Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1260779851.jpg-(79 KB, 750x600, 1260768909334.jpg)
    79 KB Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:37 No.7155093  
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:38 No.7155105
    Hey Bushy do you use Macs?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:39 No.7155112
    BUSH WAS THE GREATEST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:40 No.7155116
    hai guise this isn't technoilogies suck my fat cocks
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:40 No.7155117
    He wasn't evil. He was just misunderstood.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:40 No.7155122
    >>7155117
    he was just stupid.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:41 No.7155130
    bush wouldn't have been so bad, if it weren't for that whole pointless War in Iraq thing
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:41 No.7155131
    Bush was better than this nigger we have now.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:41 No.7155132
         File1260780110.jpg-(125 KB, 811x540, obamamac.jpg)
    125 KB
    obama likes macs
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:42 No.7155137
    >>7155130
    No war is pointless.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:43 No.7155147
    I bet Ron Paul would've used Linux.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:43 No.7155151
    >>7155117
    nobody could understand what the flying fuck he was doing
    >> Marisa Kirisame !MARiSADA4A 12/14/09(Mon)03:43 No.7155152
    This image is being posted on every board. sage.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:43 No.7155154
    I'd rather have Bush than Obama. At least I had a job under Bush.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:44 No.7155159
    >>7155147
    OpenBSD, clearly.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:44 No.7155161
    >>7155137
    so what was the point of the war in Iraq? what did we accomplish? in what way was it worth the trillions of dollars we flushed down the toilet to fund it?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:44 No.7155166
    I somewhat agree with the OP.
    He wasn't the best president, but he wasn't the monster people made him out to be. He went along with the will of the majority after the shit happened, and fickle dumbfucks used him as a scapegoat when they saw what the cost of their decision was.
    >> Nomad - MAXIMUM !ZSTRENGTH. 12/14/09(Mon)03:44 No.7155167
    In 10 years Bush will be known as a good president.

    In twenty years he will be known as one of the greatest USA presidents of post cold war era.

    In thirty years he will be recognized as the man who led USA to new age of unprecedented global supremacy.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:44 No.7155168
    >>7155154
    >at least I had a job under Bush

    Obama has been closing down glory holes?

    FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUU
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:45 No.7155169
    >>7155147

    GNU/Linux*
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:45 No.7155170
    >>7155161
    I dunno. Why don't you ask Obama, he's continuing it.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:45 No.7155171
    >>7155169
    linux
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:45 No.7155172
    >>7155161
    Actually not true we killed saddam and their government is now not as corrupt and democracy ensues
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:45 No.7155174
    >>7155161
    >trillions of dollars

    So much for credibility.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:45 No.7155182
    AWW HE'S LIKE GODZILLA, WHEN HE'S DEAD OR DYING WE REALIZE HE WASN'T SO BAD AND WE'RE THE REAL MONSTERS NIGGERS NIGGERS JEWS JEWS NIGGERS
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:46 No.7155188
    Linux & Ron Paul. As American as Apples in a Pie.

    And both are the answer to out-of-control monopolies.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:46 No.7155190
    >>7155161
    protip: war was to open up a strategic point of ours other than Israel to combat Russia and Iran
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:47 No.7155195
    You name the Bush disaster, and Obama is continuing it, or escalating it.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:47 No.7155201
    >>7155172
    Democracy would be awesome if reasonable human beings were in the majority.


    [They aren't]
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:48 No.7155204
    >>7155130
    it was for oil
    >>7155137
    depending on what it is for
    >>7155182
    lol true
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:48 No.7155205
    >>7155201
    the Majority of human beings aren't reasonable.
    >> King Neckbeard !LiNUXD3Occ 12/14/09(Mon)03:48 No.7155209
    >>7155182
    Bush never fucked up Tokyo
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:48 No.7155212
    Obama is making everything worse, you are witnessing the death of Americas.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:48 No.7155213
    >>7155161
    >>trillions of dollars we flushed down the toilet to fund it?
    Hey, how's that social welfare program doing?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:48 No.7155214
    >>7155147
    >implying Ron Paul can even use a computer

