France master race reporting in.

>America lost the Korean War
0/10

They got fucked when the chinks came in the war.

America never declared war on the Ottoman Empire.

>>4433125
Really?Really? Fuck off.

>>4433108
France made Ireland a protectorate.
LOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOL. No. citation needed.

>>4433084
What the fuck kind of stupidity am I looking at?
America has never, ever once lost a war. Ever. Korea? Stalemate, and only because of Truman's cautiousness in handling the situation. Vietnam? We killed millions of Vietcong and NVA. The objective of the war wasn't accomplished as Vietnam became a communist country, but we scored a massive military victory there.

And don't even say the War of 1812 - both countries consider it a draw.

>>4433167
Not winning = losing.
Deal with it.

Also, give me a template so I can rectify the nonsense I just had the misfortune of correcting.

>>4433167
Vietnam. Objective:Prevent the countries fall to communism.
Mission accomplished? NO.
Status:failure.

>>4433084
Quasi War, does not mean the US ever fought france

>>4433162
Good response.
>>4433150
But they didn't annex the entire Korean peninsula into communism now did they? America came in and defended South Korea. South Korea's very existence shows that we did win the war.(well technically the war isn't over but still)

>>4433177
Look up the term "war" in any dictionary.
war: (n) A state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state. (Dictionary.com)

Our armed forces obliterated Vietnam's. Our political objective wasn't accomplished, but it was rectified due to the fact that Vietnam didn't rise as a major communist power as thought.
(Instead it's now a shitty third-world Southeast Asian country with most of its citizens suffering in heavy poverty, haha!)

>>4433167
The States failed in their objective to annex Canada and Britain prevented the annexation of its colonies. You lost, deal with it.

>The United States
>Losing a war

OP is a Eurotrash in disguise, isn't he?

>>4433186
>Our armed forces obliterated Vietnam's.
And yet they never surrendered. Thus they were undefeated. They never stopped fighting, you did thus you forfeited. You couldn't force surrender so you didn't win, meaning you lost.Deal with it.

>>4433187
derp, You mean brtish oppressing US ships to france?

There really should be a "tied" opinion on there OP.

>>4433167
It's like they don't even have schools in murika

Since when did the United States fight Norway?

>British start war by stealing American sailors
>Capture (AND BURN) the fucking White House and still get nothing but a white peace
>Call it a victory anyway

Template?

>>4433125
>>4433196
>usa winning any war


ahahhahha

>>4433226
u jelly because we won every war but Vietnam?

>>4433226
Right, cause defeating the Brits and Japanese doesn't count. I know that the Pacific Theater was an Allied effort, but, like Russia in the European Theater, we did most of the work.

>>4433108
Sweden strong.
Suck it rest of Europe.

Russia kicked our ass, but with like 20 times the population. And they had help from the rest of Northern Europe.... The rest of Europe feared "Lejonet från Norden", so they ganged up against us and knocked us down.

And we still won most of the engagements with only a fraction of the population of our opponents. But still, our power relied on good leadership, high morale, decent diplomacy and advanced tactics, instead of just meat-wall. And it's hard to build a empire on that alone.

If the rest of Western Europe has supported Sweden against the Russian hordes the entire Baltic would have been way better off, the North would be united under strong leadership and a power to rely on with western values.

Swedes were better off when we gave up the great power ambitions, but the rest of the North suffered for it. Thanks Russia.

>USA
>won a war against Bosnia
>lost a war against Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia

What?

>>4433237
Finland beat Russia. Deal with it.

>And don't even say the War of 1812 - both countries consider it a draw.

Canadian highschool history classes teach that the US lost.

As far as I know only americans (and possibly UK/foreign) consider it a draw.

Finland has the most epic war victory of all time
OF ALL TIME

accept it, fägöts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_war

>>4433221
USA was shooting at the canadian border for months.

USA then sailed across the river and burned down the docks.

Britain sailed across in retaliation and burned down the white house.

>>4433239
The OP is a retard.

>>4433250
So everyone except the Canadians, who weren't even a country when it happened and wouldn't be for well over 100 years?

Britain started it and it ended in a white peace, that's either a draw or a victory for us.

What war did the US lose to Poland?
Also, Denmark. I kind of generalized and included wars where Denmark barely did anything. Also, I'm pretty sure we lost a war of coalition against France.

