Science....or porn. Hmm.
Science, or porn. Science. Porn. Ugh, tough.

government has nothing to do with science.

America needs to deal with these fucking leftists before we can retake our nation and restore our former greatness.

I dont understand the american political system. can you cram issues as diverse as porn and science into a single "bill"?

It's funny how the same people who sneakily hold racist views based on perceived intelligences also support this crap.

At least those dumb blacks that they hate are a little more honest about any racist views they hold.

wow, fuck.

seriously man, america, what the fuck.

>>1010811
>perceived intelligences
Disregard this idiot libtards post.

>>1010815
you are just attracting more attention to it.

>Rep. Ralph Hall (R-TX), the ranking member of the House science committee

Who the fuck let a TEXAN on to the House SCIENCE commitee???
That's like assigning a hemophiliac to be a bumper car test driver.

>>1010892
delusional leftist who ignores the fact it's LIBERALS who are blocking advancement and science with their invasive regulation and censors.

I thought republicans were the party of science, what gives?

>>1010910

>>1010953
Despite how things may really be, I don't think science should/does have anything to do with republican or democrat just like religious beliefs or else we have problems as big as the big bang.

>>1010910
Yeah, liberals have been chasing science out of our schools for decades.

>>1010910
Keep telling yourself that, moron.

>>1010992
So all this time it was the Liberals who want to push Bibles into school and ban lessons on evolution?

What Dr. Lahn told his audience was that genetic changes over the past several thousand years might be linked to brain size and intelligence. He flashed maps that showed the changes had taken hold and spread widely in Europe, Asia and the Americas, but weren't common in sub-Saharan Africa.

Yet today, Dr. Lahn says he is moving away from the research. "It's getting too controversial," he says.

He personally believes it is possible that some populations will have more advantageous intelligence genes than others. And he thinks that "society will have to grapple with some very difficult facts" as scientific data accumulate. Yet Dr. Lahn, who left China after participating in prodemocracy protests, says intellectual "police" in the U.S. make such questions difficult to pursue.

Wow. So it really is like that?

Kent: With our utter annihilation imminent, our fed government has snapped into action. We go live now via satellite to the floor of the United States congress.
Speaker: Then it is unanimous, we are going to approve the bill to evacuate the town of Springfield in the great state of --
Congressman: Wait a minute, I want to tack on a rider to that bill: $30 million of taxpayer money to support the perverted arts.
Speaker: All in favor of the amended Springfield-slash-pervert bill?
[everyone boos]
Speaker: Bill defeated. [bangs gavel]
Kent: I've said it before and I'll say it again: democracy simply doesn't work.

>>1010727
Fucking GOP obstructionist fucks.

And the public wonders why congress gets nothing done

>>1011007
No, it's the liberals who criminalize speech they do not like ("hate" speech, in liberal parlance), protest scientific results they do not like, get researchers thrown out of their jobs if they do a study which reaches conclusions contrary to liberal dogma, etc.

Oh and let's not forget persecuting Nobel Prize winning geneticists for daring to have an opinion which is different from their faith-based belief in blank slate ideology.

>>1011034
Don't forget that genetic testing which can determine the race of a criminal from a DNA sample has been banned thanks to liberal outcries against it.

The company which pioneered racial DNA testing for law enforcement went out of business after proving that a "white" suspect that the police were searching for in a rape case was actually black.

Liberals would much prefer to railroad innocent White men into convictions than to catch the Black criminals who actually committed the crime.

Democrats: Hey, here's a bill that funds science and education!
Republicans: Here's some pornography attached to it.
Speaker: Ok, now we shall vote on the science and pornography bill.

Do republicans add "pornographic arts" to everything they want to kill?

>Signed into law on May 21, 2008, GINA prohibits employers and health insurance plans from discriminating against persons on the basis of their personal genetic health or DNA information, including genetic testing, family genetic information, and family history.

http://americanaffairs.suite101.com/article.cfm/gina_limits_collection_use_genetic_information

There's nothing liberals really hate more than science. Especially hard sciences like math and genetics.

Science enables people to gather important information which can be used to make rational decisions about available options (a.k.a. "discrimination").

Science is antithesis to Liberal ideology, which maintains that anti-discrimination is a moral imperative.

>>1011079
>>1011034
Samefag spouting about the one same incident of the geneticist, and not realizing that the DNA pointing to a black rapist when the suspect was KNOWN to be white means that the method is FLAWED which is why it was banned.

Keep spouting stormfront talking points though, I'll just be enjoying a liberal surge in NSF funding.

>>1011124
Why would your workplace need your genetic history to function well?

That's just retarded.

