Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1266271445.gif-(39 KB, 540x720, SocialismPostmodernism.gif)
    39 KB Fundamental Freedom: Corporations Have Human Rights AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)17:04 No.155117  
    Pretty good article from Barron's:

    >Thus it isn't just about the money, it is about the speech. The members of the century-old progressive movement have often been frank about their fear of rich people and the power of their money. They see corporations as shielding the wealthy from retribution for such crimes as charging what the traffic will bear and crowding out less effective competitors.

    http://online.barrons.com/article/SB126541470058441571.html
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:05 No.155127
         File1266271532.jpg-(68 KB, 720x540, the fuck is this shit.jpg)
    68 KB
    >things that don't really exist and are not human have human rights
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:07 No.155136
         File1266271667.gif-(147 KB, 320x240, lupinlaugh.gif)
    147 KB
    >it isn't just about the money
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:13 No.155164
    >>155127
    >>155127
    Fucking this.
    >> AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)17:13 No.155165
    >>155127
    That's what happens when you have an entity like that state that has a monopoly on coercion. They get to decide what is deserving of so-called "rights" and what is not.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:14 No.155171
    >>155165
    Stop blaming everything on the state and fucking open your eyes. Capitalism is NOT perfect.
    >> AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)17:21 No.155199
         File1266272460.gif-(806 KB, 300x248, wat.gif)
    806 KB
    >>155171
    >Capitalism is NOT perfect.

    Explain please.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:24 No.155217
         File1266272685.jpg-(234 KB, 600x664, Jefferson.jpg)
    234 KB
    Enormous concentrations of wealth, and the power and influence that they wield, is a threat to democracy itself.

    Their money has poisoned our campaigns with 30-second ads, rather than principled and rational debate. Their influence props up a two party system, that delivers nothing but a false choice between two corporatist candidates.

    Recognizing corporations as being equal to American citizens under our Constitution is an affront to the founding principles of this nation.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:26 No.155229
    >>155199
    Industrial Revolution's consequences for the vast majority of people, colonialism, WWI, the Depression.
    >> /d/eviating Ca/tg/irl 02/15/10(Mon)17:28 No.155240
    >>155199

    Nothing human made can EVER be perfect, but, thats just the short hand. For the long hand, well, just look at whats going on, right now.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:28 No.155244
    >>155217
    >Recognizing corporations as being equal to American citizens under our Constitution is an affront to the founding principles of this nation.

    FUCKING THIS.
    >> AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)17:29 No.155249
    >>155217
    The State decided that corporations were persons in order to further their owner agenda. That's why they are legally bound to give them the rights that are owed to all persons under the US Constitution (14th Amendment, read it.)

    Incidentally, the 14th Amendment was the result of leftist sentiment. Yet another example of leftists screwing everything up for themselves and the rest of us.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:34 No.155280
    I agree, corporations don't have rights.

    So let's reign them in. Let's start with the US government, the biggest, most dangerous monopolistic corporation out there.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:36 No.155297
    >>155249
    >leftists
    >give corporations rights
    Where and how the fuck did people come to this fucking logic and conclusion?
    >> AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)17:42 No.155324
    >>155297
    Leftist Politicians create 14th Amendment-> 14th Amendment is abused by Supreme Court to grant rights to corporations that they liked-> Eventually,Corporations are granted full rights as a person.

    That is why Leftists, not Capitalists, are responsible for the Supreme Court's most recent decision.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:45 No.155341
    >>155324
    I'm sure the leftist from the late 1800's had this in mind.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:45 No.155342
    >>155324
    oh shut the fuck up troll
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:49 No.155359
    CORPORATIONS SHOULD BREED SUPER HUMANS.

    I can't believe the civilized world is going to go down in flames whent he solution is right in front of our faces.

    all these corporations flush with cash should truly invest in the future and start breeding kids with high iq's good looks and healthy bodies.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:52 No.155374
    >>155359
    You may be interested in the Fourth Reich. I can't believe Stormfront has taken this board back over. OR everyone is a troll, or an uneducated dolt.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:52 No.155375
    >>155249

    the state is a tool. you are blaming it for the actions of those who have hijacked it

    murder weapons are not murderers
    >> AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)17:53 No.155383
    >>155341
    That's the problem with leftists. They never think about the consequences of their "reforms" (especially when they involve the expansion of state power.)
    >> AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)17:55 No.155391
    >>155359
    Corporations exist to produce profit and nothing more. If you want a benign authority to make your life better, get religion. Or a spine. Or just kill yourself.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:56 No.155393
    >>155383
    I don't think you can really anticipate the the supreme court will go full on retarded in about 140 or years.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:56 No.155394
    >>155383
    The difference is that the state, particularly in the United States, derives its power and authority from the people. So an expansion of state power should theoretically be in the public interest because the state is bound to serve the people.