>Canada burning Washington
>twice

>draw

baaaahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
aaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahhahaha
ohhohohohohohohohohoh
dohohohohohohohohohohohohoho
hihihihihihihihihihihihihihihihihihihihih

HUE HUE HUE HUE HUE

In a war, if the aggressor fails to complete the mission, they lost. In 1812, the United States failed to annex Canada and therefore, the United States was defeated. Also, britfags are mad about that battle of new orleans.

>>4433257
...and still was forced to settle for a white peace.
Do you not know what a white peace means? It means that they didn't get anything out of the war. The war that they started, by impressing our sailors. Even though they captured and burned our capital city.

>>4433237
Anglo-Swedish War (1810–1812)

France threatened Sweden to declare war on the UK so Sweden being pussies had to declare war on the UK, so Britain just sent a few ships and did a naval blockade

>>4433165
>Protectorate OR satellite state.

Seriously, how did America fight a war against Poland and Norway in 1802?

>>4433265
>implying destroying someone's capital=victory
If that were the case then the French won when they burned Moscow to the ground.

>>4433278
But it was the Russians who burned Moscow...

>>4433276
I'm wondering the same thing. And when have we ever been at war with France?

>>4433274
I'm pretty sure that isn't using "satellite" in the usual sense. I've never heard of a country called "united Irishmen" for one thing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
No losses listed other than Vietnam according to wikipedia, which I know you will all denounce as wiki is generally bullshit.

>>4433224
>>4433173
I used this. It has pseudo-states included though.

>>4433198

We signed a fucking peace agreement after the Tet Offensive with them you fuckshit. That's like if Spain and France went to war, France fucked spain's shit up and Spain took 10x the casualties of France, then they signed a nonaggression treaty where France gets half of Spain, then Spain just goes and re-invades the land in complete violation of the treaty and international protocol. And you would call that a fucking Spanish victory. America won the Vietnam war, or at least, we didn't lose it. Oh, and France started it.

Sure is insecure buttfrustrated revisionist eurotrash history in here.

>>4433276
See >>4433274

>>4433278

>French
>burned Moscow

>>4433284
>Croatia
>German puppet state
>Taking the victory of the partisans
Dat history cherry-picking.

>>4433284
>won against Germany

yeah..that totally happened.

TEMPLATE FFS

Macedonia, map related

Someone should add an option like "Participated in a war against X"

wait
did we fight a war against China?

>>4433300
>Vietnam
>not a loss for America
Do you think the Ashanti beat the British, too?

>>4433319
Korea

>>4433306
>German puppet state
>Taking the victory of the partisans
The puppet state was a puppet state, unsupported by a large majority of Croats who were also its victims. As for the Partisans the first unit was organised in Croatia by Croats, Josip Broz Tito was a Croat and the idea of a united state of South Slavs was originally an idea of the Croatian Illyrian movement. So piss off.

>>4433308
Take a look at how WWII ended.

>>4433309
See >>4433319
>>4433294
If 'we' is the US, yes, Boxer Rebellion, or maybe they're counting Korean war.

>>4433325
wasn't that a stalemate?

>>4433336
Yes, OP is just a colossal fag.

>>4433271
"The war, however, existed only on paper"

>>4433263
The amounts of wars Sweden/Denmark have fought is just silly.
We still don't say Danes as much as we just say "Danskjävlar!" or "Danskjävlarna"
Translates to the Danish Devils.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlTukY9fV9Y

>>4433324

What's your point?

>>4433331
Yeah, the Wehrmacht was totally defeated by the Croat partisans. This is what ended the war.

>>4433345
Yes, it is. Partisans had almost no foreign support. We won the war, what is your problem?

>>4433274
But It was neither. The only time you even sent troops they never even fucking landed. And your ships were blown onto the coast and ran from the british.

>>4433274
>Claiming a group of rebels constitute a state.
Nope.

>>4433343
The Ashanti accomplished their goals, which is a lot more than you can say about America in Vietnam.
So by your argument, the Ashanti won the War of the Golden Stool, even though it resulted in their annexation.

>>4433352
These maps are just simplified versions. I don't think Croatia can claim victory against Germany when their country became a German puppet state, unlike say, Serbia, which was occupied by a military government. Croatia was a member of the Axis, Serbia wasn't.

>>4433352
>We won the war
>Croats
>winning WWII

>>4433274
>US
>against the French

didn't they fund some of the war for France?

