Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳
    • File : 1252803176.jpg-(114 KB, 1280x356, 1250610584747.jpg)
    114 KB Picture question Anonymous of College Park,MD 09/12/09(Sat)20:52 No.5777213  
    This image popped up during a discussion on /g/. Do you know the source of this picture?
    >> Anonymous 09/12/09(Sat)20:53 No.5777219
    Wherever you found it, put it back.
    >> Anonymous 09/12/09(Sat)20:55 No.5777236
    >>5777213
    Pretty sure I saw it on lifehacker.
    >> Anonymous 09/12/09(Sat)20:55 No.5777248
    >myspace isn't an emo faggot
    >twitter isn't a faggot
    >deviantART is a hot "indie" chick, rather than a fat ass weeaboo girl
    >Youtube isn't a 12 year old
    >> Anonymous of College Park,MD 09/12/09(Sat)20:56 No.5777251
    >>5777236
    Direct url to the article?
    >> Anonymous 09/12/09(Sat)20:56 No.5777255
    That picture is one of the most homosexual things I have ever seen. Please refrain from posting that image in the future.
    >> Anonymous 09/12/09(Sat)20:57 No.5777271
    google + wikipedia = really the youtube guy.
    everyone else is pretemtious casual
    >> Anonymous 09/12/09(Sat)20:58 No.5777274
    ITT we're afraid of being turned gay by anthropomorphic representations of social sites.
    >> !BvNikkorIA 09/12/09(Sat)20:59 No.5777286
    google and wikipedia are the only accurate characters in that drawing
    >> Anonymous 09/12/09(Sat)21:00 No.5777293
    very accurate image, myspace should be swapped with youtube tough.
    >> Anonymous of College Park,MD 09/12/09(Sat)21:05 No.5777357
    OP here:

    I found the source:
    It came from imgur.com. Then it some how went viral.
    http://imgur.com/4Vp9N.jpg
    >> Anonymous 09/12/09(Sat)21:06 No.5777379
    I can agree with more or less everything up to DeviantArt. Facebook should have some more gadgety shit though, trying to look cool and popular. Myspace should look like more of a douche. Twitter is fine because it's meek and not very well known (and extremely basic - hence the small size).

    Wikipedia looks fine. Deviantart should look more cliche and probably fat.

    Youtube should be a 5 year old screaming shit out. Google doesn't need to be so authoritarian-looking. Between it being so pro-open source and giving everything away for free (if you can accept an ad or two), he should be less uptight.
    >> Anonymous 09/12/09(Sat)21:07 No.5777386
         File1252804026.jpg-(24 KB, 336x331, 1248825346738.jpg)
    24 KB
    There are a bunch of people watching here, looking on.

    Hey, I am just thinking, we got Google, Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, and god knows who else looking on here. If you are good at something, don't do it for free. But I hope these companies realize minds and the ideas they have can be bought and belong solely to them. You've seen gold before, no need to convince anyone further...
    >> Anonymous of College Park,MD 09/12/09(Sat)21:09 No.5777411
    >>5777357
    Further update: Here's the real source, it's called "If websites were people"

    http://imgur.com/gallery/4Vp9N

    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]AnonymousNew Jersey Appl...
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]INFECTED!i7MUSHROOM
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Cheeseum (...!GLENDAyXwQ
    [V][X]Anonymous