Like slowking.

I can outsavvy them. I'll be fine.

>>19270310
like reinstalling TOR

I don't give a shit about them, should I?

>Department of Justice

Felsgudman.

pretty good, I hope they enjoy their prison butt rapege

>implying a bunch of butthurt 40 year olds can outsmart us
>laughingwhores.tiff

>Implying I keep CP

Shit isn't even sexy, just strangely weird and funny.

>child porn
>horror site

pick one

>>19270310
You're a faggot.

nope.jpg

It was a clearnet board (Dreamboard) that got busted, not a Tor hidden service.

Serves you right if you think proxys make you anonymous

>>19270461
horror site.

>feds bust into my house
>find nothing but milf porn
>high five me
BEST DAY

>>19270478
officer1: this 13 year old has MILF porn..
officer2: is this legal..?

>>feds bust into my house
>find nothing but loli doujins
>high five mai waifu
BEST DAY

>>19270469
clearnet board? i cannot into this...

>>19270310
I feel happy they caught those pedophile fucks.

>>19270453
Honestly, I'm extremely happy that I don't find it appealing in any way, it would eat me inside :/

>>19270310

How does it make me feel? Good that the DoJ is capable of catching these criminals.

>>19270310
Indifferent, never had interest in 3D.

>>19270485
officer1: this 13 year old has milf porn
officer2: nice, nice

>>19270493
Clearnet as in NOT on an anonymity network.

>>19270493
>clearnet

Its a term tor faggots use to try and sound cool.

>>19270512

thanks for *clearing that up
(c) reddit

>>19270495
>:/
Get out.

>>19270310
>anonymous
>screen names

Why am I the first one here bothered by this blatant oxymoron?

Feels good man.

>>19270495
God tier finidng child porn disgusting and wrong masterace here no guilt HELL YES I CAN'T EVER BE PUT IN JAIL FOR WHAT I JERK OFF TO HELL YES

>>19270478
Underage+fapping to MILF porn = creating CP. Enjoy your prison buttrape you sick pedo.

>>19270548
>Why am I the first one here bothered by this blatant oxymoron?

Because unlike you we understand that the media can't into internet terminology and are fucking retards?

>>19270548
>used anonymous screen names
>anonymous
>screen names

yea, i feel you.

i also find it painful to know that they seem to think having non-real names is some kind of protection system

>>19270567
wait, wait,

what?

It just reminds me of two things
1) Anonymity is an illusion and anyone who buries their head in it is delusional
2) This thought that everyone is entitled to anonymity on the internet just outs the people espousing that view as culturally naive. Anonymity has never been a component of society. There has never been an expectation of anonymity in the history of mankind. Perhaps one could argue a right to privacy, but privacy and anonymity are completely different things with only tangential relationship to each other.

These guys were in some cases child abusers, and whether we joke about it or not, child abuse isn't acceptable. Society is strict on that in virtually every community around the world. Screwing a girl before she's old enough to carry a child is virtually universally considered wrong. So I'm not too upset that these guys got nailed and I'm none too distressed that - in the process of getting these guys - the DoJ also illustrated that your notions of anonymity and freedom to say WHATEVER you want is completely made up.

Moot would sell you out to the feds if they came to him with a post indicating deliberate intent to do something violent and illegal. He would, and so would any other sane admin, no matter how much you think they defend that "Anonymous is lejun durp" nonsense.

>>19270567
>underage
23 years old masterace

>implying they'll ever catch anyone using TOR and noscript

>>19270453

I concur, only children past puberty are attractive, and then there are plenty of "just 18" sites that have legal girls that look 14.

Pedofags are into it because of some physiological inferiority complex or something, I saw a show about it once, not really because they are that attracted to the physical body of children. Or something like that, I'm not a psychologist. Whatever the case its sick and they need to be put to death probably, or at least put in jail.

slowpoke.jpg

>>19270601

>23
>on 4chan

Confirmed for failure.

>>19270629
>under 23
>on 4chan

confirmed for developing failure

>>19270594

You can say whatever you want, at least in most countries, you just can't expect to be anonymous, and you are accountable for the damages of whatever you say/do.

If there was a "right to anonymity" the world would pretty much be a big shit hole like 4chan.