>>4433363
Read
>>4433331

Croats were not members of the Axis and the puppet regime in Croatia WAS an occupation, Croats continued fighting the Germans and Italians and at the end were on the winning side, what methods Germans used to attempt controlling the occupation is irrelevant. NDH was not supported by the Croatian population and the "Croatian" Nazi camps still included Croats. Concerning Serbia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commissary_Government
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_National_Salvation_%28Serbia%29

Germans installed puppet regimes everywhere.

>>4433382

Yeah, but at first they were all "ooo, we're going to be giant cunts and not pay back the debt we owe you. why? because that was when the monarchy was in power. you revolutionaries/republic now!!"

>>4433331
>unsupported by a large majority of Croats

the Nazis arrival in Zagreb: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tvw9nxukKos&feature=related

boy they sure hate those nazis

I'm only counting formal declarations of war, because undeclared military action is a giant clusterfuck and a half. Korea and Afghanistan should be considered draws. Red border is World War I, yellow border is World War II, black border is both.

>>4433402
>Nazi camps included Croats

>>4433436
>Canada
>a country during either World War
>implying you weren't an autonomous colony

>>4433448
Canadian declaration of war was done independent from Britain in World War II. Declaration of war in World War I was technically done by Britain but it doesn't change the divisions of Canadian soldiers who fought and died in the Canadian army fighting under Canadian generals while flying the Canadian flag. Canada's military, save the airforce until after World War I, was completely independent of Britain's.

>>4433402
>>4433402
>NDH was not supported by the Croatian population
Oh you silly Croats, you might have the Westernfags fooled but come on, seriously.
Ko vas ne zna skupo bi vas platio.

>>4433419
>boy they sure hate those nazis
Yes, they did, and hand-picking videos won't change it. The ones being happy there were happy because the pro-Serbian oppresive regime of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was over, not because they love Nazis, they didn't even know who Nazis were, just a bunch of Germans to them. And you had Nazi supporters in every country. Does that mean anything? No.

I'll again repeat that Tito was a Croat and that the Partisans were formed in Croatia by Croats, 78 Croats and 1 Serb.

>>4433446
Maybe in the sense that German death camps also included Germans that were political prisoners.

>>4433446
Would you care explaining why you comment on things you're obviously completely oblivious about? Anyone who in any way showed discontent with NDH or cooperated with the Partisans was sent to a concentration camp, including my two great grandfathers.

>>4433461
The huge majority of the Croatian population supported the Partisans, yes.

Hint: Ovi tvoji te lazu.

>>4433479

Hint : Lažes samog sebe i tvoji te lažu.

>>4433488
>>4433479
>>4433461
Speak English, damn it.

>>4433494

Ne

>>4433494
>2. Posting in languages other than English is allowed—and encouraged!

>>4433488
A šuti molim te, da nije bilo nas nebi bilo ni Jugoslavije ni Tita. Odi prouči malo osnovnu povijest (iz ne-srpskog izvora) pa se onda javi.

1993, America lost against somalia war.
Silly boy

>>4433479
the number of croats killed in concentration camps is so low that its pretty much insignificant..

>>4433488
>i tvoji te lažu.
A ako te baš zanima "moji" hoće da mrzim Partizane.

>>4433506
Not according to Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Task_Force

>>4433504
>>4433502
>implying you're speaking a language and not a dialect of Serbian

>>4433504
Možda bi ti trebalo da poučiš istoriju van hrvatskih izvora pa da se javiš. Ne smatraju vas svi džabe nemačkim dupeliscima. Gde ima dima ima i vatre, kužiš?

Dat feel...

>>4433511
8% of conc. camp victims were Croats, 58% were Serbs. 8% is not insignificant and add in the huge amounts of Croats who died fightining in the Partisans.

>>4433538
source?

>>4433504

Da nije bilo vas, bilo bi isto kao da nije i bilo jednog od drugih.
Niste posebni, samo puni sebe i blago receno Kimichi Balkanska verzija.

>>4433535
I'd exclude the African nations. Their actual land area was associated with a power that defeated you, not their people or anything like that. Also, South America is kinda iffy, sure they declared war, but it's not like the majority did anything.

>>4433535
Forgot i didnt save agian.

>>4433527
>da poučiš istoriju van hrvatskih izvora pa da se javiš
A glupane, da to nisam napravio onda ne bi branio Partizane. Oli mislis da hrvatska vlada trči okolo s petokrakom i pjeva pjesme o Titu?

