>>5165173
>implying all users have a range of choices regarding ISPs

>maybe you should have chosen an ISP which isn't inferior
hurp durp maybe if they didn't have a monopoly in most places

Add to the list the Visalia/Fresno area, I tried using the open AT&T wifi spot in the neighbourhood and it's not working.

>>5165163
move to a better country then.

>>5165163
>net neutrality

You keep using that term but I do not think you know what it means.

http://digg.com/tech_news/AT_T_blocks_4chan has a better chance of being front paged, even if it's a little inaccurate. (But it's digg so that's expected)

ITT: Butthurt 15 year olds who can't find proxies other than Tor

>You've got to login or join to Digg that!
well at least i tried to help

>>5165202
net neutrality = good
against net neutrality = bad

Forced AT&T fag here, can't access either.

your best chance would be to organize a series of phone floods

IRC channel at rizon, #save/b/. Go chat up a plan there, people, and remember that legality is a necessity.

>>5165202
>net neutrality war
>war
Sounds reasonable.

>>5165234
The term 'net neutrality' has become a bit vague and largely a meaningless buzz word, ranging from the act of leaving the internet alone to strong government involvement in the internet. For the sake of clarity, what's happening here is involuntary censorship by an ISP, which is clearly a negative.

>>5165363
and king neckbeard reaffirms why he is the best poster here

Can any of you faggots spell, "SHOCK TESTING"?

>>5165375

King Neckbeard detected.

>>5165394
If this really is just shock testing, then it's probably one of the worst ones you can try because the immorals will drop AT&T completely for this stunt.

>digg
GET THE FUCK OUT

>>5165417
and att will lose .001 percent of its customers

BOYCOTT TIME.
money walks. walk yours elsewhere.

Nobody goes to /b/ or /r9k/.

AND NOTHING OF VALUE WAS LOST

dugg

herp derp

>>5165438
it's "Money talks".

We've already got a gigantic thread for this:
>>5163554

This should improve AT&T's Quality of Service

lol, theyre just asking for trouble

gg at&t

canceling att now

dugg
now whats the plan?

This is also rather popular on Reddit, though I don't have a link.

>>5165163
On my iPhone over AT&t 3g and /b/ and r9k work fine.... It's all lies because Disney allready broke neutrality

Enjoy <3
http://www.hideport80.com

1-800-400-1447 call here, press 4 to cancel your account, and request that a report be sent to corperate for web filtering problems

I have to use OpenDns to look at Wallmart's
site my ISP hates them

WTF would be worth blocking on /r9k/

feels good man.
how long until roadfailrunner blocks it?

>>5165739
Blocking /r9k/ is its own reward.

Cox is starting to block too...

I have been effected. I am now teaching you guys how to find publicly available information on the company big shots.

using the SEC website to find insider trading reports, one can find who owns the stocks of ATT. Below is all the people who own stocks at ATT and work for att

http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?company=&match=&CIK=T&filenum=&State=&Country
=&SIC=&owner=only&Find=Find+Companies&action=getcompany

clicking on document and going to the htm version gives you something like this
http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000122520809015062/xslF345X03/doc4.xml

the CEO of att's information. That is all. Publicly available information

>>5165778

FFFFFFFFFFFF
proof?

>>5165778
thats what i thought, but then i remembered /b/ is always hardly connectable.