    I like the guy, but he's just as computer illiterate as all the other old, white men in Congress.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:49 No.7155217
    >>7155205
    very good, you managed to read and interpret the second line of the post you responded to
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:49 No.7155221
    When Bush was president I heard everyone complaining about the economy. When Obama became president I considered moving out of the country.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:50 No.7155230
    The End of the American Empire. What country should we flee to?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:50 No.7155233
    Every day under Obama is worse than the last.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:50 No.7155236
    >>7155212
    Not really.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:50 No.7155237
    >>7155217
    [They Aren't] implies that reasonable humans aren't in the majority in the Government, not that there isn't a majority of reasonable humans in the human race.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:51 No.7155240
    >>7155174
    "According to a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report published in October 2007, the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could cost taxpayers a total of $2.4 trillion dollars by 2017 when counting the huge interest costs because combat is being financed with borrowed money. The CBO estimated that of the $2.4 trillion long-term price tag for the war, about $1.9 trillion of that would be spent on Iraq.[9]"

    so yes, trillions of dollars. all for nothing. absolutely nothing. Iraq is why Bush will go down in history as a disgrace.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:51 No.7155241
    >>7155209
    hey janitor.

    do your fucking job. delete this troll thread allready.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:51 No.7155243
         File1260780673.png-(5 KB, 429x410, 1255375656481.png)
    5 KB
    >>7155204
    >it was for oil
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:51 No.7155245
    >>7155201
    I never said good just saying he did accomplish something. Obama just seems to sit there for the most part.
    >> King Neckbeard !LiNUXD3Occ 12/14/09(Mon)03:51 No.7155249
    >>7155204
    It wasn't for oil. It was because Saddam tried to kill his daddy.

    >>7155214
    His presence was almost entirely on the internet, so he at least surrounded himself with those who undertood the internet well.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:51 No.7155251
    if you think about it obama is the worst thing to happen to this country in its history
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:51 No.7155252
    >>7155237
    Author of that post here.
    You misinterpreted it.

    Most people are unreasonable.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:51 No.7155253
    >>7155241
    What?

    Since when is he a janitor?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:52 No.7155255
    Lol everyone was behind bush after 911.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:52 No.7155256
    >>7155236
    Yes, really. Have you seen the unemployment/debt/casualty numbers lately? They are all worse with Obama.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:52 No.7155260
    >>7155240
    >by 2017
    >Bush out of office 2008
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:53 No.7155266
    >>7155255
    lol, bush was behind 911
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:53 No.7155269
    >>7155241

    Janitors can't delete threads, broseph.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:53 No.7155270
    I'm not worried. I guarantee you Obama will be a one term president.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:53 No.7155280
    >>7155253
    for a long time
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:53 No.7155283
    LETS EXPAND GOVERNMENT MORE AND FUCK MORE SHIT UP
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:54 No.7155287
         File1260780862.jpg-(48 KB, 749x462, DJI1.jpg)
    48 KB
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:54 No.7155291
    >>7155280
    Is there any proof of this or are you just stringing me along like a troll?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:54 No.7155293
    >>Obama just seems to sit there for the most part.
    Sit where? He's always busy on his World Apology Tour™.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:54 No.7155296
    >>7155270
    Hopefully but I wish sarah palin would take the religious right away so we can have one rational party.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:54 No.7155297
    >>7155260
    the point is that Iraq will end up costing trillions, and Bush initiated the war.

    Had Bush not been elected in 2000, we would have never gone into Iraq, and the US would be trillions of dollars better off. Just think of what could have been done with all that money. Instead it was flushed down the toilet, with absolutely no payoff
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:54 No.7155298
         File1260780899.jpg-(36 KB, 480x338, amerifail.jpg)
    36 KB
    >>7155270
    >implying the winner of the next election is up to the American people.

