Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1276404000.jpg-(115 KB, 600x450, 113563218.jpg)
    115 KB 100,000 barrels a day. Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:40 No.1320312  
    Due to BP fucking with it, the well may now have risen from 20,000-40,000 barrels per day to ~100,000 barrels per day leaking out. Wonderful job.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7146713.ece
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:41 No.1320324
    Well, least it'll end faster.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:41 No.1320327
    100,000 barrels = 4,200,000 US gallons; 16,000,000 litres
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:41 No.1320328
    But the more oil that comes out the faster the spill will end

    I don't see a problem with it OP
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:43 No.1320345
    >>1320312
    ROFLCOPTER
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:45 No.1320358
    http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1097505/pg1

    read this. realize how fucked we are.

    have fun
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:46 No.1320359
    Wow its really pissing out, thought theyd fixed it

    http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/incident_response/STAGING/loca
    l_assets/html/Skandi_ROV2.html
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:48 No.1320379
    >>1320358
    Dude I know...

    That guy is a predator.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:49 No.1320389
    why dont we just ignite the oil?

    if we burn it up it won't be in the water anymore.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:51 No.1320408
    >>1320389
    BP has been pumping a toxic dispersal chemical into the oil to make it so the spill is less visible at the surface. You have oil layering underwater as it creeps off around Florida and flows into the Atlantic. They can no longer burn or contain it. Where it was once just destroying Gulf fisheries, now it's unstoppable and set to devastate the entire Atlantic.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:52 No.1320415
    so uh....how long until we get those relief wells?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:52 No.1320418
    ...uhhh. Nuke it now?

    Liberals?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:53 No.1320427
    >>1320415
    9 months. min
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:53 No.1320428
    >>1320389
    Burning the oil requires a large source of oxygen. You can only really burn the oil on the surface, and they've been using dispersement chemicals to keep most of it below the surface of the ocean.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:55 No.1320441
    The worst part of this spill is ironically not the oil but the toxic gases that are escaping from the well head , theses gases will give millions of USA slobs cancer
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:55 No.1320442
    so uh....who's ass do we kick?

    i mean, oil drilling is a dangerous business, accidents happen, but this is just out of fucking control
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:55 No.1320448
    it's really sad that bp didn't change its regulations for deep sea drilling. you would think they would have flotation and anchor systems on the riser to keep it from bending and breaking like that, to make it easily retrievable if something like this would happen. or you know, make it so their safety equipment works.

    what the fuck is with these corporations that don't know what the fuck they are doing?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:56 No.1320451
         File1276404989.jpg-(10 KB, 475x360, dean is shocked while drinking(...).jpg)
    10 KB
    >>1320408
    Well, we're fucked.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:57 No.1320464
    I dont get these fucking retards.

    Why didnt they just find the last recorded pressure, the width of the blowout preventer and just make a worse case estimation and then say it is that much. Because if you go the max value that is physically possible, it can only get better with tools of measurement.

    This is why you keep the businessmen in the back room when the adults have to talk about science.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:57 No.1320465
    >>1320448
    i remember a thread a few days ago from an oilman on /new/ basically saying that it was sabotaged. have the thread and the documents saved on my harddrive for future reference.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:57 No.1320466
    >>1320441
    Toxic gases? It's natural gas (methane). It's not toxic, and it's certainly not a carcinogen. I mean, unless you consider farts toxic.

    Most of western Canada and parts of the western US run their home heating and AC off of natural gas piped directly to their homes.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:58 No.1320468
    >>1320448
    They knew what they were doing. They knew exactly what they were doing. But they cared about maximizing profit, so they said "fuck it" to safety.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:59 No.1320476
    >>1320358

    I can't help but notice that the forum is filled with alot of faggots.
    >> The Pole 06/13/10(Sun)00:59 No.1320479
         File1276405184.jpg-(72 KB, 482x720, 1276304222213.jpg)
    72 KB
    just like the Ixtoc spill it will take about 9 months to stem the tide....so long as the deposit and layers hold up under the pressure......considering the earths crust is at tits thinnest under the ocean we could have a catastrophe on our hands
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:59 No.1320484
    >>1320476
    Yeah, you can always count on disasters to rally the nutters and their tin foil hats.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)00:59 No.1320485
    >>1320441

    and that's... bad?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:00 No.1320489
    >>1320466
    >Some gas fields yield sour gas containing hydrogen sulfide (H2S). This untreated gas is toxic. Amine gas treating, an industrial scale process which removes acidic gaseous components, is often used to remove hydrogen sulfide from natural gas.

    Why do people like to talk shit about things they know nothing about.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:02 No.1320500
    >>1320448

    if it weren't for taxes then bp wouldn't have to cut corners to save money. if the government let the free market work like it's supposed to then this wouldn't happen.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:04 No.1320526
    >>1320489
    >Hydrogen Sulphide.

