> 5) If you want to make a request then take it to /r/. This board is for people who wish to contribute. If /r/ does not fill your request it is still not okay to post it here. If you contribute a decent amount of board-related material then feel free to request, but not before.

>>3210586

How about you go fuck yourself?

>>3210596
Enjoy your ban.

This is relevant to my interests

>>3210585
I'm not reporting this; I'm just letting you know you should go to >>/r/

>>3210600

I'm waiting.

if you make a thread on /r/ about this please let me know

>>3210585
>>3210596
>>3210602
>>3210604
This is the level of posting you're encouraging, moot.

>>3210596
I quoted a nice rule we have got here in /h/, from the sticky. Go somewhere else. You thought the sticky moot did about /e/ /u/ content relates to your shitty posting? No.
So even if the rules say so, Im telling you I reported your thread because its against the rules, something I have already pointed out.

>>3210606
Since when did anyone come to 4chan to act like a normal person?

>>3210606
Don't worry, your obnoxious ''reported'' posts weren't any better.

>>3210610
>>3210610
Agreed, this only empowers the trolls by giving them attention.

>>3210609
>>3210610
I know you're upset that even with the new sticky you can't spam freely, but try to keep it down.

>>3210612
This has been responded to many times, I won't buy that you haven't seen it.

>>3210610
That's why I, at least, saged my posts, so we dont give them attention. Thread has only 1 pic, and you guys keep bumping with nothing.

>>3210613

You're cute.

>>3210618
Thanks, OP.

I think we're getting to a point where the community is policing itself, not in a good way though. Here we are on a board that is about cartoon girls with dicks fucking each other and you want us to sit here and converse with the same candor and transparency that we need to go around every day with?

I can't accept that, sure 4chan has had problems with spam and stupid, but i don't think reporting every obnoxious requester is going to make your community anything less of a boring dystopia.

>>3210625
And letting the spam flow freely is the answer? You should know better than to think they'll get bored of it and stop if we leave them alone.

>>3210625
/h/ has been working like this from the beginning. Otherwise, half the board would be /r/equests. /h/ has some nice rules, respect them or get out.

>>3210628
Do you not understand the rules? Reporting posts is obviously still allowed.

>>3210631
And do you understand that the *only* effect this new rule will have is to encourage the spammers? It would be fine if we had improved moderation or something, but these threads stay up as long as they always do, meaning we don't. Not letting them know that they're reported is letting them spam freely, in its way.

So what if it we're mostly requests? I remember this being a chaotic place i found much joy in. I lurked and spent hours reading people's inane rants. I rarely come by anymore, even /b/ has lost its charm.

Frankly i think people like you are the problem here, trying to regulate everything and keeping code. So what if he's being an asshole? So what if he's not following the rules? Traffic to /h/ has decreased over time I've noticed. I think it's because people like you complain too much, you take the internet too seriously.

>>3210632
That's not true. We can post non-hardcore now without being reported by a bunch of fags, as long as it's in context. Could not do that before.

>>3210633
Confirmed for spammer. Thanks for clearing any doubts.

>>3210634
You're still getting reported, don't fool yourself.

>>3210636
>>3210637

Truly beyond reproach.

>>3210633
Board is fine like it is now, you are trying to ruin it by letting kids spamming naruto/bleach/one piece porn /r/equests.
> I lurked
Try to contribute something between kids spamming MOAR because they dont know about flood detection or asking for sauce when its in the filename. You havent noticed it because you have never contributed.

> even /b/ has lost its charm
Yeah happens when you grow up.

>>3210600
Enjoy your ban

I swear to god this place has become the reddit of hentai.

>>3210650
le ur mum

I don't really care what people do in shitty threads such as this. But /h/ can definitely do without this kind of bullshit. >>>/h/3206519

>>3210656
Then get out.

>>3210596
>>3210600
>>3210604
>>3210607
>>3210636
>>3210637
>>3210647
>>3210653
Can y'all grow the fuck up and just post hentai?

Also: there really isn't much of Lil out there, a few images on paheal, go grab those.

>>3210658
No, OP. Requesting is still not allowed.

>>3210657
Get out for what? I'm not being an obnoxious "reported" cuntwaffle or a rulebreaker.

>>3210657
Looks like someone hit a nerve.

He's right, there's no need to act like a gigantic asshole because you report something. It will only result in shitstorms and flamewars, which are just another form of spam.

>>3210658

THANK FUCKING GOD.

>>3210662
You are a spammer and/or requester.

>>3210663
I will repeat that this has been addressed many, many times. Don't tell me you've never seen it.

OP here, a big thanks to TK. I will now proceed in dumping the pics he pointed me to.

