Holy shit I need to become a registered transexual and get allowance to use the women's locker room at my gym.

Ugh.

This will definitely happen too lol

>>33918486
holy shit

>>33918527
Are you duh girl from the other thread? I could tell by imagining the look of disgust on your face as you posted "ugh".

Eh, it is just a penis. Most women don't want my penis, so I would assume most gay men wouldn't be interested either.

Why would I care about this?

File: 1369011602675.jpg-(33 KB, 480x720, 1368898329595.jpg)

33 KB JPG

As a homosexual, this is not how I will be using Glass.

I don't care about seeing dirty neckbeard cock.

There's signals that show someone is recording, besides, I'm pretty damn sure google glasses won't be allowed in certain places anyways.

>using a public urinal
why

If that happened to me I would commit a hate crime on a faggot.

>>33918476 (OP)
>tfw homos wouldn't even bother to glass me
average size penis

>>33918543
please Ugh/duh girl

talk to me

>>33918567
>playing hard to get
oh you

>not using a stall

>>33918645
having a vagina

>>33918476 (OP)
yfw people said the same shit about cell phones.

Take off your tinfoil faggot hats. You'll be fine.

>>33918543
No.

I don't mind. My penis deserves to be seen by these ballsy bastards.

>>33918582
>being this asocial

why

>>33918684
You're talking to people who board themselves up in their mom's basement afraid of sunlight and the outside botnet-filled world.

>>33918684
>implying a cell phone is as easy to see cocks with
>implying fags won't use glass to invade heterosexual privacy.

>>33918718
>pissing is a social event

As long as there are lights to show when they are recording, which I believe there are. I have no real problem with this.

>>33918658
8" reporting

I like my minimum of intimacy thanks

>>33918476 (OP)
Don't use the stall for peeing, then.

>>33918476 (OP)
>thinks homosexuals will want to look at his small cock while taking a piss

Yeah, no.

>>33918734
>implying pissing is difficult around other males

>>33918728
I know. Hence why I said faggot hats, to distinguish them from the respectable, average conspiracy theorist's tinfoil hat.

>>33918730
There will be a light emanating from the fucking device. Just like when you take a picture with a cellphone it makes a fucking sound by law.

So when you see a faggot looking at your cock with a red dot over his Glass, man the fuck up and rip that off of his head and start pissing on it. Or just punch him in the fucking face.

Grow some fucking balls you faggot.

Why you need to stop that?
People won´t actually would do that, if some fucket put out his cellphone and started recording you would do one sane thing, punch that fucker, same with anyone with glasses, not because its on your head mean that you can do wathever shit you like.

>>33918762
My S3 dont make sound if its on vibrate.

File: 1369012473080.jpg-(138 KB, 447x600, 1367637350407.jpg)

138 KB JPG

How do you know he's not playing Angry Birds?

>>33918730
It's the same thing anon. If someone is looking at your dick without your permission for any reason, which they would have to do to record with glass, you should be fucking concerned regardless. There is no difference between a camera that straps to your head and a camera that you hold in your hand as far as ease of privacy invasion goes.

>>33918762
>>33918770

So it's decided. OP doesn't have a cock or balls anyway so why does he care?

/thread

>>33918570
just like the shutter on android, once rooted it would be easy to disable

>>33918476 (OP)
no

>>33918770
Finally someone with some goddamn sense

>NOBODY WILL EVER SEE MY PENIS IN PUBLIC!!

Cause sometimes I have little bits of toilet paper stuck on it.

I measure my penis in negative inches.

Anybody wash their penis in the urinal water when they flush?

>>33918889
Anybody flush the urinal with their penis?

>thinking you have to right to penis privacy in a public restroom

get with the times beards

>>33918889
>implying anyone on /g/ has a penis over 1"

Unless that google glass has a zoom feature, it won't very effective

>>33918934
>tfw 2" master race
suck on it pleb.

>>33918954
Truly you are the king of /g/

I don't care. I haven't trimmed my pubes in over a year and I'm a grower not a shower so it just looks like I piss out of some hair

If people really want to see that I don't have a problem

>>33918824
I dont have Shuuter sound on vibrate settings on my stock non-rooted samsung S3

>>33918816
>being this asspained

>your penis in a faggy tumblr channel

why.