    Dude, that's one of the key components to getting a good Jenkem high.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenkem
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:06 No.1320534
    >>1320500
    >implying the same safety mechanism that almost every other first world country forces BP to use, that they didnt use because America didnt make them, wouldnt have stopped this from happening

    There is a reason why safety mechanism are mandated, it is cause they work, not because "it makes us feel safe".
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:08 No.1320547
    They can't boom right either.
    >> TheMinimalist !!If1lDuko2Xo 06/13/10(Sun)01:08 No.1320549
         File1276405691.jpg-(235 KB, 780x599, warm141.jpg)
    235 KB
    >>1320500
    >implying they would be any less greedy if taxes weren't in place
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:08 No.1320555
    time to stock up on food and frozen fish
    >> The Pole 06/13/10(Sun)01:10 No.1320559
    soon your frozen fish will have a higher octane rating than your gasoline
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:10 No.1320561
    the free market would've had the piece of shit CEO hanging from the nearest tree instead of letting him spend more money on airing advertisements that HURRRRRRRRRRRR WE CARE on television than BP is paying in claims. Luckily the army is making itself useful by getting sent to help file the claims now. those guys will shit on your face if you jew around with them because NOBODY CAN PUSH PAPER LIKE THE US ARMY FUCK YEEEEEEEAR
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:10 No.1320563
    >>1320500
    While I agree taxes are evil, I don't think they're at fault here. Taxes form a very small percentage of BP's daily operating costs of running a rig like the Deep Horizon which cost upward of $1 million per day, most of which would have been a right-off tax wise.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:12 No.1320580
    So that's how it will play out...yeah, i mad.
    >> The Pole 06/13/10(Sun)01:12 No.1320581
    >>1320561
    Truth...theres a form for everything
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:13 No.1320587
    i'm so sick of this oil shit
    fuck the animals
    and fuck the fisherman they are going to be compensated anyway
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:13 No.1320589
    >>1320464

    It's just too bad that the suits have a PhD in Intimidation. Those scientists and engineers don't hold a candle to threats about one's livelihood.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:16 No.1320602
    >100,000 barrels = 4,200,000 gallons.

    >Price of oil today = $74.20

    >$74.20 x 4,200,000 gallons = $311,640,000 worth of oil wasted per day.

    Wait, what?
    >> The Pole 06/13/10(Sun)01:17 No.1320608
    >>1320587
    compensated when? in a couple years after lolappeals.... people are in dire need of help...and i dont mean due to being covered in oil but the lack of sustaining themselves
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:18 No.1320615
    WHERE IS THE FUCKING NUKE?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:19 No.1320624
    >>1320602
    its $74 per barrel not gallon
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:23 No.1320657
    >>1320608
    when the appeals are over they'll just go Bankrupt and restart the company under a new name
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:23 No.1320659
    >>1320624

    oh DERP, got it backwards lol.

    $7,420,000 per day then, including cleanup costs which are also in the millions.

    >>1320408

    >BP has been pumping a toxic dispersal chemical into the oil to make it so the spill is less visible at the surface. You have oil layering underwater as it creeps off around Florida and flows into the Atlantic.

    Are you fucking serious? And I thought me being in Sarasota, 350 miles south was far enough for now.
    >> The Pole 06/13/10(Sun)01:24 No.1320674
    >>1320657
    That couldnt be further from the truth......business as usual
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:25 No.1320685
    >>1320615
    BP has less than 24 hours now (they were given 72 hours on Thursday afternoon) to come up with a workable contingency plan showing that they can contain the oil and stop the leak. If on Monday they show up with their thumbs up their butts, expect the US government and the military to take over operations. The US government has also sent in research vessels to determine if the bedrock has been compromised and if oil is leaking up all over the place. Results are expected by the end of next week.

    If the results are positive (oil all over the fucking place), then expect a nuke within a month.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:27 No.1320697
    >>1320312
    >June 9, 2010
    >> The Pole 06/13/10(Sun)01:27 No.1320702
    >>1320685
    my money is on the possibility the oil is comming out of the porous sea floor...... honestly a oil spill the size of marlyland and new jeresy isnt coming out of one pipe
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:27 No.1320703
    >>1320685
    you know as bad of an idea as a nuke is. It will be refreshing to get some high quality recording of a spray dome.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:34 No.1320769
    This just hit on CNN 5 minutes ago.

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/06/12/gulf.oil.disaster/index.html?hpt=T1

    >ederal authorities have ordered BP to get more aggressive with its plans to recover thousands of barrels of oil spewing from a broken well into the Gulf of Mexico, according to a letter made public Saturday.

    >In the letter, Rear Adm. James Watson, the government's on-scene incident manager, gave BP 48 hours to identify and expedite other ways to contain oil, given new estimates that doubled the amount of crude gushing out every day.
    >> The Pole 06/13/10(Sun)01:36 No.1320785
         File1276407385.jpg-(112 KB, 600x400, BAR-0308_dolphin-in-oil.jpg)
    112 KB
    >>1320769
    BP covering their asses as to how much oil is being spillt? say it aint so
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:36 No.1320791
    >>1320685

    What I want to know is whether anyone will muster up the collective force to charge BP between $10 and $15 billion for this fault of theres because that's going to be about half of the damage this will cause once the immediate ripple effects are calculated. How much will BP pay and why are they still even allowed to go near that rig?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:39 No.1320821
    >>1320791
    It'll cost Obama the next election if his government doesn't make BP pay in full. He's well aware of this.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:40 No.1320828
    Gov't needs to step in seal the fucking thing.

    Fuck that well, there's others on earth. Get the fuck over it.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:42 No.1320846
    >>1320821
    Oddly enough, it's the neocon republican congressmen who are mostly protesting against removing the $75 million cap, citing that it will drive away oil companies, reduce competition and destroy jobs.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)01:53 No.1320953
    >>1320821
    You expect people to vote Republican with this shit going on?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)03:57 No.1321842
    >>1320685
    >Results are expected by the end of next week.

