White man shoots up museum: that dude is crazy
Black man shoots up museum: blacks are crazy

etc, etc

If only white people gave black people more welfare this shit would NEVER have happened.

It's poverty that drives people to do things like this, and whites keep blacks in poverty.

>>121725
>herp derp all black people are responsible because i had my luchmoney stolen by niggers in junior high

>>121750
Yes, because whites and blacks commit crime at equal rates.

Oh wait, they don't.

>>121755

How can you morons complain about collective attitudes towards race and then push affirmative action and other racist policies?

>>121750
what he said
>>121756
economic inequalities and etc
rednecks commit more crimes then rich white people blah blah blad

>>121768
>implying im positive towards affirmative action

>>121756

Sure they do. And crimes with even greater impact, as well. Unless the Wall Street bankers that bankrupted the country using grandma's retirement money doesn't count. Or Maddoff's scheme. Or Bush's reckless war that killed thousands of American soldiers and 100s of thousands of civilian casualties don't count.

It's a matter of scale and influence.

>>121782
>economic inequalities and etc

Many people believe that a bad social environment is a major contributor to crime. They believe that if people of all races had the same education, income, and social status, there would be no race differences in crime rates. Academic research, however, shows that these differences persist even after controlling for social variables.

In fact, the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic accounts for crime rates more than four times better than the next best measure: lack of education. Furthermore, even controlling for all three measures of social disadvantage hardly changes the correlation between racial mix and crime rates. The correlation between violent crime and the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic is 0.78 even when poverty, education, and unemployment are controlled, versus 0.81 when they are not. In layman’s terms, the statistical results suggest that even if whites were just as disadvantaged as blacks and Hispanics the association between race and violent crime would still be almost as great. It may seem harsh to state it so plainly, but the single best indicator of an area’s violent crime rate is its racial/ethnic mix.

>>121768
there you go again with you people, like I had anything to do with policy put into place before I was born. I don't go around blaming white people for Reaganomics

sage for stormfaggotry, hidden, reported

Where do negros find these weird ass ideas of parenting? Remember the guy that tried to calm a baby by burning it with bacon grease?

>>121796
>Sure they do.

Can you demonstrate this with reference to empirical evidence?

>Or Bush's reckless war that killed thousands of American soldiers and 100s of thousands of civilian casualties don't count.

Can the hyperbole, we're talking about domestic crime rates here. Stop going off at tangents.

>>121796
This.

If you fuckers are going to scream about "Obama is destroying the country" it's because he's in a position of power, so all the retards before him like Bush and Reagan must also shoulder their failures and the number of people they affected.

>>121798
>>citation needed

did you ever finish college english?

Crimes are performed every day. Just because one black man performs one crime, the whole black race is accountable. If anything this event proves that nobody is superior, and that each race is susceptible to both greatness and falter.

>>121821
“Minorities, Crime, and Criminal Justice,” p. 66. FBI,

Crime in the United States, 2002 (USGPO, 2003)pp. 68-76.

Census Bureau, 2002 American Community Survey, “Percent of People Below Poverty Level in the Past 12 Months (State Level)” (Census Bureau),

http:/www.census.gov/acs/www/Products/Ranking/2002

R01T040.htm. Accessed July 9, 2005. US, Dept. of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Regional and State Employment and Unemployment: December 2002” (Washington, DC: US Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics 2003),

http:/www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/laus_01282003.pdf.

Census Bureau, 2002 American Community Survey, “Percent of People 25 Years and Over Who
Have Completed High School (State Level)” (Census Bureau),

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Products/Ranking/2002/R01T040.htm

>>121811
>Can you demonstrate this with reference to empirical evidence?

I gave you the list in that same post. Read it again.

>Can the hyperbole, we're talking about domestic crime rates here. Stop going off at tangents.

War crimes aren't crimes? Whoddathunkit. If you want to narrow your definition of "crime" to something that fits your argument and blind ideology, then don't expect sane people to stifle laughs around you.

Hey, I don't usually comment in these threads as I'm not American, I'm Dutch. All I want to say is, how the fuck can you blame stuff like rape and burning a baby to death on 'economic inequality'?

