>>
03/21/12(Wed)11:41 No. 23692979 >>23692898 >If you haven't seen a mac past 101 classes, you are in a shit school, sorry dude. No,
I'm not actually, but there's no point in listing it, because you'd
call it shit still even if it was an ivy league school, and if not,
you'd just say I was lying, which is why this argument of nothing but
baseless claims is pointless, and I find it hilarious and pathetic that
you'd wish to continue it. Do you really have that severe of a case of
buyer's remorse.>Linux is the only sensible alternative to macs, but especially on laptops Apple just beats the shit out of it. Wow,
now I'm starting to think you're trolling. You're telling me an
operating system that can be systematically configured to work
seamlessly with any piece of hardware, and can support dozens of
lightweight programs and WMs can't compete with an operating system that
can only run on a very select set of hardware, with whatever bloat it
comes with, and the inability to alter code to make it do as you wish
instead of being controlled by it is better than GNU/Linux? Sorry,
but you're a fucking drone. A sheep. You're baaaaaaaing with your
baseless claims because that's all you know. That's all you were taught
by your overlords. It's pathetic, and actually quite sad. I pity the
shit out of you, bro. I really, really do.