    Great, no rush or anything, it's only 500,000 more barrels.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:04 No.1321868
    Once the realization sets in that there is no way to stop the leak, expect offshore drilling to be banned most places in the world which will trigger peak oil
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:05 No.1321877
    >atlantic gets fucked

    >the pacific has been fucked for years because of the pacific trash vortex

    some people just want to watch the world burn
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:12 No.1321910
    Actually the teenagers here harping on the dispersants are retarded. We still burn that oil when we skim it into large enough pools to be burned (needs to be 3 milimeters thick i believe to burn thoroughly)

    The dispersants suck but dont hold us back.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:15 No.1321925
    >>1321910
    The dispersant is making it where the oil isn't coming to the surface. You have underwater slicks now.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:19 No.1321953
    >>1321925
    You don't want all that ugly crude oil, it's better to dump neurotoxins all over it so it stays out of sight.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:20 No.1321955
    You know, at this point, BP might as well be pissing and shitting in the Gulf.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:29 No.1322011
    Pressure at the wellhead of 300MPa, gg guys.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:31 No.1322018
    lol throwing tampons on the beach
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:32 No.1322032
    I hope you faggots drown in oil.

    Maybe if you didn't consume as much they wouldn't have needed to drill so precariously in the first place.

    You brought it onto yourselves.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)04:41 No.1322084
    >>1322032
    maybe if the dune coons weren't perverted greedy zealots we wouldn't have to drill oceans in order to make affordable gas
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:00 No.1322185
    >>1322032
    Maybe if liberals didn't want to protect some goddamn animals no one really cares about up in Alaska, we could be drilling up there.

    I don't give a shit about this spill. I'm laughing as people are freaking out about it.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:02 No.1322197
    >>1322084
    >Implying that is the reason that Americans are drilling for oil in the ocean.
    >Implying it isn't because even the Arabs don't produce enough to sustain American demand.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:06 No.1322212
    >>1322185
    >>1322084
    >>Implying oil drilled off American waters and land would not simply go on the open market and sold to the highest bidder, most likely China or Europe
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:14 No.1322243
    This wouldn't have happened if fucking liberals weren't so fucking anti nuclear energy. Because pretty much free energy is a bad thing.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:21 No.1322269
    >>1322243
    >>Implying nuclear powered cars would be a good idea

    Bro, you've never played Fallout 3 have you?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:36 No.1322347
    >>1322032

    THIS WILL KILL THE WORLD, NOT JUST USA.
    OH DEAR GOD.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:38 No.1322355
    OPEC was created to pressure the West to cut ties with Israel.
    The high gas prices pushed offshore drilling

    Therefore,
    >Jews did BP.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:47 No.1322386
    >>1322355

    But...wasn't it just massive reserves of oil in that particular area?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:52 No.1322399
         File1276422721.jpg-(53 KB, 465x604, 1223801080020.jpg)
    53 KB
    You can't bring the second coming without an apocalypse here and there.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)05:58 No.1322421
         File1276423122.jpg-(364 KB, 813x800, The Annu.jpg)
    364 KB
    >>1322347

    >Implying the USA is the world.

    Jewish Overlord is pleased with your statement.
    >> Michio Kaku explains why not to nuke Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:08 No.1322456
    You nuke fuckers are idiots
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_ZWgSGzF4w

    Michio Kaku sets the record straight.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:13 No.1322486
    >>1322421
    not at all. the spill is already set to hit the Caribbean but thats probably not what they were referring to. some people are predicting that the ocean floor will rupture and that out of it will come untold amounts of oil that will poison the planet. at least thats what i got from the couple of articles linked above.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:20 No.1322517
         File1276424434.jpg-(229 KB, 825x638, Kiss.jpg)
    229 KB
    >>1322486

    >Implying the extinction of the human race is bad.

    >Implying Humanity isn`t prone to extinction.

    >Implying Humanity doesn`t deserve to be exterminated.

    >Implying the death of Humanity would be of any importance regarding the vastness of the Universe or its superior alien civilizations.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:21 No.1322522
    >>1322517
    i didnt imply that
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:22 No.1322525
    This is unstoppable, there is nothing BP can do about it, the blowout preventer will tip over and we will have 150,000 barrels a day. The relief wells will take months to drill and will not be done in time. Gulf is fucked.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:22 No.1322531
    and after reading the links again i think maybe i was confusing that theory with posts in the other thread from tripfag Scientist26
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:23 No.1322532
         File1276424582.jpg-(126 KB, 384x480, Nietzsche.jpg)
    126 KB
    >>1322517

    I'm sorry, did you say something?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:24 No.1322539
    >>1322517
    >implying this only affects humans or that humans probably arent actually the least affected by it
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:25 No.1322542
         File1276424707.jpg-(76 KB, 500x325, bp.jpg)
    76 KB
    You are now aware the oil has stopped. Go back to your cars.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:27 No.1322553
    >>1322539

    >Implying Humans did not, will not, exterminate all biodiversity in order to maintain their status and that the oil spill is the main cause of it.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:28 No.1322554
    >>1322525
    if it happens im glad its the gulf. what a shithole anyway.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:29 No.1322561
    >>1322531
    Scientist26 seemed like a pretty smart dude. Another thing, I read about that abiotic oil theory a long time ago in an article by conspiracy monger Joe Vialls. If you can get by his obvious biases against Jews and other such things, you probably would enjoy his writing about some of the technical aspects of this ultra-deep drilling. It does seem to make sense what he says. And yes, the link is Rense, don't bust my balls over that. Vialls own site is gone now, he died a few years ago.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:29 No.1322562
         File1276424956.png-(747 KB, 821x916, Picture161.png)
    747 KB
    >>1322456

    Was listening with an open mind till that dipshit said hydrogen bomb.

