I would fuck the shit out of Neil Cicierega.

reporting in

reporting in,
but I see no one to question its greatness

>the same fucking thread about pretend browser elitism
>no one changes from what they currently use, even if they are "proven" wrong
>everyone is still at least not using IE which is what is actually important
>just find another reason to hate pretty much an exact copy of yourself sans browser preference

I like a browser that can zoom in and out of images with the click of a mouse WITHOUT the need for extensions.
There's also things like rendering quirks websites differently from every other browser under the guise of COMPATIBILITY, going against defacto standards such as binding undo closed tab to Ctrl+Z instead of Ctrl+Shift+T, and other things like that I forgot about.
It says a lot about a browser when it takes 6 years for the developers to fix the file selection dialog in Windows.

>2001
>Not using minimalist webkit based browsers

>>19887313
Are you complaining that opera has not enough features build in in comparison to other browsers?

>>19887335
No, I'm saying Opera is a mess.

>Slow as dicks with them

>2011
>Still using "speed" as a point

All browsers load at the same speed as far as I can tell. Sure, you can try to prove one is faster than the other by opening a stupidly huge and bloated site or by posting synthetic benchmarks, but neither one proves shit, as neither one of them are actually happen in the real world.

Anyways, I use the true underground browser: Darth Vader. You can only get it from other people who use it.

>>19887366
oh I am sure you just did
>I like a browser that can zoom in and out of images with the click of a mouse WITHOUT the need for extensions.

also rest of your rant doesn't make sense, you are complaing that opera is not using retarded two modifications hotkey and that there are some renderink quirks(which sites? any example at all?) and then some shit about 6 years selection dialog...

I am, OP.

>In before Win32, there's no 64-bit build of Opera so it shows up that way.

>>19887313
Opera has allowed you to resize images with a click since version 11 (although I disabled it with a script). They also follow web standards, which means that any errors are due to poor website coding.

>going against defacto standards such as binding undo closed tab to Ctrl+Z instead of Ctrl+Shift+T

Ctrl+Z is the de-facto standard for undo in everything. If you don't like it, you can easily change it to Ctrl+Shift+T or whatever else you want in preferences.

>>19887313
>I like a browser that can zoom in and out of images with the click of a mouse WITHOUT the need for extensions.
Not only can Opera zoon with the click of a mouse, you can also (if you wanted) have a slider that zooms.

>going against defacto standards such as binding undo closed tab to Ctrl+Z
Who had tab-closed undo first? Opera. The copycats decided that particular key binding.

>>19887422
Super Cool Story Bros.

>>19887453
>Who had tab-closed undo first?
This argument again. If you want to argue firsts, then guess who had hardware acceleration first? Firefox. However, that's irrelevant. It's about who does it better, not who does it first.

>>19887448
Yeah, I'm saying I don't like how whingy Opera is.
For instance, they've gone through what, 3 major UI revisions in the past 2 years?

The things I was complaining about are just the things I noticed in my short time with Opera, and I'm sure if I used it more I'd find even more things it does differently for no reason.
As for the file dialog. Opera was using the Windows 9x selection dialog on Windows up until a few months ago.

>>19887449
>Opera has allowed you to resize images with a click since version 11.
Well it's about time.

>They also follow web standards, which means that any errors are due to poor website coding.
Meanwhile every other browser renders sites like 4chan nearly (if not completely) the same way despite the non-compliant coding, which to me seems like a problem with Opera, not everyone else.

>>19887453
>Not only can Opera zoon with the click of a mouse, you can also (if you wanted) have a slider that zooms.
See above.

>Who had tab-closed undo first? Opera. The copycats decided that particular key binding.
Okay, but that really doesn't change much. Opera is still the only browser that uses Ctrl+Z to undo closed tabs.