>>19270667
That's why real life is not the internet. I for one am distressed by governments using child porn as a scapegoat for spying and censorship. There has got to be a more proactive way to stop child pornographers then create a bunch of nanny laws that have extreme potential for abuse. A certain level of online anonymity is always going to be necessary to protect free speech.

>>19270821
it gets exploited for sure for the simple fact that pornography has no real connection to rape. most people however only get upset by what they see.

>>19270859
>pornography has no real connection to rape

But we are talking about child porn where 100% is connected to rape.

Why should the internet be any different than real life? If I own some warehouse where a traffic children for sex and the police have probably cause to search my warehouse, they shouldn't they be able to?

>>19271009
You CANNOT have free speech without anonymity. I don't know how many times this has to be said for it to be true.

>>19270667
the world is worst then 4chan

>>19271046

Yes you can, free speech without anonymity has occurred for hundreds of years before the internet.

Did they hack past TOR?

>>19271215
I believe this site was on the plain web

I'm happy that justice has been brought to these freaks

But they should also crack down on the cartoon CP that gets posted on this board too

>>19271230
I mean did they get past users using TOR to access the website?

>>19270667
I agree.
>>19270821
The fact is that the government has a right to show up at your front door with a warrant and just come right the fuck in. Similarly, they can watch you from across the street and follow you around town and the only thing they have to get cleared is internal permission for budget stuff.

The internet is fundamentally different from real life, but that's a double edged sword. If the purpose of freedom for cops to watch you from afar is so that they can observe your public actions without interfering with your privacy, then there must be some way to facilitate that on the internet. Furthermore, when people turn to things like TOR and whatnot, there needs to be a set of rules delineating when cops can and cannot break in (assuming that's even possible in a given situation).

The only solution to the threat of scapegoating and corruption is accountability. Make the punishment for illegal wiretapping as serious as breaking into someone's home. Consider it a real crime, and not just a logistical mixup or a paperwork fuckup. When an investigator knows that illegally accessing someone's data without a warrant will mean his job, he won't break the rule. When a president knows that violating the intellectual property privacy of individuals is as serious as breaking into their offices and spying on them illegally, only 1 president will be so audacious as to attempt such an act.

There have always been and will always be secret organizations in the government which just act above the law. And if they go through your apartment or office, you've got no recourse. That sucks. Trying to get rid of them would be like trying to eliminate corruption. Sure we endeavor, but only a profoundly naive person would think it's actually completely doable.

>>19271046
Say it as many times as you like, it won't make it true.

>>19271238
I doubt it

>>19271215

TOR isn't anonymous, they can easily obtain your real IP, its best to use a proxy with TOR.

Even then there is no way to remain completely anonymous, its just a matter of how much effort it would be to catch you. You could probably get away with ordering drugs and such with TOR because they don't really care that much. But for child porn sites you better be using multiple proxies.

>>19270310
lucky that I'm not american

In my country the punishment for this would be 120 hours of community service.

CP is shit anyway. 3D is pig disgusting, especially brats.

>>19271264
if you want drugs, go to a better county it's way less of a hassle

They should have moved to Russia.

It's legal there.

>>19271264
The truth is that nothing (offline or online) is totally anonymous. We have this notion of anonymity because
A) we feel safe in our underwear sitting in front of our humming computer, and
B) law enforcement has historically been slow on the uptake. It's like we're committing an IRL bank heist and then when the cops chase after us and jump into our getaway car, the cops go "holy fuck how did he do that? What the fuck was that thing he jumped into?" as we drive away.

Give them a few weeks though and they'll figure out what a car is and how to make one work for them. Then you'll need something cleverer than a getaway car.

By the same analogy, there was a time when police enforcement had no idea what the fuck TOR was or how proxies worked. They learned quickly, and now if you're committing a seriously heinous crime (worthy of national law enforcement and investigation), you better have brought a fucking rocket ship, not a getaway car.

>How does this make you feel, /g/?

It makes me feel as if I shouldn't care what they find on my machine.

I don't subscribe to, nor do I even seek out, kiddie porn sites.

If you want to fantasize, then go do loli. No children even involved.

Personally, I like nc erotic lit. It doesn't mean I'm going to go out and rape someone.

>>19271361
why.jpg

are they all peter files there?

>>19271404
No, it just hasn't been made illegal to own. Probably because of Russian mafia lobbying.

>>19271324

No thanks, I'd rather live in a country where I don't have to worry about being killed by some enrages crackhead or high driver.