Based on an FBI profile and a confident eyewitness, the Multi-Agency Homicide Task Force futilely upended South Louisiana in search of a young white man who drove a white pick-up truck. They interrogated possible suspects, knocked on hundreds of doors, held frequent press conferences and sorted through thousands of tips.

In late December, after a fourth murder, police set up a dragnet to obtain DNA from some 1200 white men. Authorities spent months and more than a million dollars running those samples against the killer's. Still nothing.

"Your guy has substantial African ancestry," said Frudakis. "He could be Afro-Caribbean or African American but there is no chance that this is a Caucasian. No chance at all."

The task force followed Frudakis' advice and, two months later, the killer was in custody.

http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/10/dnaprint?currentPage=all

>>1011124

It's interesting how Stormfags blame everything on Liberals the same way blacks blame whites.

>>1011185
AND HERE IS THE REAL GEM FROM THAT ARTICLE:

>Tony Clayton, the special prosecutor who tried one of the Baton Rouge murder cases. Clayton, who is black, admits that he initially dismissed Frudakis as some white guy trying to substantiate his racist views. He no longer believes that and says "had it not been for Frudakis, we would still be looking for the white guy in the white pick-up truck." But then he adds, "We've been taught that we're all the same, that we bleed the same blood. If you subscribe to the (Frudakis) theory, you're saying we are inherently unequal."

>He continues: "If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."

A liberal, the PROSECUTOR (thanks to affirmative action), openly admits he wishes technology which helps catch criminals would disappear.

>>1011193
because leftards are ACTUALLY BEHIND everything we complain about, you fucking idiot.

Same as everyone mccarthy accused of communism was ACTUALLY A COMMIE.

>But his tests had found something else, too: none of that DNA material was from the three players, or any of their teammates.

>Mr. Meehan had promptly shared this information with Michael B. Nifong, the Durham district attorney. Yet his summary report -- the one that would be turned over to the defense -- mentioned none of this.

>It was an awkward omission that Mr. Meehan struggled to explain under withering cross-examination from defense lawyers. At one point, he was forced to admit that the incomplete report violated his laboratory's own protocols.

LIBERAL #1: "Should we report these scientific findings that conclusively prove that you are railroading innocent men for a crime they did not commit?"

LIBERAL #2: "No thanks, that does not fit with the conclusion I reached before doing any investigation or research! FUCK science. It's always getting in the way of my liberal worldview. Science can go to hell."

>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."

LOL, LIBERALS

THEY HATE SCIENCE SO MUCH THEY WANT IT TO DISAPPEAR

>>1011193

stormfags are the white equivalent of black niggers

>>1011286
not even close, libfag
not by a million miles

>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."
>"If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."

This is a quote from a prosecutor, speaking about technology which helps to catch criminals and free innocents.

And yet I am sure no liberals would even bat an eyelash at this. They are thinking the same thing themselves.

"Damn that science, why does it always have to keep proving our fantasies wrong? I wish it would just disappear."

>>1011306

>>BU BU BU BUTTTTTTHURRRRRRRRT

oh lawd

>>1011329
Way to oversimplify and butthurt

Op here. Disregard that, I suck cocks.

Bump for liberal TOLD.

>>1011233

>>Same as everyone mccarthy accused of communism was ACTUALLY A COMMIE.

HAHAHAHA!

Now I know you're trolling. McCarthy got destroyed by Edward R. Murrow when he tried to prove his theory on live television. Then the MILITARY pushed his shit in further during Army-McCarthy Hearings.

Face it, you're just a whiny fucktard. I'll give you a 3 for the laugh though.

GET OUT OF MY FANTASY SCIENCE
WE'RE ALL EQUAL WITH RAINBOWS AND BUTTERFLIES

>>1011389
Science has nothing to do with politics or crime.

>>1011409
You are delusional.

>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124
>>1011124

Welcome to the trip forest!
You can call me liberal if you want, but no matter what you call me I'm better at science and morality than you. If you'd like me to explain - PLEASE JUST ASK SOMETHING OR INFER SHIT!

You have just helped me with posting that... lets see how long the proceedings can last.

>>1011389
Kumbayah, comrade.

"...gene is mythical part of living structure which in reactionary theories like Mendelism-Veysmanism-Morganism determines heredity. Soviet scientists under leadership of Academician Lysenko proved scientifically that genes don't exist in the nature."

>>1011728
>implying Lysenko wasn't a crappy scientist.

>>1011389
You're sarcasm is right but deception is wrong. I am better than you and I can be honest about it. My ability to learn and adapt if quantified would be higher than yours.

>One problem encountered throughout scientific fields is that the observation may affect the process being observed

>>1011751
Lysenko is a hero of the liberal left.

You're just saying that because you are a genocidal stormfront nazi racist.