>>19887538
>implying you need hardware acceleration
>implying HWA isn't just another gimick made by bloatfox to appear fast when its the slowest than IE

let me tell you something
- Opera invented Tabs
- Opera invented memory management
- Opera was the first to integrate privacy control
- Opera was the first to integrate a component which speed up loading times, and could increase page loading as high up as 40x
- Opera designed today's browser UI. Chrome, FF and IE copied it to some extent.
- Opera designed the minimalistic UI of having 1 icon where you access all settings etc.
- Opera pioneered the latest speed race, without Opera, FF would still be in Beta 1, Chrome would be in Chrome 6, Opera is the lead innovator and THEY are paving the way for browsers such as FF and Chrome.
- Opera was the first to have integrated search
- Opera was the first to have Small Screen Rendering
- The first to have full page Zoom
- Opera was the first to cache web pages in RAM rather then HDD
- First to introduce Mouse Gestures
- Opera was the first to introduce integrated pop up blocking
-Opera was the first to introduce Speed Dial. An innovative feature which is now copied by Chrome and I believe Firefox as well
Don't forget to add that Opera is the first to support HTML5's <input type="date"> so you don't have to use a library like jQuery UI.

Also, compare Operas and Firefox UI, its exactly the same, Firefox put the menu bar in the EXACT same place hence Firefox COPIES opera, Opera is the only "true" browser as it has innovated. Firefox, IE and Chrome merely copied it and made it it's own

>>19887587
>cue in a year later
>HAH OPERA HAS HARDWARE ACCELERATION TAKE THAT

>>19887587
>complaining about bloat
Firefox never takes up more than 300-400 MB. Maybe if I was stuck in 2004, it would be a problem, but I have more than 512 MB of RAM.

>>19887604
And that's why OPera is the best browser currently

Oh you...

>>19887604
Where is your about:robots ?

>>19887659
It's a web browser, stop trying to justify shitty coding. That's enough to run an Operating System.

>>19887576
>Meanwhile every other browser renders sites like 4chan nearly (if not completely) the same way despite the non-compliant coding, which to me seems like a problem with Opera, not everyone else

Opera renders 4chan the same, show pictures of differences you see... oh you got nothing only mouth full of shit...

>>19887726
30MB is enough to run a operating system, horrible comparison.

>>19887729
I believe it goes a little something like this:
>a few less pixels padding on posts
OMFG OPERA SUX I'LL NEVER USE IT EVER

-Community has abandoned it, only went back for a brief second for Opera 10.5 before leaving again
-Because the community has abandoned it there's a significant lack of, well, everything: themes, addons, compatible userstyles, you name it.
-Last I used it the only way to make pictures automatically fit-to-width on open was to enable the fit-to-width option for everything since the auto-resize addon thingy was both buggy, awful, and abandoned.
-Allowing for global fit-to-width breaks many things, but most importantly Opera Mail
-Opera still can't into basic things in HTML like, say, Facebook's popup privacy settings
-Memory leaks at random sites
-The UI is not very slick, seems to be an extra curved version of Firefox and it looks bad
-When enabling certain toolbars you get rid of the UI's transparency
-No way to reorganize the toolbars how you see fit, or, say, put the URL bar right next to the tabs

>>19887729
It's a feature.

>>19887808
community != you

Well Mozilla claim every new Firefox release is faster than the last one, but the reality is that it’s just more bloated and sluggish.

The real point here, is Apple(Sunspider), Mozilla(Kraken), Microsoft(Testdrive) and Google(V8 benchmark) have all created benchmarks to show off certain strengths of their browsers, Opera didn’t need to, as anyone smart enough to use Opera knows benchmarks means jackshit in the real world.

>>19887853
See second line.

>>19887849
>no benchmarks presented whatsoever in that image

>>19887729
I don't have Opera installed so I can't give you pictures, but you should have padding at the bottom and left of each post. Here's what 4chan looks like in every other browser.