I don't care, they put hundereds of manhours into this and millions of dollars for a reason.
If it was, for example, 100 people sharing ripped Michael Bay movies using the same protection, they would never be caught.
Moral of the story: You are never fully anonymous on the internet, but if you're careful enough, it will take the fucking Department of Justice to find you. Also, don't fuck children, you sick piece of shit.

>>19271431
because drugs are equal to bad stuff

>>19271451
Drugs are for weaklings that cannot deal with reality, and need something to alter their brain chemistry to escape it. I'd consider that bad, yes.

>>19271485

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to he happy"

- Ben Franklin

Protip: Alcohol is a drug.

BTW, don't try to "prove" this wrong. He wrote this about wine, but it got misquoted over the decades to mean beer. It's still alcohol.

>>19271451

Are you kidding? More infants are killed a year for opiate withdraw in Florida then people die in car wrecks.

>>19271561
I don't drink drugged-up pisswater like some goddamn peasant. And quoting some colonial peasant isn't going to change that.

>>19271561
alcohol is hard-drug
deal with it

Just fine, really. I feel no sympathy for those revolting fucks, and I'm not surprised at all that the partyvan can find you through proxies, Tor, etc. You think they aren't operating their own honeypot proxies and that they don't have a bunch of nodes in the Tor network? Think again. For every guy claiming he uses those out of principle to maintain his anonymity, there are three more who do it because they're pulling shit like this. Good riddance.

>>19271584

Alcohol, I'm fine with it being restricted like it currently is, that is its illegal to consume in public in most parts of the U.S, and illegal to drive will intoxicated. Maybe weed should be the same way, but thats the extend of anything that should be legal.

>>19271619
In my opinion weed should be legal and alcohol illegal

>>19271645

In terms of health effects and addiction, yes weed is much better than alcohol if you use something like a vaporizer (smoke is bad). But both weed and alcohol's effects are very manageable compared to other drugs. In terms of the impact of drugs to society, its any one's personal choice if they want to use drugs, but alcohol and weed have less negative effect on other people than the majority of other drugs.

>>19271264
>better be using
tor IS multiple proxies

Just fine.

>>19271692

See

>>19271611

Tor has many security vulnerabilities.

>For every guy claiming he uses those out of principle to maintain his anonymity, there are three more who do it because they're pulling shit like this.

More like 1:1000, from an ideologist perspective sure anonymity sounds like a great idea, if everyone in the world is saint that abides by every law. The fact is 99.9% of tor is drugs and child porn.

>>19271692
Not really.

Oh, and for those whining about guys getting busted just for looking...

>Members were also segregated according to the degree of original content that they provided, or the degree to which the administrators trusted them. Classifications included "Super VIP," "VIP," and "Member." According to one user's guilty plea, the "SuperVIP" level was reserved for those members actually "producing child pornography and posting homemade child pornography to the bulletin board."

They actively encouraged PRODUCTION. I hope they throw all these fucks into a hole filled with horny rapist howler monkeys and leave them to rot. I don't think there is a punishment out there that would be sufficient for scum like this.

>>19271619
I'm glad that people who can't even be bothered to spell properly are not the people making the laws.

>>19271857
I'm very worried about their definition of CP. Are they talking about girls stripping in front of their webcams or ACTUAL CP. Because the former is harmless, and I would be enraged if I ever got in trouble for it.

>>19271689
Psychedelics are some of the safest drugs.

>>19271883

Its called typos.

>>19271887
Even loli (drawn shit) is being classified as CP these days.

It's goddamn thought crime.

>>19271910
It's called spellcheck.

>>19271887
probably the latter, they only allowed for children 12 and under so I assume they would have difficulty explaining what to do

>>19271921

None of those words were misspelled.

>>19272007
>but thats the extend of anything
>thats the extend of
>the extend
>extend

>>19272039

Extend is spelled correctly.

Wrong words are not misspellings.

>>19271913
well thats just a deviancy.

>>19271887
>girls stripping in front of their webcams

Its wrong to distribute this, as the girl may not of understood the consequences. However I agree its not nearly as bad as the "production of CP"

>>19272039

ffs its called typos, and no ones going to re-read what they've written on fucking 4chan unless it has a big red squiggly under it.

