Looks like someone just deleted system32

>>5922115
>posting on /g/
>telling others to stop
They see me trollin'...

whore.

I AM OUTSIDE, ON A NETBOOK, TALKIN TO THREE BITCHES. WHAT NOW OP?

i would if they would talk to me, but they dont

No way, girls frighten me... plus, they've got cooties

we are in a recession!!!!!!

OBAMA DONT APPROVE

you need money to talk to a girl irl
internet girls=free

What would I want to talk to a girl about? Animé?

OP apparently cares what we think, he took the time to make an advice puppy pic and start a thread.

NEVER. THIS NETWORK TRAFFIC ISN'T GOING TO MONITOR ITSELF. FUCK.

>you need money to talk to a girl irl

This.

it's 2AM

there are no girls can speak at a time like this.

>>5922115

I was outside all day, I talked to girls, even saw one take her. Whats the big deal?

I'm not going to spend me precious jewgolds on females with the HD5800 release being so close.

Fuck you, OP. Fuck you, females. Hello, my precious new GPU.

>implying people care what I think IRL.

>Go outside
If you think about it, there isn't much to do outside, besides travel to other houses so that you can be inside.
>talk to girls
Yes, I'd really like to waste my time on the inferior sex. Why should I waste my time on them? Make them waste their time on me, and I've got nothing to lose if they don't.

>Yes, I'd really like to waste my time on the inferior sex. Why should I waste my time on them? Make them waste their time on me, and I've got nothing to lose if they don't.

massive virgin detected.

>>5922943
It's funny that you'd automatically assume that. So, just because some people do not think of women in the same way that you do, they must be wrong? Well played.

No.

so ronery ;_;

>>5922939
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelace

This woman contributed more to technology than all of /g/ combined

So no, it's you who are inferior considering she got somebody to fuck with and plenty of bucks

I dont need people when i have the internet.

>>5922990

No pics of vag,its a trap

THE PENIS IS WHAT GIVES US TEH POWAH!!

im pretty sure freud would have something to say about that view point though....

>>5922965
Problem is that you are not thinking, you just alienate yourself, it has more to do with emotions than logic

>>5922990
Yes, I'm sure one woman makes all the difference. This just in - there are also respectable black people.

>>5922873
learn to tell the time you asshat

>>5923000
she had three children, that's a convincing trap

HERP DERP YOU NEED A NEEDY GURLFRIEND WHO CANT SUCK THE FUN OUT OF YOUR LIFE

>>5923003
>it has more to do with emotions
Clearly. A wasteful thing, wouldn't you think? Control yourself, don't let your emotions control you. So, go about your uncivilized business, I'll be busy doing whatever it is that I do with all the free time left over.

>>5923011
You said inferior sex, which just shows your prejudice, if intrinsically inferior there would be no exceptions, i presented you one, don't get butthurt

>>5923049
Now, look who is talking logic! Women are inferior, and one will not make a difference when you are talking billions.

its raining :/

>>5923040
You should follow your advice, why are you even responding to this thread, if you have free time do you spend it on things you enjoy to do, then you are showing preferences based on emotions.

In your clouded understanding of human psyche you confuse control of emotions with it's absence or suppression, which is what you do. You are more a slave of your emotions than any of us, because you reject them.

>>5922109
> Save the English language: http://www.anon[removethis]talk.com/ICARE
Saw this posted somewhere else...

>>5922115
>>5922115
>>5922115

You're doing it wrong you illogical piece of shit.

FIND A GIRL THAT LIKES STAYING INDOORS

>>5923072
Sorry but no, in fact women make half of the work force and are as productive as men. I understand it's natural for you to dismiss what you can't or won't try to understand, that's being inferior imo.

http://www.economist.com/world/britain/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14177408

Why would I talk to a girl when I could be fucking one?

>>5923167
because that way you won't be charged for rape just harassment

>>5923106
There are things that people require, and things that people do not require. Without something to entertain me, would I not become depressed? Depression can lead to suicide, and we wouldn't want that.
On the other hand, a girl is not so important, in my mind. And I am all the better for that.

>You are more a slave of your emotions than any of us, because you reject them.
Good one. I'm afraid that won't work, though.

>you confuse control of emotions with it's absence or suppression, which is what you do.
Not at all. I'm not a robot. And it's a good thing I didn't mention anything about controlling your emotions, but rather controlling yourself. It does not matter how you accomplish it. But yes, one has to do away with emotions... or do you enjoy being a brute?