>>19887887

>implying benchmarks matter when real word firefox is slow as shit

>>19887893
I'll help. You can see here the text clearly goes to the bottom of the reply box

>>19887946
http://my.opera.com/chooseopera/blog/2010/03/22/opera-10-51-released-making-the-fastest-browser-even
-faster

Apparently they do matter to Opera!

>>19887893
>but you should have padding at the bottom and left of each post
Nope that's just the non-standards compliant way of doing things. if not emulating IE conventions means rendering things differently, then I prefer it. And there is padding on the side, the only thing you're whining about is a difference in a few pixels, like the aspie retard you are.

>the community has abandoned it
Holy shit!! The extensions are being updated by ghosts!!

Stop talking out of your ass already.

>>19887978
>1 review
It's worse than I thought.

>oprah

>>19887989
It's brand new genius.

>Chrome
>Cannot into privacy

This is what 12 year olds actually believe.

>>19887965
>Opera 10.51

>>19887977
Actually I'm complaining that Opera is the only one who does this.
I don't see the point in using a browser if they can't render everything like everyone else does.

>>19887893
>>19887893
what?

>>19888013
>implying it can
mozilla master race

>>19888034
Are you fucking blind?

>>19888034
are you blind?

>>19888013
>Chrome
>Not a glamorized piece of adware/spyware
This is what retards actually believe.

>>19888013
>this is what the botnet wants you to believe

i use opera, but that looks like retarded ricer shit, op

opera has no good custom themes and most ui layout customizations made by users are unpractical and look dull

and rearranging buttons of the same features is not much of a customization

Also running the very latest Opera version and here's another thing that bugs me:

When maximized the tabs don't reach the top of the screen. There's about a 5 pixel space between the two as evident by the placement of the Opera button. This means that it's the only browser that when maximized I can't just move my cursor to the top of the screen and click, I have to go to the top of the screen, then manually go down a few pixels which is highly unintuitive and bad design.

>>19888034
Not sure if retard or blind.

>implying opera has any extensions
>implying opera can into page rendering

Opera, the browser for unique individuals such as myself.

I'm above you mainstream browser peasants.

Would you idiots get over yourselves already? It's an established fact that the only two browsers that matter are Firefox and Chrome, with Chrome being vastly superior in every way except for certain benchmarks and memory management (sometimes).

>>19888091
This is done so when the bar is full of tabs, there is still a sliver of the titlebar showing. In windows you can double-click the titlebar to restore the window. Those few pixels are there intentionally so you do not lose that function.

>2011
>using closed source browser

>>19888125
Jesus fuck those need to be shot on sight.
And then buried 16 feet under.

>>19888097
>>19888059
>>19888046
Sounds like this:
>>19887799

>>19888150
>Chrome being vastly superior in every way

[Citation needed]

>>19888125
The guy holding the app sign looks like this guy.

Browser hierarchy of greatness:

Chrome Beta/Canary > Opera Next > Nightly > Chrome regular > Opera regular > Furfox > everyone else

prove me wrong

>>19888189

search your heart, you know it to be true.

>>19888182
http://lifehacker.com/5645038/how-and-why-chrome-is-overtaking-firefox-among-power-users

>>19888150
You're absolutely right, except only one matters. Guess which on.

>>19888189
http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2010/06/10/a-survey-on-safari-5-chrome-and-firefox-extensions-api/

Nope.
Enjoy your toy.

>>19888091
The space is there so you can always go to the top of the window and double click to restore it, which is not an option in other browsers. This can be disabled on opera:config, I'm sure some other anon can provide the specific settings.

>undisputed master race
>can't render pages properly

>>19888100
>implying you're not buttmad at an application
>implying this is somehow normal

>>19888211
WILL YOU FUCKING DROP THIS?!

everyone knows 4chan is shit coded and opera strictly sticks to standards

>>19888207


>wordpress
>valid source

2/10 made me open the page

>>19888151
That leaves space both under the Opera button and next to the new tab button.

You click a tab more often than you grab a maximized window by open space in the titlebar. There's a reason why when Firefox 4 was in beta and it had that space it was one of the most popular "bugs" reported.

