Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
reCAPTCHA challenge image
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1326402971.jpg-(9 KB, 350x317, 1544528414_tumblr_li8h2ckOPI1qaw7nl_answ(...).jpg)
    9 KB Anonymous 01/12/12(Thu)16:16 No.325853  
    Hey /n/. Let's talk about trains.
    >> Anonymous 01/12/12(Thu)16:45 No.325858
         File1326404753.jpg-(80 KB, 720x480, BRW_no_60.jpg)
    80 KB
    OK. Here's one by me that has been undergoing repairs for about 10 years now. It now looks like it's finally done and should be running again by spring.
    >> Anonymous 01/12/12(Thu)17:22 No.325862
         File1326406960.png-(834 KB, 903x666, High_Speed_2_route.png)
    834 KB
    I was really excited about High speed 2 in England getting the go ahead, but then I discovered that it's going to take about 20 years to build. I can't understand how they are building it so slowly. The speed it's going to be built at is comparable to that of snails and tortoises. People dig tunnels faster than HS2 is going to be built.
    >> Anonymous 01/12/12(Thu)17:49 No.325867
    >>325862
    that and its a huge pile of shit they have managed to make a train that kicks out more pollution than a car per person assuming it runs close to full which it wont also who the hell wants to go to Birmingham let alone 20 minuets faster also the cost of that thing we cant afford housing or to run our hospitals or schools properly and the government is wasting billions and destroying thousands of acres of land for a fucking train that will clearly be shit that and the Olympics what a waste of time effort and money
    The money would be better spent on the existing rail network

    :That feel when you realise you are getting angry over a train.
    >> Anonymous 01/13/12(Fri)14:53 No.326065
    >>325867
    lol he mad
    >> Anonymous 01/13/12(Fri)22:45 No.326143
    I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS! I LIKE TRAINS!
    >> Captain Slog 01/14/12(Sat)09:31 No.326238
         File1326551491.jpg-(208 KB, 640x480, 1157046847119.jpg)
    208 KB
    >>325862
    HS2 will be in a tunnel!
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-16516733

    But yes, as much as I like the penis-waving abilities of high speeed rail, this will only initially benefit the south of England and the chances are the trains will be Japanese anyway.
    Its too little, too late.
    >> Anonymous 01/14/12(Sat)13:06 No.326268
    >>325862
    Seems like English speaking nations have forgotten how to do infrastructure quickly and well.
    >> Anonymous 01/14/12(Sat)15:03 No.326286
         File1326571419.jpg-(23 KB, 652x327, vancleef.jpg)
    23 KB
    HS2 is estimated to cost £33 billion.
    So that means it's actually going to cost closer to £40-45 billion

    Normal line costs roughly £10 million per mile.
    New trains are about £2 million.

    So with £40 billion you could upgrade almost every main line in the UK, and equip it all with new rolling stock.
    You could also buy a Big Boy and run it all day, every day, just for fun, with the change.
    You could have a space program. You could build and operate a fleet of zeppelins. You could bring back Concorde. You could give every town in the UK a statue, a fountain and a market square and buy some land for allotments for millions of people.
    You could subsidise the cost of tickets so that everyone in the country benefits from cheaper travel.

    Or instead, you could have one line, which will carry less passengers at a higher cost than a normal line, and in terms of passenger numbers moved per hour, will actually be slower than normal rail, and the tickets will be expensive enough to be out of the reach of most rail users. But you'll be able to get to the hellish shithole that is brum 20 minutes faster!

    Fuck everyone involved in this shitty boondoggle.
    >> Anonymous 01/14/12(Sat)15:10 No.326288
    >>326286
    I honestly have no idea why this line is going to cost that much.

    And then they started talking about "putting it in a tunnel because it will be cheaper." What kind of shit is this?
    >> Anonymous 01/14/12(Sat)18:12 No.326324
         File1326582748.jpg-(81 KB, 800x443, 800px-60163_Tornado_Peterborou(...).jpg)
    81 KB
    >>326286
    The Tornado, the newest steam loco built in the UK, cost £3 million.