    Typical Americunt.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:55 No.7155304
    >>7155293
    Actually he did snub eurotrash fags for talking shit about america all the time.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:55 No.7155313
    >>7155256
    The economy broke before he was elected. It's not something that can be fixed in a few months.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:55 No.7155314
    >>7155171

    GNU/Linux*
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:55 No.7155315
    Obama raped my cat and hissed at his piss.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:55 No.7155318
    >>7155314
    linux
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:55 No.7155320
    >>7155298
    It is as I am a rich american person. We do get to decide.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:56 No.7155331
    >>7155287

    Current DJI: 10,471.50
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:56 No.7155336
    >>7155270
    >>I guarantee you Obama will be a one term president.
    He's done more to fuck up the country in less than a year than Bush did in 8 years.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:56 No.7155337
    >>7155320
    >rich
    >Obama elected
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:57 No.7155350
    With those trillions spent on war by Bush, we could've established a colony on the Moon AND put man on Mars.

    Fuck yes America...
    >> King Neckbeard !LiNUXD3Occ 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155354
    >>7155337
    He's appointed more RIAA members than we've had collectively in the last 20 years.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155356
    obamas's so bad i bet he helped get bush elected
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155357
    >>7155337
    Yeah obama helped fund me and wall street with trillions of dollars.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155358
    >>7155291

    If he is a janitor, he's not supposed to discuss it, lest he risk losing his janitorship. So probably best to just drop it and believe whatever you want.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155359
    >>7155291
    there is some proof, although i dont have it on this computer.

    i got some important stuff of his. couch *salt* couch
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155361
    >>7155320
    No you are just a typical 9-5 drone or the son of one. You have no representation or actual power.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155365
         File1260781107.jpg-(25 KB, 921x606, facepalmcard.jpg)
    25 KB
    >>7155336
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155367
    >>7155297
    Highly presumptuous to assume a different president would not have taken the same actions.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155370
    >>7155313
    Why are you making excuses for Obama? Not only is he not fixing [name the issue], but he's making it worse.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155371
    >>7155350
    no thanks I'd rather kill brown people
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)03:58 No.7155372
    OBAMA DID 9/11 AND THE CHICAGO FIRES
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:00 No.7155379
    >>7155358
    Janitors are not supposed to discuss it. If it comes out for whatever other reason from anyone else, there's no penalty. It's not like we'd get banned or anything.
    >>7155359
    >I'm making completely baseless claims and am full of shit.
    Oh okay.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:00 No.7155382
    >>7155298

    lolled @ image
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:00 No.7155383
    >>7155313
    Actually unemployment is pretty much obama's fault. He spent trillions of dollars on wall street instead of mainstreet jobs.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:00 No.7155388
    >>7155350
    Actually, you could have paid for a Harvard class education for every person in America.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:00 No.7155389
    OH and king neckbeard do your job, also change your password, we got the hash sum and the salt.

    just sayin.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:00 No.7155391
    >>7155383
    TARP is appearing to be an unmitigated success.
    And of course, you say what you say despite it being appropriations that were designed, stamped and shipped off by Bush.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:01 No.7155397
    >>7155367
    of course you're right. we'll never know. But I highly doubt Al Gore would have taken us to war in Iraq. Bush was planning to invade Iraq before 9/11
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:02 No.7155405
    Just another lie from Obama. I'm seeing a pattern here.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:02 No.7155409
    >>7155287
    Look at a longer scale graph and see what really happened. It's pretty funny how far your economy fell when the republicans held both the executive and legislative branch (decisively).
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:03 No.7155414
    >>7155397
    You obviously have no idea how many bombs Clinton and Gore dropped on Iraq.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:03 No.7155415
    >>7155391
    Um tarp was done by the bush admin not obama. And that was focused on the banks which most of them paid back most of the money because they didn't actually need it.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:03 No.7155416
    >>7155367
    Bush was pre-determined to invade Iraq, regardless of reasoning behind it. The former British PM's leaked emails pretty much confirm it.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:03 No.7155417
    well i can see that neckbeard appears to be yet another lazy ass fucking janitor, contributing to the trolling without doing any real work.

