>Google

That's a relief, I thought my system had fucked up.

RAGE!

shitsux

Google search is getting gradually worse.

>feelsgoodman.jpg

Feels bad man. :(

>>5756049
this,
i thought i had fucked the font size or something.

It looks worse on Windows.

FFFFFFFF

I feel very unsettled by this change...

>>5756032
>>5756041
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF-
thanks for reminding me how shit windows font rendering looks at large point sizes

I think it is fine. This way the elderly can use Google too and there is way too much free space anyway.

>>5756077
No no no! Font rendering on Linux is always worse than Windows! It's a fact, I heard it on the internet.

I thought I accidentally resized my FF font

Fucking Google lol

ITT: Aspies and OCD participants

i liek

*Ctrl+Mouse wheel*

I can't really tell the difference.

Superior

I don't use Google's regular theme.
I changed it myself cause I'm cool like that.

ITT: General faggotry

It's OK.

It would be nice if there was a "customize" button for the font size for it.

Anyone have a decent .css for google?

feels like im blind and they want to help me

Am I the only one who has google huge on their homepage?

It's been like this for over a year or so now. I also set 4chan huge as well, makes it easier to read I guess.

I KNEW SOMETHING WAS UP

>>5756162

That's why they did that. The internet is increasingly used by older folks. It's not like it's 1995 and everyone is between 15 and 30.

I hate how everyone start making shit bigger to compensate for the higher resolutions of modern stuff.

NEWS FLASH: 1680x1050 ON A 15" DISPLAY IS STILL NOT ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY THAT!

>>5756168
The artifacts! They burn!

ITT BAAWWWing about inconsequtial shit.

Shit sucks

i thought something was off

I don't like it. In fact I'm pissed about it. I don't like it when my fonts get changed. It took me a month to get used to Segoe UI in Outlook 2007. GET OFF MY LAWN

Feels bad man

>>5756225
Calibri is better, but Segoe UI is actually kind of good. Google's faggotry is something else, though. Ruins my search experience. I'm switching to Bing.

ctrl+-

Problem solved.

...what the hell is wrong with you people?

I do not approve

http://userstyles.org/styles/20850

>>5756261
Mental illness coupled with tiny sad lives.

i think op just control + mousewheel'd the size.

Google doesn't change anything.

great improvement bravo for larry and sergei , btw which size is now? :O

Thank God.
It's different, but I'll adjust...

I'll have to, to survive.

my igoogle is still the same...

>>5756272
>0 installs this week, 0 total.

why should i care about the size of goog... fuck it

>>5756168
>songbird

i heard you like big things

>>5756307
>igoogle

don't like it.

another thing you tech-impared people wont notice, they stopped using tables for their result set, apparently.

>>5756329

g "query text" in my address bar. i'm lucky if i ever see the front page so i don't care

FEELS BAD MAN

They really need a restyle. Bing looks so much better. Google is just white.

>>5756032
>>google

non-faggots use bing

>>5756335
its on the search results page as well you buttass

>>5756366

>>5756346

You do realize you can take any page and make it your own, correct?

The google search page is the easiest to customize since it's not full of crap.

So quitcherbitchin, save a local copy of the page, and put in a background. How fucking hard is that?

Feels good, man.

well, screens are getting bigger and resolutions also bigger, usually means smaller pixels.

>>5756366

and i don't use that box either cockdick

>>5756032
Feels web 2.0

Somone should patent that layout with the larger fonts and troll them into using the old small fonts or even larger ones

>>5756392

How is this black box?

i dont like it considering my main net box is an aspire one

If there's one thing that annoys the shit out of me - people that buy 22" 1680x1050 screens, then set the resolution to 1024x768, attach it analog and set the monitor to "stretch".

>>5756346
Fuck you, it's a search engine it isn't supposed to look pretty.

>>5756433
I FUCKING HATE THAT SO MUCH
I HAD THIS TARD FRIEND THAT FUCKING BOUGHT A 30" TV AND USED THAT FOR A MONITOR. IT WAS 1920 x 1080 BUT HE STILL USED IT AT 1280x 720 RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE

Holy shit, I thought I was going batshit insane

>>5756041
OS/Browser?
Those buttons are sexy

>>5756433
Man I hate that shit. It's worse than fags who buy 21.5-inch 1080p monitors, though. That shit should be reserved to 24-inch monitors and above. Also I hate 1080p monitors as well, should all just be 1920x1200.

http://google.com/ig
feelsgoodman.jpg

Pisses me off.

>>5756333
why does no one care that google has graduated from using tables?

>>5756456
What the fuck? 1080p 21.5" monitors are god-tier. The resolution is perfect for the size of the screen.

>>5756502
lol no

1680x1050 is more like it

1920x1200 should be for 24-inchers and above

I have bad eyesight so, feels good man.
You guys xbox huge monitors, so stop complaining.

WHITE HOT RAGE IS WHAT I FEEL

HI, MY NAME IS GOOGLE. NEVERMIND ME, I'M JUST MAKING UGLY CHANGES FOR NO GOOD REASON

>>5756512
Reasoning?

>>5756520

MONITOR SIZE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. TEXT SIZE SHOULD BE CONSISTENT.

>>5756512
Sure thing blindfag

>>5756524
Well, it's acceptable, but in my opinion even 1920x1080 is too high-res for 21-22 inches and it's not necessary. I enjoy high resolutions but enjoy it even more on larger screens. Also high res screens can be very problematic sometimes, example is the Vaio P with its 8-inch over 9000 res monitor.

I'm switching to Bing out of spite.

No, I'm serious.

I don't care if they increased their font size or not, but I'll laugh at anyone raging over something as minor as this.

>>5756549
Image editing, page setting, CAD ... other things you probably have no clue about.

>>5756560

It looks like shit, and they call it an improvement. That is rage-worthy.

Oh god, I fucking lol'd.

Why is everyone complaining about this?

>I accidentally the whole CTRL+forwardmouseroll

>>5756043
>anything other than google

>>5756564
Most people I've seen buy these monitors for gaming. Now if you had said that in the first place...

Anyway, I'm of the opinion that fags like you and the ones you're defending are just too poor to afford nice 24-inchers and have to settle for "FULL HD" 21-22-inch TN pieces of shit. Enjoy.

>>5756590

They perform adequately. No need to be financially irresponsible.

>>5756606
A. Man earning X dollars in a month
B. Man with 2X dollars in a month

Which one sounds more financially responsible to you?

>>5756576
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/now-s-u-p-e-r-sized.html

It looks like shit, like all those bullshit web 2.0 blogs with 30pt titles and no fucking content

I didn't notice, I've been using Bing.

ITT: Bing astroturf

>88 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
seriously... do you guys not have anything better than discussing a font size?
this is why we can't have nice things

i thought it was me