Firefox 3.6.18, I don't like how the newer versions look.

Pale Moon 5.0

>>7661420
>Chrome
Chromium. And install Gentoo while you're at it.

At the moment I'm tempted to look at 4chan X over 4chan Plus which is what I'm currently using. Along with the Shift_JIS art script.

Newest firefox. I like it because it works.

Google Chrome.

Firefox because I like rikachan and chatzilla and because it works.

IE 7

Mozilla Aurora! F**k yea

>>7661420
OP here. What are the differences between them?

Also I use the "official" 4chan extension with my FF. It's been having some compatibility issues since the guy who made it takes a long time to update to the current FF version (if at all). I didn't like 4chan X. If anything I prefer 4chan Plus, I got it on my laptop with Chrome on it and it's really nice. Too bad there's no report button though.

Chrome ftw

I prefer Firefox for perapera-kun and Greasemonkey scripts.

On a side note, has anyone been able to get 4chan grab working for Firefox 5 yet?

Opera, simply because I'm used to it

Latest Firefox with 4chan X. But I changed the looks from the modern hipster stuff to something similar to v4.

>>7661443
> no report button
fags like this actually exist!?

Opera supremacy

>>7661423
Are you serious?

It takes like a couple clicks to make it close or an addon/theme to make it practicly the same.

3.6 is fucking shit tier now.

>>7661467
Don't care, I'm lazy and 3.6.18 does whatever I need it to.

>>7661447
4chan grab works up to FF5. If you're using 4chanX disable the expander or just disable greasemonkey (it's faster to just click the GS toolbar/statusbar button) for the thread and refresh it before grabbing.

>>7661427
4chan X seems to be better. Spoiler test.

>>7661477
If it does all you need it to, which I'm guessing is not much, then you might as well switch to Chrome.

And I'm just gonna add that's a dumb as fuck reason not to upgrade too. 5.0 is way faster and more stable.

Firefox Nightly mainly, Chrome as a secondary.

>>7661423
Enjoy your vulnerabilities, old javascript engine, inadequate HTML5 support and the total lack of CSS3.

>>7661484
GIF test.

yo miku stop hogging the bandwidth

Newest Firefox

>>7661493
Shift_JIS test.

　 ∧＿∧　　　∧＿∧ 　　　∧＿∧　　 ∧＿∧　 　　　∧＿∧
　（　・∀・） 　 <丶｀∀´>　　（　´∀｀）　 （　・ω・）　　　 （　´ω`）
　（　　　　つ┳∪━━∪━∪━━∪━∪━∪━┳⊂　 　 　つ
　｜ ｜　|　 ｜　　I love this thread so much!　　｜　｜ ｜　｜
　（_＿）＿） ┻━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┻　（_＿）＿）

>>7661485
>5.0 is way faster and more stable.

Seriously, it felt like I bought a new computer when I upgraded from 3.6

firefox has a slim 2ch browser and customizable search bar plugins (allows to choose 10+ different search engines with just a click on the icon, and has right click integration so you can look shit up without copying and pasting), rather than having to type random shit I can't be assed to remember before the search terms.
So latest Firefox for me, though it's not like I was dissatisfied with Chrome, it's just that I like some of the Firefox extensions better.

>>7661485
I've tried Chrome, didn't like it. I don't have any speed or stability issues with Firefox, so whatever.
>>7661490
Enjoy your vulnerabilities, old javascript engine, inadequate HTML5 support and the total lack of CSS3.
Okay.

Firefox 5.0
Simply because it has an Adblock that actually works, Rikaichan, and how easy it is to customize the entire browser to your liking.

I use Chromium as backup when I need to test stuff, or, as rare as it may be, someone asks me to use my laptop to check his mail or look something up real quick.

Wait, you need a script specifically for AA? Why can't you just use your browser viewing 4chan in its default form? Don't tell me you actually use Yotsuba B.

http://www.palemoon.org/download-v4.shtml

Still nothing comes close to Opera for me.
Firefox is fine now if it suits your needs better.
lol Chrome

>>7661443

>>7661525
I didn't put AA tags. Does 4chan X handle them? Also with and without extension. I tried using the four standard themes and no real difference.

