>you'll never cradle yourself into the arms of a handsome man
thanks for reminding me, op. fml

Much, much less plz, thx.

Did you get that from Baraspot OP?
That's Patrick O'Brian

FINALLY a chance to show off Justin with no shirt on.

>>1247991
Ohh how I wish that hadn't been shopped.

>>1247703
Oh god, that thumb

>>1247864

holy shit, that guy could seriously be my /fit twin. i look so much like that guy it is freaking me out. who is that?

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

HA!

Mod does exist!

>(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
then
>(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

THEN
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
IT BEGINS

4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC

Filthy faggots.

>>1254532
I second this

I'm not gay (ya ya stfu. im not) and i don't think people should be banned for this.

>>1254532
>>1254532
this

>>1254511
>>1254526
>>1254532
>>1254554
>>1254570
>implying OP wasn't banned for making an obvious request thread by saying
>"Moar?"
>"Plz?"

Idiots.

>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578

lame, probably a 3 day ban

>>1254687

>4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC

Phobia means fear. No fear here. I just hate fucking faggots. What I mean by faggots are whining bitches who will claim that their rights as a collective are violated whenever anything is done against another of their kind (their kind is whining faggot bitch little pussy cum junky asshole licker), even though deserving it fully for being a faggot .

Your mother should have swallowed you instead of conceiving you.

May you be fucked by a gay horse you faggot fuck.
Mods, feel free to ban me. Cheers.

>>1254687
>I don't understand 4chan's rules, so I'll just accuse them of being discriminatory when in reality the content of the post in question had nothing to do with the ban the poster received.

USER COULD BE BANNED FOR THIS POST
HE DOES NOT CARE

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

On 4Chan you can get lolitas' drawings, torture pictures, necrophyly. You can be pedophile, necrophile sadic (only versus women) on 4Can. But when you post a naked man, you are banned. What's wrong with you, moderator ?

>>1255168
hurp derp, you're retarded AND a faggot? Amazing.

He was banned for posting a request on /hr/. This isn't /r/, take that shit there. The ban was because of his request and content-less thread, not his actual image.

So, stop being such a stuck up, whiny bitch, and go fuck yourself, faggot.

>>1255169
It was for No.1254756.
And please, be polite, your torrents of insanities whill not make you an adult !

>>1255169
Drill are you a Tourette's sufferer? Try to make a sentence without a obscenity. Try it! It's possible!

>>1255169
>>1247425
This thread begins by a request but received no bans...
Don't search excuse !
Don't hide your homophobia !

>>1255198
>>1255197
>>1255190
being a faggot doesn't make you an adult either. get the fuck over the idea that abuse is a sign of immaturity cock knocker, the real world doesn't work that way. what is more, that thread you posted? the op actually followed the request with content and said he was doing so. so fucking learn to read you snivelling little catamite retard.

>>1255200
Hope you are not MOD otherwise 4CHAN has a big problem !
And problems are just beginning...;)

We'll be here a while...

4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

>>1255789
read the rules, point 4

1. Post quality high-resolution 2D/3D artwork, scans, photography, and images of interest here.
2. Do not simply post images because they have large dimensions. If an image would be of interest to another board, please crosspost the image (resizing if necessary).
3. The high resolution board was created to provide a venue for extremely large images. It is not intended to be a random board.
4. Non-worksafe images are allowed, however content must be kept tasteful (no grossout images).

So why were the rules suddenly kicked awake in this particular case and not in the countless other violations we see on a daily basis here?

>>1255801
Start using the report feature then

>>1254578
implying i implied that i was caring for reason banned.

>>1255804
I have done so many times and no one has ever given a shit. I genuinely want to know, why were the rules suddenly enforced here?

>>1255807
Take a look around bro, there are visible bans everywhere after 6 years of almost zero visible moderation on /hr/; obviously there's a new mod in town. It's pretty damn obvious. It's no use bitching about why some thread ages ago didn't get dealt with but suddenly they are now.

4Chan.org should be renamed 4Bigot.com !

Aw sick! It's a naked male! Hell naw man!

So in this case.. mods are not fags???

interdasting

>>1255857
4Chan.org will become 4China.com...<:)

on 4Chan you can get necrophylic, scatophylic, sadistic pictures...
on 4Chan you can get tortures pictures and you can glorify nazis...
on 4Chan you can get vags picture with what you want within except a dick...
On 4Chan you can gets what you want but no dick
4Chan is 4Bigots
4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC

if you don't like it, take your gay ass somewhere else. this is the free internet, fagfag.