    keep it up man, i like it like this.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:04 No.7155422
    >>7155391
    don't bother trying to explain it to him. right wingers are too stupid to understand the difference between TARP and ARRA (aka the stimulus bill). No matter how many times you try to explain it, they'll still "blame" Obama for TARP
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:04 No.7155425
    >>7155397
    Clinton did a lot of military actions he was pretty far from being propeace by any means. And Obama just did a surge. Basically liberals are propeace until they get elected.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:04 No.7155426
    >>7155414
    They also protected the Al Queda setups there, via proxy.
    Of course, it was a very small, isolated settlement. But still.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:04 No.7155428
    >>7155409
    ...and who was in complete control of congress (and the purse-strings) during all that? That's right: democrats!
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:05 No.7155435
    >>7155417
    Unless you can prove that he's a janitor, you're just another of the retarded anons who shit themselves over tripfags for no reason.

    And if you're referring to the screencap that someone posted of report tickets where King Neckbeard's name was blue, then quick protip: names are blue when the email field has text in it.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:05 No.7155437
    >>7155318

    GNU/Linux*
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:05 No.7155442
    >>7155437
    linux
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:05 No.7155445
    Earlier this week, Obama ordered an attack on Baghdad that killed 128 civilians and injured 400.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:05 No.7155447
    >>7155370
    >Implying a single human being can have complete control over many extremely complex systems.
    He isn't "making it worse". It's getting worse because it's getting worse, and when things are bad people lose faith in the value of money and they stop spending. As usual, the problem here is faith. Our economy is built around faith.

    It has nothing to do with what jackass holds what meaningless title.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:06 No.7155449
    >>7155425
    >1 = many/most
    lol. US "liberals" are mid-right conservatives in pretty much every other first world (non arab) country.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:06 No.7155450
    >>7155367
    your right gore just would have passed a trillion dollar cap and tax i mean 'trade' bill instead.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:06 No.7155451
    >>7155195
    Faith-based Initiatives. Iraq (you could argue the troop reduction was Bush's idea but Obama suggested back it 2007). Cutting education and science funding. Etc. etc. etc.

    >>7155221
    What the fuck were you smoking? The economy was pretty good in 2001-2006 and it wasn't until 2007 that questions of the economy started to rise (lol redefining "unemployed").
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:06 No.7155458
    >>7155435
    shun the nonbeliever

    shunnnnnnnnnnn
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:07 No.7155461
    >>7155451
    Shhh don't tell him that the people in congress voted for the war people like hiliary clinton. Let him keep thinking it was all bush's fault.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:07 No.7155462
    Neckbeard where is your broom nao?!
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:07 No.7155465
    >>7155450
    Congress was solidly Republican until 2006, even then the Democrats didn't have enough seats filled in the Senate for "Gore to pass" anything.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:07 No.7155466
    >>7155451
    >Cutting education and science funding

    FUCK YES AMERICA
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:07 No.7155468
    >>7155445
    Tis War.
    Of course, it isn't the same as Bush's weekly "bomb that church where our coalition soldiers are holding up and there has been no resistance for the past 6 months".
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:07 No.7155471
    King neckbeard, I know you're the janitor (from the previous thread of the mod screencaps).

    do your job and start deleting troll posts.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:08 No.7155475
    >>7155451
    A lot of that had to do with glass stegall which bush tried to correct back in 07 or so because he was worried about a financial crisis but chris dodd a democrat filibustered it. Loliberals.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:08 No.7155479
    >>7155471
    >from the screencap

    Where his name was blue?

    That means his email field had text in it.

    Like "sage"

    Fucking retard.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:09 No.7155483
    proof that neckbeard is a janitor, he dissapeared himself and went full anon on all threads.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:09 No.7155484
    >>7155466
    bush supported school vouchers pretty sure obama is the one who hates education outside of the failed public school system.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:10 No.7155493
    >>7155483
    Except this one, and all the other ones lately.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:10 No.7155494
    Jews
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:10 No.7155498
    Obama > Bush.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:11 No.7155502
    King Neckbeard,

    I want a riced out computer that runs Crysis.
    And I want 2010 to be the year of the GNU/Linux Desktop.

