How would that even work?

>>2899467
Of course he doesn't like it. He doesn't like the internet. It keeps making him look stupid.

>>2899473
It wouldn't. That's the point.

National wi-fi would be a disaster right now.
It would create way too much white noise, coming up in Feb with the digital transition.

It'd be hard for anyone to be able to run anything from wireless mics at a stadium, to the headsets at best buy, to having constant static on your cordless phone at home.

Captain Picard and Jack Black Streaming over the airwaves?


GTFO.........

>>2899489
I see what you did there.

>>2899519
What did I do there?

>>2899525
Your trip and your crappy argument.

>>2899536
It's not a crappy argument, you ignorant fuck.
It's exactly why it's not happening right now.

Go read a fucking news article for once, you basement-dwelling reclusive faggot.

>>2899489

>white noise

>>2899536
oh u

>>2899489
More like there would be too much 'black noise' from the Messiah's community not getting free computers to use their new nationalized internets.

>>2899489

>white noise

>>2899489
There are much more sound arguments than "DURHUR WIRELESS MICS". Like the fact that we'd need decent cable infrastructure to link wireless routers with. Decent cable infrastructure we don't have.

And who is going to pay for the infrastructure to put in the free national wifi?

Oh right, the taxpayers. Stop wasting the public's money for shit like this, you fucking socialists.

Glad I voted for McCain.

>>2899625
It's likely part of the Obamessiah's $700B "New Deal Version 2.0". The government can always afford to throw away money at shit, regardless of whether it would actually work or not. After all, they have us taxpayers to 'give' them as much money as they desire.

>>2899625

>Glad I voted for McCain.

Too bad you didn't make a different..

>>2899625
How is using the public money for public services socialism? What would be socialistic is using private money for public services.

There are many things in the USA that are socialized (fire depts, police, roads, etc), but wouldn't it be easier to trest internet access as a utility like water/electric/phone/etc and stop trying to regulate it?

>>2899657
>trest

>>2899657
The government wanting to step back and not regulate something?

>>2899642
Too bad you don't know that popular vote means shit.

Also, AWB 2.0

More to the point, what's exactly wrong with Socialism?

>>2899696
It impedes technological advancements, punishes those who achieve, and rewards those who are weak.

>>2899657
That would make it to easy for the govt. to say "these are our interbutts and we make the rules" then you get censorship of all sorts and the horseshit that comes with it. a better bet would to have the backbone be maintained by the govt and let all the ISPs link to that.

>>2899729
Exactly, it gives me no motivation to work hard.

>>2899696
America posted a 14 trillion dollar GDP in 2007.
We are one country.

The European Union posted a 13 trillion dollar GDP.
The EU is 27 countries.

>>2899644
Thats.... what socialism is.....
Government subsidies paying for things...

>>2899758
So is the military socialistic?

>>2899696
There's nothing wrong with it. It's just old red scare/McCarthyism in the U.S.A. Socialist is gateway communist and communist is evil. You're not an evil
commie are you?
>>2899746
hurrr GDP = everything you need.

>>2899765
Yes. If you want to be pedantic and take it down to the lowest level, taxes are socialist. That's why this whole socialism=evil shit is retarded

>>2899729
this is bad for 4chan how?

>>2899765
Yes it is.
I've never once said that socialism doesn't exist in the US.
We have many socialistic programs and such in the US, that help people live their every day lives.

Though, there is a very strong line in which if you cross, you start to lose the foundations of what America was created on.

We are well over that right now, going even farther is going to be detrimental to our country's ideals.

>>2899773
Hurr GDP = productivity and standards of living.
GDP creates jobs, and puts money in your pocket.
GDP is what makes the economy turn.
GDP is what allows you to live in a house, buy a television, and put food on your table.

GDP is everything.

>>2899796
Country's ideals are embodied in the Declaration of Independence and implemented by the Constitution.

There's a reason Jefferson changed "Life, Liberty, and Property" to "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness". Congress is there to promote the general welfare, among other things.

>>2899786
I never said it was bad for fourchon. There are more things to life than this shitty site.

>>2899796
So how does the latest DickBuster™ Missile help Americans more than free public internet services that they would use on a daily basis? The Military is fucking more bloated than itunes, but I never hear the same FUCKIN SOCIALIST screaming people calling for a lower "defense" budget.

>>2899746
I would rather live in a country where I was given an equal share of a small GDP than live in one where we had a massive GDP and I got nothing out of it because I wasn't part of the top 5% of the economic hierarchy.

>>2899729
If Socialism impedes technological advances, then why do Socialist countries have fucking AMAZING internet infrastructure?

>>2899961
Simple.

Less landmass.

>>2899946
Equal share?

Would you not say that 150,000 a year isn't enough to live on?
That isn't hard to achieve in America.

>>2899946
You're pathetic. You bitch and moan about being a slave of the top 5%, but you won't do shit about anything. You think that it's impossible to go from nothing to everything? You want to be force fed and have the comforts of not having to achieve anything. Enjoy working slaves pay.

>>2899966
This is what amerifags actually believe. Take a look on the north European countries, huge landmass compared to population. You can live in fucking Forestistan and still have DSL

Despite the "it's socialist!" whining, national wifi would create jobs for people who can set it up and maintain it, and it would force us to have a much better broadband infrastructure. I'm all for it.

I'd much rather have had Bush waste money on this rather than this wars he's wastes money on, having our companies build shit over there instead of over here

>>2899972
150k / year is not hard to achieve in the US?
Are you fucking stoned?
You need a four year degree plus about 5 to 10 years of experience to start making that
Even with a doctorate you'd be lucky to start at 150k

The average income of the nation is around 40 - 50k a year, and that's heavily skewed by people who make millions a year.

>>2899972
OH GOD GTFO /G/ AND BACK TO /R9K/.

What a fucking retard. If he wanted it to fail he should have announced his support.