>>19271887
Read the article.
>In addition, the most exclusive area of the site was reserved for members who could provide content that showed children suffering. "If the girl looks totall [sic] comfortable, she's not in distress, it does NOT belong I [sic] this section."

This was hardcore rape shit. The people involved in that should be forced to eat their own cock and balls raw.

>>19272101
im not into little girls but ive probably seen a few 16 and 17 year olds on stickam masturbating and shit

I hardly see how if I ever got in trouble for something like that how i could be classified the same as someone who actually likes 3 year old girls and shit.

>>19272101

>not of understood
>of instead of have
Even ESL faggots get this right. What the fuck is wrong with you?

>>19272147
That's rather sadistic. And to think people who put their own children through such misery.

Guys, what if I was a 13 year old girl and I took sexual pictures of myself naked, then 30 years later found the pictures on my old camera and decided to distribute them?

>>19272181
it would be illegal

>>19272147

Nah, just turn them out into general population instead of keeping them in protective custody.

The inmates will mete out appropriate justice.

>>19272149

You won't, if its plausible you didn't know the age of the girl, its likely you would get off, or get a really weak punishment, at least in the US. Now if you distributed said materiel that's a different story.

>>19272190

So how were they caught? Were they using TOR? Did the FBI post CP to get onto the forum?

guys, what if say someone is 16, and they are looking at (not distributing or anything) pictures of other 16 year olds that are sexual?

>>19272215

>>19272190

>>19272200
because it still counts as CP it doesn't matter who its of, this is why 17 year olds who take pictures of their cocks get in trouble for sending it to their friends

>>19272181

Its illegal, but a victimless crime, you would not be convicted.

>>19272165
Again its fucking 4chan

>>19272202
They don't go into details, which isn't surprising. Dunno if folks were using Tor, but there were proxies involved, at least. And yes, the Feds probably did post some CP to get in there. They wouldn't have been able to do so otherwise.

And I've always wondered about Tor. It wouldn't be surprising at all to see the partyvan have a lot of their own nodes in the Tor network. Now, let's presume that they have the nodes spread out both physically and logically in the network, each with high bandwidth so they get plenty of traffic. If you were intent enough with capturing and analyzing all traffic at every node and comparing all the data, would it be possible to pinpoint the entry node? I'm thinking this might just be doable.

>>19272215
I heard about a case where two 15-year olds were sending each other erotic pictures over the phone, and were convicted of spreading CP.

Don't underestimate how out-of-touch with reality some people are.

>>19272260
to be able to see what someone is doing i think you have to control at least the entry node and the exit node

>>19272263
In my country (Canada) it would be legal for those 15 year olds to fuck, but they cant send pics to each other?

jesus fuck

>>19272236
>Victimless crime
>You would not be convicted

In the US? I don't think so, Tim.

>>19272263
Thankfully, some states are adopting sane laws for sexting that makes it a misdemeanor in certain cases. Fuck, even Texas of all places is implementing that kind of law. If fucking Texas can realize that kids being stupid shouldn't put them on the sex offender registry, then maybe there's hope for the rest of the country.

>>19272290
yes, although here in Florida we've cut down on the maximum punishment IIRC now you get a fine the first couple of times you're caught

Guys, what if someone had some weird growth disease where their body stopped growing when they were 12, so the person is 20 years old but with a 12 year old body

>>19272290

By law, yes, but it would be laughable for any court to actually convict anyone in such a scenario.

>>19272337
then its legal, its all about the age the law doesn't recognize anything else

>>19272287
And if my understanding is correct, a lot of people will host relay nodes, but are hesitant to host entry/exit nodes. Leaves a nice dearth of them for the partyvan.

However, if you don't have the entry/exit node, it might be possible to pinpoint the entry if you can capture enough traffic across the network. I can't say as this really isn't my area of expertise, but if the partyvan had a way to do this, you can bet your ass they wouldn't make it public.

Guys, what if I'm only 15 years old and I go and rape someone who's 19 years old, would they get charged with statutory rape?

>>19272337

You're an idiot.

>>19272311

Every defendant has the option of being tried by jury, no jury would ever convict someone in the scenarios presented: person distributing their own pictures. Unless the idea is to prevent any reason for people to encourage a child to take pictures of themselves, then distribute it after the fact. Although that's pretty far fetched.