    This is not a normal oil spill.

    BP has attempted to drill a "superdeep well", over 35,000 feet from the ocean surface, or 30,000 from the bottom of the ocean. This taps into the Mohorovicic Discontinuity where Russians presumed the abiotic genesis of oil happens. This is an interface layer between the upper mantle and the crust, which ...is thin at the ocean. The Russians, however, never attempted to dig down to it but instead used different techniques researched over 60 years in order to tap into it.

    BP and the west wanted to frogleap Russia on this technology and decided to tap into the earth's oil "reactor" directly. The consequences of this disaster is left to the reader to ponder.

    The rig design was not compatible with the sheer rams, which failed to close the pipe as the last-resort failsafe. This was one of many failures and the oil began to gush out at >20,000psi gauge pressure.

    Later on, during the top kill procedure, the righead was further damaged from the increased pressure and the actual sub-surface (sea floor) began to rupture -- the strata is completely leaking out into the ocean from multiple points.

    Realistic estimates vary, one scientist using the film provided by BP put it at 70,000 barrels per day. There are worse estimates which account for the subsurface damage (100,000-300,000 barrels per day).

    The relief wells in August will not do anything as the subsurface has been damaged -- the integrity of the wellhead has been compromised as well as the entire rig.

    Every day that this spill is not contained, the wellhead and rig will corrode until they disintegrate, then there will be no hope of ever stopping this spill and it will grow exponentially.


    The Nuclear option is our only hope.(Low yield Atomic bomb)
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:29 No.1322566
    You now realize that BP is a british company
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:30 No.1322568
         File1276425007.jpg-(510 KB, 1720x1137, 03_DEEPWATER.jpg)
    510 KB
    >>1322561
    >>1322561
    I forgot the link:
    http://www.rense.com/general75/zoil.htm
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:32 No.1322576
    >>1322562
    I also thought that Japanese guy sounded like he was full of shit. And twice he was referring to the use of underground nukes as for canals only in spite of Russians using them four times to seal gas wells.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:33 No.1322580
    Oil abiogenesis is a crock of shit, only fringe weirdos trying to get book deals push it.
    >> deleted !RMbnClAiRE 06/13/10(Sun)06:34 No.1322583
    >>1322456
    Haha, he doesn't understand what the nuke-the-well people want to do at all.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:36 No.1322589
    >>1322580
    Not according to the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden.

    http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/13/abiotic-oil-supply-energenius08-biz-cz_rl_1113abiotic.html
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:37 No.1322593
    Hydrocarbons are a natural excretion from the mantle. Every planet has trillions of tons of methane, ammonia and other chemicals and not all of them are in the atmosphere.

    Coal is the only true fossil fuel.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:37 No.1322594
    >>1322580

    you sure got told
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:38 No.1322596
    >>1322561
    Did he write anything else since that thread? Has someone saved that shit btw?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:41 No.1322603
    >>1322596
    Yeah, I saved that thread. It looks like >>1322562 did too, that's his writing. I can give a condensed version of his posts if >>1322562 isn't posting it any more.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:42 No.1322607
         File1276425774.jpg-(104 KB, 534x634, 0_oilwar4.jpg)
    104 KB
    From the Vialls article
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:47 No.1322622
    Worse than 9/11.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:47 No.1322623
    very condensed. He had many other rebuttals to opposing questions that bseemed sound as well.

    This is not a normal oil spill.

    BP has attempted to drill a "superdeep well", over 35,000 feet from the ocean surface, or 30,000 from the bottom of the ocean. This taps into the Mohorovicic Discontinuity where Russians presumed the abiotic genesis of oil happens. This is an interface layer between the upper mantle and the crust, which is thin at the ocean. The Russians, however, never attempted to dig down to it but instead used different techniques researched over 60 years in order to tap into it.

    BP and the west wanted to frogleap Russia on this technology and decided to tap into the earth's oil "reactor" directly. The consequences of this disaster is left to the reader to ponder. I will now give you figures on what is happening.

    The rig design was not compatible with the sheer rams, which failed to close the pipe as the last-resort failsafe. (they didn't expect the double wide piping from south korea as it was poorly specified). This was the initial failure and the oil began to gush out at >20,000psi gauge pressure.

    Later on, during the top kill procedure, the righead was further damaged from the increased pressure and the actual sub-surface (sea floor) began to rupture -- the strata is completely leaking out into the ocean from multiple points.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:48 No.1322627
    >>1322623

    Realistic estimates vary, one scientist using the film of the flow putting it at 70,000 barrels per day or 8 million liters per day. There are worse estimates which account for the subsurface damage.

    The relief wells in August will not do anything as the subsurface has been damaged -- the integrity of the wellhead has been compromised as well as the entire rig.

    Every day that this spill is not contained, the wellhead and rig will corrode until they disintegrate, then there will be no hope of ever stopping this spill.

    A nuclear detonation may help close off the rig as per this video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpPNQoTlacU

    However, if such a technique is to fail, humanity is finished.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:48 No.1322629
         File1276426111.png-(155 KB, 630x499, nukewell.png)
    155 KB
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:49 No.1322634
    >>1322629
    Physics doesn't work like that.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:52 No.1322644
    >>1322629
    Yeah.. fracture all that rock with 20k psi under it, and you just get a bunch of rock pushed up.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:53 No.1322648
    >>1322622
    Worse than 9/11? More like worse than Chernobyl. I hope not, this is sad for so many people, and probably all of us, not to mention the "poor fuckin birds".
    >> lol i trol u !!FXIYoStbOnd 06/13/10(Sun)06:54 No.1322654
    >>1322623

    Jesus, if this is so, then we are beyond fucked. Nothing short of a nuke has any hope of ending this spill.