>>3210658
Assisting the breaking of rules is in itself breaking the rules.

>>3210666
Actually I lurk mostly, and post an occasional picture. But I guess you didn't even check what post I pointed to, and/or missed this part of the sticky?

>Ecchi content has a place on this board when contributed to a thread that is predominantly /h/ material. Leave the straight /e/ threads to /e/, but a few ecchi images in reply to a larger /h/ topic is ABSOLUTELY OKAY.

Something that is completely logical to the purpose of this board: FAPPING.

>>3210674
This is a request thread, expressly forbidden by the rules, and the few images that were posted later are all /e/ except >>3210671 >>3210673. Anything else?

>>3210676
I'm not defending this thread though.

>>3210676
listen bud, why don't you go ruin someone else's good time??

>>3210679
Then keep quiet. The thread will be deleted anyway.

>>3210680
Why don't you go spam in /b/, where it's allowed?

and 7000 more thanks to TK

I'm quite impressed with people's devotion to reporting posts on a board most people come to dick-in-hand.

>>3210681
I know. But given the recent announcement I'm happy to use this to get a few things out of my system, like a few other people.

>>3210685
I'm impressed with the people (person?) who devote their lives to spamming /h/.

>>3210686
The threads so far have shown that only the spammers and shitposters are happy about this. I can see why you'd be happy.

>>3210687
stop being a dick dude, just let it go.

>>3210688
Stop spamming and we'll see about that.

>>3210690
at this point you're just as bad as i

>>3210691
Wrong! He's worse, cause he's doing this in _every_ goddamn thread

>>3210691
I (and everyone else) only report your request/spam threads, you're the one who makes them.

>>3210687
I have already said, damn it. I don't care what happens in shitty threads. But I do care about good threads, and when people get pissy over nothing and have a negative effect on them. Exactly what the new rules are supposed to do.

>>3210691
>>3210692
One post is enough, kid. And the solution is simple: read and follow the rules.

>>3210694
Then get out of this one. And no, the new rules allow threads like this to continue undisturbed until the mods delete them. Which isn't taking any less time than it used to.

>>3210693

The only one, yes? Years from now, our progeny will exchange blood for blood because of the enmity established here today. The vendettas will be never ending. I see it all too clearly now.

But no, there will be a white knight among my kin, and a damsel in mine, and they will fall in star-crossed love despite the never-ending skirmishes.

So look forward to being my brother.

>>3210695
Reporting is enough, kid. You don't have to advance the act by spamming ''reported'' in every thread. It accomplishes nothing.

>>3210697
Nice, too bad it will be deleted along with your thread.

>>3210697
wtf did i just read?

>>3210696
Guess we'll see. It's only just been announced, there will be a period of adjustment to it. And no it's not encouraging rulebreaking, but maybe it will make people more thoughtful about telling people off than just spamming a dumb flame-fanning catchphrase.

>>3210699
see
>>3210666

>>3210704
See
>>3210699

>>3210700

I find it funny how you think it's just you and me in this thread.

>>3210702
>there will be a period of adjustment to it
Yes, it will take some time for all the ignorant newcomers to see the request threads being answered and to start spamming /h/.

>dumb flame-fanning catchphrase
It's how things are done around here.

>>3210706
You're not saging and you're defending the OP.

>>3210707
'course it's working well for keeping out bad threads, and it's definitely working well at staining good threads.

>>3210707
>It's how things are done around here.
Wrong:
>Replying to a thread with "Reported." is now officially against the global rules (http://www.4chan.org/rules#global).

Do it, and it'll be your ass that gets reported this time around.

But man, you sure act butthurt over this. It's hilarious.

lol Moot is awesome

>>3210711
Yes, it was working quite well, until the spammers emailed moot, giving him a very skewed image of the situation.

>>3210712
And people like you are, as I said, the only ones happy about this. Don't think your spam will go unreported. And I'm not the one who's devoted his life to it, so I'm certainly not as mad as you.

>>3210713
she really is.

>Don't think your spam will go unreported.

OH LAWD, ANYTHIN BUT THAT MASA

>>3210717
You seemed awfully happy about it, so I just thought I'd point it out.

>>3210714
>spam will go unreported
What spam? Are you some kind of omniscient being that can peer through my anonymity to know exactly what I have contributed to /h/? You're even more delusional and butthurt than I thought.

>>3210714
I don't know if you've noticed, but after the pics were posted, the thread pretty much comprised of replies to you. I'm sure if you stop posting, it'll just die.

>>3210720
Only a spammer would defend spam. Don't think that everyone is as simple as you.

>>3210722
Yes, posts defending a request thread. We should totally let requesters play around all they want. And if the mods deleted threads like this in time, it wouldn't even be an issue.

