YEAH! I LOVE GIVING UP A SECOND LANE OF TRAFFIC TO BICYCLES! ESPECIALLY HERE IN TORONTO WHERE THEY ARE ONLY USED 6 MONTHS OF THE YEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>71751
THATS OK THEN!!! GLAD YOU APPROVE!!!!!!!!!!

>>71751
Why aren't they used the other six?

Those things are pointless because bikefags end up driving down the middle of the street anyways.

>>71754
Snow

be a fucking man and bike with the traffic.

is that San Francisco?

>>71747
NO WE FUCKING DON'T

We need more cyclists on normal roads, so car drivers learn to drive with cyclists as other full members of traffic. I only use those on three vehicle lane freeways.

>>71761
second

>>71871
>>full members of traffic
I lol'd.

>>71886
if we can get tickets and duis then we are full members of traffic, you overweight amerifag

Wait?! There are places that don't yet have bikeways everywhere?
Do you live in Africa, OP?

>>71903
I live in Sydney. I've got vehicular rights. Every lane is a bike lane.

is that San Francisco?

.

It does look like SF - Valencia street??

>>71947

The same is true here in California. But no motorist will admit to knowing this, and police are very unwilling to enforce it.

>>72005
mainly because everyone hates the shit out of bikers when they drive.

>>71747

FUCK THAT SHIT

I need that space to illegaly pass u in my sik ride

We need more of these!
Because sometimes one bike lane just isn’t enough.

45° 30' 46.76"N, 122° 39' 39.73"W
http://flickr.com/photos/jmchuff/2353299859/

If you think it’s bad giving up a lane of traffic for bicycles, try giving up the entire FREEWAY!

45°31'11.22"N 122°41'10.67"W
http://flickr.com/photos/william200549/2751147500/

If we remove the car parking, we can free up space for all those bikers who need somewhere to park. 24 bikes fit in a space that once held 2 cars. No more locking up bikes to street signs!

http://flickr.com/photos/freddy/29505769/
45°33'7.67"N 122°40'32.65"W

Maybe people would complain less about giving up traffic lanes for bike lanes if we put them in the middle of the street, instead of on the sides?

45°31'9.41"N 122°37'12.92"W
http://flickr.com/photos/freddy/29057441/

For some commuters, two wheels is one too many. Now there’s a lane for them, too.

45°31'56.65"N 122°42'29.79"W
http://flickr.com/photos/spiralshannon/20752661/

>>72027
>>72043
Portland Props!

Why do all the painted people in the bike lane look alike? Not all cyclists look the same, and bike lanes should reflect that. For instance, this guy is a mailman.

45°31'37.94"N 122°40'39.64"W
http://flickr.com/photos/qousqous/23139465/

Of course, if you give cyclists their own lane, they’re going to want their own traffic signals…

45°31'43.53"N 122°39'56.38"W
http://flickr.com/photos/voidoid21/1414405891/

>>72027
I love that in almost every biking thread, some portlander was there first.

he stole my bike

>>72113 Mk.