This collectivization of responsibility is terrifying, it's like nobody is accountable for his or her actions anymore.

>>121851
>This collectivization of responsibility is terrifying, it's like nobody is accountable for his or her actions anymore.

How dare you try to make Bush accountable for his failures?!

>>121848
>I gave you the list in that same post.

That's not empirical evidence.

You explicitly claimed that whites and blacks commit crimes at the same rates. This is an assertion that requires evidence.

>War crimes aren't crimes?

Wars are an unfortunate part of the human condition. There are no 'noble savages' and 'evil oppressors'.

HAPPY BLACK HISTORY MONTH

>>121864

I would imagine that's kind of his point, you point the finger at Bush for starting a war, but black failure is EVERYONE'S problem, and everyone must not only shoulder the burden of this helpless race of retarded mongoloids, but also blame themselves for it.

>>121851

ANY suggestion that people should be responsible for their own actions, especially black people, is hopelessly un-PC.

>>121866

War "crimes," not wars. I said nothing about Afghanistan for a reason.

Is there a list of the number of workers on Wall Street that participated in the scam that brought down the world economy? Don't count on it. The rich and powerful would never allow something like that get out.

See, the cartoons Disney shows kids have it all backwards. They depict the "evil" characters as some shady looking fellows, but the true villains are wearing suits and ties and talk all proper.

So scared to lose the argument you're going to deny anything I typed above?

>>121876
>but black failure is EVERYONE'S problem

Slow your roll, retard. I've not said any such thing. You must have had limpbaugh playing in the background or something.

OBLIGATORY BUTTHURT NIGGERS AND LIBTARDS READ THIS

LOL NIGGERS WITH THEIR SUBHUMAN TENDENCIES.

Eurofag here, why didn't you send negroes back to Africa in the XIXth century ?

And not a shit like Liberia, I mean A FORCED return

>>121926
You are going off at tangents again, if we're going to discuss war crimes then Africa is inundated with them.

But we're not discussing war crimes, if you want to open a thread about them, go ahead and do so.

We are discussing domestic crime rates.

So I ask you again, where is your evidence to suggest whites and blacks commit crime at equal rates?

>>121945
You think just because you know big words you think your all that?

WELL YOU CAN SUCK MY DICK!

>>121949
Libtards fucking destroying the entire western world is what.

The liberal media is the most powerful force in the world right now anyway, so you don't get to speak, Eurofag. You'll have to enjoy your sandniggers and we'll have to enjoy our spicniggers (we won't).

Whites will die out but at least when everything falls apart we know 1000000% it was the libtards who killed everyone.

>>121971

there was no "liberal media" in 1860 I guess..

>>121978
it's the blasted Lincoln lovers, son.


fucking niggers and their lovers

>>121963

>You are going off at tangents again, if we're going to discuss war crimes then Africa is inundated with them.
I thought we were talking about AMERICAN citizens based on YOUR stats you posted.

>But we're not discussing war crimes, if you want to open a thread about them, go ahead and do so.
Crimes are crimes, bro. And I listed more than just Bush's Iraq war.

>We are discussing domestic crime rates.
Hence my reference to American Wall Street executives.

>So I ask you again, where is your evidence to suggest whites and blacks commit crime at equal rates?
I already told you those numbers would never exist, and if they did, they'd never make it out to the open.

>>121971

I though i do dislike liberals, you should seriously stop watching Fox News.

>>121996
>I thought we were talking about AMERICAN citizens based on YOUR stats you posted.

Yes, American citizens committing crime, recorded and tallied by the police, either at federal or state level or the NCVS.

>Crimes are crimes, bro. And I listed more than just Bush's Iraq war.

No, there are different types of crimes, you are impugning that war in of itself is a crime. That's bullshit, every race starts wars, there are no 'evil oppressors' and 'noble savages' - War is a part of the human condition.

Now if you're referring to WAR CRIMES, start a new thread about them and I'll be happy to discuss that aspect of Africa's rich history.

>I already told you those numbers would never exist

You mean numbers pertaining to domestic crime rates? They do exist, in plentiful numbers in fact.

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/ - You can start here.

>>122033

*Although, not "I though".

Dyslexic fail.