    For £33 billion, you could replace every train in the country with brand new steam engines that meet modern standards, just like the tornado.

    But instead we get a crappy high speed line that'll take 2 decades to build and probably only have 6 shitehawk-class plastic jap crap speedywaggons.

    Fuck this country, man. Fuck this country.
    >> Anonymous 01/14/12(Sat)18:46 No.326327
    >>326324
    Isn't that the locomotive that they used on the Top Gear episode with the race between a steam locomotive, Jaguar xk120 DHC, and a Vincent Black Shadow? That seemed like a pretty cool locomotive.
    >> Anonymous 01/14/12(Sat)19:34 No.326337
    >>326327
    It was.
    >> Anonymous 01/15/12(Sun)05:09 No.326422
         File1326622189.jpg-(103 KB, 800x480, 800px-60163_Tornado_at_Newcast(...).jpg)
    103 KB
    >>326324

    More glorious Tornado
    >> Anonymous 01/15/12(Sun)05:15 No.326423
         File1326622526.jpg-(233 KB, 602x799, 3pacifics.jpg)
    233 KB
    >>326422
    Tornado, Britannia and Dominion of New Zealand
    >> Anonymous 01/15/12(Sun)05:15 No.326424
         File1326622556.jpg-(138 KB, 600x400, 21091103CarlisleGordonEdgar.jpg)
    138 KB
    >>326423
    Tornado at Carlisle
    >> Anonymous 01/15/12(Sun)05:16 No.326425
         File1326622599.jpg-(118 KB, 600x400, 21091106ChorleyFrankYates.jpg)
    118 KB
    >>326424
    >> Anonymous 01/15/12(Sun)05:17 No.326426
         File1326622644.jpg-(218 KB, 600x400, 22101101MedsteadEdwardDyer.jpg)
    218 KB
    >>326425
    On the watercress line / mid hants railway
    >> Anonymous 01/15/12(Sun)05:19 No.326427
         File1326622791.jpg-(101 KB, 600x400, 22101105MeadsteadBankIMcD.jpg)
    101 KB
    >>326426
    The Mid hants railway allegedly has some tiny little trains that run on it that are powered entirely by flywheels, that get spun up at the stations and have enough energy to move the trains along the entire line. Never seen one though.
    <Another shot of the Tornado on the watercress line
    >> ­­­­ 01/15/12(Sun)08:00 No.326438
         File1326632433.jpg-(163 KB, 800x600, 800px-Tivedshambo_2006-03-12_P(...).jpg)
    163 KB
    >>326427

    this one?
    (stolen from wikipedia)
    >> Anonymous 01/15/12(Sun)11:23 No.326456
    >>326438
    If that is one, then I think it's a national disgrace that they're allowed to run it on the same line as real trains. Maybe they don't though. I've heard about them enough times, but I can see the line from my window and I've never seen anything that looks like that running on it. Flywheel drive sounds cool, but not if that's what it looks like.
    >> Captain Slog 01/15/12(Sun)12:09 No.326460
    >>326456
    http://www.parrypeoplemovers.com/
    What's so desgraceful? Little, fuel efficiant trains that are economical to run and are made in teh UK. Just so long as they don't use them on longer routes. Its bad enough they allow Pacers on cross country runs.
    >> Anonymous 01/15/12(Sun)13:29 No.326466
         File1326652157.jpg-(639 KB, 2048x1536, black5.jpg)
    639 KB
    >>326460
    I just have an instinctive dislike of anything that doesn't belch huge clouds of black soot into the sky, made out of metal and weighing a minimum of 50 tonnes. And I don't like the way they look. Horrible little pods.
    Logically, I should love them. They sound great on paper. They're "green", made in the UK by a small company and are quite inventive. They could appease my wrath by at least trying to inject some character into them. Maybe later I'll go down to the basement and hammer out an angry letter to them on my typewriter telling them what they're doing wrong. I'm sure they'd appreciate that.
    Pic related, bitches dig steam trains. I don't think they'd dig jumped up trams.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]