Anyway, enough with you. Enjoy wasting your time.

>>5923150
As if we really care about how productive they are, when all they do is complain and waste money.
And yes, there are always those exceptions.. but why give in to those exceptions?

>>5923225
That's because you convinced yourself about it, unless you are homosexual or asexual, your body physically demands a sex partner of the opposite sex (not necessarily a relation). You probably satisfy that need by the use of substitutes. A biological dependence is still a dependence (duh) and stronger than an emotional.

The use of substitutes is what prevents you from having a relation, so it's impossible for you to affirm you value (or not) what you never had. It's like saying you like or dislike the flavor of a fruit you never tasted before. Of course you can have an idea about it, but it's limited by your biased perceptions.

>Good one. I'm afraid that won't work, though.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything, you already convinced yourself. Just telling the truth.

>Not at all. I'm not a robot. And it's a good thing I didn't mention anything about controlling your emotions, but rather controlling yourself.
What difference does it make, you act moved by emotions, logic is a tool not an end itself. A means to obtain self-benefit a, which is subjectivelly determined.

>It does not matter how you accomplish it. But yes, one has to do away with emotions... or do you enjoy being a brute?
You can't be without emotions. Unless you consider yourself a thing. That is lower than a brute.

>Anyway, enough with you. Enjoy wasting your time.
Don't get butthurt.

>Animé?

Something's wrong wit your e bro.

>>5923371
Of course I'm not butthurt. I wouldn't want to get all emotional over a little thing like this.
However, I see no end to this. You see a different 'truth' than I do, and this must not go on for 200 posts. So, you can go outside and talk to girls if you want, but I will keep my free time as I am not as dependent on such things.

>>5923244
lol nerd rage

Don't tell people how to waste the money they earned, i'm sure most of them put their money to a good use, the article i posted is a good example of it and not an exemption but the general rule, women are more cautious when investing money than men. That's a virtue in times of crisis (caused by eexcessive risk-taking).

>>5923410
Wrong, i see more than you do. Given we had similar experience with the opposite sex you could say we think different, but that's not the case when the asymmetry of information is obvious. Tell me when you catch up to discuss again, if that ever happens.

>>5923498
>Wrong, i see more than you do.

For such an enlightened person, you sure have trouble understanding the concept of different opinions and mindsets.

>>5923498
>IM RIGHT AND UR WRONG
pleasure talking to you too.

>>5923410
You're so far in denial it's funny.

this place is too fun to leave.

>>5923552
>>5923541
I never said there's a correct opinion or mindset, just that mine is based on (little or much?) experience rather than the lack of it.

3D women are pig disgusting.

>>5923621
cool story bro.
I'm gonna go ahead and label you as someone who lacks thinking capabilities now instead of just retarded, then claim to be unbiased and unforced in my delivery of my message.
Christ, I'd feel sorry for your friends since they have to put up with someone like you, but what are the chances of that? You're probably lonely enough to defend your choice over companionship over the internet. Useless little fuck.

>>5923650
but universe is 3D, so technically what you think is 2D is just really flat 3D pictures

>>5923621

That's nice but if you truly understood the aforementioned concepts, you would learn to respect individuals with different opinion or mindset than yours, even if you did disagree with them, partially or completely.

Simply saying "You are wrong, I know more I am the right one here" makes you look like a pitiful absolutist.

>>5923664
labeling is what you criticize me for doing but you don't hesitate to do it yourself? And you also feel sorry for me but rather than showing compassion you insult me?

Interesting... i'd like to get to know you.

>>5923498
Alright, alright. So you got me to respond once more.
>Wrong, i see more than you do.
We aren't going to have an epenis fight here.

In fact, It does not matter to me what experiences you have had. Because this doesn't need to be based on experience at all. Rather, it is a matter of how pointless it is to waste your time with giving into your emotions, attraction and perhaps your dependence on another person. If I don't need to waste time with a partner, I'm all the better for it.

And before you go off on some tangent again, I'd just like to point out that this does not strictly apply to humans. The less reliant you are on anything, the better you are for it. It's just that a partner can consume such a large amount of time that I thought I'd discuss the point.

The lesson here is: Be your own person, and be in control of yourself. Do not rely on others, and do not rely on emotions. It's a difficult thing to overcome, I know.

And that about sums it up.