>>19888182
Why do I need citations on that? It's like asking me to explain why you shouldn't step into a puddle of lava. You just don't.

>>19888207


>2010
>one-year-ago

also
>wordpress


grasping at straws i see

>>19888224

So Opera sticks only to what works on paper while every other browser compensates for the reality of modern web pages?

Sounds like Opera is a pile of shit.

>>19888224
Personally I consider standards to be less of "what every browser is supposed to stick to" and more "what every browser does and every website is designed for" which Opera goes against.

But sure Opera's great for IRC and Mail, just disable that Browser feature.

>>19888237
You claimed a popular piece of software is indisputably better than another popular piece of software with no evidence.

Tell me, where is 'Chrome being vastly superior in every way ' ?

>>19888237

>>19888046
>>19888059
>>19888097
I guess I am, here is image of both pics next to each other, can you red circle of what am I suppose to be looking for?

>>19888224
Yeah. Autists stick to their own standards too, but they have a hard time functioning in the world, too.

>opera rendering web pages

>>19888242
>one year ago
>implying any browser vendor in their right mind would change their extension infrastructure if they don't wanna get mauled by mad users

But hey! At least Chrome got a completely useless and buggy beforeLoad feature that works 40% of the time!

Definitely a improvement, now the probability of it blocking ads went from 'lolno' to 'there's a chance'

>>19888276
>chrome blocking ads

>>19888256
Well, for one, faggots like you don't use it.

Does Opera have any extensions and can it run scripts?

>>19888260

>>19888293

you're bad and should feel bad for denying website owners ad revenue in order to keep their sites (which you obtain all your free pirated shit from) alive


DIAF you're the cancer that is killing thepiratebay

>>19888261
>whining about standards
>2011
Is there any excuse you retards won't use to keep using your 15 year old netscape hack? This is getting kind of hilarious now.

>>19888308
yes and yes

extensions:
https://addons.opera.com/addons/extensions/

scripts:
http://extendopera.org/
http://userscripts.org/

>>19888224
>opera strictly sticks to standards
I'd like to see a proper, specific citation for why Opera seemingly discards the bottom margin on contained elements.

I've done a short search and I end up getting margin related issues in Opera dating as far back as 2002.

>>19888308
>extensions
Yes it has a few but it has no community left to make anymore so the extensions are pretty basic.
>scripts
If those scripts are made to be Opera compatible. 4chan X is if that's what you're wondering.

>>19888301
Not using chrome bro

>>19888320
>TPB

Good, that honeypot needs to die.

>>19888324
It's also hilarious how the Opera devs think the internet should conform to them, rather than Opera conform to the internet, and how the users are okay with this.

>>19888303
No, but actual faggots do use it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7skPnJOZYdA&feature=player_embedded

>>19888354

>>19888260
There's no bottom padding under the text in the posts.

Even though you easily fix this with a style sheet (if you kids can even write css) I prefer it because that space is useless and I can see more posts without it.

But apparently those useless missing pixels are a massive fucking deal to aspies.

>>19888338

It's because they don't stick to standards at all. Their rendering engine prefers speed over accuracy. It doesn't even work because Opera is slow as shit anyway.

>>19888301
>Firefox just running

>>19888371
Gay people are popular in the companies of all mediums of technology

u mad they do something with their lives?

>opera user share

So why is Opera so unpopular? I'm not trying to be an ass, I'm asking an honest question.

>>19888393
Go away faggot.

I think everyone should use Safari because all the other browsers cannot into antialiased text.

Posted from my iPad

>>19888406
Apple like userbase.
Massive viral.

>>19888406

its pretentious hipster bullshit that churns out remakes of obscure features the other major browsers have and makes them a huge part of the browser, just so they can claim they invented it. its almost as bad as apple.

>>19888397
um, ok...

