This is 4chan, what do you think?

/lit/ is filled with young, arrogant teenagers who think that their taste is superior to everyone else's and old, embittered writers who never made it and therefore see fit to trash on everyone else's writing.

/lit/ was never good. Anyone who says otherwise is delusional.

>ambitious young minds
>arrogant, ignorant teenagers

Same thing, if you ask me.

>>670600
;_;
At one point it was worth coming to to have a meanigful conversation with fellow anons who actually read...

>>670609

It's been the exact same from day 1, you fucking fag.

I was there. Right back in the beginning. I saw the rise, I watched the fall and do you know what, son, /lit/ was awesome.

Good sir, you're implying that the only users of /lit/ are teenagers (despite 4chan restricted to people 18 and over), and is similar to /b/.

>>670618

I meant that it's been infiltrated by them.
There's still a lot of good men willing to stay behind.

>>670620

I miss the early days, when you could spot a troll by the picture of Ayn Rand they posted.

>>670624
Those were the days..

the first 4 days were fucking amazing.

Yeah, such good times, all those years ago. Oh no, wait. It was like 3 months ago, and it's the same as it always was.

/lit/ is just the same as every other board on 4chan... they all have good and bad points (apart from a few boards like /b/, which have none).

>>670638

agreed.

The day Salinger died was the beginning of the end.

>>670638
Very fucking agreed.

>>670599

Old, embittered people on 4chan?

No, it's just the young faggots part.

"I am so e/lit/ist; Ayn Rand is such such; lolol Kurt Vonnegut!"

/lit/ is one of the better boards but at the end of the day this is 4chan.

I remember back in the good ol' days, when you could scroll down an entire page and there'd be nothing but GRRM and Ayn Rand threads.

>>670724
Don't you mean "party time"?
Yeah, Catch THAT in the fucking Rye.