>> |
!!gI66DpmwfeY 03/05/11(Sat)06:15 No.16270479Responded to this poster already but due to the moderation, it wont be posted for says so...
>It's
just sad, because obviously this article was not written by someone
well versed in the tech industry and the true ins and outs of every
product but, in fact, someone only well versed in the given specs
without any actual benchmark testing, side by side comparison, or other
such testing done to back up the claim in this article. The numbers
(10000GB of RAM or 100000MP) mean nothing when the OS can't even keep up
with it's own processor. True, if you lived in a world of
closed software development like Apple is creating. For the rest of us,
operating systems can be customized and updated at will, and for free.
>3G on a $499 tablet doesn't mean squat when the service is spotty at best. Is
this a shot at Verizon? Because the iPad is sold by Verizon too. Also,
Verizon is widely known for it's huge coverage areas. And even if the
coverage did suck, it doesn't hurt to essentially have a 3G antenna for
free. But Apple fans will never understand this as long as they keep
paying for things and paying more than the worth of said things.
>Nor does a flimsy flash, when you could compare it to the light given off by a lit match... Once again, better to have it for free than not at all or being charged for it.
>Apple doesn't build products before they can be perfected (for the current materials and means of production). Wait a minute...
>They
wait until they can deliver a gorgeous, unibody, thin, lightweight,
product with all of those features before doing so. WAIT! So
why did they come out with the original iPad in the first place?
Certainly technology has not changed so much in less than a year to the
point where they couldn't have possibly included all the features of the
iPad 2 in the original unit. Just face it, you've been scammed into
buying two units.
(cont.) |