>>19888314
>>19888314
>>19888314

but if I run firefox I see same issue in it, isnt that padding made by 4chanX? You have your issue with whoever make that script and not the opera.

>>19888419

>Apple_User !IL8mwN0ctg

rev up those filters

>>19888414
But I'll never go away, especially with my future software engineering degree. I'll just be adding to the ranks and continue being better than you.
>>19888406
When's the last time you've seen an Opera ad?

>>19888397

Private trackers that don't require a ratio? I've never seen one of those.

>>19888406
The lowlife peasant sheep conforming to the mainstream do not understand my Artistic soul like Opera does.

>>19888430
Take a screenshot of you seeing the same issue.

>>19888406
have you seen opera bundled with some peace of software also?

>>19888436
I don't remember any Firefox ads, either.

It's been a while since I'd last tried Opera, so why not. Let's see here...
Okay, every browser asks this, that's fine and well...wait, why isn't it doing anything when I click ``No''?

>>19888388
see
>>19887659

>>19888453
thats the screenshot right there in firefox>>19888430

>>19888435
Lol, what's a filter bro?

>>19888438
Well, they do require a ratio, but I can download without increasing my download count thanks to the wonders of cookies and http

I'm sorry, but firefox is the best. You probably use Opera because no one else does. It's okay.

>>19888460
Yeah,

>>19888476
I don't see the issue. I see the padding you'd expect to see with a decent browser.
>>19888461
They did a very, very large scale anti-IE marketing campaign a few years back.

As for FF4... the fuck if I know, I've had ads blocked for years!

>>19888480

Oh okay. I just edit the tracker details in the torrent client so it doesn't report my upload or download.

>>19888379
> those useless missing pixels are a massive fucking deal to aspies.
It isn't so much the missing pixels I find to be an issue. It's that Opera users flaunt its supposed standards compliance, but when confronted with such a basic request such as >>19888338 they have nothing to show for it.

Other than the typical "lol aspies / autists". For all of their supposed classiness, that is about as scum level 4channer as you can get.

>>19888522
Ah, ok.

>>19888466
Restarted and this time it went through. Opened a few tabs to see how it handles and such, choppy animations all over which no other browser has had a problem with(out of Safari, Firefox, and Chromium). Not such a big deal I really don't care.
Why isn't it loading 4chan at all? It doesn't even appear to be trying...

>>19888522
> see the padding you'd expect to see
I'm sorry I hope you get help with your autisms.

>diss Mozilla fore relying on Chrome
>proceed to bash Chromes lack of proper adblocking.
I don't even

>>19888544
Because OS X, Opera development for that has always been on the backburner.
>>19888548
>implying its about one little problem and not a plethora of little problems that make people switch

>>19888522
>>19888522
>>19888522
>>19888522

>>19888548
>Flaunts conformity to standards
>Disregards one standard and claims that anyone who cares about it is an autist

Sure do love those double standards.

>>19888536
>Opera users flaunt its supposed standards compliance
But most webpages aren't standards compliant at all, you unbelievable moron. Stop using flaky logic to support your shitty software, it's still a 10 year old engine that needed a full rewrite 5 years ago.

>>19888592
What sites you have problem with?

Is opera next transparent out of the box? If it is, I'll switch. I'm a vain bastard.

>>19888544
I waited a few minutes and it finally loaded. I tried clicking a link in Opera Speed Dial, it maybe half-loaded? Favicon loaded and URL bar changed and now when I try closing the tab it doesn't close. Whatever I'm deleting this I guess.

>>19888480

Mind explaining how?

>>19888577
>>19888564
>>19888548
>>19888536
>>19888476
>>19888453
>>19888430
>>19888379
>>19888314

Here's your pixels back, aspies:
.reply {padding-bottom:10px !important;}

>>19888602
Try, say, 15 sites at the same time.
>>19888628
This is pointless and you know it.

>>19888592
>completely failing to address the issue at its core.

So are you going say anything of substance or just continue to make blind assumptions about which browser I'm using?