>>1256296
do you think 4Chan.org is enough homophobic ?

let them do and 4Chan will become 4TeaParty !

don't care 420chan.org is better !

better stuff on https://7chan.org
just forget 4chan !

>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
>>1254578
Learn the rules, people.

IF DELETED 4CHAN IS HOMOPHOBIC

Bumping this thread so more people see how idiotic and spammy those faggots are.

>>1257379
small sized this MOD should be
narrow minded he is...

"1257379

Bumping this thread so more people see how idiotic and spammy those faggots are." You know what? You can make a sentence without any insult! Try it and become adult now!

>>1257388
Insults are what people normally use when they see someone trying to start shit or whatever. You counter impoliteness with impoliteness, or do you expect people to turn the other goddamn cheek?

Caution this picture contains 2 dicks !
Michelangelo sculpted guys and gods having a penis...

5 centuries later, a stupid mod on 4chan does not want to see any dick on /hr/
but vags are allowed...
4chan is going down !

>>1257421
http://www.4chan.org/rules#r
1. All requests, be they for content or reseeds, belong here.

>>1257775
>implying mod(s) haven't used the b&hammer in other threads pertaining to women
>implying OP wasn't making a request
>implying you're not an idiot

>>1257426

95% of the threads here qualify as requests since it's basically the op trying to get people to post more

so I guess the point now is that you have to word the op post right or not word it at all

>>1257792
Do we have to have this same fucking discussion in every thread where the OP gets banned?

1. Wording means nothing. The OP could have just as easily left his comment field blank and he would have gotten banned in a case like this.
2. Posting one or two images warrants a deletion or banning unless it's a cross-post or OC, though probably not in all cases.
3. Three or more images seems to be enough for the mods.

understanding words requires some brain...

>>1257806

>Do we have to have this same fucking discussion

You seem to be more than eager to have it.

>>1258137
Oh snap, man. You got me. Yes, I'm "eager" to explain what the mods appear to be doing (even though I'm only a regular user) because if they only ban people without anyone getting it through their thick skulls WHY THE FUCK they do it, it'll change nothing.

>>1258163
cool story Rupert !
easy to speak as the mod
do not hide you...
you don't need anon for that...
grow up !

Lol'd, I hope more faggots get banned

we are legion too...:D

>>1258556
I hope that faggots that post hetro porn gets banned too.

Nice one new janitor, keep /hr/ gay free instead of banning selected /hr/ users for no clear reason. I hope this is what you do from now on.

>>1259587
gay users post not only gay threads...
gay users was also banned for no clear reason...
gay users are also legion...

If you have hr women, there will always be people that are going to post hr men.

Mods are closet fags

you faggots are so stupid. op got banned for REQUESTING. please find the HIV thread, that's where you belong

>>1255198

jesus......do you not see that the OP of that thread posted at least four images of their own? god I hope all you whiny sniveling ball gaggers get banned

>>1260425
If he was banned for requesting, shouldn't almost every other thread be banned too? They all say thing like "Lets get more of this" or "Everyone post...". These are requests, just like "Moar plz?"

>>1254756
>>1255789
>>1250170
>>1253000

I'm fucking confused will i get banned for just posting a guy?

>1600x1200

why not post this in the low res /gay/ section?

>>1260448
The difference is that some requesters at least try to make an effort. Look at the big flashing text on /s/:
>As a courtesy, please refrain from opening new threads if you have nothing to contribute.

That shit should give you a hint that this isn't about requests per se but about how much people provide with their requests.

This has been repeated in almost every thread where the OP got banned. The least you assholes could do is lurking and trying to figure shit out based on that instead of repeating yourselves over and fucking over.

>>1260538
...this isn't about requests per se but about how much people provide with their requests.

That's still bullshit.

What exactly is the fucking difference between a thread that started with ONE picture and closed with 125 pics, and the thread that started with FOUR pictures and closed with 125?

>>1263624
>What exactly is the fucking difference between a thread that started with ONE picture and closed with 125 pics, and the thread that started with FOUR pictures and closed with 125?

I don't know what the mods and janitors would have to say about this, but my reasoning has always been that banning empty-handed requests resulted in more content being posted and fewer threads ending up empty or near-empty.

Successful threads where the OP didn't provide anything of their own are an exception that proves nothing.

bump