>>7661521
>I don't have any speed or stability issues with Firefox, so whatever.
I know being used to slow performance isn't an issue per se when you don't know any better, I mean it used to be perfectly acceptable to wait for several minutes for a game to load back in the C64 days, but how can you be fine knowing that there's a whole bunch of websites you can't even view because your browser is a relic of the past and you refuse to upgrade for no good reason? You know that nowadays they make browser games and everything that don't rely on Flash? They call it progress.

>>7661552
Do not listen to this gigantic browser fanboy faggot.

Oh Sudo, is there not one thread where you don't flaunt your idiocy?

Internet Explorer 6

>>>/g/

>>7661548
I see what you mean now, it's a script that changes Times New Roman -> MS PGothic when the AA poster wants it changed.

Firefox 5, the extension I use (especially Save Image in Folder) are something I can't live without anymore.

Firefox 5, because I've used it since the first version was in beta and I've got a shitload of addons which functionality cannot be accurately reproduced in other browsers. I also have Chrome and Opera installed just for kicks. Chrome seems to load really fucking fast, I believe it pre-caches links when a page is loaded or you move the mouse close to them or something.

This thread would be a lot more interesting if we saw what add-ons /jp/sies use.

>>7661576
You can get that feature in Firefox.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/speed-dns/

>>7661552
>but how can you be fine knowing that there's a whole bunch of websites you can't even view because your browser is a relic of the past
Such as? I have a fast Internet connection, and no website I've ever gone to has failed to load. You sound pretty full of shit, to me.
>>7661566
Cool ad-hominem.

>>7661564
I'm far from being a Firefox fanboy if that's your impression, Webkit is a far better engine and I'd much rather be using Chromium if the Firefox extensions weren't so damn useful. Even IE9 has a better support of HTML5 elements than Firefox 5, try any canvas game. If I'm a fanboy of anything, it's of developing the internet.

>>7661578
Here's mine. inb4 madotsuki barf.jpg or some shit, Pale Moon with Memory Fox always kept its RAM usage under 1GB even with 100 tabs.

>>7661569
Not nearly that sophisticated. When a post has certain characters in it it'll switch the font for that whole post. So it's a little annoying at times.

>>7661578
As of now, no more 4chan Plus.

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/51412 (4chan X)
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/107059 (4chan Shift_JIS fix)
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/100614 (better better booru)

>>7661585
You compared a modern browser like Firefox using an analogy involving a Commodore 64. Fuck off.

>>7661584
>Such as?
http://webdesignerwall.com/trends/47-amazing-css3-animation-demos
Any one of these, for starters.

>I have a fast Internet connection, and no website I've ever gone to has failed to load.
And this was just getting interesting.

>>7661591
Firefox 3.6 is not a modern browser

>>7661578
Don't judge me by my tabs. ;_;

>>7661584
>he thinks that's an ad-hominem

Keep going, Sudo. You're doing great!

>>7661590
Thanks. I still choose to not use any extensions that change the look of 4chan though.

>>7661594
I don't care about animation demos. None of the sites I go to use anything like that.
>And this was just getting interesting.
It was never interesting. You spouted a bunch of shit about there being a "whole bunch of websites" I couldn't go to and just countered replied with a bunch of animation demos.

>>7661602
>Abusive ad hominem (also called personal abuse or personal attacks) usually involves insulting or belittling one's opponent
That's exactly what you did. You called me an idiot, presumably for not upgrading my browser, when I have no need to do so whatsoever.

>>7661612
>doesn't know the difference between ad-hominem and an insult

Do you want to keep going?

>>7661578

>>7661606
>I don't care about animation demos. None of the sites I go to use anything like that.
The technology is pretty new, there are still way too many people using old browsers for popular sites like Facebook to embrace it.

There used to be people who didn't care about Javascript or Flash or posting forms because none of the sites they went to used anything like them.

>>7661615
Yes, the dictionary is wrong and you're right. My mistake.
>>7661634
Like I said, if a site I frequent were to not work correctly with my browser, I'd upgrade immediately. Until then I have no need to.

>>7661663
Oh Sudo, you're such a funny guy.

Try scrolling down on the page you googled that from. And next time try not to use words you just learned from 4chan, okay?