Reportfag is just sulking now that he can't act like an almighty, arrogant cunt without risking the possibility of a ban.

>>3210725
I'm pretty sure you're sitting at your computer typing with this face on.

>>3210734
See...well, all the saged posts in this thread. All your standard responses have been answered. And you still don't get to spam.

>>3210725
Fuck you and your strawman.

>implying there's not like 8 anons here talking to this butthurt reportfag

O.K that's enough. Guys, the reportfag is schizophrenic, you cannot not convince him to change his ways no matter how hard you try so I advise you to "IGNORE" his pleas and let the mods decide the appropriate actions to be taken if needed.

>>3210739
The mods will delete your thread, as they do with all rule-breaking threads. And if you think you can advocate requesting and spamming on /h/, you'll always be proven wrong.

>>3210743
Same to you, spammer.

>>3210725
>spammer would defend spam
Kid, I don't think you know that stating such a thing is a straw man argument. In other words, fallacious.

>Don't think that everyone is as simple as you.
Making this part of your argument nothing more than a display of irony.

>>3210750
>When someone is disagreeing with you, shout TROLL and claim victory
Does not work like that.

>>3210748
>>3210750's first part was aimed at you. And I love how someone who's been spamming /h/ for months now has the guts to call someone else schizophrenic. I don't know what caused that much butthurt, but it must have damaged you seriously.

>>3210758
Not only are you defending spam, you're bumping this thread.

>>3210759
If only you had some argument, huh.

>>3210759
See
>>3210760

>>3210759
>When someone is answering your posts, call him schizophrenic and claim victory.
This is what doesn't work like that.

>>3210766
Whoops. Forgot to reverse them.

OP here,
Finished fapping and came back with what the fuck? This thing is still alive? I'm saging my own thread in the hopes of getting the lot of you to let this thread die, it's of no use to /h/ now.

>>3210768
Follow your own logic, since that's exactly what you do all time. Someone disagrees with your argument or behavior, call them out for ''Spammerkid, spammer, troll, whatever.''

Either your autistic, or twelve-year-old.

>>3210774
If a certain samefag would stop bumping it, it will. It will be deleted before that, though. I'd tell you not to make another request thread, but I know you will.

>>3210777
Except you're always using the same arguments, same request/response methods, same spamming methods, you name it.

>>3210768
But my argument was always that "Reported" spamming only encourages ugly flamewars and intolerance when done in good threads, and does fuck-all good at making a bad thread disappear faster. In a nutshell, that it's a negative contribution.

>>3210788
As I and others have said numerous times (to you, I assume), it does help with destroying the illusion that requests are okay here, which is something the spammer is obviously trying for. And no matter what is posted in a thread that will be deleted anyway, and doesn't belong here, it doesn't do near as much harm as the thread itself.

>>3210785

I'm not bumping my own thread, i realized i look like a dick from the top, because i was cranky and horny from not being able to find what i was looking for. I did, and i'm relieved now. Thanks to TK and any other good natured member of /h/.

>>3210802
You (and whoever helped you, assuming it wasn't you) don't belong on /h/. Read the rules.

>>3210795
Obviously it's working great, that's why every day we get the same problem threads right? And what about the good threads that fall victim to the obnoxious ones?

>>3210813

You're a nuisance to /h/.

>>3210785
>same arguments, same request/response methods, same spamming methods,
Nope. You first need to prove all of the above before you accuse someone of doing that.

>>3210815
As long as the usual spammer(s) are the only ones doing it, it can be contained. Ban evasion on their part can't be prevented.

>And what about the good threads that fall victim to the obnoxious ones?
If the spammers have their way, which this sticky is certainly leading to, there will be no good threads.

>>3210819
Says the spammer.

>>3210819
No. Requests belong in /r/, while /h/ is for people who want to contribute. I disagree with how people go about enforcing the rules. Not the rules themselves.

>>3210819
It's not just /h/, he and some others have been doing this "everywhere". At least this new rule will remove that eyesore.

>>3210823
It's been done in many previous threads, I don't see why we have to indulge you every time. Besides, you're not saging, that alone says a lot about you.

>>3210829
You fail to understand the very simple concept of "this is how it's done around here".

OK I was just discussing this on /v/. A mod went and deleted a few reportfag's post, then decided to deleted the entire thread.

>>3210833
>It's been done in many previous threads,
So? This is supposed to justify it instead of a substantiative argument?
> I don't see why we have to indulge you every time.
Indulge me in what? Terrible arguments that lack sound reasoning and logic?
>Besides, you're not saging, that alone says a lot about you.
It says that I can't be arsed to sage this thread, nothing more. At least lay off the straw mans if you want to be taken seriously.