| >> |
08/12/11(Fri)18:12 No.4177755Anyone just seen David Starkey on Newsnight in Britain?
He blames the riots on 'black culture' - the glorification of violence, misogyny, etc, etc. He got totally lambasted.
But he's right!
Some
of the most economically deprived areas in Britain are in Wales,
Scotland, and Northern England - areas which have very, very little
minority areas.
Did you see these areas rioting? No, you didn't. Economic and social deprivation is not an automatic reason to riot.
As
Starkey said, a lot of 'white people' have, over the past 10-20 years,
ingratiated themselves into 'black culture' and so become in the
parlance of this board, 'wiggers' - white people with black culture.
This
process of 'wiggerisation' is limited only to those areas of large
black population, and it is virtually unknown in the provinces and the
North.
Why is it hard for 'liberals' to accept that 'black
culture' is dangerous and anti-social? I would class myself as a liberal
too, but I am also a scientist. And as such, I look at and analyse
evidence.
The most glaring evidence, to me, is this:
The
riots occurred in areas with the largest African minority communities;
they did not occur in the areas with worst social deprivation.
Therefore,
the riots are caused by 'black culture' and not social deprivation. I
may be taking Aristotle's deductive process too far here, please, prove
me wrong. |