>>19888627
>>19888627
There are lots of transparent sking, glass, omelion,..

>>19888648
What's pointless? Trying to use Opera? I don't understand what you're trying to say.

>>19888641
That's uneven with the padding-top, you can't even into styling right. And why would you resort to a userstyle to make up for a shitty browser's problem? You'd be spending years fixing every site.

>>19888652
>thinks agreeing with his misconstrued arguments means addressing the issue at its core.
I believe we're done here, I cannot argue with a pathological moron.

>>19888641
Still incorrect.
Pictures should not have the same padding as text.

>>19888667
You trying to use opera, taking screenshots and making up issues as you go. It's kind of pathetic and a waste of time. You're not going to run into any trouble installing and running it.

>>19888671
>>19888671
>>19888671
WHy don't you rather answer to this >>19888574 you shitty tripfagg

same rendering as firefox you retard

>>19888641
>wrong padding-bottom
>lack of padding-right
>USING OS X FONTS IN WINDOWS

>>19888697
I thought that was a picture against Firefox.

The top left isn't Opera.

>>19888641
>>19888641
thanks anon

>>19888695
>making up issues
lole? I will record a video if you're really this daft and require proof.

>>19888641
The left and right margins aren't the same size...

>>19888671
>>19888683
I give up. You've gone full autism. If you want it pixel fucking perfect go write your own CSS.

>>19888711
Er, against Opera I mean.

see:
>>19888260

>>19888724
OR
instead of having to fix EVERY SINGLE WEBSITE that has fucked up CSS thanks to Opera...

I could just not use Opera.

>>19888711
>>19888711
is same picture as here >>19888314 you faggot the same one you circled, it is opera.

>>19888748
I was taking his picture and pointing out the diff-
Oh why am I even replying.
2/10

>>19888718
Why would you suddenly get so many issues when everyone else has no trouble installing it? Keep reaching, idiot.

>>19888679
>misconstrued
You're going to want to go over these posts again if you truly believe this is anything even close to misconstrued.

Opera users assert that Opera does it right. It's down to them to justify it - and they can't.

>>19888664
>daily show
>reddit

liberal faggot detected

FIREFOX 9.01 MASTER RACE.

>>19888746
Or you could not gripe about a few missing pixels that are fucking useless and making a massive deal over nothing.

>>19888762
Hint: I'm not running the same operating system as them.

>>19888746
>EVERY SINGLE WEBSITE that has fucked up CSS thanks to Opera...
None of them? What is the main problem here, a few pixels on the comment boxes hardly qualify as a bug, specially considering the way webpages are rendered.
So all in all, you have nothing besides 2 pixels. I'm sorry but I'm not going to waste half my RAM just to share your mental condition.

>>19888758
>>19888758
I know its my picture, but its funny that you no longer claim thats the padding is the issue once firefox picture with padding is there but you claim that the picture in top lef is not opera.

what would it change if it was not opera? When the obvious padding issue was there, you were fine with it being opera, now its not opera. And? someone pretend that its opera so he can claim padding issues all for himself?

you right you better stop replying you are starting too look like a faggot and with retarded tripfaggs it won't go away

>>19888425
>>19888425
>>19888425
>>19888425
>>19888425
>>19888425
>>19888425
>>19888425
>>19888425

>>19888834
>opera

i swear to god, i'll switch to firefox or chromium just because of obnoxious user-base denying developer fuckups and pretending that badly implemented features and customization platform abandon by userbase is something great

>>19889019
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/

>>19889006
>Firefox

>>19889019
any concrete issues?

actually if you see most opera user here deals with facts and arguments against some wide speculations and accusations full of faggotry like your own post...

>>19888834
The problem is that Opera lacks the padding...

>>19889019
>of obnoxious user-base denying developer fuckups and pretending that badly implemented features and customization platform abandon by userbase is something great.
Good riddance, that's the worst reason to discontinue software usage. You are clearly a disturbed individual.