> 2013
> using a urinal
> not being a stall man

>>33918995
thats not typical and theres a very hot button issue with this glass in particular, but it would be just as easy to rename the shutter sound anyway

File: 1369013537175.jpg-(82 KB, 500x606, pants-down.jpg)

82 KB JPG

>y you no like butt?

>>33919036
What about the light that shows people you're taking a pic?

A sound is easy. It's just a OGG file. I deleted mine on my N4. The light is a different story.

>>33919033
>stallman

I see what you did there.

>>33919078
Thank you for proving my point about cell phones being no different.

>>33919033
Might as well chop your dick off.

File: 1369013779063.jpg-(42 KB, 742x720, 1367551589507.jpg)

42 KB JPG

>>33918762
>. Just like when you take a picture with a cellphone it makes a fucking sound by law.

Do you live in Japan? The US doesn't have any laws like that.

>>33919127
I can corroborate this.

>>33919117
>being this brainwashed by society

>>33919078
dude just doesn't wanna get pee on his pants. I think vulcans pee this way too.

>>33918762
>implying I don't disable the sound with a custom rom so I can take pictures of hot bitch asses

>>33919078
Fells good man.

>>33919155
>being this edgy autist

>>33919127
What is the country with these laws that makes it so Android has to do this unless you get a custom ROM or root?

>>33918476 (OP)
Why do I care who's looking at my dick? I mean, after all, I'm not the one taking dick pictures of people in public restrooms.

If someone thinks my dick is worthy enough of a picture, then that's their business, not mine. Just a picture.

>>33919210
>I need attention so much daddy please somebody pay attention to me!

>>33919194
No idea, but you can flick the iPhone's camera sound effect off by using the silent mode switch on the side of the phone.

>>33919228
...What about my post implied I wanted attention? I asked OP why I should care about this issue, because he clearly is bothered by it. I don't understand why, so I asked.

>>33919173
What fucking country are you in?

In the US, it is not required by law that cell phones make noise when taking a picture.>>33919233

>>33919233
True in america, but not in japan. The sound cannot be muted in japan.

>>33919240
Is this a law somewhere, but just not at the federal level?

They'll just have some sort of IR flag that disables camera functionality when passing/within a certain amount of feet.

It'll already be necessary for theaters/performances, and of course for government facilities.

>>33919240
I think in Japan they have that law because guys tend to upskirt pictures on crowded public transit

>>33919254
You can disable it on Android though.

Did they add an additional speaker, or a additional hardware to prevent the headphone shortcircuit?

>>33919263
Not that I know of. They might have done it so they could sell phones in some other country

Like >>33919254 said, it's illegal for digital cameras and phones to be capable of taking a picture without a flash or sound effect in Japan.

File: 1369014343058.png-(240 KB, 585x403, l.png)

240 KB PNG

What color should I get, /g/? :3

>>33919270
So instead of trying to influence societal behavior, they punish companies instead.

>>33919281
I swear, the redlight for live recording devices was a law at some point in NA.

>>33919280

You can't in stock. Requires root + deleting the file.

>>33919287
That's what happens when your society has lost its morals and people become sexual deviants.

>>33919285
I heard that modern Android phones are more locked down/more bullshit for basic features (i.e. tethering/network setup) than my old 2.3.4 Nexus One. Is that true?

>>33918476 (OP)
My penis has been already captured on both photo and video, and it has already been uploaded in more places I can imagine; I could care less.
You should be more concerned about your face, or name, or overall privacy

Do you guys sit when you pee?

>>33919287
>Asking you to make your cell phone camera to make noise
>punishing companies

lel

>>33919317
>I could care less.

Moron

>>33919311
>tethering
>basic feature

Nope.

>>33919287
>implying making a company do what a camera is supposed to do is punishment

>>33919331
You don't actually know what language is, do you?

>>33919311
On some carriers yes. For example prepaid carriers sometimes ship their phones out with their own custom ROM that disables tethering.
Nexus phones have tethering enabled, so for a company that takes GSM unlocked phones, it can be a nightmare for them.
Sometimes the phones are very freely open, but the carriers watch your data and if mysteriously you're using 5+ gb per day, then obviously something's not right.

>>33919342
Do you even know what he is trying to tell you?

>>33919341
>A camera is supposed to make noise
No, not at all.

>>33919342
I hope you don't talk like this. You sound very awkward.

>>33919369
bad for battery life

>>33919361
The anon you're replying to isn't even the original poster about his penis on the internet (me)

>>33919338
Yes it is? My phone provides for it on stock.