>>4433526
0/10

>vas svi džabe nemačkim dupeliscima
A samo vi, žao mi je vas Srba u koje sve pizdarije vjerujete.

>>4433546
*Kimchi

>>4433523
since when, wikipedia is trustful ?

>Stipe Mesic- Croat: we both 2 times in ww2 (reffering to saluting Germans and when they saw that things are not going well, they switched sides)

>1940-1945: 700k dead non-croats in death camp Jasenovac

>90s, NDH symbols, NDH symbols everywhere

boy you croats were sure innocent and on the right side in ww2

I feel like doing an English one would take my whole life. Lot of orange, lot of green, lot of black, lot of yellow, little bit of red in Europe.

>>4433545
Dragan Cvetković, a Serbian historian, it was publish by some historical institute from Belgrade.

>>4433556
Wikipedia is generally fairly accurate, since it's policed by incredibly autistic neckbeards who flip their shit at even the slightest bit of possible vandalism. This is especially true of anything involving recent wars.

>>4433562
>implying there'd be no red in America

>>4433557

you forgot

>2011 Thompson the singer: Hail Nazi, whole country jizzes on his concerts

Serbia here

Lost every war, still going strong

Fuck you pussies who won every war

>>4433278
Last time I checked, russians burnt their own city so the french army couldn't settle inside.
Actually, it's the french army that saved the kremlin to being burnt to a crisp.*
Napoleon thought the russians would surrender since the laws of war at this time implied than once a capitol is taken, the country lost.
But well, that's hard-living russians for you.

>>4433582
>implying we aren't better than you just by virtue of not losing

>>4433557
>Stipe Mesic- Croat: we both 2 times in ww2
So what some dickhead said sometimes is suddently an arugment? The current Croatian president is telling people to wear Partisan hats.

>they switched sides
God damn it, you retard, at least read the basic historical background. The first Partisan unit, which was formed by Croats, came in 1941., Tito himself was a Croat, what are you not getting here?

>1940-1945: 700k dead non-croats in death camp Jasenovac
A lot of non-Poles died in Nazi camps in Poland, derp. And it's barely 500,000, including Croats.

>90s, NDH symbols, NDH symbols everywhere
What about Chetnik symbols everywhere in Serbia during the 90s? Chetniks were also Nazi collaborationists and have, an several occasions, fought together with Ustashe under German command.

>boy you croats were sure innocent and on the right side in ww2
What is wrote in one of the previous posts is all I needed to say.

>>4433590
>implying that doesnt prove youre sissies
Real men aren't afraid of losing

>>4433582

Won plenty against Turks, won against Bulgarians, humiliated the Austrians quite a few times, etc. etc.

NOPE

>>4433575
>Thompson
OH BOY, HERE WE GO!

1) Thompson never said anything that in any way supports Nazis, some of his audience did. There are skinhead kids in every country.
2) Thompson constantly has problems with holding concents because they after just get banned.
3) Any portrayal of Nazi or Ustashe symbolism or their support is illegal in Croatia, anti-fascism is the main founding principle of this country.
4) When someone says he likes Thompson people facepalm him.

>>4433605
Fuck you pederu
Losing a war > winning a war

Any halfling French faggot can win a series of wars, it takes giant balls to lose a series of them

When we win, it's just interlude until we lose

>>4433598
Somehow that dickhead was your president few years ago but i guess he was the best dickhead of them all in the country

Also >2011 Prime minister Kosor salutes war criminals, nice touch croats

>>4433599
>America
>win against serbia
lol pyrrhic

>>4433582
fake serb is fake

Bring on all the hurpadurpa about what constitutes "winning"

What;s with fake serbs on this site, are other countries that pathetic to imitate serbs all day, erryday?

>>4433605

Also i forgot :
Made a global record chasing out Albanians, and probably would have stomped them to the end,
were it not for big bro USA and western powers.

Too bad, would have been funny if it all succeeded to the end.

>are other countries that pathetic to imitate serbs(or other countries) all day, erryday?
Yes, that's /int/'s standard operating procedure.

>>4433620
>that dickhead was your president few years ago but i guess he was the best dickhead
So there's no Serb better than Milošević, right? Croatian politicians are the worst Croatia has to offer.