>>5922990only child of the poet Lord Byron
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gordon_Byron,_6th_Baron_Byron#Affairs_and_scandals
>>In 1812, Byron embarked on a well-publicized affair with the married Lady Caroline Lamb that shocked the British public.[24] Byron eventually broke off the relationship, but Lamb never entirely recovered, pursuing him even after he tired of her. She was emotionally disturbed, and lost so much weight that Byron cruelly commented to her mother-in-law, his friend Lady Melbourne, that he was "haunted by a skeleton".[25] She began to call on him at home, sometimes dressed in disguise as a page boy,[24] at a time when such an act could ruin both of them socially. One day, during such a visit, she wrote on a book at his desk, "Remember me!"

Fuck yes yandere

>>5923693
Since when debating is synonym for disrispecting. When ideas (not persons) confront there's usually one that is closer to the truth.

I understand you may feel identified and try to whiteknight him. But if you were discussing a book, isn't reading the book the minimum to ask your interlocutor for?

>>5923844

Oh I don't really care about the subject you two were discussing. I merely pointed out that you can't be "right" when it comes to opinions and that you should stop pretending to be superior when talking about a subjective matter.

>Since when debating is synonym for disrespecting.
>Wrong, i see more than you do.

>>5923761
Glad you are back.

I think you misunderstood me. I used "see" in a rhetoric way, since you started your argument with that word, doing the same gives mine some sense of continuity.

I already made clear you can't escape the very emotions that makes you (us) human, rejecting them is also rejecting your humanity. That is degrading yourself, becoming inferior. Note that i don't think emotions are opposed to logic or whatever you value the most. That, what you value, you value because you enjoy it, that is a sensation, a subjective feeling.

My point is that i'm sure there's things you place great value on without acknowledging that value is subjective and depends on your previous experiences, which in turn you evaluate as positive or negative by the standard of feelings and emotions using logic.

Then, what you have no sufficient experience on (relationships), you cannot evaluate as positive or negative. And all evaluations you make will be based on lack of information rather than the abundance of it. The more complete is the information the better the judgement. That's why yours is defective.

I think i made myself clear.

>>5923982
Then you shouldn't comment, when i said wrong i was referring to the fact that i do see and end to this, i wasn't implying he was wrong.

lrn2 read contexts

>>5924039

That's why you appeared to have a superiority complex, by three different people.

Yeah sure buddy, have fun with your "debate".

>>5922115

It's 10 at night. I'd wake the wife and kids.

>>5924003
>assuming people who disagree with you lack experience
yeah, good luck with that man. your argument doesn't seem to be working too well.

>>5924094
It's not my fault you don't pay attention to the discussion before criticizing, that's the worst apology i heard

>Follow your biological urges and try to find a woman who'll let you put your ponos in her vagoo, or rape.

>Disregard females, fap and use your time for other shit. Buy a gynoid whenever they become available at a reasonable price.

I chose the latter, but neither is a better choice than the other, both have pros and cons. Women aren't inferior, even if the non-ugly ones do have it alot easier in life.

>>5924250

Wait so, now you want us to apologize for you coming off as an "I'm better than you" prick?

Oh wow buddy, I'm done with you and your lack of logic.

>>5924163
I'm assuming right since he haven't say contrary

It's you who hasn't presented an argument and limits to criticize mine based on nothing but assumptions and intentional misinterpretations.

>>5924326
You attacked me (and continue to do so) based on your failure to understand a simple sentence, i already made clear what i was referring to, that's the least i expect from civilized people, but i know where i am, so no

>>5924336
Oh, well I'm just here to say contrary. I've had several relationships in the past, the last two being pleasantly eventful, but I gave up on that, for reasons that I've already discussed. That is what you get for assuming things.

>>5924372

You are operating under the assumption that the "I'm right, you are wrong" part was the reason you came off as an ass with a superiority complex to me and the others.
>I'm not trying to convince you of anything, you already convinced yourself. Just telling the truth.
>Don't get butthurt.
>lol nerd rage
>Wrong, i see more than you do.

>>5924433
Ok, tell me more about them then

>>5924440
I already aid i wasn't, you are operating under that perception about me even after i denied it and explained why. You are literally in denial.

I suggest you to calm down and think before posting.

>>5924433
pics or didn't happen

>>5922115
no.

REALITY AIN'T GOT SHIT ON THIS SON

>>5924564
why would anyone save that gif?

>>5924590
It's /b/'s ideal girlfriend (read raep) material.

>>5924590
Because it makes me hard.