>>460594

Open door, see nigger rush, close the door.

American here. We must sterile the mexicans because they breed like roaches.

NIGGER RUSH KEKEKEKE

50 years ago people were saying OH NOES THE WORLD WILL COLLAPSE DUE TO OVERPOPULATION. Now we are three billion more than they were back then and still no collapse. I don't think it's an issue.

>>460615

Mexican here, we must sterile the gringos because they type like retards.

>>460594
Population density isn't the problem, resources are.

Though in the US it still wouldn't be a problem, since it uses a quarter of the world's.

>>460623
True, but what about when there are 4 billion more?

Already in arid places water is running out, and resource consumption is going straight up

brazilfag here
same as OP, our density is low due to a large territory
not an issue
maybe in over 9000 years
but china is surely screwed

Things will be fine, birth rates have been dropping and in most countries it's negative, the world population growth will come to a halt soon.

>>460658
True but much of your land is Rainforest

That shit cannot go

>>460638
Those people will die. Sucks to be them, yes.

Living in the netherlands we got a population of 16,5 mil which is a-fucking lot if you compare it with sweden's 9 mil with such a streak of land.
Oh, and immigrants keep on coming.

>>460708
lol nederlanders are so fucked
such tiny country with a gigantic population
incoming shitstorm

Total population is a huge problem.

To be sustainable it should probably only be around 1-2 billion.

Also the demographic switch is going to cause a lot of problems.

In 100 years when there are half as many native Europeans as there are now and twice as many African Europe is going to become New Africa.

>>460752
No, they're gonna be swarmed by Muslims, Indians and Mexicans first.

YUROP IS DOOMED

>>460725
Plus for added fun, water levels are rising due to glaciers melting across the globe

Amsterdam is gonna be underwater in a few decades when levels rise several meters

>>460725

Yeah, the white birthrate is slightly out of balance and there aren't enough childeren to increase the numbers of white population.
On the other hand muslims nest like fucking ants.

>>460773

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Works

niggers will flood the world

>>460594

Canada here.

Smooth sailing till the end of the planet for us!.

You could comfortably fit the entire worlds population in Texas.

True story.

>>460594

1. Don't do anything about global warming
2. watch icecaps melt, build floodwalls, laugh at poor countries who can't afford them.
3.??????
4 PROFIT!

Slovenia is going to go from 2 million to 500k people in 2050, I wouldn't mind that as long as immigrants don't replace them.

Is the World Over Populated? Lets do the math... The World Can Fit In Texas

The world has a surface area of 510.072 million sq km. Well clearly we can
not live any where on the surface of the world as the majority of it is
water 361.132 million sq km. The remainer is the land mass 148.94 million sq
km. So what is the population of the human race? Estimate is currently at
6,525,170,264 (July 2006 est.).

Now let us do some translations. For every 148 sq km you get 37,000 acres of
land.

37,000 acre = 148 sq Km meaning that the world has about 3.68*10 to the 10th
Acres of land. I will be using 37,000,000,000 acres for the math below. Now
if you were to split that land up between all the people of the earth and
gave each one a share each would get 5.67 acres of land.

37,000,000,000/ 6,525,170,286 = 5.67 acres per person

That does not sound like a lot does it? Some may say "Much of the land is
unliveable" and they are right so let look at a area where we could make it
nearly totally liveable. The Great State of Texas. Texas has a surface area
of 261,797 square miles.
1 square mile = 3,097,600 square yards = 640 acres
640 * 261,797 = 167,550,080 acres in Texas

Now lets say we move all the people of the world to the state of Texas. They
would each get only .02568 acres of land.
167,550,080 / 6,525,170,286 = .02568 acres per person

That does not sound like alot. But wait how much is .02568 acres?
1 acre = 4,840 square yards
4,840 * .02568 = 124.29 square yards
1 square foot = 1/9 square yard
124.29 * 9 = 1,118.61 square feet

