>> |
04/17/09(Fri)12:13 No.4128712>>4128501 It depends. In a civil court, it's not innocent until proven guilty.
So
if you get a bad lawyer, or their side really makes a good case, you
could lose on the basis of not proving you weren't doing something
illegal.
The main points you'd have to argue: -Usenet has
illegal content. Youtube hosts illegal content- at times- and when the
copyright owner notifies the Usenet provider, they remove it. It's
legally compliant. -SSL Encryption- it's to make your discussions
private from your ISP. Just like your ISP doesn't have to know your
credit card number when you buy stuff from Amazon.com, they don't need
to see what you're discussing. -Encryption on the hard drive. You
put work shit on the drive and are required to keep employee, company,
and/or client data secure.
Basically, you'd want to make
yourself into the little guy who is being bullied by a big media
company with broad and unproven accusations.
The RIAA has only ever won one case against an individual filesharer- and they ended up losing the appeal.
If: -The usenet provider has no logs -The usenet provider doesn't market itself as a way to get illegal content -There is no obvious evidence that you downloaded anything.
You'd probably win. |