    I'm an oil driller.

    >>1322634

    It sort of does. The Russians have done this before, but they've nuked leaking wells in fields of crystallie granite, on the surface, before. Nobody exactly knows how the largely-sedimentary geology of the Gulf, under a mile of water, will behave if you light a nuclear explosion off around it.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:55 No.1322658
    >>1322629
    note how you have to drill the exact same distance as if you were going to drill a relief well, which has the bonus of being usable if we allow it
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:55 No.1322660
         File1276426523.png-(28 KB, 321x169, 1275828291978.png)
    28 KB
    >>1322634
    >>1322644

    lolwut did you not watch

    >>1322627

    I guess they just made it all up
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:55 No.1322661
    >>1322629
    You know, that looks just like a diagram the Russians show on Youtube, not the explanation of a glass sphere interrupting the bore route like that loudmouth Olbermann was interviewing.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:56 No.1322663
         File1276426605.png-(160 KB, 630x499, fixed.png)
    160 KB
    >>1322629
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)06:57 No.1322673
    >>1322658

    >thinks mspaint drawing is to scale
    >implying relief well will even work when there is another leak in the pipe at an unknown depth
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:01 No.1322692
    >>1322673
    The relief wells would work if they were below the seafloor damage wouldn't they?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:02 No.1322699
    >>1322654
    Oil Driller troll dude, try reading that Vialls article, You might get a kick out of it.>>1322568
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:03 No.1322704
    >>1322692

    Yes in theory they could, but we have no idea where or how deep the leaks are
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:03 No.1322705
    >>1320312

    Proberbly doing it on purpose to help all that 'WE MUST TAX CARBON AND DO ALL THIS GREEN SHIT'
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:05 No.1322708
    >>1322705
    BP may've done more for the environmental fucknuts in one swoop than they've accomplished themselves in decades.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:05 No.1322713
    >>1322705
    This event will be throwing that program into high gear I bet.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:05 No.1322714
    >>1322705
    No, maybe the initial sabotage was for that, but now it's beyond some political tool.

    ... this is the worst man-made disaster ever.
    >> lol i trol u !!FXIYoStbOnd 06/13/10(Sun)07:09 No.1322731
    >>1322699

    I'm well aware of that article. It's about 95% true. Oil IS abiotic in origin, pretty much everybody who's anybody in the industry agrees on that.

    Hell, I'm working in the oilsands of Alberta Canada right now, where about a trillion barrels of abiotic bitumen crude are locked up in the sand. There were never any dinosaurs up here, but there is an absurd amount of natural hydrocarbons leaking up through fractured granite.

    If BP decided they'd try to beat the Russians when it comes to deep-drilling technology, and tried to drill a superdeep well under a mile of water, they should all be executed. Period.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:09 No.1322736
         File1276427397.jpg-(8 KB, 329x244, RandallFlagg.jpg)
    8 KB
    It's gettin there. This man would be proud.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:10 No.1322741
    >>1322714
    Doesn't even sound like something done intentionally, who would use the wrong pipe diameter for your other gear? They shouldn't be licensed to do anything anywhere.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:11 No.1322750
    >>1322731
    >If BP decided they'd try to beat the Russians when it comes to deep-drilling technology, and tried to drill a superdeep well under a mile of water, they should all be executed. Period.

    According to that Scientist26 guy they did, but just what will executing them do? They need to be waterboarded imho, until they come out with it, all the plans, all the "proprietary" information etc.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:12 No.1322754
    >>1322741
    Yeah I meant, if it was a sabotage. At this point that seems way too unlikely, the entire design was flawed.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:13 No.1322760
    >>1322731
    BC here. We should drill and refine our own fucking oil in this country become self sufficient and do it our own way safely. Also, arm the shit out ourselves, nukes and all, keep bizzaro world OUT.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:14 No.1322773
    >>1322673
    Draw me one to scale.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:16 No.1322783
    >>1322750
    agreed
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:17 No.1322784
    >>1322773

    That the best you can come up with? No debating the fact that it could work, just going to harp on my mspaint skills

    lolgetthefuckout.jpg
    >> lol i trol u !!FXIYoStbOnd 06/13/10(Sun)07:20 No.1322800
    >>1322760

    Er, Canada is the largest or second-largest single exporter of oil to the USA, last I checked. Canada is also the only major oil-exporting nation that charges its citizens market price for the gasoline made out of the oil that the citizens of the country own.

    >>1322750

    If this is ture, their 'proprietary' information doesn't exist and the disaster was created by them attempting something that they didn't know how to do. Executing them would discourage further disasters.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:23 No.1322807
    >>1322800
    I'm glad were loaded with oil. Now we need a fence on the border. Maybe even run it up the side of Quebec.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:24 No.1322815
         File1276428292.jpg-(65 KB, 1131x649, 1276295178906.jpg)
    65 KB
    >>1322807
    I wouldn't be talking like that normally, I'm just tired of all their bullshit.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:27 No.1322827
    >>1322800
    >Canada has shit tons of oil

    Everyone? Show of hands? Liberation of Canadians from the oppression of the brutal and godless regime of terror they suffer under?