>>7661676
>I have no rebuttal so I'll just re-state the same thing and try to appear more intelligent

>ad hominem [(ad hom -uh-nem, ad hom -uh-nuhm)]
>A Latin expression meaning “to the man.” An ad hominem argument is one that relies on personal attacks rather than reason or substance.

You didn't say why I was an idiot, you just made a personal attack. That's exactly what an ad-hominem is. Enjoy your false sense of superiority, oh wise one.

Opera

>>7661423
I still use the old Firebird beta build on older computers, because it works great as a standalone low-resource browser. It's like a 250k standalone executable.
I use Chrome on my personal though, for some reason Firefox has become a rather nasty resource hog.

>>7661688
This should help, Sud-tan.
http://plover.net/~bonds/adhominem.html

>>7661688
Posting the definition isn't going to do much when you're the one not understanding it.

But keep going. You can't say I didn't try to help you.

>>7661715
And yet you conveniently neglect to educate us on what the definition actually is, according to your overflowing fountain of wisdom.

>Sudo making a fool of himself again

This is always entertaining.

>>7661729
You posted it, TWICE! You silly goose.

>>7661584
>>7661521
>>7661423
You should try Pale Moon 3, unlike Firefox it's still being updated.

>>7661739
I did, and yet you claim that what you did doesn't constitute an ad-hominem.
>Therefore, if you can't demonstrate that your opponent is trying to counter your argument by attacking you, you can't demonstrate that he is resorting to ad hominem.

You said I was an idiot for (presumably) not upgrading my browser, when I made a valid argument as to why I didn't need to. You didn't try to counter my argument, you just called me an idiot and then proceeding to tell me that it wasn't an ad-hominem over and over.
>>7661732
>useless post

>>7661774

You don't see the contradiction in that post?

>>7661774
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem#Common_misconceptions

Keep going?

Addons

>>7661774
>useless post

>>7661423
>>7661477
>>7661521
>>7661584
>>7661606
>>7661612
>>7661663
>>7661688
>>7661729
>>7661774
>useless posts

>Sudo
>useless poster

>>7661799
I'm not going to keep going in circles with you, because you're not going to admit you're wrong and neither am I. I'm not going to call you an idiot in return because that's what you want.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/usage-counter/

Everyone install this, come back tomorrow or so. (It works on Firefox 5)

>>7661832
Did you finally realize how stupid you are?

>>7661832
-useless post
-useless poster
-useless human being

>>7661843
If I was wrong, I'd admit it. I'm not that petty.
>>7661846
Good for you, you know how to imitate others.

Scripts greatly help to follow valuable and exciting discussions on /jp/.

>>7661855
That's not what I asked.

Did you finally realize how stupid you are?

I've always wanted an addon that'll give me this, but in Firefox. I wonder why nobody made one yet.

>>7661860
I can't realize it if it's not true. Discussion over.

Why does Sudo have to constantly shit all over the board?

>>7661841
But, as with many outdated add-ons, you have to download it manually, open the .xpi in an archiver and edit install.rdf. Parameter:
<em:maxVersion>6.0</em:maxVersion>

Living the dream.

>>7661890
Nope! Just go to about:config and make a new boolean value called extensions.checkCompatibility.5.0 and set to false.

>>7661832
So you don't have anything to say about this?
>>7661802

I hate for you to go through all this and come out with nothing. You can at least say you learned something today, Sudo! That's an accomplishment. You make one of those, once a month? Maybe that's too kind.

>>7661905
Nope. Only if you had it installed earlier. If you try to install now, mozilla site won't allow it.

Revel in the shit that is this board.

>>7661841
I have wakoopa for that.

>>7661858
Okay, I'm using 4chan X now. (I'm that person who said I liked default 4chan) Is this a feature that puts replies in the same postbox?

>>7661924
Click the [4chan X] that replaced [Home]. Check everything under Quoting.

>>7661920
The main attraction is the time spent browsing each site.
ie:
2h ehentai
8h 4chan
1h google
9h hongfire

etc.

Chromium.
My OS is Jolicloud, so.... yeah. Chromium is my only option.