>>19272397
no but you would be charged with rape

>>19272397

No, you idiot, the 15 year old would be charged as a minor for rape.

sooo... why doesnt everyone just do questionable shit on public wifi instead of going through all these security measures?
to much of a shut-in to sit outside starbucks?

>>19272165

I'm 32 and make 220k/year with a BA, and I didn't know that was wrong. You jelly?

>>19272417
Except there have been numerous convictions for sexting, although thankfully that might be coming to an end. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened and won't continue to happen, though.

>>19272455
>sit outside starbucks?
I'd rather disembowel myself.

>>19272455
I dunno bout you but browsing a CP site in public sounds like a bad idea

>>19272455

This would work for people received the content, but obviously content distributors couldn't host their website at Starbucks.

>"No matter how savvy online predators think they are, we will find them, dismantle their networks, and bring them to justice."
>taking DOJ at it's word
obviously theres a level of savvyness that they cant deal with

>>19272485

True, but its always been girl sent pic to boy, that boy sends it to all his friends, not really in the scenario described. If so who found out and how? Someone sent it to the wrong person.

>>19272506
you dont actually go in, order a coffee, and start looking at CP/ordering drugs obviously...

>>19272551
There have been cases where it's been kept private until someone was borrowing the phone, saw it, and called the cops.

Or what about those cases where, say, a 15 year old girl seduces a 20 year old guy, then reports him, and the guy gets put in jail.

An impossible scenario in countries with a sane age of consent law, but many countries use the 16-18 ones.

>>19272590

I don't see that as a problem, at 20 you should be able to control yourself around a 15 year old girl.

>>19271749

Tor itself is not hackable. People love to claim that it has security vulnerabilities but anybody who has been caught using Tor (like that lady with the government emails a few years ago) was using it incorrectly.

Back your ridiculous claims up. The DoJ is trumpeting this around but it was not a .onion site- from what I've read about it it was just a normal http site. They're using very generic terminology and phrasing to try to scare stupid pedos and assure all the "normies" of how great they're doing.

>>19272590
I read a story about some 13 year old bitch who looked much older. She'd make fake IDs, go to bars, and take guys home. One guy got convicted, and she kept doing it. The next guy found out and went to her parents. They called the cops. Dunno if he got convicted, but he probably did. Why that miserable little cunt didn't go to prison for knowingly enticing the guy into unknowingly committing a felony is beyond me, but when I read the story, he was charged and she was not.

Common sense isn't as common as you think.

>>19272590
>An impossible scenario in countries with a sane age of consent law

Sane? 16-15 years is the norm in the vast majority of developed countries. In the US its 15-18, depends by state.

>>19272590
If she says she's 18 and you have no good faith basis to question that statement, she's without recourse.

Rob Lowe ran into that in the 80's if memory serves.

>>19272654
It's 13, 14, or 15 in most of Europe.

>>19272654
the age of consent doesn't work if the parents don't consent IIRC

Pedophiles are the pioneers of the Internet freedom. No other group has promoted the development of encryption and anonymizing software which is the only thing capable of providing freedom of speech to the people. This makes me proud of my kind.

>>19272777
And they've also helped to destroy it by giving politicians a reason to crack down, which fucks us all.

Thanks a lot, you useless shitstain.

>>19272700
>It's 13, 14, or 15 in most of Europe.

What? In the UK its 16 - 18 depending on the relationship of the people involved.

In Germany its 16 to anyone under 21, only 14 in rare scenarios.

Denmark 15, Norway is 16, Netherlands is 16, Sweden is 15, Switzerland is 16.

Almost all of Europe is 15-18 just like the US, Spain being the rare exception, ranging from 13-16 depending on the scenario.

Did you know in Canada the age of consent is 12-16 depending on the age of the partner. Except anal intercourse is only legal between two people 18 years and older, that is anal is illegal if your having a threesum. Lol Canada.

>>19272829
1. if not CP, the politicians would just find another thing to blame everything on. For example video games

2. You are a voter as well. You elected them.

>>19273028

Not really, very few people care about piracy, but almost everyone condones the invasion of privacy to prevent child abuse/rape.

>>19273028
>2. You are a voter as well. You elected them.
You say that, but representative democracy isn't really democracy.

I can vote all I want, but I still end up with elitists pushing their world-view on the general populace whether it agrees or not.