    Hey Canadianfags, want some democracy?
    Here it comes!
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:27 No.1322832
    >>1322827
    That's like invading your own backyard.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:30 No.1322841
    >>1322827
    We'll have all the oil in the world on our shores soon so there's no point.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:30 No.1322843
    >>1322832
    high time we annex that shit anyway
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:30 No.1322849
    >>1322832
    It'd be like the last official Mexican Army invasion.

    They charged through and took over a town. Nobody reacted, they just asked wtf they were doing, and the army left due to not being taken seriously.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:32 No.1322851
    >>1322827
    Well, the US military has already been given permission to come "help" here the event of a terrorist attack or something along those lines. Say there was a sudden incident by "osama" in Vancouver and you've got a government approved annexation already prepared.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:34 No.1322864
         File1276428875.jpg-(17 KB, 577x265, 2001bow.jpg)
    17 KB
    >>1320312
    One of the wildlife experts it listed in the plan as a potential adviser died in 2005.
    WUT
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:39 No.1322883
    >>1322864
    lol, that's like a reverse spin of the living hijackers from 9/11. Haha, that fucking guy probably saw this spill happening and went and saw the secretary - "Hey baby, could you make it look like I'm dead on that paper there? Great, see you at 7 tonight."
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:41 No.1322891
    >>1322731
    >Biotic oil theory posits that oil comes from dinosaurs

    Kill yourself faggot.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:43 No.1322902
    >>1322891
    Plants and animals is biotic oil fuckwad. Have you ever heard of plants and animals living 8 miles under the Earth surface? Didn't think so.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)07:46 No.1322911
    >>1322902
    Not to mention virgin bedrock, lol.

    Oh but but-- biomarkers
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:09 No.1323021
         File1276430988.jpg-(141 KB, 600x400, ept_sports_sow_experts-7934324(...).jpg)
    141 KB
    This is all you can expect from stinking Brits.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:11 No.1323028
         File1276431101.jpg-(65 KB, 623x527, Lulz.jpg)
    65 KB
    >>1323021
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:29 No.1323103
    could someone repost the whole conversation with that scientist guy, please?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:35 No.1323131
    >>1323103

    Scientist26 !!f4nESPV4U6H

    This is not a normal oil spill.

    BP has attempted to drill a "superdeep well", over 35,000 feet from the ocean surface, or 30,000 from the bottom of the ocean. This taps into the Mohorovicic Discontinuity where Russians presumed the abiotic genesis of oil happens. This is an interface layer between the upper mantle and the crust, which is thin at the ocean. The Russians, however, never attempted to dig down to it but instead used different techniques researched over 60 years in order to tap into it.

    BP and the west wanted to frogleap Russia on this technology and decided to tap into the earth's oil "reactor" directly. The consequences of this disaster is left to the reader to ponder. I will now give you figures on what is happening.

    The rig design was not compatible with the sheer rams, which failed to close the pipe as the last-resort failsafe. (they didn't expect the double wide piping from south korea as it was poorly specified). This was the initial failure and the oil began to gush out at >20,000psi gauge pressure.

    Later on, during the top kill procedure, the righead was further damaged from the increased pressure and the actual sub-surface (sea floor) began to rupture -- the strata is completely leaking out into the ocean from multiple points.

    Realistic estimates vary, one scientist using the film of the flow putting it at 70,000 barrels per day or 8 million liters per day. There are worse estimates which account for the subsurface damage.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:36 No.1323133
    >>1323103
    >>1323131

    The relief wells in August will not do anything as the subsurface has been damaged -- the integrity of the wellhead has been compromised as well as the entire rig.

    Every day that this spill is not contained, the wellhead and rig will corrode until they disintegrate, then there will be no hope of ever stopping this spill.

    A nuclear detonation may help close off the rig as per this video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpPNQoTlacU

    However, if such a technique is to fail, humanity is finished.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:36 No.1323135
    >>1323021

    > Stinking Brits

    > Post pic of an the English goalkeeper

    Bitch doesn't know about the UK.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:37 No.1323137
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133

    But what is more concerning than the fate of humanity is the fate of the Earth. To dive into this topic, research needs to happen on the energy source that drives the core of the earth. This is the same source which generates the hydrocarbons at the interface of the mantle and the crust. This generation will continue even as the spill siphons off the product. The question is, for how long?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:37 No.1323144
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137

    Pro-tip: you're completely out of your mind.

    It is not the salt water that is causing the corrosion. It is the high temperature volcanic mixture of oil and other minerals, gushing out at a high pressure differential.

    >Relief wells ALWAYS work and have nothing to do with the wellhead.

    You don't get it, I already said, it won't work, the pressure is INCREASING as time goes on for a reason above. The subsurface has been damaged, do you get it? If you're unfamiliar with the standard literature on this topic, you're probably the WRONG person to discuss this with. You're probably not familiar with the engineering design of super deep wells. I myself have only read a few papers on this topic, but the concerns of high temperature and pressure have stopped many projects like this one in the past from even starting.

    The relief well will fail. When it does, I will return on here and tell you guys what will happen next. You better all hope I am wrong.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:38 No.1323148
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144

    >Oh god, you support the abiotic oil theory?
    LOL, get out of my face you stupid layman. Most physicists understand the biotic theory to be nonsense of the 18th century, it is the geologists who have a problem with the abiotic theory. (outside Russia, of course)

    And today the acknowledge abiotic oil exists, but "not in commercial" quantities. They do this just to protect their own necks as they've been wrong for so long.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:39 No.1323151
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144
    >>1323148

    No, this is not exactly the same process, but it's very similar to other artificial processes. This cannot create extremely long carbon chains, which are being collected now on the shores of the USA.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:39 No.1323154
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144
    >>1323148
    >>1323151

    You joke but it could have, until top kill had failed. Now they've removed that as an option.