>>7661939
Thanks. I like the quick reply thing. I still disabled the report/hidden buttons, since I don't like seeing it everywhere. This is handy.

>>7661946
Or rather, I like having 4chan look somewhat like the original.

Communism

Ask a 4chan X dev anything related.

The camp music is beautiful, you feel like you have the nostalgia of something but at the same time you feel like you missed something important in your life. The main difference in the Prismrivers is in the first 3 spellcards, some of which are easier than others.

Is one better than the other? The thing is, moebots really need some of their distinctive mechanical parts to identify them, otherwise they look like some generic anime girl.

read this
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/opera-firefox-chrome,2976-15.html

>>7661957
Do you have sex with animals?

>>7661957
Why there are two Hide for each post in the chain of replies? >>7661858

>>7661957
Also, can you make it so that in-line quotes had black borders, so they didn't blend together so much and were easier to read?

>>7661924
if you check quote inline you can click on post number quotes like this >>7661924 and the quoted reply expands. This way you can follow discussion where people quote each other all from just the last post, which is what that guy was doing I guess.

>>7661974
4chan filter is a separate script, it doesn't support the latest 4chan X versions and aeosynth doesn't update it anymore.
There is a modded version (https://userscripts.org/scripts/show/103818) but I doubt it prevents that bug from happening.

>>7661985
Try that: http://userstyles.org/styles/48538

Firefox 8.0a1
I've tested everything else, it's definitely the best for me.

Jp/ is the worst board on 4chan.

Are we ever going to get a update for 4chan report Queue ;_;?

Nightly.
Also 4chan X, and Appchan personally modified of course.
Most recent versions.

>>7661957
Have you fixed the ImageZoom compatibility yet?

>>7661940
Ooh, that's handy. Thanks!
>>7661957
I love you.

Try running it using the Windows 2000 compatibility mode.

>>7662017
Sorry to burst your bubble, but I found that the addon doesn't work. I'm looking for an alternative.

>>7661957
I used to have an almost perfect configuration, which I've been unable to duplicate since, mainly due to the newest versions I could find of the two scripts are incompatible in many ways. So could you just tell me what scripts I should download if I want the thread updater and the inline quotes, without messing anything up?

>>7661996
Can you make 4chanX's quotes work like /b/ackwash? Without the stupid purple highlighting basically.

I use /b/ackwash separately but 4chanX keeps interfering with it.

No problem, I will open this program for you. I will help you research this topic on the Internet. Posting was disabled for the /jp/ archive due to the low quality of posts; it was mainly being used for complaining about being banned, complaining about the state of /jp/, complaining about the actions of 4chan's staff and vanity posts made by the worst trip users on /jp/ after being (rightfully) banned.

>>7662012
>ImageZoom
What do you mean by `ImageZoom` and `compatibility`?

>>7662017
Thanks.

>>7662023
4chan X has those features, but if you want them separately, use 4chan x Updater and /b/ackwash reloaded, and disable these features in 4chan X's options.

>>7662025
You can change it easily with CSS.

It's like my Firefox evolves whenever one of these threads comes up.

Thanks a lot.

>browser fanboy wars that are supposed to be on /g/
>117 posts and 22 image replies omitted

You can't fucking be serious.

>>7662075
Except it isn't a 'browser fanboy war.'

>>7662032
>4chan X has those features, but if you want them separately, use 4chan x Updater and /b/ackwash reloaded, and disable these features in 4chan X's options.
Oh, I remember now, there were some things about the 4chan X features I didn't like and prefered the way /b/ackwash did it, but those have been improved upon now. Still prefer the quick reply from /b/ackwash, but I guess it can't be helped.

>>7662078
Not the other guy, but I think you need to get your eyes checked, anon-kun. Plus it doesn't matter, browsers are definitely not /jp/ related.

Pale Moon 3.

>>7662086
Sharing Firefox addons and talking about a script for Firefox isn't a browser fanboy war.

Let me guess, you're a Chrome user.

>>7662091
Nitpicking. Most of the thread is not about Firefox add-ons.

Also way to contradict yourself, saying that there's no browser fanboyism here then crying about Chrome.

>>7662104
I'm not crying about Chrome. You're the one crying in a thread that obviously isn't for you.