    I've been very good all year I swear!
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:11 No.7155503
    >>7155442

    GNU/Linux*
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:11 No.7155505
    >>7155503
    linux
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:11 No.7155509
    >>7155451
    >2001-2006
    LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLno.
    Yes, it was 'strong', because Bush was riding a wave off of the 90s tech/boom and an amazing economy created by the Republican legislators and Clinton's presidential office.
    Strong doesn't mean it wasn't diving faster than your mom when she drops a cheeto.

    >>7155461
    1) Hillary Clinton was a knob. Democrats were spineless, and as easily misled as most of the American people. As much as any honest, logical person would hate to admit, Ron Paul was the only sane person for a few days in the House.

    2) You aren't at war. Your congress never voted for a war;
    You are officially not at war. Your allies, like South Korea, are technically at war. But you are not.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:12 No.7155511
    >>7155161

    Everyone knows it was to protect our oil interests. The government has admitted this already. The goal of the army is to protect the US and it's assets a.k.a. the oil reserves in the middle east. Those lands in the hands of a Saddam meant unstable access to oil, but under democracy, especially one we set up, we have a constant flow.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:13 No.7155521
    >>7155475
    LOLWUT? What does the War in Iraq, Bush's cuts to education and science funding have anything to do with the de-regulation of banking? His borrow-and-spend attitude and "trickle down" economics approach (which Obama hasn't continued but hasn't really pushed away yet either) could be arguably another "catastrophe" that Obama hasn't continued. Any other non-sequitors you want to toss out?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:13 No.7155525
    >>7155509
    > implying the tech boom didn't give clinton the economic boost, but gave bush the boost when it happened during the 90s. SO yeah.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:14 No.7155528
    i think he is the most misunderestimated president
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:14 No.7155531
    >>7155509
    >Strong doesn't mean it wasn't diving faster than your mom when she drops a cheeto.
    However stating "everyone complaining about the economy" is a gross disregard for reality or a blatant attempt at revising history.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:14 No.7155532
    >>7155521
    The war didn't cause the financial crisis numbnuts.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:15 No.7155535
    >>7155528
    >>7155117
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:15 No.7155537
    >>7155484
    Funny story, the failing public school system is due to a grossly misinformed public (who themselves were not told the most important lesson, that they are MORE THAN HALF of a child's education), a terrible beaurocratic system (up to 1000x more supervisors/superintendents per capita than its 60s equivalent), and a capitalist textbook system that ended up leaving a small segment of Texas bookmakers (and by proxy the texas school board) in control of around 70-90% of the school textbook industry's direction.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:15 No.7155538
    >>7155466

    We gotta feed those lazy niggers, no money left for science.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:16 No.7155544
    >>7155521
    He actually successfully cut public education and hurt unions which is a good thing because private schooling went up if you knew anything liberal trash. Private schools are better than public even eurofags realized this much(they have more private schools). So those cuts in spending were good. Hell will freeze over before obama stops spending.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:17 No.7155553
    >>7155511
    Half the reasoning was oil, the other half a "flypaper" military strategy to attract extremists to one spot to defeat easier. Which was an amazingly retarded military strategy that might have actually worked if he had sent more troops in the first place. At least, according to Paetreous.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:17 No.7155554
    http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/02/science-funding-in-the-final-bush-budget/

    >science funding in bush
    um sure liberal troll
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:17 No.7155556
    >>7155505

    GNU/Linux*
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:17 No.7155558
    >>7155556
    linux
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:18 No.7155559
    >>7155241
    >>7155253
    >>7155269
    >>7155417
    >>7155435
    >>7155471
    >>7155483
    What's this? Someone provided facts showing Obama is screwing up? Quick! Janitor, delete the thread! Suppress the truth before anyone else reads it! Everyone loves the great Obama!
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:18 No.7155562
    >>7155544
    >if you knew anything liberal trash
    Fuck, I know it's a troll (nobody speaks like this on the internet outside of red sites. Nobody that isn't a radio personality, at least) but it's just so realistic I can't help but respond.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:18 No.7155564
    >>7155553
    Obama has the same foreign policy as bush which is why he left the same generals in command.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:19 No.7155572
    No. Just. FUCKING. NO!