>Prime minister Kosor salutes war criminals, nice touch croats
This never happened unless you're stupidly implying that Gotovina is a war criminal. I'll also not that this is completely unrelated to the original discussion here or the thread itself. You just don't have any arguments and instead of responding to anything I say you just attempt finding more bullshit to complain about and the more bullshit you say the more nonsense it is. Great job.

P.S., I want Kosor hanged, she wasn't even elected.

>>4433617
u live in the diaspora dont you?
also, bullshit.
except
>There are skinhead kids in every country.
>>4433625
either that or the truest of the true.>>4433504
>A šuti molim te, da nije bilo nas nebi bilo ni Jugoslavije ni Tita. Odi prouči malo osnovnu povijest (iz ne-srpskog izvora) pa se onda javi.

potpuno se slazem. Eto ko bi rekao da be se Srbin i Hrvat slozili da da nije bilo Hrvata nebi bilo ni Tita ni Jugoslavije ??

>>4433306
lol nothing out of character there...

>>4433647
>>4433647
ohh yeah, ponovo ja,
Capcha was pivo liti .
bottoms up momci

>Balkanians derail another thread

>>4433266
>To Stop british impressment of US ships tard.

>>4433654
nego sta....

>>4433642
>unless you're stupidly implying that Gotovina is a war criminal

im Serbian thats fine with me but then neither was Mladic or Hadzic or Kapetan Dragan...

>>4433625
>>4433631
>podrazumjevas da nisam srbin
Sta nemogu biti ponosan ocu koji je dao zivot za tvoju kozu?

>>4433504
>>4433647
>nebi bilo ni Jugoslavije ni Tita
Jeli vi picke znate da je bila jugoslavia prije tita? Jebo vam tito mater, trebo je vama u dalmatsku pozvati milione albanaca, a ne nama

"HURF DURF SERBS NEED TO BE WEAK FOR YUGOSLAVIA TO BE STRONG DERP"

Tito was a snake in the grass Croat working 24/7 at destroying serbs

>This never happened unless you're stupidly implying that Gotovina is a war criminal.
Wait, are you implying he isn't?

>>4433647
>u live in the diaspora dont you?
No, Dalmacija.
>also, bullshit.
What? Serbian news claim different?

http://www.057info.hr/zabava/2010-04-12/thompsonu-i-treci-put-zabranjen-nastup-u-pulskoj-areni

http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/25-dana-zatvora-zbog-ustaske-kape-na-koncertu-thompsona/393719.as
px

http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/pusic-thompsonovi-koncerti-privlace-ustasku-ikonografiju-i-sovini
sticko-ponasanje/390732.aspx

Clearly the Croatian government and public loves Thompson, right? He is liked only by rednecks who as Serbs would be kissing pictures of Arkan and listening to Ceca. If you're a Serb you should be glad but concerning how you fags just love looking for conflicts you'll just go ahead and imagine stuff in your head about Croatia just so you could keep shitting on about it. And while we're on it, I believe Thompson moved to Canada due to a overly negative atmosphere here.

>>4433462
I think you're stupid.

It might have been started by Croats, but at the end of the war, the Serbs formed a majority in the Partisans. Also, South Slavic union was started in Serbia before WWI, and Tito is half-slovenian.

Also, Nazi's were disgusted by what the Croats did to the Serbs and their corpses. Even those monsters disliked your monsters.

balkans gona balk?

>>4433642

Honestly, i'm fucking with ya, i hate our politicians from the deep of my heart, although i do think that majority of croats dun goofd when ww2 started and jasenovac really nailed you to german side (i honestly dont understand that hate in the 40s towards serbia, probably the king wanted to take your moniez) but i understand that media did its best to justify it, just as our media tried to justify bombing of your cities in 90s, that was uber retarded imho. Also, my opinion is that EVERY general on all sides is war criminal, mladic/gotovina/those mudslimes in Bosnia from arabia (or whatever they came from).

And let it be known, i first heard for the term "big Serbia" on your side, nobody normal gave a fuck about those idiots in Krajina, too bad whole Krajina fell due to retards that bombed Zagreb

All in all, it's uber retarded to split in war and merge in EU 20-30 years later

Hey Croats, if you're so cool, how come while Slobodan Milosevic looked very handsome, Ante Pavelic had missing teeth and a unibrow?