>>7662032
Zooming with ImageZoom (rightclick+scroll) on an expanded image in reply posts, the width reaches a point where it cannot expand anymore resulting in a vertically stretched image. I can't seem to override this because the width limit imposed is an inline style attribute on the image's tag (style priorities).

>>7662017
>>7662019
>>7661940
>>7661841
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/aboutme/

>>7662115
>NO U argument

Okay. I didn't even mention browsers, you just assumed I was associated with the shitposting group opposite to your shitposting group.

Now fuck off back to >>>/b/

Old FF 3..6.1X, had to fuck around a lot to make the UI even workable since Mozilla devs are fucking retarded.

>>7662118
Why not using ctrl+scroll?
You could overwrite it with img[md5] + img {max-width: auto !important;}

That reminds me, I got the latest chromium a few days ago and they added "awesomeface" as one of the profile icons. Goddamnit Google.

>>7662007
;_;

So, can we use this thread to recommend each other Firefox add-ons for our /jp/ related habits? I have two I want to speak up for, which have significantly improved my browsing experience, and I hope you guys have some others which will help me further.

FireGestures. Bind "change to tab on the left" to a straight line to the left, and right for tab on the right. Makes it extremely easy to flip through tabs quickly, without having to click each tab. Other functions I recommend gestures for is close tab, reload and scroll to top/bottom. But the most important one is save image, I have that bound to a single line down. Combine this with Automatic Save Folder (setting all image files to be automatically saved to whatever folder you save images in), and you'll be go through images in multiple tabs and save them really quickly.

The other is Scroll Search Engines, which finally motivated me to start using the search bar. Lets you just mouse over the search bar and scroll with the scroll wheel to change engines, or when highlighting a word. Not particularly revolutionary, but it's nice when someone is talking about an eroge I haven't heard about yet, I can just highlight the name in his post, scroll to VNDB, and automatically get a new tab searching for the name in VNDB. Or when browsing DLsite, I can do the same to check if it's in my favorite hash database. Add to Search Bar is needed to, should go without saying. And I also like Searchbar Autosizer, since it adds an option to empty the search field after searching for something, something which has always annoyed me when I search through typing something in.

Firefox 3.6

Why does 4chan X autoscroll to the bottom when it updates a thread?

I'm surprised how many FF 3.6 users are in here. Are you all running Debian or something?

>>7661957
There's an idea I want to propose. When you're in a thread and want to post without referring to a post number, you have two options:
1. Going to the top and replying the normal way, which is annoying, since it reloads the page and marks your post in the URL, unlike quick reply.
2. Click a post number to open quick reply, and remove the post number, which is annoying, since it adds an extra step to making a post.

So, could you add some button somewhere that lets you open quick reply within a thread, without clicking a post number?

>>7662223
Someone was complaining that it doesn't do that, from my use it doesn't, and I like it that way.

>>7662223
Picture related.

>>7662235
You can use keybinds, there's one for that.

Firefox under Slackware and Opera under Windows.

>>7662235
Persistent QR, just leave it up.
I'd recommend Appchan as well.

>>7662157
ctrl+scroll zooms the whole page, I just want to zoom on the image.

Still can't overwrite it. When I try to resize the image the max-width property on the element.style also gets updated overwriting what ever I initially put on it.

>>7662206
I prefer using my keyboard. Seems a lot more convenient.
ctrl+tab next tab
ctrl+shift+tab previous tab
ctrl+w close tab
space and shift+space scrolling
ctrl+s save image

The search engine one seems unnecessary. You can add keywords to any search box in Firefox. Just rightclick a search box and choose "Add a keyword for this search".
After that you can search anything from the address bar via "<keyword> <search terms>", e.g. "vn little busters" for a vndb search on my keyword settings.
Combine this with alt+D to focus on the address bar and searching becomes fast and easy.

Though it won't give you the mouseover search, I'll give you that.

>>7662310
I'm confident that my method is much quicker. And it frees up a hand I could use on more productive things, like fapping (seriously, that's an extremely common thing to want to do when you're saving images).

I honestly didn't know about the keyword function, though. That's quite useful too. I think I'll use that for search engines that I don't need the highlighting function for, or simply don't use that often, like thesaurus.com.