    Bush is the most idiotic and obtuse President we've had in a long, long time (since Taft IMO). He sat on his hands for days after Katrina hit, broke the levees and pretty much leveled New Orleans. He put into practice a recognized unsustainable economic practice (Reaganomics/voodoo economics). He all but threw American soldiers into harms way for little to no justification (WMDs? "Bring it on"?) He pushed for one of the most damaging bills to civil liberties.

    If Bush was misunderstood its because people don't recognize just how bad of a President he was.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:19 No.7155573
    >>7155562
    You got to be a troll considering you ignored all the points he made.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:20 No.7155578
    >>7155572
    Obama is doing the same thing.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:20 No.7155585
    >>7155532
    No shit. That's why I said it's a non-sequitor "numb nuts". Did you jump in late on the discussion or are you simply the proud possessor of a third grader's reading comprehension?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:20 No.7155587
    >>7155544
    I really hope you're not serious.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:20 No.7155589
    >>7155572
    44 percent of people now want him back over obama. If obama ran against mccain today he'd lose.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:21 No.7155591
    If the cost of the war in Iraq is what's fucking up the economy back home, then why is Obama continuing the war?
    >> patachu|staind !LULZISTwQI 12/14/09(Mon)04:22 No.7155598
    THIS THREAD IS STILL UP?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:22 No.7155599
    >>7155559
    ...it's a /g/ board, 100% removed from politics.
    Speaking of, why don't you post your facts in the politics board if you're so excited about it?

    >>>/newpol/

    >>7155532
    It's quite a funny situation, considering both Obama AND McCain were arguing the same points from 2000 to 2005 about the economy and the impending disaster.
    McCain even had an economic plan to avoid it all but the Republicans just told him to shut up.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:22 No.7155601
    >>He pushed for one of the most damaging bills to civil liberties.
    Guess who's pushing to not only renew the Patriot Act, but to expand it.

    That's right: Obama.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:22 No.7155604
    >>7155544
    So it's good that 80% of America's children have less funding on their education? I'm sorry, when did I enter Bizzaro-world? Shit. I forgot my passport.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:23 No.7155615
    >>7155558

    GNU/Linux*
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:23 No.7155621
    >>7155591

    To be fair, things are being cut back in Iraq. Just moving these troops over to Afghanistan, though.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:24 No.7155624
    >>7155589
    >>44 percent of people now want him back over obama.
    It's only been a year and already almost half of people have voter's remorse.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:24 No.7155626
    >>7155599
    once again you ignored the fact chris dodd which I pointed out already stopped bush FROM regulating and this caused the housing bubble.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:24 No.7155627
    >>7155615
    linux
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:25 No.7155632
    >>7155591
    Because ending a war isn't as simple as sending in some helos and bringing the troops back.
    Just as well, I don't think he wants to establish a precedence of randomly giving up on an ally with a problem. Guy's having enough trouble improving international relations as is; most US citizens view his "temporary adoption" of foreign customs as "bowin' down to turrists!"