>>19889066
obviously so does firefox.

>>19889085
..But.. it has it there...

>>19889066
The problem is how you expect rendering to happen. If everyone else does it wrong, it's not a good reason to imitate them.

>>19889097
dunno what you are talking about

>>19889105
Yes it is especially when websites base their designs around this.
>>19889116
Exactly. That space is the padding, and the padding being there is what you should expect. The bottom left is Opera and the only one that lacks it, which is the issue.

>>19889105
Come on

>>19889138

>>19889167
Eh?

What's wrong with addons? Mozzila has a strong community and an addon for everything you can think of and some for things that no sane man could.

And slow? Sorry, I thought I was living in the 21st century

A message from /v/:

Are you people seriously arguing about which browser is the best? Get a fucking life, they're all so similar it doesn't matter.

[spoiler]but chrome is the best[/spoiler]

>>19890788
Dear /v/,
Stop necrobumping.

>>19890823
No, it's the only way to keep vidya threads alive

>>19890847
/v/ doesn't have threads about video games, /v/ has threads about everything but.

>Chrome: cannot into privacy. Cannot into adblock.
>Cannot into adblock.

What?

>>19892335
the only proper adblock is on firefox
botnet API doesn't allow for proper adblocking

Nightly master race reporting in.

>>19890823
Sup Chrom* master race friend.

>slow as dick with them
0/10

Fact is firefox has the most functionality at the end of the day and nobody gives a fuck about a couple millisecond differences in page load times

>>19892335
What the fuck is with you people and necrobumping.

>>19892446
Lurkers~

Yeah.

>>19892454
Hi Zixaphir.

>>19887095

>>19890823
>necrobumping
I don't even-

>>19892471
>I don't even-
>>>/b/

>>19892455
Sup nig.

>>19892463
Transparency is sooooo 2008.

>>19892471
>>>/b/

http://www.opera.com/privacy/

>Please note: Opera Software cooperates with HitsLink.com, Google Analytics, addthis.com, AdMob, and Otrs.org.

>Some of Opera’s Web sites and services use Google Analytics, a web analytics service provided by Google, Inc. (“Google”). Google Analytics uses “cookies”, which are text files placed on your computer, to help the Web site analyze how users use the site. The information generated by the cookie about your use of the website (including your IP address) will be transmitted to and stored by Google on servers in the United States. Google will use this information for the purpose of evaluating your use of the website, compiling reports on website activity for website operators and providing other services relating to website activity and internet usage. Google may also transfer this information to third parties where required to do so by law, or where such third parties process the information on Google’s behalf.

>yfw Opera voluntarily pimps your info to good and other Big Brother-esque corporations

>>19892446
>>19890823
I have never seen anyone except you complain about "necrobumping"

>>19892502
Well normally its just, say, "why did you bump this shit, this is from 3 hours ago" and I shortened it with the normal way to shorten it according to internet terminology.

Why do you get bent over one word? Do you derail threads over reddit comics as well?

>>19892511
>normally its just, say, "why did you bump this shit, this is from 3 hours ago"
How is 3 hours old? This isn't /b/. And no, I don't complain about reddit comics, I don't even post in threads containing those.

>>19892525
The thread itself is 7 hours old, but it was mostly against those who bumped it after 2-3 hours of no one replying to it.

You could do everything and make my bed, but you're still closed source.

Epic troll thread.

I don't use opera but firefox users need to be taken down a peg. Its not the best thing since netscape. Its just not. Its bloated and more IEtards are clicking on the fox more instead of the compass or E. Honestly. Its slow with addons. Thats all it has. Fucking addons. As if you need addons to have a good browser? I use midori and arora. They work fine and have built in features.

>>19892835
>Thats all it has. Fucking addons.

Nope. Troll harder.

>>19887095

What is OP using that makes his windows fully transparent and have close buttons that look like that?

>>19887095
>bing
vomit.jpg