    Unlike corporations, which are bound to serve themselves.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)17:57 No.155403
    >>155393
    >the the

    er that the
    >> /d/eviating Ca/tg/irl 02/15/10(Mon)17:57 No.155405
    >>155391

    And you wonder why we like to have some restrictions on them.
    >> AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)17:59 No.155414
    >>155405
    The profit motive is good for society. The problem occurs when institutions (LIKE THE STATE) try to co-opt that motive for their own purposes. This is called "corporatism" and is a terrible system that can produce only tyranny.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)18:04 No.155439
    >>155324
    slippery slope fallacy is slippery, nigger
    the failure here is not 14th amendment
    it's farfetched supreme court interpretations and justices with faggoty political agendas
    >> /d/eviating Ca/tg/irl 02/15/10(Mon)18:04 No.155441
    >>155414

    Really, now? Pure profit, no restrictions? HOW CAN THAT NOT FUCK UP?!
    >> /d/eviating Ca/tg/irl 02/15/10(Mon)18:08 No.155458
    >>155439

    No, that's not even slippery slope, 140 years, there was no way to plan for that insanity.
    >> AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)18:11 No.155472
    >>155439
    The failure is that of the lefitsts' and their assumptions about the State. To the leftist, the state is a perfect, rational entity devoted to serving its constituents. That is why they do not mind giving it total power over them.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)18:14 No.155497
    >>155472
    The failure is in the supreme court's decision. That decision may be influenced by corporations and their profit motive.
    >> AnonAtheist !!G9h1Zg7SzNq 02/15/10(Mon)18:22 No.155536
         File1266276170.jpg-(974 KB, 2953x1969, chomsychavez.jpg)
    974 KB
    >>155497
    >That decision may be influenced by corporations and their profit motive.

    Possibly, but it is still the primary failure of the state and a fantastic argument against its continued existence.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)18:29 No.155569
    >>155117
    >Corporations
    >it isn't just about the money

    Look, I consider myself a libertarian, but even I know this article is garbage.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)18:38 No.155620
    >>155394
    >The difference is that the state, particularly in the United States, derives its power and authority from the people. So an expansion of state power should theoretically be in the public interest because the state is bound to serve the people

    I'd like to remind everyone that, again, this is THEORETICALLY SPEAKING.

    Actual lol to anyone who actually thinks the government works like this IRL.

    >>155497
    >The failure is in the supreme court's decision. That decision may be influenced by corporations and their profit motive

    And not by the people, even though that is whom (the state and the courts) serve.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)18:42 No.155643
         File1266277371.jpg-(99 KB, 500x336, Nocourtispefect.jpg)
    99 KB
    >>155391
    >>155324
    >>155341
    Poor poor, uninformed sheeps. You really believe all that you read right?
    Well believe the truth for once: Leftists created the 14th amendment after the Rosa Parks incident. The main objective was to stop with the racism bullshit by allowing Black people to become citizens of America and declaring illegal any kind of discrimination by race.
    Of course, right wingers needed to screw it up. I guess they thought that more bribe money in their pockets was worth screwing up the entire country for decades. Anyway, a few republitards, along with corrupt democrats, started to (as it was usual) make more sections and adding more content until they came up with the corporate personhood bullshit.

    By now, they have more than enough power to prevent any law that seriously restricts their liberty to make money however the fuck they want to ever be approved.
    Listen up kiddos: just because a few faggots want to play 'revolution' by saying that HURR DURR AL CORPORATION EVALllll! doesn't make it less true. Or are you too far brainwashed to acknowledge the simple fact that something who's target is to make money, will not give a shit for anything else?
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)18:48 No.155676
    >>155643
    >sheeps
    Stopped reading.
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)18:51 No.155695
    that is the single worst graph I may have ever seen

    clearly OP is a massive faggot
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)19:02 No.155800
    Article is behind a paywall. can someone liberate it?
    >> Anonymous 02/15/10(Mon)19:23 No.156005
    A lot of the corporate personhood bullshit is just doubletalk for supporting so-called commercial speech.

    Commercial speech is the ability of large concentrations of wealth, both corporations and other special interest groups, to use massive amounts of money to influence elections with shitty attack adds, that dumb down the political process. Because they call it a right, it falls outside the purview of campaign finance laws.

    This bullshit is the cancer that is killing American politics.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymousthe UK police s...
    [V][X]AnonAtheis...!!G9h1Zg7SzNqFundamental Fre...