    I've been saying this forever: The president is privileged with information we won't know about for decades. There was always a chance that there's a damn good reason that Bush couldn't leave that still hasn't changed.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:25 No.7155634
    >>7155621
    >>To be fair, things are being cut back in Iraq
    Really? Why don't you ask the 128 people Obama bombed a few days ago how they feel. Oh, you can't. They're dead now.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:25 No.7155637
    >>7155624
    Palin is only one percent behind obama's approval rating.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:26 No.7155640
         File1260782770.jpg-(8 KB, 240x240, 1260699943762.jpg)
    8 KB
    >154 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:26 No.7155641
         File1260782774.jpg-(88 KB, 573x587, democrats-spot-a-backbone1.jpg)
    88 KB
    >>7155626
    I didn't ignore it. It's irrelevant to what I'm saying, which was simply a quip about McCain.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:26 No.7155644
    >>7155591

    Iraq and Afghanistan are two different places with two different agendas. Iraq was to protect oil assets. Afghanistan was to fight terrorism. Libs agree with Terror war but no with oil war. Remember that.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:27 No.7155649
    Palin/Hillary 2012
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:28 No.7155658
    I can't get over the fanaticism maybe it was nigger sof obama's campaign. You didn't see that in 2000/2004. A guy with 0 experience and surrounded himself with fanatics like his preacher he sat and listened to for 20 years saying goddamn white people.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:28 No.7155663
    >>Libs agree with Terror war but no with oil war.
    Really? When the terrorists were in Iraq, the libs didn't seem to be against the terrorists.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:29 No.7155665
    >>7155634

    Umm, OK... troop numbers are being reduced in Iraq, which is all I was claiming. Obviously the conflict still continues. And even when the US leaves, people will still continue to die at the hand of Iraqi police and military.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:29 No.7155668
    >>7155554
    Are you that much of a retard that you confuse increasing funding for the Department of Energy as increasing funding for science? Did you fail to read the cuts for the CDC and NASA's science division? And that's only in regards to his LAST year in office.

    2007:
    http://education.zdnet.com/?p=847
    http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/06/bush_cuts_clima/
    etc.

    2006: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/31/sotu-bush-has-cut-science-education-funding/
    http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2006-03-02-nasa-budget-harm_x.htm
    http://www.the-scientist.com/article/home/24892/
    etc.

    2005: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0221-27.htm

    2004: http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/22134/

    etc etc. etc.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:29 No.7155669
    >>7155627

    GNU/Linux*
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:29 No.7155673
    >>7155669
    linux
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:30 No.7155677
    >>7155637
    And Palin is a certified idiot who's got the "dumb supermodel" cliche wrapped up in a bow with glasses. Quite scary that she could have been a heartbeat away from the hotseat. Not that she'd have made any decisions anyways.
    I found an exclusive interview with her on this very idea:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww

    >>7155624
    Nearly half the US didn't vote. At all.
    These polls take in ANY person, regardless of if they voted. The majority of them will always poll against the president. Check out Bush's decline before 9/11 and you'll see a similar (if accelerated) trend.
    Clinton got lucky and Obama simply doesn't have an "inspirational FUCK YEAH AMERICA" war he can start.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:30 No.7155678
    >>7155634

    >Hur Dur, I don't know how long it takes to remove troops from a war torn nation and what cut back means.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:31 No.7155690
    >>7155578
    Cite your sources. Especially in regards to New Orleans and voodoo economics. Obama's had Biden floating balloons about raising taxes since before he was sworn into office.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:31 No.7155693
    >>7155665
    >>Umm, OK...
    Look at how you just brush off the deaths of 128 people with "Um ok". Some compassion you've got there. You must really care about brown people.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:31 No.7155703
    >>7155644

    And Afghanistan is going to be just as big of a quagmire as Iraq, we don't have the resources to fix that country, it's beyond fucked. I'd rather we just get the fuck out and take reasonable measures domestically to increase our security, but that's just my $0.02.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:32 No.7155708
         File1260783130.png-(228 KB, 334x493, 1232043306042.png)
    228 KB
    WAR FOR PRIVATE PROFIT
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:32 No.7155709
    >>7155641
    You said mccain was ignored but i'm pointing out that later on that wasn't the case.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:32 No.7155711
    >>7155601
    But that doesn't absolve Bush for insitgating it, retard. Stop trying to make Bush look good by making others look just as bad.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:33 No.7155717
    >>7155678
    More excuses from the O-pologists. Obama continues the war, and you twist and squirm to somehow justify it. Sad.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:33 No.7155726
    >>7155634
    Why don't you ask the 50,000-500,000 people that Bush killed how they feel?
    Oh wait, you can't, because PacMan.
    http://paciraq.ytmnd.com/