Haters gonna hate

>>122036

>you are impugning that war in of itself is a crime
Buuuuuuulshit. I already said THREE TIMES I don't believe that. That's why I singled out the Iraq war and not Afghanistan.

>You mean numbers pertaining to domestic crime rates? They do exist, in plentiful numbers in fact.
No, the numbers you asked to support my claim that "Wall Street executives and high ranking officials cause more damage on a greater scale than black crimes."

I'll repost this from above: "Sure they do. And crimes with even greater impact, as well. Unless the Wall Street bankers that bankrupted the country using grandma's retirement money doesn't count. Or Maddoff's scheme. Or Bush's reckless war that killed thousands of American soldiers and 100s of thousands of civilian casualties don't count."

Those numbers would never exist, and you know that.

>Yes, American citizens committing crime, recorded and tallied by the police, either at federal or state level or the NCVS.
That's a hard line. I guess Al Capon's crimes only consisted of tax evasion since that's all he was pinned for. So why all the movies about some bad ass gangster?

>>122066
>Those numbers would never exist, and you know that.

Not him, but they do exist - They're categorized under 'white collar crimes' (e.g. fraud, larceny, embezzlement) and blacks commit them at a rate greater than whites do.

>>122066
So you're suggesting the police unfairly target blacks? Or that the Justice system is biased against blacks in conviction rates?

>>122076
>So you're suggesting the police unfairly target blacks?
Not what I was saying, but that would be a true statement, yes.

>Or that the Justice system is biased against blacks in conviction rates?
Not because of race; because of power/money/influence. Or have you not been keeping up with all the shit movie stars/ government officials/ athletes get away with that other people wouldn't? It just happens to be whites have a monopoly on those positions on Wall Street and the government. Google Tom Delay.

>>122073
>They're categorized under 'white collar crimes' (e.g. fraud, larceny, embezzlement) and blacks commit them at a rate greater than whites do

>my face when I don't believe you.

>>122096
>my face when I don't believe you.

See pic.

>Not what I was saying, but that would be a true statement, yes.

Untrue. and absurd. The best test of police bias is to compare an independent and objective count of the percentage of criminals who are black with the percentage of arrested suspects who are black. If they are about the same - if, for example, we can determine that half the robbers are black, and we find that about half the robbers the police arrest are black - it is good evidence police are not targeting blacks unfairly.

However, for most crimes, police are arresting fewer blacks than would be expected from the percentage of criminals the victims tell us are black (rape/sexual assault is the only exception). In the most extreme case, burglary, victims tell police that 45 percent of the perpetrators were black, but only 28 percent of the people arrested for that crime were black (NCVS and UCR data). If all the NCVS crimes are taken together, blacks who committed crimes that were reported to the police were 26 percent less likely to be arrested than people of other races who committed the same crimes.

>>122096
>Not because of race; because of power/money/influence.

Then one would expect poor blacks to have the highest conviction rate. This is only true however, if you don't control for criminal records (something a judge/jury must take into account).

Again, the evidence runs contrary to your own beliefs.

>>122137
>However, for most crimes, police are arresting fewer blacks than would be expected from the percentage of criminals the victims tell us are black
Of course. They are trying to avoid the appearance of being racist and targeting a minority group.

>>122161
>Of course. They are trying to avoid the appearance of being racist and targeting a minority group.

Did you even understand the point? Police arrest less blacks than are actually reported for crimes. If the police were racist, then they would be, logically, arresting more blacks than were actually reported.

And a crazy white guy waterboarded his kid for not knowing her alphabet at 4.

Stupidity/insanity knows no ethnicity.

>>122148
>>122137

Those charts are quite intriguing, but address what I said. Provide the link showing Tom Delay's date of conviction and jail time. You think because they didn't get a court date they didn't commit a crime? Please. You think the Wall Streeters will ever give a single interview with a regulator, much less a cop?

And please don't tell me what cops do/don't do. I worked as a police dispatch for 7 years and was close friends with some of the most racist cops you'll ever meet. Shit is real out there.

>>122174
>but address what I said.

I already did. You claimed blacks and whites committed crimes at equal rates, you then re-specified this to white collar crimes, when proven wrong you claimed the police were racist, then when proven wrong on that point you asked me to address an anecdotal instance rather than general statistical trends.