Thusly if we moved every living human to Texas and the split the land amoung
them they would each get 1,118.61 square feet. Now you may say that still
does not sound like alot. But consider the average square footage of a
house.

http://www.census.gov/const/C25Ann/sftotalmedavgsqft.pdf
http://www.pcdf.org/Meadows/squarefootage.htm

"The average American house in the 1940s had an area of 1200 square feet".
Well that means individually each person could have almost a house worth of
space to live in. But there is more as we know most people don't live alone.

http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/hh6.pdf

The average population of a household in the USA is 2.5. Ok then combined
the average household in this World Population Texas would have a living
space of about 2,796.5 square feet. Easily a nice sized living space. But
the "Over populated world crowd" may say "You need roads, schools and other
things then just living space", and they would be right. Let us consider New
York City.

http://www.citypopulation.de/USA-NewYork.html
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/landusefacts/landusefactshome.shtml

8,143,197 People live in the area of New York City. New York City's land
area covers 321 square miles (almost 206,000 acres or nine billion square
feet). So how much land are does the average New York Citizen use?
206,000 Acres / 8,143,197 People = .02529 acres

.02529 acres per person in a working, functional, and "Safe" city. How much
land would the people get in our Total World Population in Texas? .02568
acres per person. Wow nearly exactly the same amount, and in fact it would
be a little more spaceous then New York City is.

The US seems to be doing pretty well. Kinda.

We're on the cusp of a population shift. People are seriously sick of the midwest, the south has lots of cheap land, and I'm guessing even the northeast (sans NYC, which is its own creature) is going to have a dwindling growth rate compared to the west coast and south.

Honestly, who the fuck is going to pick Detroit/Philly over Austin/Jacksonville now they the former don't even have jobs to make up for the shitty weather and crime?

CONCLUSION: The total world population could move to Texas and make Texas in
to a functional MEGA city that acre by acre would look much like New York
City does today. Leaving the Rest of the world with out a single person on
it. Image Russia and China devoid of people. The only humans you could find
would live in Texas. And that city would be as safe as New York City is
today, Skyscrapers and parks included.

Summery: The world ISN'T over populated and has a long way to go before
getting any where near it. The truth is that man kind is spread around and
yet even with the spread we seem to perfer to live in cities. So we group up
and naturalist get upset at seeing these groups and think that is a sign of
over population. It is all a game on their part and don't buy in to it.

Well for starters there's gonna be a lot more Soylent Green on the shelves.

>>461131
Hey, dumbfaggot. The problem isn't running out of space. It's RESOURCES.

>>461131
Let's do it. I always wanted to move to a warmer place anyway.

>>461131
What about water? Sanitation? Pollution? Resources?

>>461097
>>461109
>>461114
>>461131
You put a lot of effort into that.

Yet you don't realize that the issue of overpopulation isn't land, but resources.

>>461163

>"The United States is sitting on over 100 years of gas supply at the current rates of consumption," he said. Because natural gas emits half the greenhouse gases of coal, he added, that "provides the United States with a unique opportunity to address concerns about energy security and climate change."

>Recoverable U.S. gas reserves could now be bigger than the immense gas reserves of Russia, some experts say.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/02/AR2009120204305.html


>U.S. is Saudi Arabia of coal

>According to the U.S. Energy Department, the United States has 267.3-billion short tons of coal reserves, or 26.8 percent of the world total.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/jan/25/rudy-giuliani/us-is-saudi-arabia-of-c
oal/

>The U.S. is sitting on the world's largest, untapped oil reserves

>untapped reserves are estimated at about 2.3 trillion barrels, nearly three times more than the reserves held by Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) nations and sufficient to meet 300 years of demand -- at today's levels --

http://www.kiplinger.com/businessresource/forecast/archive/The_U.S._s_Untapped_Bounty_080630.html

>>461169
then why don't use them now that your economy is down the shitter?

>>461163


>Iowa is often known as the "Food Basket of the World",

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa>>461160

>>461160
>>461154
>>461181
no point arguing with a troll, especially a copypasta troll

>>461182
Because the government, oddly enough. A lot of those resources are on public land, and the government won't let anyone touch it. Even Bush couldn't do it when he tried to open up more land in Alaska for oil drilling.