    >>7155644
    Actually, Iraq was fought with a "flypaper" strategem in mind, wherein the terrorists would all be drawn to one small country and easily dispatched.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:33 No.7155729
    Imagine how much worse the recession would have been if Bush hadn't done what he could behind the scenes to diminish it. We're lucky.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:34 No.7155732
    >>7155711
    >>But that doesn't absolve Bush for insitgating it,
    Of course it doesn't. But in what world doe that make it okay for Obama to continue and expand it?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:34 No.7155736
    >>7155663

    Nice job taking a quote of context. I'll rephrase that since you decided to ignore everything else I said. The Libs agreed with the war in Afghanistan because it was to combat the terrorists, the ones that attacked us. They did not like the war against Iraq because they never saw any justification since they never provoked us or seemed to be a threat to the well being of US citizens. There you happy?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:34 No.7155739
    >>7155601
    "The democrats are just as bad as my guy so vote for my guy."
    Seriously though, people in power want more power? REALLY?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:35 No.7155751
    >>7155663
    ...the terrorists were drawn to Iraq by the war.
    You idiot.
    It's a flypaper strategy. A stupid one, but that's what Bush 2 wanted.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:35 No.7155752
    D-

    Offtopic
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:36 No.7155757
    >>7155739
    Not sure about this one. Are you too making more excuses for Obama's Patriot Act renewal?
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:36 No.7155762
    >>7155736
    You don't seem to realize that, in the US, it's "the hardcore cons" and the "middle cons". And sometimes, someone far off; a centrist.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:37 No.7155771
    >>7155752
    QUICK Sage now! People are waking up to the Obama disaster. bury bury bury! sage!
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:37 No.7155774
    >>7155673

    GNU/Linux*
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:37 No.7155775
    >>7155774
    linux
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:37 No.7155777
    >>7155732
    It's called "precedent". You give any branch of the government new powers and they're going to try to expand upon it. Its been going on pretty much since the inception of the Constitution. The Supreme Court does it (Judicial review and judicial activism), Congress (Commerce Powers and implied powers), and the Executive (too many to write about). Obama's doing a pretty good job all things considered, but he'd probably do a lot better if he took a page out of Bush's book and pushed more things through without trying to build a consensus. Though considering how well he's been doing with health care that may not be a fair supposition since Bush had 9/11 on his side for the first four years or so.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:37 No.7155778
    >>7155757
    Explanation != excuse.
    I'm saying that, if it surprised you, then you haven't paid attention to politics...ever.
    Had it been another democrat or Republican, it'd be the same thing.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:38 No.7155780
    >>7155711
    >>7155708
    but obama voted for it in the first place so he presented no opposition to it.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:38 No.7155785
    >>7155771
    SEE
    >>7155599
    >>7155599
    >>7155599
    >>7155599
    >>7155599
    >>7155599
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:39 No.7155786
    >>7155777
    obama actually supports wireless tapping to a more extreme than bush did
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:40 No.7155794
    >>7155780
    Again with the moral relativity. Whether or not Obama supported it doesn't mean that Obama would have done the same thing Bush did.
    >> Anonymous 12/14/09(Mon)04:40 No.7155796
    >>7155717

    Of course I'm justifying it, I believe it's a good idea we went there, but our tactics were complete shit. Now Osama is probably fucking around in Pakistan While were stuck in Afghanistan. We went about the war all wrong. Does that mean it was wrong? Not at all. Currently though, the point is gone. Every smart Al Qaeda member has let Afghanistan so there is really no point in being there as of now, so I disagree with the troop surge that Obama is implementing. But of course he probably has more information about this so a troop surge might make more sense if we knew the info he has.



    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous