the future is in the darknet.
i2p + freenet + tor deepweb.
if only more people went to the darknets. that will soon change.

>>17523225

Got any more information?

>>17523263
Just google all of that.

See, funny how we say 'google' for a search nowadays.

what you wrote is about it. I am happy that facebook at least isn't time warner, or google. at least their rules are acceptable

>>17523225
in a world where most people are lazy and can't even re-install windows this is more of a philosophy

guys GOOGLE "EUROPE"!! pic rltd

>>17523263
geti2p.net
freenet.org
torproject.org

its kind of good that google uses your OS to determine what results you would want when truoble shooting problems. i dont c a prblm wt ths.

>>17523335
>HURR

>>17523225
But what happens if they manage to block the darknets?
the verydarknets?

>>17523314
>>17523225

I think the fact that these are slightly obscure means that it would keep out the people who "are lazy and can't even re-install windows" and would actually be beneficial. Just look at 4chan, look at reddit, look at digg, they were all better earlier on and now they're overrun with "normal" or "casual" people who really ruin the overall quality of these sites. So I think obscurity is good. Kind of like Eternal September.

>>17523358
It's good in that sense, but when you're anti-issue and all you get to see is anti-issue content (confirmation bias) and nothing pro-issue, you'll get to start having problems.

>>17523425
>I think the fact that these are slightly obscure means that it would keep out the people who "are lazy and can't even re-install windows" and would actually be beneficial. Just look at 4chan, look at reddit, look at digg, they were all better earlier on and now they're overrun with "normal" or "casual" people who really ruin the overall quality of these sites. So I think obscurity is good. Kind of like Eternal September.

You have a point there. The reason I answered this way is that I felt OP was interested in the mainstream direction the internet is headed to.

It does make sense to not go by that.

Stop watching TED related videos

>>17523461
OP here- I don't think I'd mind if mainstream internet went to shit as long as there was an alternative.

>>17523478
philistine

>>17523510
yes, as long as we get enough interesting people to the darknets, they don't need a broken percentage of media coverage.

there isn't that much you could "make" it that way, though.

That TED talk remind me of dystopian Sci-fi books like The Giver and Fahrenheit 451. To keep people happy and see what they want, they filter more important news that might make people unhappy or if it's irrelevant to their interests.

>>17523519
you're trying too hard to care about something that matters alot less then you think it does

>>17523557

>>17523549
Exactly what this is it, just feeding the people what they like, don't make 'em think too hard.

>>17523569
No the difference is I dont care what you like/dont like

>mfw derps have to watch a presentation to become aware of simple things like this

>>17523586
and yet you felt the need to tell us to stop watching TED talks, what an interesting point of view.

>>17523595
>lol look at me, let me be a douchebag instead of collaborating to the discussion

like 15 of us posed our google search results of egypt and they were all practically the same

>>17523335
You already used this joke today, only this time you cropped the "gay porn" search out of the address bar.

>>17523614
That's not the point. The point is the over-centralization of the internet how big some corporations have grown

>>17523335

That just makes Europe even better.

But seriously, obvious shoop is obvious.

>>17523631
Thanks for pointing out that it was an obvious shoop. Really good contribution.

The internet used to be in a decent place when people
weren't mass communicating, and those who knew
what they were doing were communicating with each
other, and those who weren't were on AIM or some
other shitty instant messenger to just talk with each
other.

Now everything is talked about, including 4chan
and anybody who wasn't here before is now a
bunch of dipshits who look at us all weird. For fucks
sakes, when you say "4chan" people always think
>>>/b/
which is not all of 4chan as there's like 25 other
boards to browse.

A lot of the internet has become overrun with the
major internet websites, such as the one's in your
picture OP. Does anybody remember Netscape?
Didn't fucking think so, because they got bought
out by AOL and then they ended up going to shit.
Netscape got out when they could, and now all the
other social networking sites are hidden out there
with no recognition thanks to constant talk about
facebook and twitter from these new casual users
who weren't part of the original elite and now the
internet has become crap, because they're now
hooked on shit like facebook or other website
designers who exploited them for viewership on
their own crappy website (thank goodness most of
these are gone now)

the problem after that though, was that soon after
people who were at the bottom of the original elite
were really fucking excited acting like little girls
playing with their pricks, and it got bad to the point
that they showed everybody the stuff of the original
elite as computer nerds, but then the cool people
got to find out, showed the social world all the shit
and now here we are...

the deepnet is where they say many of the original
elite have gone...

>>17523614

that is because all of us didn't qualify for special treatment concerning the egypt thing. maybe we could do the same googling for electronic products, for example?

>>17523631
It's not a shoop. He just replaced ``Gay porn'' with ``Europe'' after searching, and cropped out the address bar.

google is the only company i trust.