>>7662327
Down -> Hybrid save
Down Left -> save image NOW
I love that one.

>>7662206
I don't like concentrating while making mouse gestures, thus make a lot of wrong moves, which in turn irritates me. Not to mention that I rarely, if ever, need to flip through tabs quickly. I'd rather use keyboard anyway. It's not like there are tons of images I save either, and when I do, I use Save Image in Folder to save to a specific folder for an image type.

hey hey Chrome bros!

Chrome because Firefox never releases memory when closing tabs, and I have better things to do with the 1GB ram of my poor computer.

>>7662381
Have you used FX since 3.6?
Because mine released memory fine way back at 4, now I'm on nightly and it never goes over 350MB total.
Memory is an outdated argument for chrome, same as speed.

>>7662381
Install CleanMem

>>7662381
Not really. First when opening 110+ tabs, second after closing 100 of them.

>>7661920
Yaw, diablo II :3

Warming up for beta?

>>7662397
Yes, I have FX5 installed, with ABP, Scriptish and stylish and memory always hovers around 400-500MB after some hours of browsing with one tab, and goes upwards from there. Chrome right now is at 230 after 7 hours of constant shitposting.

>>7662413
You are proving my point

I need....more adddons.

>>7662424
Your point was that it doesn't release memory after closing tabs, but it does. Absolute amounts of memory used doesn't make much sense, because it will be different depending on the available memory in your system.

>>7662424
I don't know what's wrong there then. It's been months since mine went over 400MB.
Could be some underlying problem, maybe an OS fuck up or something?

No he's not... >Firefox never releases memory when closing tabs. That's exactly what it's doing.

>>7662438

If I open 110 tabs on firefox here, I will get an OOM error and it will crash.

>>7662424
>Yes, I have FX5 installed, with ABP, Scriptish and stylish and memory always hovers around 400-500MB after some hours of browsing with one tab
I have the same extensions, use 3-4 tabs on average and it never goes above 250mb here, maybe the problem is not firefox'

>>7662448
Now that's bad. And it's definitely not firefox's fault.

>>7662448
Get more memory.

>>7662424
RAM is cheap as dirt nowadays.
For me browsing is not a race but a long-term travel, so I put comfort over the speed. I have both browsers installed and they are both fine. Chrome is more light-weighted but I haven't stacked it with addons, so not sure about real memory consumption. Firefox users should be careful with extension obsession, some addons are badly written, and eat a lot of RAM and slow down page processing. With tuned setup I dont see much difference in terms of speed between FF and Chrome.

Chrome, because it's pretty.

>>7662461
I don't know what the point of Chrome/ium is nowadays.
Nightly is more lightweight and a lot faster even with basic addons.
Maybe Canary puts up a good fight, I don't know...

I can't be the only one that's gay for transparency.

>>7662461
>>7662459
Ram is cheap when your motherboard has DDRII or DDRIII slots.

I won't waste 25% of my unemployment payment (50-60 euros) to buy 2x1GB DDR sticks (only 2 slots on motherboard).

What VN's does /g/ read?

What video games does /tg/ play?
Does /mu/ prefer dickgirl or giantess eromanga?
Who's /lit/'s favorite camwhore?
What's /t/'s best natural scenerey-themed wallpaper?
What did /int/ think of the final episode of the Sopranos?
Does /u/ really believe the US put a man on the moon?
According to /e/, who is whiter: Argentinians or Brits?
Has anyone on /o/ collected all 151 pokemon using the link cable on the original Pokemon red and blue?
Can /k/ tell me if my HD6970 is dying? Where are all these artifacts coming from?
Does /soc/ prefer the arty GitS movies, or do they all favor the atmosphere of the syndicated television series and comics?
If /a/ was backed into their home during a violent crackdown on gun rights by the Obama regime and the Feds were encircling your home readying to trample your constitutional rights, would you turn to your riced-out AR-15 modified for 6.5mm Grendel rounds, or your semi-automatic domestically manufactured AK-74 replica?

>>7662465
Not foxy enough

Microsoft Internet Explorer 5 for Mac

Iron, I should probably switch to Chrome or Chromium what with all the botnet stuff and such but I don't feel like transferring all my data manually.