    In any case it would be a temporary solution as the volcanic pressures (some leaked figures at gauge pressure of ~300kPa, well above the limit of the blow off valve) would destroy either the structure above, or the sea floor around the strata.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:40 No.1323156
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144
    >>1323148
    >>1323151

    The problem is the worst-case scenario of the nuclear weapon failing. It only has a 80% success rate so far. Once it has failed there is literally no plan H. Nothing. We'd be completely helpless.

    People need to stop pressuring BP, the solution may take a long time, but it has to be a solution that lasts. If nuclear weapons must be involved, then use them, ignore the stupid environmentalists who don't understand what is going on.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:41 No.1323158
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144
    thanks for that!
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:41 No.1323161
    >>1323148
    and that's the reason we find pieces of organic molecules in every single oil well
    go away tinfoilfag, you science is weak
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:43 No.1323172
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144
    >>1323148
    >>1323151
    >>1323154
    >>1323156

    Care to explain how "fossil" fuels got down into the crust-mantle interface? LOL? You can't?

    Then shut the fuck up. You can't even explain how entropy is magically reversed to form the so-called "precursors". Face it, all you have are stupid biomarkers which show interaction upstream, rather than formation.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:44 No.1323176
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144
    >>1323148
    >>1323151
    >>1323154
    >>1323156
    >>1323172


    Note that idiots like this are part of the problem. If people actually studied the science and picked up a basic-fucking-book on statistical mechanics, there would have been no need to "leapfrog" the Russian well designs. Instead, people confuse science with religion and cling on to a failed model even as contradictions and impossibilities pop out of it.

    Humans are filth, it's just such a shame that we're taking the environment to hell with us.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:45 No.1323182
    >>1323172
    >You can't even explain how entropy is magically reversed to form the so-called "precursors"
    You obviously don't understand what entropy is
    go away
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:45 No.1323187
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144
    >>1323148
    >>1323151
    >>1323154
    >>1323156
    >>1323172
    >>1323176


    >temperature is high enough to break down hydrocarbon bonds
    Yes, at atmospheric pressures, but the pressure is high enough to flip the normal thermodynamic equilibrium. Before, the state of methane would have had lower enthalpy to the state of some long carbon chain. It is precisely this combination that forms the hydrocarbons beneath the crust. These huge reserves percolate upwards through channels into the bedrock on land. The generation is spontaneous and continuous, much like a chemical reaction in equilibrium. This is actually a related mechanism to the formation of diamond, which does not require a hydrogen rich environment.

    For example, there have been many oil fields found BENEATH bedrock, there is no way the fossils ended up below that virgin rock.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:45 No.1323188
    >>1323161
    >Calls established science (outside stupid geologists) "tin-foil"
    >Expects his empty biomarker rhetoric to actually hold up to scrutiny
    >Unfamiliar with the scientific principle of faslibility
    >Unfamiliar with other mechanisms of "biomarkers" appearing in oil reserves above the deep reserves in strata

    GB2Wikipedia
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:47 No.1323195
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144
    >>1323148
    >>1323151
    >>1323154
    >>1323156
    >>1323172
    >>1323176
    >>1323187
    I was going to link to an older paper which was far more comprehensive, but instead I'll give you this short abstract which is less informative, but should answer your question:

    http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v2/n8/abs/ngeo591.html

    (Note: the reaction is reversible)
    >By mimicking the conditions in the crust where oil is found we can create light crude in a lab.

    I haven't seen the process for this commercial (note the wikipedia discussion) and as I said, since it is heated far beyond normal crust temperatures like other ARTIFICIAL processes, this shows nothing.

    Good day, you lose sir, etc.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:47 No.1323196
    ^ sounds like the ravings of a man hoping for a gigantic disaster. It's easy to scream "HOLY SHIT WE'RE ALL FUCKED" whenever something like this happens.

    Realistically the well will be plugged eventually, something else will happen somewhere in the world and everyone except the people living on the Gulf coast will forget all about this. BP will slip out from under most of the liability with a wink and a grin, cleanup will take over a decade, deepwater drilling will start up again, business as usual.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:47 No.1323199
    I like how the objection >>1323161 was then answered by the scientist in the pasted log >>1323172, right afterwards.

    Such irony.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:48 No.1323205
    >>1323196
    >Realistically the well will be plugged eventually
    How do you know this? LOL.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:50 No.1323210
         File1276433407.png-(83 KB, 512x339, boomingschool.png)
    83 KB
    >>1323103
    >>1323131
    >>1323133
    >>1323137
    >>1323144
    >>1323148
    >>1323151
    >>1323154
    >>1323156
    >>1323172
    >>1323176
    >>1323187
    >>1323195

    That's all I've got, all credit to Scientist26 !!f4nESPV4U6H
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:51 No.1323215
         File1276433497.jpg-(49 KB, 445x442, On_Titan,_its_raining_hydr(...).jpg)
    49 KB
    >>1323161
    >we find pieces of organic molecules in every single oil well

    You mean complex hydrocarbons themselves? But we already know now that those can form naturally without any life forms.

    Saturn's moon Titan is covered with hydrocarbons which rain from the sky.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:51 No.1323216
    Lol Oil spillan
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:53 No.1323222
    >>1323215
    Now the geologists are claiming there's life on titan.

