once in a while.

Like those neo-nazi guys...They seem like an alright bunch, but the NIGGERS are trying to keep them from holding office.

What a travesty.

American conservatives confirmed the only ones standing up AGAINST Muslims.

Liberals confirmed Islamic terrorists' best friend.

That chart shows Conservatives and Muslims having the same ideals. How does that make Conservatives worse? If you're going to insult, at least be consistent about it.

>>1738873

Well you know what John Stuart Mill said, the value of democracy is not in the tyranny of the majority

When you must be a professed Christian believer in order to hold political office, we have a bit of a problem here

>>1738853
>>1738853
>>1738853

You all do realise America was founded as a Republic, right?

>>1738907
It looks like you've got some growing up to do.

>>1738888
>implying sarah palin wouldn't be al qaeda's poster woman if they could get the bitch to wear a burka

>>1738877
The state is evil no matter who is in charge.

>>1738907
John Stuart Mill was a statist whore. His philosophical ramblings have little value. Read this:

http://www.antiwar.com/stromberg/?articleid=992

>>1738917
A democratic republic. What of it?

Did you know we started out as a confederacy, but had to switch to a stronger central govt soon after?

>>1738917
You do realize that in a republic, the majority vote still (indirectly) makes the rules, right?

>>1738907
You don't HAVE to be anything other than a good represenitive of the people you want to represent.

You you expect a district full of wiccans to elect Mike Huckabee to represent them or someone more in line with their beliefs.
The fact that the country is majority Christian has more to do with the the fact that the canidates are Christian.

Do liberals even make sense anymore?

First they get all butthurt and defensive about making generalizations and mocking Muslim beliefs because "LOL INTOLERANCE!" and then they pull out this bullshit with vapid vast generalizations?

Hypocrisy is the liberal's Hindenburg.

>>1738885

lolwat

Bleeding heart liberals were the first to speak out against Islamist extremism, way before 9/11

Conservatives just like to have unnecessary wars in order to spread their special brand of morality

Interestingly, the only high profile living Republicans I can think of off the top of my head who actually fought in wars are Colin Powell and John McCain. Republicans don't actually like exposing themselves or their children to the horrors of war. Meanwhile, John Kerry, Al Gore, Max Cleland, and Wesley Clark, among others are prominent Democrats who actually served. Yet they are demonized by Republicans.

>>1738935

>statist whore

Yes, you and your source are not biased at all

Awesome

>>1738978
Even Noam Chomsky admits that Mill was an imperialist bastard.

Americans aren't bullies. America rescues the innocent from bullies and always have. yes, it takes military might to free the oppressed and war is not a pretty gay pride march. War is good if you're fighting for the right side. Pick a side: poor dirty terrorists or smart civilized conservatives.

Ice cream

>>1739011

Yes, I am aware of the fact that Mill was a huge imperialism fan

But his theories on democratic governance still have merit

>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018
>>1738018

This

>>1738670

Samefag status:

[ ]not samefag


[ ]samefag

[ X ] Obvious Samefag is obvious

>>1739044
define merit you autocratic fuck
does functionality automatically justify the method? you may as well defend monarchy with that shit.