>>461182


Too expensive to do in the past. But companies are now in the process of gearing up to recover shell gas and oil in the US.

It will become more profitable when prices go higher.

>>461187
Kind of like how your sporting events are often known as "the world series"?

>>461194

i looked into those claims

not a single one has been confirmed by anone outside of the US,

Im gonna go ahead and call bluff.

>>461203

No.

>>461203


We export billions and billions of dollars worth of food.

Probably more than everyone else.

Natural resources is something Canada and the US are blessed with.

You go on with your butthurt though. Makes my massive american penis harder.

>>461212


You know better than the US Department of Energy.

Shit nigga, you should apply for a job there then.

Nuclear war, you dunce. And when all is clear of smoke, I'll write the new history, and birthing cycles shall be implemented!

>>461240
>>461240

>Canada and the US are blessed with.

<3 form Canada.

>>461252

i wasn't raised in an american school system.

i know more then all your scientists politicians and educational personal put together.

>>461268


:D

<3 from America

Land space is not an issue, since any moderate size country could actually hold the entire human population. The problem is resources and way of life, for example the American way of life used more resources than the Chinese, and they need more resources despite being just having a quarter of china’s population. So the real problem is a collapse of services and economy for lack of resources, but in reality you don’t need more population, just that china and India raise their living standards, and need more resources until the point of collapse

>>461269
a truly eloquent argument,brohammed

we can produce enough food, and there is plenty of space just as soon as people get their shit together.

>>461268

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrA4V6YF6SA

I salute you Canada. No country in the history of this planet has been lucky enough to have a neighbor such as yourselves.

When the Russians eventually make an attempt at drinking your milk shake, we will be right there to drop the hammer on them.

What will happen?

Liberals and socialists are on the verge of losing every voters in europe(democrats are liberals are a different system) Then radical-right wing parties will shut down borders and make a self-sufficent fortress europe, because europe is actually overprodocing food now. Then, the rest of the world will be down in the shitter, just like africa now.

Same happens with america, australia, japan, korea and the european parts of russia.


And nothing of value was lost.

>>461378
>>461378


>europe is actually overprodocing food now.

SPAIN is over producing food. Do not try to leech of off us FAGGOT.

Mongolico estupido.

>BAAAW HYOOMANITY IS DYIIING

>Continue to use cars, litter, and have a carboon footpint larger than the ego of the average anon

Yeah, greentards. You are fucking logical.
Its not global warming whats killing us. Not climate change. Not industry.

Us. As long YOU and the average joe doesnt give a fuck, thinks paper plates are somehow more "green" than normal plates and unwilling to change his living methods the planet is fucked.

Got that? Reeducated the westernn society?

Now do that with the niggers of africa, the tribes and cartels of south america and the chinese.

>>461402

And germany, and netherlands, and hungary, and romania and france and.....

And we arent really using GMOs, hydroponics, hyperextensive farming and such. Europe could feed several billion people.

>>461402
nice fake spanish. a spaniard would never use those terms.

>>461413

>thinks paper plates are somehow more "green" than normal plates

>OH MUM LOOK IMMA SAVING WATER AND DETERGENTS BY PRODUCING MORE TRASH

This makes me mad. Environmentalists always tend to forgot that shipping and manufacturing shit is far more expensive than cleaning some water.

Environmentalists hate evrything including economics though, its some kind of evil devil to them.

>>461402
yes, next time you try to troll as a spaniard learn2spanish first man. lol.

>>461402
>>461402
>>461402
Real spaniard would have said "estúpido mongólico"

LRN2TROLL

Well my country is already so populated that there isnt even enough electricity for everyone, but that's the government's fault mostly

>>461503
no one older than 8 uses the word mongólico. WTF?

>>461543
wat?

>>461543
Venezuela isn't even close to overpopulated, just mismanaged.