>And please don't tell me what cops do/don't do. I worked as a police dispatch for 7 years and was close friends with some of the most racist cops you'll ever meet.

Anecdotal evidence. If this is the case, why do police not arrest blacks at ABOVE the rate at which they are reported?

>>122170
I know. That's why I said they are avoiding, or a better way, hypersensitive to the race issue.

>>122180
>You claimed blacks and whites committed crimes at equal rates, you then re-specified this to white collar crimes, when proven wrong you claimed the police were racist, then when proven wrong on that point you asked me to address an anecdotal instance rather than general statistical trends.

Blacks/Libs are counter-propositional in nature, they never really raise evidence or posit anything as a solution, they just criticize that which opposes the paradigm, which doesn't really make any sense, but then again critical theory is a crock of shit so why should it?

>Libfags trying to refute statistics from studies.

>>122185
Right, so they are racist because they arrest less blacks than they should be arresting.

Cool story bro.

He was arrested because he is black,
Not because he burned a 20 month Old child with Dran0,
disfiguring and wrecking it for life.

>>122180
>I already did. You claimed blacks and whites committed crimes at equal rates, you then re-specified this to white collar crimes, when proven wrong you claimed the police were racist, then when proven wrong on that point you asked me to address an anecdotal instance rather than general statistical trends.

Not sure if you're intentionally misreading what I said, so I'll ask again: what percentage of whites in positions of power or great wealth EVER get prosecuted or called in for questioning? How many Wall Streeters ever get that treatment? I'm guessing you're too young to have watched the movie "Wall Street" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094291/

Don't play dumb, bro.

>>Anecdotal evidence. If this is the case, why do police not arrest blacks at ABOVE the rate at which they are reported?

It's called "harassment." See a black person walking on the side walk with a bag in his hand, pull him over. See the bag has a soda, then proceed to question him to the nth degree.

Enough with the dodging of facts. Give me something concrete. I bet you'll spend the rest of the week on /new/ bitching about corruption in government, but can't bring yourself to admit most of those people are WHITE.

>>122210
>Is constantly asked to provide evidence
>Refuses to, instead is counter-propositional
>All of his propositions are destroyed by empirical evidence
>Resorts to citing fictional movies as 'proof'

>>122187

Aw, buttsoar about something, junior?

>>122188
>derp, I didn't read the thread but I'll act like an ass anyway

>>122210
>It's called "harassment." See a black person walking on the side walk with a bag in his hand, pull him over. See the bag has a soda, then proceed to question him to the nth degree.

Do you have statistical data that affirms these beliefs?

>most of those people are WHITE.

http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewarticle.asp?id=33829

>>122217
>calls a movie based on REAL events "fictional"
>watches Mad Money not knowing Kramer's boss was the man depicted in the movie
>still scared to face reality is against his beliefs

This fucking thread already fucking explains and raped this thread

>>121547
>>121547
>>121547
>>121547
>>121547
>>121547
>>121547

>>122227
>Do you have statistical data that affirms these beliefs?

Every time these stats come to light, police chiefs take the steps necessary to lower the stats, not eliminate the racial profiling. Really fun arguing with some kid that doesn't know shit about the profession I was involved in try to lecture me about what REALLY happens.

/mini rage

>most of those people are WHITE
You post a link showing the most corrupt city is run by blacks, then ignore there are MILLIONS of cities run by whites with either latent or overt corruption.

I'm getting the feeling I've been troll'd :\

>>122096
Statistically, the idea that rich people or movie stars 'get away' with anything is not true. They often face greater punishment and have greater social ramifications of their crimes.

>>122257
>Every time these stats come to light, police chiefs take the steps necessary to lower the stats

So, simply put, in order to believe in egalitarianism you have to accept the existence of an invisible, immeasurable, unobservable, omnipresent power in the universe which tampers with all scientific/social studies in order to make Negroes look bad.

>You post a link showing the most corrupt city is run by blacks

Well yeah, good point, there's Baltimore, Detroit, Miami etc too.

