>>
03/21/12(Wed)11:46 No. 23693058 >>23693053 >Under
DMCA 512(a), service providers like you are typically protected from
damages for copyright infringement claims if you also maintain "a policy
that provides for termination in appropriate circumstances of
subscribers and account holders of the service provider's system or
network who are repeat infringers." If you have and implement such a
policy, and you otherwise qualify for the safe harbor, you should be
free from fear of copyright damages. >As
for what makes a reasonable policy, as the law says, it's one that
terminates subscribers who are repeat infringers. The notification you
received is certainly not proof of the "repeat infringement" that is
required under the law before you need to terminate my account. In fact,
it's not even proof of any copyright infringement; a notice claiming
infringement is not the same as a determination of infringement. I have
not infringed any copyrights and do not intend to do so. Therefore, you
should continue to be protected under the DMCA 512(a) safe harbor
without taking any further action. >Thank
you for working with me on this matter. As a loyal subscriber, I
appreciate your notifying me of this issue and hope that the protections
of DMCA 512 put any concerns you may have to rest. If not, please
contact me with any further questions. >Very truly yours, >Your customer, [User] 