>>33919358
So what's the best option on the market for not having any shit locked down?

I tried out a Galaxy Nexus a while back but it felt almost as slow as my N1 (browser, UI, input delay, etc.). It was pretty damn disappointing, but it's also an old phone at this point so that's expected I guess.

>>33919361
I'm not that guy. My guess is that he's making the flawed argument that "I could care less" actually means that the person does care, and not the meaning that society has conventionally agreed upon.

>>33919399
>the meaning that society has conventionally agreed upon.

It's not agreed upon. It's a fact that the meaning means what it means.

>>33919285
Shameson?

>>33919399
>that society has conventionally agreed upon.
I never heard anyone say "could care less" until I started watching southern-US Americans on YouTube. I'm still not convinced that it's a "thing" outside of that area, same as referring to all sodas/pop as "coke" or "pepsi".

>>33919412
>>33919399
>>33919371
>>33919342
>>33919331
>>33919317
I'm the guy that could care less, and you're morons.

>>33919285
Black to match the Otterbox you'll inevitably buy.

>>33919395
>My phone provides for it on stock.

That makes it a basic feature? If it was so basic they wouldn't be trying to block it so much

>>33919395
Pretty much just buy a Nexus or Google S4 and use PDANet which an app. Its undetectable by your carrier. don't use too much data in tethering. Depends the company too, what company are you on?

>>33919412
Meaning means what we decide it means. Logical consistency of the message conveyed isn't a criterion by which we produce or decode language. It's a fact that when you say "I could care less," people understand you. That's language. It's the same reason people understand double negatives. Linguistic meaning is nothing but convention.

>>33919434
>anecdotes

>>33919438
I literally could care less.

>>33919467
>It's a fact that when you say "I could care less," people understand you.

Yeah they understand what you meant to say, and that you're an idiot.

I care less than all of you

Can't we just discriminate on men who have sex with men? I mean I'm not saying shoot them - but maybe a quarantine would be a good idea. They spread disease, after all.

>>33919486
>a person's dialect is reflective of overall intelligence

lel

>>33919489
The lesser you care, the more you couldn't care less

>>33919500
>They spread disease
In the same way that anyone who has sex spreads disease.

>>33919516
That's not what a dialect is, dumbass.

>>33919500
edit: like how /lgbt/ is a containment board

we could 'contain' them afk as well.

>>33919526
Well, we could send away the fucking whores and sluts too if you want. I usually try to forgive them.

>>33919516
>implying that's dialect and not a logical error

>>33919500
>Can't we just discriminate on men who have sex with men?

I support deporting them. Shooting them in the head is only needed if they go after pre-teens.

>>33919521
So the more you pro-actively care less, the more you couldn't care less?

caring less general

>>33919581
>being this insecure

Why can't we just kill all of the people like you so we have a more efficiently ran country?

>>33919530
If in one group of people "I could care less" maps to that meaning then it is part of the dialect of that group. Phrases used in different ways by different groups is dialect.

>>33919554
As I said, logical consistency of ideas conveyed is not a criterion by which we produce language. Words do not have to map exactly with the concept we are trying to convey, other context must be taken into account. Pragmatics.

>>33919080
turn the flash off

Jesus fucking Christ, it's a saying.
There are so many saying you should try to care less about the "logical meaning" whatsoever.

Morons.

>>33919617
there are more people in this thread that could care less then people who care

>>33919606
>Why can't we just kill all of the people like you so we have a more efficiently ran country?

Because that's what Communists do.

>>33919624
And how do you go about this? It's not as simple as deleting a file was my point.

>>33919646
It's part of the camera settings.
Regardless, a fucking piece of electrical tape.

>>33919606
>killing people for wanting to deport homosexuals

You liberals always show your mental illness so easily

hurr sunglass cameras don't exist

>>33919632
This guy knows what's up.

There's a disconnect between literal interpretations of words said and meaning implied. In this instance, the words mean the opposite, but what matters more is the overall message understood by both speakers.

This is why when one kicks the bucket, no actual bucket is actually kicked. A disconnect between words and meaning.

>>33919582
Yep; on the other side, if you couldn't care less, you couldn't consider a lower level of caring, right below your caring standards

You should train yourself in enlarging your caring spectrum trying to imagine how less you can care about it

>>33919669
You have glass? It would be a huge deal if this was just a setting.

Unless you're being retarded and talking about the actual flash and not a "recording" light.