>>122257

>my face when Sarah Palin is the leader of the republican party and faced dozens of ethics charges for corruption in office and got away with no punishment despite the panel ruling against her

>>122272
New Orleans

>>122272

Yeah, because actual real-life experience is "accept[ing] the existence of an invisible, immeasurable, unobservable, omnipresent power in the universe which tampers with all scientific/social studies in order to make Negroes look bad."

Hurr. You keep failing harder with each post.

>Well yeah, good point, there's Baltimore, Detroit, Miami etc too.
See the post below yours. Please tell me Sarah Palin is covered by your graphs. No? What about Tom Delay? Can't bring yourself to admit a greater number of whites get away with shit that others don't because of wealth an influence.

>>122262

Sauce?

>>122190
No. I said they are avoiding the appearance of racism by arresting fewer because people are hypersensitive to the issue. I guess you can't read.

>1.) Ask for proof
>2.) Get proof
>3.) Dent proof
>4.) Change angle of argument to a favorable one
>5.) Goto 1.)

And the liberal media still reports...
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20100209_Man_charged_with_using_Drano_to_kill_baby.html
... a lot

>>122304
>Yeah, because actual real-life experience

You have yet to provide a single piece of proof for any of your assertions. Not a single piece.

For example, this:

>Can't bring yourself to admit a greater number of whites get away with shit that others don't

Is a naked assertion, you do not provide a shred of proof for this. Yet you assert it as axiomatic.

Then you go on to demand sources and empirical evidence from others, when provided and beaten you just move onto another subject. You're counter-propositional, just like Marx was.

>>122330
But by definition that's not being racist, it means they're arresting larger proportions of whites for crimes than they should. It makes no sense.

>>122332

I understand you kids have a short attention span these days, so I'll recap for you:

>op posts article of black man that committed a crime
>respond with >>121750

Now, you can follow those links to confirm OP clearly claimed more blacks commit crimes than whites. I told him he was wrong for not taking into account the Wall Street and government crimes that never get reported or convicted. He shifted his argument repeatedly to avoid admitting Bush and the Wall Streeters (including Madoff) are responsible for more destruction with THEIR crimes than any black person. Then it devolved into a refusal to admit those crimes exist and aren't reported or accounted for in his graphs.

Again, tell me how much time Tom Delay has served. Tell me how much time Palin has served. Those are crimes, but you refuse to equate them with black crimes that include drug possession.

You're in strong denial.

>>122369
> I told him he was wrong for not taking into account the Wall Street and government crimes that never get reported or convicted.

People were convicted though. Madoff got sent to jail you fucking retard.

It's funny you're talking about the subprime crisis though, consider the role niggers played in it.

>When the CRA was created during the Carter administration, the administration also funded with tax dollars numerous "community groups" that have helped the Fed, the Comptroller of the Currency, and other federal regulatory agencies to enforce the act. Under the CRA, if a bank wants to make virtually any change in its business operations — merging, opening up a new branch, getting into a new line of business — it must first prove to regulators that it has made "enough" loans to the government's preferred borrowers. The (partially) tax-funded "community groups" like ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) can file petitions with regulators that stop the bank's activities in their tracks, perhaps defeating them altogether. The banks routinely buy off ACORN and other "community groups" by giving them millions of dollars as well as promising to make even more dubious loans.

They effectively FORCED those banks to give your criminally inured kind loans.

>>122357

Because you're asking to prove a negative, which is impossible. And if I posted a link to youtube showing the abuses that happened in my old department, you'd claim it was a one-off occurrence. And if I posted more videos, then you'd refuse to accept it until you could see graphs.

Again, just tell me you think ALL or MOST crimes committed on Wall Street and in government are a) not committed by whites b) always reported. Don't bother proving it. Just tell me that's what you really believe. Are you willing to make that big an ass of yourself? But that's exactly what you're saying in this thread.

>>122365
It doesn't matter if it is logical or not. They are trying to appear not racist. If that manifests itself as arresting fewer black people than actually commit crimes, then that is what happens. People are so stupid over the issue of race that for police departments, it's better to let some people slide than deal with the lawsuits, even if the evidence would support the actions of police favorably. You fail to consider that people are neither logical nor rational.

>>122377
>your criminally inured kind loans.