SERBS 12344
CROATS -23452345

>>4433676
>>4433676
>>4433676
mooooooooolim? pa brazeru, whaddafack pa jel ti zaista mislis da sam ozbiljan kad govorim ovom kretenu, otkud znam sta on tamo mrmlja, al ako je u tripu da hrvatska == tito == jugoslavija, ima vece sopstvene probleme?

a osim toga, svaka budala zna da je postojala kraljevina srba hrvata i slovena...

>>4433683
>No, Dalmacija.
stopped reading right there.
confirmed for narkoman

>>4433676
>Jeli vi picke znate da je bila jugoslavia prije tita?
Ja govorim o SFRJ, ne o Velikoj Srbiji sto se krivo nazivala Jugoslavijom.

>Jebo vam tito mater
A nece, ne boj se.

>Tito was a snake in the grass Croat working 24/7 at destroying serbs
Je, i poljsko-zidovski mason koji je srusio piramide sto su Srbi izgradili prije 3000 godina. Da nije Tito unistavao Srbe vi bi izgradili grad na Jupiteru do 2020. Aj odjebi s tom pseduo-znanoscu i teorijama zavjere.

>>4433682
Yes, I am. And ICTJ is a criminal court that exists only for political purposes. Many of my family members fought together with him and knew him in person, Gotovina always insisted and repeated to his troops not to touch civilians or harm prisoners. He was a Foreign Legion-trained professional.

Sup Serbs and Croats.

Just wanted ya'll to know that I'm an American.

It's true, I did all my inventing here and became a citizen and everything.

Just thought you'd all like to know that your greatest inventor was actually an American.

>>4433718

shitfest in 3.....2......1....

>>4433713

It's true that Tito suppressed Serbs. There's a few documents and books on them, check them out.

OH YEAH and if NATO didn't decide that Serbs are evil you'd be a part of Serbia right this very moment so I would quite while you're behind.a

>>4433713
e majmune aj ne seri, da je tito umesto srpskog naroda, hrvatski narod zabranjivao povratak na njihova ognjista, bila bi druga pricao.

>>4433718
Red Card

Then Germany can't claim Einstein :(

>>4433687
>I think you're stupid.
And I think you're uneducated.

>the Serbs formed a majority in the Partisans
Because Serbs are the most numerous Yugoslav people, dipshit.

>According to Tito the national composition of the Partisan army in 1944 was 44% Serb, 30% Croat, 10% Slovene, 5% Montenegrin, 2.5% Macedonian, and 2.5% Bosnian Muslim.

>Also, South Slavic union was started in Serbia before WWI,
What are you talking about? The first ideas of a unity between South Slavs was in the 19th century in Croatia. What the Serbian royal government was doing till WWII was a pro-Serbian regime aiming for a Great Serbia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illyrian_movement

>Tito is half-slovenian.
On his mother's side, something that was ignored in the Balkans before. Tito also stated to be a Croat.

>Also, Nazi's were disgusted by what the Croats did to the Serbs and their corpses.
Which is why we killed those traitors.

>>4433735
That is correct.

If only they hadn't persecuted my people...

>>4433728
>if NATO didn't decide that Serbs are evil you'd be a part of Serbia right this very moment
HAHAHAHAHAH!

>It's true that Tito suppressed Serbs.
How? By promoting equality of all South Slavs?

>>4433731
Ili se okani Google prijevoda ili si malo sredi tu gramatiku.

Concise

>>4433084
When did the USA fight their first ally, Morocco?

>>4433746
>alaska
>colony of Britain
I get filling in all of the continental USA for convenience, but since the paint bucket tool didn't paint Alaska green, I can't really see why you even bothered.

>>4433748
1801-1805, according to Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

>>4433745
mislim da bi bila bolja idea da se odreknes tog izmisljenog hrvatskog jezika i da naucis Srpksi.

a sto se tice mog kucanja na tastaturi, jbg, sta cu kad mi prsti polete ponekad, bavim se programiranjem po ceo dan....ma jedi bre govna sta imam tebi da se opravdavam...

>>4433746
You know you lost the Crimean War, right?

>>4433760
A budala sere a ne zna da su Hrvati tu duže od Srba, mi smo vas i spašavali od onih Bugara, imali moćno kraljevstvo kad ste vi bili malo bizantske a malo bugarske sluge. Jadni vi pred Bogom s tom vašom arogancijom, glumite najbolje a najgori ste.

>1812
>status quo ante bellum
>implying loss

>>4433762
Are you serious? That's just wrong.

