chinks are 85iq poorfags

But China has gone from absolutely nothing to this in 30 years. Where will they be in another 30 years?

>implying GDP has any influence on military might

>>637107
in civil war I figure

From 2000 - 2008 GDP of China grew by 2.75 trillion USD.

During the same time GDP of USA grew by 4.54 trillion USD.

Where is your god now?

>>637107
All it takes is a collapse of the Chinese economy and people will riot. And everyone know the china economy is lacking in foundation.

>>637145
if chinese economy collapses, you think it wont affect everyone elses?

>>637151

I think it will make the shit we buy from them cheaper

>>637151
You say this like that would stop it from happening. These "global economy" people are fucking retards.

>>637103
>China isn't a threat to anyone, no matter how many people live there.

We should be grateful for China's one-child policy. Otherwise they'd have taken over the entire planet by now; all they'd have to do is export the "excess" population.

Africa needs better leaders, BTW. The ones they have now suck.

>>637145
>All it takes is a collapse of the Chinese economy and people will riot.

Especially in the US, since China will drag Uncle Sam down with them.

The PRC denies its people very basic rights. The greatest threat it poses is to the Chinese people.

>>637151
It will prove that China is a bad investment and globalization will fail. Everyone will be mad for a while but will be happy since globalization have been proven to be a disaster. More jobs in the local economy.

>>637229

Man the investors are going to love when they lose everything they have.

>>637229
Being against a free market global economy is like being against evolution by natural selection.

>>637258
That doesn't even make sense.

The "global economy" is not a free market, its main purpose is to attempt to create a dependence on other countries for the purposes of avoiding war. Whoever came up with that retarded theory was an idealistic bag of dicks.

>>637293

>its main purpose is to attempt to create a dependence on other countries for the purposes of avoiding war

Or, you know, buying from other markets what you can't find in yours.

>>637293
Capital moves freely and instantly over borders. We are in the era of a free market global economy. You can't stop it because of the wealth it generates. It won't go away until civilization is destroyed.

>>637205
>implying that if China and the US collapse it wouldn't turn the world into one giant Africa

>>637298
You would get those goods or services anyway. What, you think no trade happened at all before 1980?

The global tie-in thing is nothing but a social scheme to attempt to make countries dependent on one another. It has nothing to do with actually improving any single aspect of a local economy.

>>637317
lol

>implying it isn't the US that keeps the shitty parts of the world (Africa, Southeast Asia, South America) shitty

>>637320

Huh? Before the 80s the USA still had an industry.

>>637317
Why would it?

Finally, someone with some sense

Protip: Its because they are a DEVELOPING country.

>>637382
>made the first thread in my life
>accused of making 10 threads a day
>typical chinese

as your theory goes:
divide usa to small countries like whats it like in eu
each of them would be peaceful like shit and absolutely no threat to no body
conclusion:
uncle sam is damn peace-loving and of course would not force their will on other contries because of their natural resource or whatever

>>637103
>Implying the dark continent could unify when even niggers within a country hates each other.
>Implying a United Africa can grow at double digits per year for 30 years.

>>637124
>Implying China will be in civil war, when even exiled students of 1989 agree with current Chinese policies.

>>637145
>Implying China's economy will collapse, and that its growth is 'lacking in foundation'.
China is the first country out of the recession, survived numerous bubbles, the majority of its growth is in tangible goods, and their economic model mirrors the 'miracle growth' of Japan and South Korea, except they learned to avoid the pitfalls that limited the aforementioned economies.

>>637197
>Implying China can 'export' its population, and that the One Child Policy wasn't a good thing for China.

>>637219
>Implying rights such as Education and Food/Water aren't 'basic' human rights, and that a country needs democracy to thrive.
lol India.

>>637407
>Implying he's accusing you of being Chinese
Typical gweilo.

>>637197
>Africa needs better leaders
Africa needs white leaders.

>>637661
>Africa needs white leaders.

They already tried that. Didn't go so well.

>>637599
>Implying China can 'export' its population,

You don't have illegal immigration on your planet?

>and that the One Child Policy wasn't a good thing for China.

Your planet doesn't have reading lessons either?

dem growth rates

/thread

>>637599
>implying China isn't bound to self-destroy

>>637676
Shit was better than it is now.

>>637691
>Implying China is facilitating illegal immigration on a national level.
lol @ gweilo delusions.

>Your planet doesn't have reading lessons either?
>Implying he didn't say China would 'take over the world' without the One Child Policy.

>>637731
>Implying China is just because you want it to.

>>637790
>implying a buttload of made-up shit

The problem is that africa doesn't unite. It would be nice if they created some kind of loose african union, though. They have to protect themselves from chinese neo-imperialism somehow. I'd like to see a strong africa. A balance of powers is good for everyone in the world

>>637892
>it would be nice if they created some kind of a loose african union
>doesn't know about the african union

>>637883
>Implying I made shit up
>Implying you're not butthurt

>Implying OP didn't failed at trolling so he went to /new/ instead.
>>>/new/540295

>>637103
>implying GDP per capita is what important, not economical and other soft powers, amount of warheads, delivery ways and assault weaponry

>>637927
>implying the two threads werent made at practically the same time

lol and you just proved yourself a fucking idiot because you visit /new/

>>637912
I know about it, but it doesn't seem very useful. They should try to avoid civil wars and promote economical reforms to boost growth in Africa. This way they might stop the exploitation of Africa

>Implying the gwailo chink won't get 50rmb per post

>>637948
I hope he does. If every chinese citizen shows that much genuine nationalism, it's worrying. I have no problem if he tries to correct incorrect notions about china, though

lol

>>637939
>Implying OP didn't post in his own thread.
Take a look at the samefaggotry in both threads, retard.

>you just proved yourself a fucking idiot because you visit /new/
lol @ gweilo. You think I'll be satisfied with just one board? I'll go wherever there's fun.

>>637978
I am the OP. the following posts are mine:

>>637103
>>637124
>>637326

the one you quoted,
and this one.

not samefagging if i'm not pretending to be different people.

>>637978
Can't you at least stop that gweilo shit? It's pretty irritating. I guess no one has a problem with decent discussions about China, but at least we don't say "chink chink chink" in every post.

>>637995
I don't mind if you say chinky chink chink, gweilo. It's pretty hilarious, which is why I do it. If that really gets in the way of decent discussions/arguments, then I'll drop it.

yeah but the big difference is that china is still a rural country, about 57% of people live in farms. And yet still agriculture is only 13% of China's GDP, since most of this farming communities live on their own, while is true they technically live with less of a dollar a day, they have food and shelter unlike poor niggers in Africa. That’s why they bring china’s average down, but several of the industrialized regions of china are equal to other countries entire economies.

>>637317

It wouldn't turn the world to a giant Africa, but governments would have to step in and strictly control and distribute resources to avoid starvation and anarchy.

GDP is good for finding out how well off citizens live.

GNP is good for finding out how important a nation is.

Those tiny ass micro-nations in Europe have high GDPs, and when were they relevant to world politics or even economics?