>>6563491
/thread

I am sick of this shit. brb moving to the arctic and creating my own internet backbone.

>>6563962

There's already a thread about this you fucking retard.

>>6563971
Why not just grow a backbone and contest the law?

Oh yeah, that's hard work, silly of me to forget.

I don't live in anericka.

FUCK

>>6563983
protip: the ACTA is an agreement between america and your country. your country will lose.

Bill Clinton brought you the DMCA
and now Obama will bring you the ACTA

that's what you get for voting in Hollywood Democrats!

>>6563997
not legal in my country, so nope!

>>6563997
[spoilersdon'tworkin/g/]I live near Russia.
[spoilersdon'tworkin/g/]

uh how founded in fact is this?

>>6564027
and what country is that?

already a thread up, genius >>6563491

>implying this will prevent piracy and improves media sales

this will never pass.

>>6564093
Piracy helps sales. This has been demonstrated.

LOL

ENJOY YOUR INTERNET WHILE YOU STILL CAN, AMERIFAGS

>>6564094
>this will never pass.

DMCA passed.

>>6564094
you don't understand treaty laws.

>That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material.

well at least 4chan's safe

>>6563971
i live in actic

President signs treaty. Congress must ratify.

Call your Senator. . . .

:(

>>6564107
> That the whole world must adopt US-style "notice-and-takedown" rules that require ISPs to remove any material that is accused -- again, without evidence or trial -- of infringing copyright.

http://www.eff.org/issues/free-speech

Free Speech is dead in the 21st century and is nothing but a lie, a distant memory.
The shareholders are your new congress and their CEO is your new president.

Welcome to fascist America: disagree with the corporation and you'll pay the price.

>>6564107
What part of "international treaty" don't you understand? Also, France is further along in draconian laws and they have fuckwin connections.

>>6564415
Ohaio, Nanami desu.

Here's the problem with this treaty. It's unconstitutional because there is no due process. The treaty will allow ISPs to terminate internet access because of piracy without providing any evidence.

It's corporate profit protection masqueraded as national security of the highest order and it will kill most of the actual free-market and have one dominated by corporations.

>>6565820
That doesn't change the fact that it's still France.

>>6565820
>What part of "international treaty" don't you understand?

Lots of countries have laws explicitly against those things suggested by the treaty draft, meaning they just cant adopt it over-night

>>6564464
Your senators won't even care, unless you're donating to his campaign fund. The only possible way to stop this treaty is to go directly to the congressman's offices in DC and visit him in person.

Phoning them don't work, emailing will get you back a form-letter response, and mailing them a letter will take weeks due to the fact that they have to irradiated for any anthrax spores.

Good luck finding the time to visit them though.

Some severe civil disobeyance should put this to an end; they cant cut and charge millions of people; everyone just tell their families and friends; and emphasize the importance of this

also; dos the reporting service by flooding millions of fake copyright claims

>>6565978
God I hope your trolling