    I like how one bad assumption (fossil fuel) leads on to another.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:55 No.1323237
    >>1323210
    thanks again.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)08:59 No.1323253
    >>1323205
    Because things like this are -always- blown out of proportion by people. Well maybe blown out of proportion isn't the right term, because it IS a catastrophe, but it's human nature. Something terrible happens and as long as it doesn't affect you personally a part of you just wants to see it get worse.

    There's always options. I can't think of a single instance where humanity has said "Well fuck it, there's no way to fix this" if fixing it really was a priority.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:02 No.1323265
    >>1323253
    So it's just dumb blind hope without any analysis? The dudes saying we have to nuke it, but if that fails we're fucked. He isn't the only one saying that, some oil guy on msnbc was saying nuking it was a good option and now the military is talking about using a MOAB instead.

    but what if it fails? ;_;
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:06 No.1323279
    >>1322562
    >Mohorovicic Discontinuity
    There's no way they reached this point. Nothing to see here.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:10 No.1323294
         File1276434646.jpg-(47 KB, 600x450, Ford-Nucleon.jpg)
    47 KB
    We had nuclear powered car technology in the 50's. What happened?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:11 No.1323296
    >>1323279
    i looked up the depth in wikipedia
    >discontinuity is 5 - 10 km (3 - 6 mi) below the ocean floor
    ... so there's a good chance they hit it, i think. just how deep was the well?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:11 No.1323297
    >>1323279

    Mohorovicic discontinuity is 5 - 10 km (3 - 6 mi) below the ocean floor

    30 000 feet = 9.144 kilometers

    You were saying?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:14 No.1323306
    >>1323297
    Was it in the ocean though?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:21 No.1323323
         File1276435301.jpg-(31 KB, 599x314, ohshitnigger.jpg)
    31 KB
    >>1323306
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:22 No.1323325
    >>1323323
    I mean, wasn't it in a GULF, faggot?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:25 No.1323341
    >>1323325
    There aren't facepalms strong enough for the faggotry in this thread.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:25 No.1323345
    >>1323325
    The Gulf of Mexico (Spanish: Golfo de México) is the eleventh largest body of water in the world. Considered a smaller part of the Atlantic Ocean, it is an ocean basin largely surrounded by the North American continent and the island of Cuba.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:26 No.1323349
    if this abiotic oil really exists: why is abiotic oul worse than normal oil?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:28 No.1323361
    >>1323349
    Because it is a piece of reality that contradicts liberal religious doctrine.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:29 No.1323366
    >>1323349
    High H2S concentration, deep drilling expenses. The "biotic" stuff is just whatever has filtered through sediments and shit from what I've read.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:29 No.1323371
    The US Government should just take over BP and be done with it in the first place. BP has dragged it's foot for so long and tried to cover their asses.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:36 No.1323395
    Obama is finished. He should of kicked BP out the moment we found out their lied and covered up how serious this was and took over.

    He's a worthless slave to AIPAC and the Oil Baronies, just like Bush and every other fucking president in the past 20 years.

    USA is finished, Corporatism has finally shown its true colors.

    If there's money to made/saved, they don't give a shit if it fucks up the entire planet.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:37 No.1323409
    >>1323395
    >>1323371
    There's nothing we can fucking do about it, so vent on.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:41 No.1323434
    >>1323409
    Yeah there is, faggot. There is always something we can do.

    Like march to Washington and overthrow the government.

    Destroy all of the TV stations, torch congress.

    Make farms, with real farmers. Create community responsibility, like we had in the past. Reforge the brotherhood of American pride, and then start over with new elections.

    First step:

    Buy a gun.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:42 No.1323441
    >>1323434
    Your entire post makes me lol.
    God, you simple faggots are fucking hilarious.

    >first step, buy a gun

    LOLOLOLOLOL
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:42 No.1323442
    >>1323395
    >Obama is finished. He should of kicked BP out the moment and took over with the US government non-existent extreme deep ocean opertating capability
    Ya, that would have worked out wonderfully.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:43 No.1323449
    >>1323349

    It's not abiotic oil vs "normal" oil. Abiotic just means the oil is not derived from living organisms.

    From what I understand; Hydrogen(most common element in the known universe) + Carbon(most common element on the planet) + heat and pressure = Hydrocarbons(oil)

    Someone please correct me if I'm wrong
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:45 No.1323462
    Thats what you get for not resorting to nuclear option the first chance you get
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:47 No.1323482
    >>1323449
    Carbon is not the most common, but it is very common.

    The pressures involved are immense, with temperatures around 700 degrees required IIRC. Nothing near what is available in the crust.
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)09:48 No.1323490
    >>1323462
    That's what you get for messing with shit you don't understand. It's like a little kid picking at a scab even though his mother is telling him not to...
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)10:30 No.1323749
    We're so fucked
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)11:50 No.1324236
    So, could someone make a brief summary of worst case scenario and was the sub-floor of ocean or whatever really damaged ? Are we facing a catastrophe in our ecosystem soon ?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)11:51 No.1324249
    >>1324236
    just pickin up on that are ya?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)11:52 No.1324254
    So a brief summary ? Ocean floor is somehow damaged ? Are we facing a catastrophe in our ecosystem ?
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)11:52 No.1324262
    >>1324249
    Google Chrome is fuckin up I see..

    I just read the thread and I am so fucking scared lol
    >> Anonymous 06/13/10(Sun)11:54 No.1324277
    >>1324236
    It's hard to make a worst case scenario when BP keeps making it worse: dumping toxic chemicals to disperse oil, incompetence killing it's stock value and threatening the well being of British pensioners, etc.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymous100,000 barrels...