>> |
06/15/10(Tue)15:01 No.1349957>>1349852 >you are doing like the creationists that believe
that by "disproving evolution" it proves their position by merely
casting doubt. >you are doing like
OK
I'm being too harsh on you, obviously you're not a native English
speaker. Look, the idea in science is you need to prove all assertions
in a set of accepted presumptions before proposing a hypothesis. If your
hypothesis breaks any of these presumptions, you need to state it, so
that this is debated too.
The problem with the creationist
pushers/evolution pushers is that they're so indoctrinated that they
can't be self-critical enough to admit flaws in both their models. To be
honest, you can't really call the creationist's crap a model (it makes
no predictions, for example), whereas evolution makes testable
predictions. But, there are definitely flaws in the current popular
model of evolution, which is why plenty of other models have been
proposed. Lets get away from this though, this isn't the right thread. |