>implying I'm black

Ahaha. Suck my right nut, faggot. Get that blood boiling so you can rape your sister again tonight, you trailer trash redneck.

Over 50% of ALL defaulted loans were by WHITE PEOPLE. A smaller percentage of whites defaulted on their loans, but because they had a larger number of loans, that lead to a NET default greater than all other minorities. Get your facts straight faggot.

>>People were convicted though. Madoff got sent to jail you fucking retard.

ONE FUCKING PERSON. Fuck, you faggots are dense. One person caused the financial crisis? Really?

>>122385
>Because you're asking to prove a negative, which is impossible.

So you believe things without any degree empirical proof and entirely from an argument from silence position?

That makes sense.

>But that's exactly what you're saying in this thread.

No, you originally claimed blacks and whites committed crimes at equal rates, then you re-specified this to white collars crimes and wars, then white collar crimes and war crimes, then just white collar crimes, then crimes committed on wall street and 'corruption', then back to anecdotal instances of wall street crimes. Then you provided proof in the way of the Michael Douglas movie 'Wall Street'.

>showing the abuses that happened in my old department

Like whites not arresting as many blacks as they should because they are playing a devious game of double bluff on a nationwide level?

I don't believe you ever worked in law enforcement, enjoy your walter mitty-esque fantasies.

>>122403
>Get that blood boiling so you can rape your sister again tonight, you trailer trash redneck.

Blacks sexually abuse family members at over twice the rate whites do.

>>122403

Actually, that Madoff example is perfect for what I'm saying. How often did the regulators let his shit go unnoticed? Why? Money. How many others were doing the same shit? How many on Wall Street have been convicted or charged with any wrong-doing? But it's easy to blame the people that defaulted on loans because they don't have the money or influence to fight the charges and smears like the Wall Streeters do.

More proof blacks are sub-human and worthless.

>>122403
Dude, niggers are sub-human scum. The sooner you understand that the sooner we can get back to fixing america.

And no, I'm not the guy you've been arguing with. Just here to push a libfag to prove that blacks are not a destructive element of society that just calls for "community dialogues" and never gets around to fixing its shit.

>>122420
Well how many times did people try to approach the SEC about it? From what I remember there were at least several. That is the most worrisome part.

Niggers aren't subhumans, you racists.


Nigger don't even fucking count as human beings, they just look humanoid but they're far inferior to actual homo sapiens.

>>122431
Sorry, never meant to insult whites and asians like that.

>>122403
>ONE FUCKING PERSON. Fuck, you faggots are dense. One person caused the financial crisis? Really?

No, see:

In order to try to diversify the risk of these loans, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company ("Freddie Mac") pioneered the "securitization" of bundles of these high-risk loans so that they could be sold on secondary markets. Such "securitization" exploded during the 1990s as a result of government regulation. As Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke himself stated in a March 30, 2007 speech entitled "The Community Reinvestment Act: Its Evolution and New Challenges" (published online by the Fed),

Securitization of affordable housing loans expanded, as did the secondary market for these loans, in part reflecting a 1992 law that required the government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to devote a large percentage of their activities to meeting affordable housing goals. (p. 3)

In 1994 the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act loosened up the regulatory barriers to bank mergers. Consequently, said Bernanke, "As public scrutiny of bank merger and acquisition activity escalated, advocacy groups [like ACORN] increasingly used the public comment process to protest bank applications on CRA grounds." In other words, there was a burst of additional legalized extortion perpetrated by the Fed and its pet "activist organizations" beginning in the mid-1990s. As a result, says Bernanke, "banks began to devote more resources to their CRA programs." What an understatement.

Also in 1995, the US Treasury Department created the multibillion-dollar "Community Development Financial Institutions" fund to "provide banks with access [i.e., taxpayers' dollars] to new opportunities to finance community economic development" as "encouraged" by the CRA, said the Fed chairman.

>>122410
>No, you originally claimed blacks and whites committed crimes at equal rates, then you re-specified this to white collars crimes and wars, then white collar crimes and war crimes, then just white collar crimes, then crimes committed on wall street and 'corruption', then back to anecdotal instances of wall street crimes. Then you provided proof in the way of the Michael Douglas movie 'Wall Street'.