>>19273055
Like I said - if there were no CP, they will find another scapegoat. If there were no CP, they would ban regular porn and request monitoring the Internet to enforce this ban. And most people will support that, because porn watchers are a minority. They could ban (violent) video games and monitor Internet to enforce that, and people will support them because most people don't play violent video games. There's always some kind of minority that could be banned for whatever reason.

But that's beyond the point - no government will ever grant you a right to free speech, because it is never a benefit for them. Only technology and science, encryption and anonymization mechanism are able to do that - math is not prone to corruption. And the pedophiles are the ones to push the development of this technology right now. They are this just by chance - it could be gamers, drug users, porn users or any other minority. Pedophiles just happened to be the ones most targeted now. Pedophiles are truly holy people.

Using proxy connections is only as safe as your ability to know that the owner and operator of that proxy will not turn you over to anyone who comes knocking. Encrypted files are fine as long as no one else has the key.... but there are still ways of keeping yourself from being by the feds. It just takes not being stupid about what you do. I always like these kinds of bullshit articles, though, that always end with some dipshit using it as a propaganda to say something like "NO MATTER WHERE YOU HIDE OR WHAT YOU DO SCUM, WE WILL FIND YOU". Laughable at best.

>>19273200
REV UP DEM TIM FOIL HATS.
CP IS DISTRIBUTED BY THE GOV AS AN EXCUSE TO INVADE OUR PRIVACY.
CRACK/AIDS IS DISTRIBUTED BY THE GOV AS AN EXCUSE TO KILL NIGGERS.

>>19273200
You are so pathetically full of shit. CP is something that the vast, VAST majority of the population loathes. They want it to be illegal and they want those who dabble in it to be punished. Nothing else you mentioned even comes CLOSE to that.
>And most people will support that, because porn watchers are a minority.
I wouldn't be so sure about that. Porn is a massive, multi-billion dollar industry and one of the driving forces of the internet. Porn has already been through the constitutional rigamarole, too.
>They could ban (violent) video games and monitor Internet to enforce that, and people will support them because most people don't play violent video games.
Funny, this has been tried, and it has failed in the US. The most they've been able to do is try to enforce the illegality of selling mature games to minors, which is a far cry from banning violent video games.
>They are this just by chance - it could be gamers, drug users, porn users or any other minority.
Sorry, but no. Pedos are far, FAR more loathed than anything you've listed.

But who am I kidding? You can't penetrate the cognitive dissonance of a fucking pedo. You're irreversibly fucked in the head. I only hope you're the type that's smart enough to realize that what you want is sick and wrong and choose not to partake, but considering your line of thought, you probably used to post on Anustalk and should have your fucking balls cut off.

>>19273763
> CP is something that the vast, VAST majority of the population loathes.
Same can be said about drugs and violent videogames

> Porn is a massive, multi-billion dollar industry
Same was said about child porn, btw.
Meanwhile porn is actually banned in several countries. You can get in jail or even receive a death sentence for distributing it online.

> Funny, this has been tried, and it has failed in the US.
Like I said, CP is the current scapegoat, there's no need to ban everything else. Putting something else at the same level as CP would diminish the political value of CP, it was a huge investment and the politicians wouldn't just throw it away. Unless some politician decides to get more appeal. And then there are other countries like Australia or Germany who actually did that.

> Pedos are far, FAR more loathed than anything you've listed.
Explain it to soccer moms. They wish you dead, regardless if you are a pedo, a gamer or a stoner. And they vote.

> But who am I kidding? You can't penetrate the cognitive dissonance of a fucking pedo. You're irreversibly fucked in the head. I only hope you're the type that's smart enough to realize that what you want is sick and wrong and choose not to partake, but considering your line of thought, you probably used to post on Anustalk and should have your fucking balls cut off.
Oh my, what do we see here, a torrent of fallacies and name-calling. So you already resigning? Good dog.

makes me feel good
hope those fucks get dick'd hard in prison

How do I go about getting on board with the feds and driving the party van? Setting up honeypots, raiding pedos, infiltrating onion sites, and busting pedos would be so fucking fun. Getting paid while doing a community service? Fuck yea.

>>19274067
join the FBI

>>19274086

What kind of degree would you have to have for something like that?

>>19274113
http://www.fbijobs.gov/

>>19274113
not sure I think they were hiring a little while back though

>>19274134
and you beat me to it

> Getting paid while doing a community service? Fuck yea.
LOL, ever heard that USA is bankrupt?