>>7662471

>>7662473
I think I'll post these later.

It's called a memory leak guys.

>>7662482
And I haven't had a single one since I was using FX3.6 with a badly setup debian system. Even then the cause of the leaks was in the xorg or something, not firefox's fault.

Opera. all the other browser can suck my dick

>>7662473
Except we all use browsers.

>>7662487
It doesn't matter what the underlying fault is. If other browsers don't have it, it's YOUR problem.

You have a typical Linux mentality. That is why it will never become big.

>>7662496
As >>7662461 said it maybe a problem with some addon(s), so of course other browser may not have it, because it doesn't have this addon.

>>7662496
Other browsers did have it as well, I'm not stupid enough to use a browser with that large of a fault even if it's my own.
And I fixed it shortly after by doing a full system reinstall and upgrading to FX4 (Being scared to use nightly for some reason). The problem didn't affect chromium either after that.

I don't get what you mean by Linux mentality... Fix it yourself we won't help you shit? Or what?

Firefox 5. I installed because 3.6 was having random hangs and I thought upgrading might fix it.
It didn't.
I miss my Unofficial Dublin theme.

>>7662519
You've disabled compatibility checking right? Should be able to use any theme maybe modify it slightly for changed parts.

>>7662468
Chrome has multi-processing, Firefox doesn't which makes the whole browser hang if one tab hang. Unless you have only a single core/threaded processor.

Firefox is faster in opening tabs and printing, Chrome is faster in rendering and javascript.

I personally benchmarked Chrome dev, Firefox 5, Nightly 32 and 64bit and Opera Next.
I opened 400+ bookmarks,
Chrome and Opera Next had about the same RAM usage, Chrome was more responsive thanks to multi-processing.
Nightly 64bit's RAM usage kept growing thanks to memory leaks and was barely usable.
Firefox 5 and Nightly 32 bit both crashed because of the memory limitation.

M-x w3m

>>7662509
I mean pushing the problem to the (truthfully) original cause. Although everyone realizes it SHOULD actually be fixed by the other guy who maintains his code that's giving the problem, in real life this usually means the application has a bug that won't get fixed.

It's Linux mentality, because if you take the end-user in mind first of all, you'll make a workaround for what is not 'your' bug.

>>7662528
Oh so it's a multithread and 64bit issue? I stick with nightly32 and have a single core.
I never have more than 100 or so tabs open so everything works fine. Never passing 500MB in extreme cases and staying responsive the entire time.

>>7662552
It's more of a memory leak issue, but as long as you don't have more 100 tabs you shouldn't have any problems.

I also forgot to mention in >>7662528, Chrome is supposed to be more stable, thanks to multi-processing again, and more secure.

>>7662528
Well, never care about browser benchmarks. It is just for marketing stuff. Even if one browser is few ms faster with processing of 9000 JS lines it doesn't matter irl. Try both browsers: browse your common sites, check extensions etc. then stick with one you feel is more convenient.

>>7662565
Interesting enough.
The only security thing I've heard about Chrome is sandboxing. Is there something else to it?

>>7662572
>Is there something else to it?
The fact that a big company is working on it and they give rewards for bug fixers.

Firefox 5.
I've had nothing but problems since version 4, constant crashing and freezing, but I can't switch browsers because I'm too dependent on my addons.

>>7661957
Just gonna say that I installed 4chan x, then immediately uninstalled and got 4chan plus.

>>7662602
Outdated and a lot less function to plus, but I ain't going to stop you.

Opera.

Got Firefox and Chrome installed, but I never use them.

>>7662565
Stability: I never have issues with FF (and Chrome as well). Maybe I use them wrong and dont open 500+ tabs, but I dont think that sane user will get any problem.

Security: Highly arguable stuff. Really, the biggest security is you own head - don't open fishy links, use no script and you will be safe. Both browser do fine in terms of protection, can see any huge advantage here.

And you forgot about Google spying after the Chrome users, and collect data about their actions. If you want give advices don't be one-sided.

>>7662619
>And you forgot about Google spying after the Chrome users, and collect data about their actions.
That's been optional from the start, and completely anonymous either way. And it's not spying when they tell the users about it. Just saying.