>>4433774

>duze od Srba

seriously guys....we came to Balkans at the same time

>imali moćno kraljevstvo

If you count Hungary and Austria as your country, you really did have great empire. Other than that...sorry

> Jadni vi pred Bogom

God doesnt't exist, sorry again.

i am jelly of your sea tho, gotta admit.

>>4433774
da Bog da nevidis sebe u ogledalu jednoga dana.....
paceniku jadni. razumem da vi nas mrzite i da mi vas mrzimo, i da smo se medjusobno klali itd... ali mi je STVARNO zao kad vi izmisljate neku nepostojeci istoriju, i glumite da ste nesto sto niste. to je stvarno zalostno. zao mi je vas...

>>4433794
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Croatia_%28medieval%29

>>4433658
I hereby declare war on the United States of America in order to remove their combat forces from Afghanistan. If the US ever removes their combat forces from Afghanistan, I will declare victory against the US.

That's the same logic you're going by. Nothing that the US did accomplished what they claimed to want accomplished.

>>4433802
But the British started the war by impressing our sailors, and ended it with a white peace even though they had our capital.

It's a draw at worst.

ITT: Balkanfags jerk on their ancestor while losing their life on 4chan with no money to buy bread.

Why dont you for a change be proud when you actually accomplish something for yourself instead of nuthugging your long dead leaders. Whole balkans combines is like some small region in China, you are insignificant as fuck

>>4433830
Why dont you for a change be proud when you actually accomplish something for yourself instead of nuthugging your long dead leaders.

you're absolutely right. I'm actually busy doing something right now, but I like to come here and poke at the trolls on occasion.

>>Whole balkans combines is like some small region in China, you are insignificant as fuck

it is to us! and that makes all the difference.... lol

>>4433796
Niti ja mrzim Srbe niti izmišljam kakvu povijest, čak i želim da opet živimo u Jugoslaviji, što mrzim su nekakva sranja vaših kretena o nepostojanju hrvatskog jezika i hrvatskog kraljevstva i ne znam ja što. Pa odi pročitaj malo, jebote, pa vidi sam, cijeli svijet zna, samo vi tvrdite neke pizdarije i izmisljate tu da je danas Hrvatska neka kvazi-fašistička država što mrzi Srbe. Jebote, vani izadem s društvom a ono cajke trešte a ovdi meni serete da mi slušamo Thompsona za od kojeg nisam ništa ni čuo zadnje dvije godine.

Eno odi na Google knjige, traži De Administrando Imperio i čitaj.

>>4433830
>with no money to buy bread.
Evo naših pametnih Europljana.

>Whole balkans combines is like some small region in China, you are insignificant as fuck
Nice way of showing your ignorance.

>>4433851
>live in a small, insignificant corner of the world
>get called insignificant
>bitch and moan about it
This is why no one invites the Balkans to parties.

>>4433853
>bitch and moan about it
You said a major stupidity so I called you ignorant, that's not bitching. Bitching is what you're doing right now.

>>4433863
>implying I'm that guy
>implying calling the Balkans insignificant is stupid and not stating a fact
You guys know you haven't been relevant for hundreds of years, right? And even then, you were just a buffer zone to keep the Muslims at bay.

>>4433844
>cijeli svijet zna
ali vidis, celi svet nezna, ali zato znaju ko su i sta su Srbi....

>kvazi-fašistička
te dve reci mozes primenuti bilo kome kako i kad ti odgovara.... tako da jbg, koliko ja vidim, ti mi tu jauces kako vas niko nerazume i kako vas Srbi mrze i da imate neku bogatu istoriju i ta su naravno Srbi krivi za sve.

I na kraju kad ti nedostaje Jugoslavija toliko, moram da ti kazem, da Srpski politicari (da su nevini, netvrdim) NISU krivi sto se ona raspala, vec tudjman i banda (ukljucujuci izetbegovica).

>>4433084
0/10 regarding the korean war. How could we lose a war that isn't over yet?

Also what's with yugoslaveia? I wasn't aware we lost a war against them, or that we did anything much more than peacekeeping there to keep the bosniaks from getting curbstomped.

>>4433844
>>4433844
a drugo, zanima me, sta pokusavas da uradis ovde? mislim posto se jedino ti i ja ovde svadjamo, jel ti zaista pokusavas da me ubedis svojim stavovima?