>>19274067
Y U SO MAD THO

>>19274177
>>19274159

>confirmed for pedos

Legalize it and regulate it. Softcore nudes should be fine, but seriously fucked up rape and torture should be cracked down on even harder. Castration for a first time offense and execution for repeat offenders.

>>19274319
i feel the same way about weed

>>19271749
>Tor has many security vulnerabilities.
Like what? As long as you're using it correctly you won't get caught.

>>19274341
Yup. Legalize possession and growing of limited amounts (one plant per person?). Tax retail of plants, leaves, and seeds heavily, and anyone found to be doing shit under the table goes to prison for ten years and gets their business liquidated to fund the program.

>>19274319
Yeah, bongs, bling-bling in forms of marijuana leafs and tshirts with such logos, listening to dope music and stuff like that all should be legal, but seriously fucked up shit like actually smoking it should be cracked down on even harder. Castration for a first time offense and execution for repeat offenders.

>>19274413
In my opinion you should be allowed to use and grow it as much as you would any other plant

>>19274462
exactly

>>19274463
Yeah, I think that's only logical. Only consuming it should be illegal.

Indifferent. There is no morality.

Feels good.

They deserve it for being too stupid to cover their tracks.

>comparing weed to child porn
You're idiots.

>>19274462
I think we can all agree there's a pretty clear line between smoking the leaves of a plant and torturing a child.

>>19274520

Makes me happy.

Bunch of sicks fucks wont get what they deserved though. They'll get to sit in prison with free food and medical care for the rest of their lives.

They all need a 35mm lead pill to the brain IMO

>>19271249
>intellectual property
Oh GOD that is such a stupid word.

Actually 2 words...

>>19274520
dumbass, weed is WORSE than child porn

>>19273938
>Same can be said about drugs and violent videogames
Wrong. Violent video games are not going anywhere. There isn't anywhere remotely close to a hard enough push to get rid of them. Drugs are illegal, however, the tide is slowly turning against that in the US. It'll be a while before politicians do anything, but there are far more people who would push for the decriminalization of drugs (especially pot) than CP. You still don't have a point.
>Same was said about child porn, btw.
Pardon me, a multi-billion dollar legit industry that has been legit for some time. It's pretty tough to take down a legal multi-billion dollar industry. Too much money can stuff congressional pockets. Was CP ever a legit industry, at least in modern times? It isn't really an industry. It's a loose collection of underground sickos swapping stuff, and even if it were legal, it would still be far less prevalent than the adult porn industry as many people would still rage at it.
>Meanwhile porn is actually banned in several countries. You can get in jail or even receive a death sentence for distributing it online.
Yeah, they're called "third world shitholes", usually in SE Asia or the Middle East. They're often run by theocracies or dictatorships. That's not the US.
>Explain it to soccer moms. They wish you dead, regardless if you are a pedo, a gamer or a stoner. And they vote.
Bullshit. The kids of those soccer moms are often playing violent video games. They may not like stoners, but if you think they hate gamers or stoners as much as pedos then you are even more out of touch with reality than I thought.

>>19277597
>Oh my, what do we see here, a torrent of fallacies and name-calling. So you already resigning? Good dog.
If the shoe fits, pal. What we have here is the truth: The warping of reality by pedos so they can desperately try to justify their grotesque actions. They're not heros. They're sickos feeding a compulsion when they should damned well know better. I'm calling a spade a spade. The only thing your arguments have done is show how obscenely out of touch with reality you really are, which is par for the course with pedos. Enjoy your cognitive dissonance in believing that pedos are actually serving a purpose with their shit other than getting even more kids raped. As we see from the bust of this site, there were rewards for submitting homemade content, and people were doing just that. If you don't think that shit like that ENCOURAGES kids to get raped then you should do the world a favor and remove yourself from it. Take out some of your fellow NAMBLA members while you're at it.

>>19276764
Getting high or messing up a person for life.
Hmm, they're pretty close

>>19270491
>>19270478
>feds bust into my house
>find nothing but trap porn
>shoot me and say I was attacking them with a weapon because they don't like faggots
>nation cheers them as heroes for stopping the leader of a child pornography ring
>my ghost's face when

>>19277634
>messing up a person for life
If they are a weak mined loser peasant in a culture that loves to tell rape victims that they are to be pitied at all times for life yeah.