So fucking wrong, it's funny. I told you in TOTAL both races commit the same amount of crimes IF you added all the crimes on Wall Street and government. As proof I was wrong you posted a link showing the most corrupt city was run by blacks, basically claiming that the hundreds of thousands of other cities that are run by whites aren't corrupt, or don't add up to more than all the black corruption. And round in circles we go.

>I don't believe you ever worked in law enforcement, enjoy your walter mitty-esque fantasies.
Meh. Don't really care if you believe it or not. Not really important to the debate.

Glad to see you refused to answer my last question, though.

>>122417
>Blacks sexually abuse family members at over twice the rate whites do.
>Chart shows a sexual abuse rate of 64.% for whites and 19.2% for blacks

>Now, you can follow those links to confirm OP clearly claimed more blacks commit crimes than whites. I told him he was wrong for not taking into account the Wall Street and government crimes that never get reported or convicted.

Alright, that would be.

>White man shoots up museum: that dude is crazy
>Black man shoots up museum: blacks are crazy

>etc, etc

1. No one was "shot" in the OP post.
2. Madoff didnt "shoot" anyone.
3. Palin didnt "shoot" anyone.

I think what you meant to address is the OP's line.

>BLACK POWER!

Which, despite the informative information that you provided for the ever changing slope of this ... lol, argument ... is the fact you responded to a troll post made to invoke a poor response from butthurt members of the /new/ viewing audience.

And when some sensitive guppy came along and jumped out of the water, the trolls starting swinging a bat at you as you breached the river under the bridge.

Please... save us your indignation.
You're posting in a troll thread.

>>122431
Niggers are just mutants who just happen to be able to reproduce with us.

>>122422

I have black friends and they aren't animals, you dick wipe. You racist fucks really piss me off with your ignorance.

>>122436

Post the link showing more whites defaulted on their loans than minorities. Post it. I know you googled it and aren't posting it because it'll prove your scape-goating of minorities full of shit.

>>122445
>I told you in TOTAL both races commit the same amount of crimes

Can you demonstrate this with reference to empirical evidence?

>IF you added all the crimes on Wall Street and government.

Yes, white collar crimes, unfortunately for you statistics show blacks commit a higher rate of white collar crimes than whites.

>As proof I was wrong you posted a link showing the most corrupt city was run by blacks, basically claiming that the hundreds of thousands of other cities that are run by whites aren't corrupt

Like it's JUST New Orleans, it's any cities with large black populations: Chicago, Detroit (Coleman Young = possibly the most corrupt mayor who ever lived), Baltimore etc.

Statistics show niggers are violent, criminal animals

>Egalitarians: LOL THATS NOT TRUE IT'S ALL LIES CLEARLY WHITE PEOPLE COMMIT JUST AS MANY CRIMES, THEY JUST MYSTERIOUSLY NEVER GET REPORTED

Evidence shows evolution is incontrovertible

>Creationists: LOL THAT'S NOT TRUE IT'S ALL LIES CLEARLY GOD CREATED EVERYTHING

>>122445

>So fucking wrong, it's funny. I told you in TOTAL both races commit the same amount of crimes IF you added all the crimes on Wall Street and government.

That argument is bull-fucking-shit. You can't just say that the majority of the population commits the same total amount of crime as a minority and then back up that fallacious assertion by broadening the scope of crime and relying on nebulous "unreported" crimes to prove your point.

If they're unreported, they are un-re-port-ed. As in they are not reported so for all we know there could be 3 crimes or 3 million. You just assume that Wall Street is some kind of criminal hotbed because you've been told that whereas we can empirically prove that blacks proportionally commit more crime.

>>122450
White represent over 70% of the population, Blacks 12.2%

You do the math.

I believe that everyone who isn't white be exiled from all respectable countries with a white majority and all women should have their rights revoked.

>>122471
Exactly, it's ceteris paribus for all races. There are for all intents and purposes just as many blacks in proportional terms who get away with corruption in places like Detroit and Baltimore as whites.

>>122459

Funny thing about troll threads (pic related). And in the end all these faggots will have read the proof that disproves their ignorant beliefs and either purposely ignore them or assimilate them into their thinking.

I guess I win.
Swing away, faggots. Swing away.