>UK

>UK

>UK

>illegal in UK

>UK

Fucking hell, Labour expect to stay in power with this shit? Or do they expect to be voted out, and are thinking "LETS TAKE THE COUNTRY DOWN WITH US!"

I checked to make sure I wasn't on /a/ or /v/.

>>4835955

a bit late for that. If you vote against them you'll be arrested as a paedophial.

>>4835972
>paedophial
a what

Ridiculous.

"Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem. From time to time we've been tempted to believe society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else?"

>>4835955
You are currently engaging in a process of illegal thoughts. Your duty, as a citizen, is to vote for us. Your IP will be contained in an information database that might be used against you in court. Contact the nearest local police department to inform them about your crime or you might be fined for this too.

Stop making these threads, they're not even about Japan.

>>4836025
OTAKU CULTURE

British government showing their incompetence yet again.

Why was it America was formed?

Security cameras on every street, an old veteran getting arrested and sent to jail for turning in to the police a gun that was dumped on his property, now this...
Face it, England is already Airstrip One.

>>4836064
Something to do with tectonic plates and cooling magma, I think.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/pets/7538391/Great-grandmother-given-an-electronic-tag-and-curfew-
for-selling-a-goldfish-to-a-14-year-old.html

>>4836011
1984, anyone?

>>4836120
> Under new animal welfare laws, passed in 2006, it is it illegal to sell goldfish to under 16s.

> In July 2009, Trafford council sent a 14 year old boy to the shop and after Mrs Higgins failed to ask the boy for identification she and her son were summoned to court.

What the fuck is the British government smoking?

>>4836129
I have no fucking idea.
I'm British, surely I should know where these ideas are coming from, since the government are supposed to represent us, but god-fucking-damn, where the hell are they pulling these laws and policies from?

>The evidence presented for this conviction clearly demonstrates that it is irresponsible to sell animals to those who are not old enough to look after them

Excluding the fact that the pet store the lady ran was terrible. Why the fuck do you need to be 1 to have a fish. For Christ's sake you clean out the bowl and sprinkle in some fish flakes 2-3 times a day and that's it.

UK is crazy man.

>>4836166
Frustration because they can't ban bluefin tuna and whales. So they figure they need to ban species that is closer to home and damaging to the main villain Japan.

Which is goldfish.

That's logical if you ask me. Goldfish are tied directly to their culture. So that's gotta be a hit.

>>4836173
It's a bad law. It's there, I presume, to prevent the younger kids from getting their own goldfish and having it die within a week or so because a lot of goldfish species are actually way more sensitive than is appropriate for such a supposedly 'easy' past to take care of.
So goldfish dying left and right isn't a good thing, of course, but actually making it into a law, suggesting it is a societal problem of enough consequence that it needed to be legislated upon, makes it a bad law.

But Britain, frankly, has a lot of bad laws these days. It's one of the most borderline fascist countries in the G20, and number 1 in the G8.

Where can I move where they have little to no government involvement in my life, guys?

>>4836260

Africa

>>4836120
>www.telegraph.co.uk

What's more hilarious than the story reported in this articles is seeing non-British people thinking of a the Telegraph as a reputable newspaper.
In truth, it's just a shitty sensationalistic tabloid no better than the Daily Mail. This is not the first time I see it spinning a story to serve their own political's ends and it certainly won't be the last.

>>4836260
Is it easy to move to another EU country from the UK? I'm a dumb American and don't know how that works.

>>4836276
lol

>>4836260
With decent enough internet and gaijin-friendly? Avoid South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Finland, and Sweden if you don't have enough financial backup.

India, Russia, or Indonesia should be good enough. Dunno about South American.

OH NO THE UK WILL LOSE ALL THE CREDIBILITY IT NEVER HAD AS A FREE COUNTRY

>>4836283
UK haets EU and is yet a member, so it's more complicated.

>>4836260
America!

freest country in the world

>>4836276
lol'd

Maybe there will be a massive uprising in the UK and all you muppets will start killing each other. It will be fun to watch on the news.

I would like to thank the UK politicians for helping make the US and Canada look good by passing shittier laws than anything here.

I feel bad for my cousin.

I would like to thank the UK politicians for helping make the Australia look good by passing shittier laws than anything here.

I cannot wait for ANARCHY IN THE UK

>>4836339
Given that we might be passing a law that bans us from accessing 4chan and many other sites that contain offensive images, this refers to not only sexually explicit images but also violence etc, I'd wait a while before making such a judgment.

>>4836277
Do you mean that they're lying about the bill being passed?

Being a shitty tabloid is irrelevant if what they post is true.

That's not a defense at all.

>>4836285
Eh? You can get by on a decent budget in both South Korea and Japan if you don't live in the heart of a major city and a pittance if you live in the country, but it's like that in most places, including Russia.

I wouldn't exactly call Indonesia 'gaijin-friendly' either. Sure, the tourist places like Batam and economic hubs of western commerce are fine, but the cost of living isn't exactly cheap in those places either.

>>4836375
No the telegraph.co.uk is about the goldfish, not the bill.

>>4836389
Always avoid the metropolis to save cost. Outskirt or nearby major cities usually provides enough infrastructure and internet.

Research first.

Im hoping that this is another scaremongering law passed to cut down on crime, but will only be enforced 1% of the time in order to keep the newspapers happy.
The amount of laws we have which are rarely, if ever, enforced here in the UK is astounding.

>>4836285

I'm taught English in South Korea.

Payed for all my expenses and I still had some money leftover.

Also visiting Japan is really cheap as well.

>>4836423
1. Thorough enforcement is expensive
2. Target one convincing criminal (poor guy) and focus all bombastic media resource on him for one satisfying week; make him an example to strike fear amongst the populace

Pretty much like what most terrorist do, like RIAA.

>>4836430
Yeah, your Engrish is showing. You're no different than Japanese with their broken English language education system.

>>4836446
Until they announce that they've hired a huge-ass team of people to monitor everyone's Internet browsing, I doubt there's anything to worry about, unless you're the one guy who gets given 12 000 years in jail for downloading a Lady Gaga song.