NO

OP, e/lit/ists don't actually OWN or COLLECT books - they just pretend their well-read and cultured since they read 1984 in high school.

>their well-read
And you're condescending about /lit/'s reading habits?

>>132589
OHSHI A TYPO MEANS THAT EVERYTHING HE SAID IS NOW WRONG

>>132592
"Their" is not a typo. Typing "adn" instead of "and" would be a typo. What the previous poster has demonstrated is a misunderstanding of a very basic grammatical rule.

>>132571
Condescending remark is very condescending.

>>132571
trollface.jpg

SNORE

itt everything wrong with this board

OP here.

I can see /lit/ is going to be a positive, intelligent board.

fuck i see /mu/ faggotry has spread.

is everyone on here from /mu/?

this shit is quickly becoming the /lit/ equivalent of /g/ desktop threads.

>>132704
No, I'm originally from /b/, but I'm so sick of that board lately.

i like your library

I would poast mah library, but I have several reasons not to:
1)I don't have a camera
2)I don't have a bookcase
3)I have nothing but R.A. Salvatore books and Stephen King EVERYWHERE. I have the odd anthology or book from a class, but I never read them. I have a feeling most of you condesceding pricks will have nothing positive to say about fantasy/sci-fi novels, and Stephen King is probably "too popular" to be of any use to the high-minded elitists.

There you go.

Superior taste.

Okay, lets get this thread back on track.

Lots of King and Poe, various manga including Death Note, Battle Royale and Hikkatsu, several collections of Calvin and Hobbes, Y: The Last Man, The Walking Dead, a handful of D&D books, fair amount of Piers Anthony and Koontz, and a 1955 copy of Websters unabridged dictionary.

>>132812
Pssh, I got you beat.

>>132812

I just threw up in my mouth.