[Last thread was deleted]if anything, the lgbt board should be renamed /sgd/ for sexuality and gender discussion /lgbt/ is discriminatory and unequal on the one hand its stuffing all the "fag talk" in one corner of 4chan, and while this may of been the original intent there is no real goal besides this. (If you want to get rid of faggots you might aswell take down the site.)on the other its discriminating against straight people, which do not get a dedicated place to discuss their sexuality or problems we have a sexuality specific board before we even have a sexuality general board. This would be like having /asp/ before /sp/ or /vr/ before /v/ /sgd/ would be unbiased and open for everyone who would like to talk about their sexual issues >the politics would be largely removed>actual discussion may occur >the name alone would draw much more traffic to the boardthis is already a board on 420chan and it accomplishes everything that /lgbt/ would and more. keep the board, change the name. People will see an instantaneous change for the better
Lol how bought no faggot
fuck gays don't let em marry
>>46283 (OP)This... could actually work
>>46368lol nice! get rekt op!
sounds good OP it would cut down on the /pol/ shitposting for one thing
yes. a board meant for serious discussion about issues regarding the lgbt community is completely discriminatory against straight people.
OP is posting in the right board he's a faggot
>>46283 (OP)this is a great idea
This board is a horrible idea to the core.
>>46283 (OP)that's actually a really good ideawont happen though, since now that it's here, taking it away would make it into OMG SO INTOLERANT FUCKING CIS SCUM all day, instead of accomplishing the goal
>>46283 (OP)No, because you want a neat little forum for a bunch of "same-sex attraction" apologists to forum-slide the fuck out of it.
Let's make a 'gays fucking each other in the ass' board while we're at it.
I see your point, OP. However, LGBT provides a clear understanding as to the topics discussed on this board. I don't think that changing /lgbt/ to /sgt/ would eliminate any of the politics involved in this community. If /pol/ wanted to start a shitstorm, they would still start one here regardless of the name.
>>46529a bored meant for the discussion of a few specific sexualities while there is not even a general discussion for sexualities is indeed discriminatory
>>46602Why?
>>46283 (OP)You just want pedophiles to be welcome you disgusting pedo freak
Daily reminder that exclusion is needed to keep furfag scum out.
>>46731No one said that there couldn't be a general discussion, dude.
>>46743It's a bunch of edgy gays who feel like they're excluded for regular society
>>46714most of the /pol/ shitstorm is around the "dissenting views cannot be discussed" thingthis is a good example of why /pol/ is shitstorming over lgbt >/lgbt/ will be the one board on 4chan where dissenting views cannot be discussed.>on /v/ you can call video games shit. On /tv/ you can call TV shows shit. On /pol/ you can call any political views shit.>This is a very negative precedent.the post was from a /q/ thread, many agreed a sexuality general would take most of the shitposters off imo even though you can never get rid of them fully
>>46283 (OP)> its discriminating against straight people, which do not get a dedicated place to discuss their sexuality or problemsIn the same way that disabled parking discriminates against the abled. Or clothing stores for tall and fat people discriminate against the short and skinny.I.E., not at all. Advice and Social and R9k are packed with threads about relationships and sexuality.
>>46743It's going to be a breeding ground for politically correct and hugboxers. Enjoy becoming rebbt 2.0.
>>46906And you could've talked about being a faggot on those boards as well.
>>46936>slippery slope general
>>46776but there is not a general discussion while there is one for a specific set of sexualites i'm fine with keeping the lgbt board but there needs to be at least a sexuality general
>>46936R3ddit is enormously racist and sexist. There are multiple subr3ddits dedicated to white supremacy or hating black people, with thousands of subscribers.
>>46283 (OP)>White people crying "We don't get a white history month... There's no White Entertainment Network"Bitch thats because every month is white history month and every other channel is WET.Just like every other board here is straight.>Straight people saying we don't have straight pride paradesThat's because you never had to.Give me a break. Eat your damned cake and let us enjoy what little crumbs we get.
>>47069>enormously racist and sexistnot really, no.
>>47174>Just like every other board here is straight.Good joke. Lurk more, kid.
>>46895Free speech is a lot like the free market. It has to be regulated to stay true to its core value.Speech is only free in the name if minority voices get squashed out - have fun dissenting in /po/.The absolute worst case scenario is that you don't visit a board on the internet that you don't like.
>>46762Pedos are just as bad as homos, bis transgenders or whatever other mentally ill individuals you harbor here.I came here to tell you that.
>>47184That's why nigger jokes get massively upvoted and /r/niggers has thousands of subscribers and /r/goingtohellforthis is practically /r/niggers2.Lurk moar.
>>47253>people are different than me, and I'm not okay with thatWhat's wrong with pedos? As long as their not fucking kids, it's fine. I don't give a fuck if someone's fapping to pizza
Married straight male here (but with lotsa LGBT friends, which is why I'm here in the first place). While OP's proposal has much merit in theory, I suspect that it would have one hugely undesirable side effect in practice.Head over to /r9k/ for a few minutes and count the number of >tfw no gfthreads over there. Now ask yourselves: do you REALLY want all those sad bastards shitting up an /sgd/ board ad nauseum with thread after thread about straight involuntary celibacy?On the other hand, it might make /r9k/ more bearable to visit.
>>46906if the only parking in a parking lot is for disabled people then yeah it is discriminating there is a lgbt board but no board for the discussion of general sexuality. r9k, adv and soc are not boards for specific sexuality discussion while lgbt isas i said beforeit would not make sense for /asp/ to come before /sp/ or /vr/ to come before /v/ sure i can talk about vidya and sports on /r9k/ and /b/ but they are not sport or vidya specific
>>46995>And you could've talked about being a faggot on those boards as well.And the tiny handful of LGBTQ people would have responded - instead of a rich community like the point of this board existing, and which you don't need with straight or cis people.This is not that hard to comprehend.
