Rule 1 there are no rules rule 2 anonymous makes the rules and he is boss l.o.l.!

rule 3

smok
ewｅed

Since there are no real "rules" of fashion (hurr durr, creative), I'll post some of the more frequently posted images.

By the way, yours (created by StrawBoss) is pretty awful and needs copy-editing.

Why is topman considered shit tier? They have a lot of silly drop crouch styles and stuff but their other pants look good. Is it false advertising?

>if your style cant be found in esquire or GQ you need to grow up

For more on colour, see:
http://galadarling.com/advice/fashion-help-for-recovering-goths

>>3426318
8glasses of water a day is more than you really need, but the rest is good advice

>>3426309
Problem?

You better compress these into a .rar if there isn't one already and post a link to download when you're done posting.

>Shit tier clothing
>American Apperal and TopMan

Fuck you, OP.

The rar already exists.
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=0j5ehpqn

epic /fa/ thread is epic

>mainly due to tripsk

flood detection for the lose

>>3426367
My opinion is that they are fine for generic basics

 ╧

>>3426575

The Lens capsule collections are a nice way to try out designer-ish looks without super hefty price tags and they support a lot of designers so they get some pretty good talent to work for them.

who put the bump in the thread

There are a few of things wrong with the image OP posted.

>If your style cant be found in esquire or GQ you need to grow up
wat
>Bright colors and beanies
There are ways to definitely make this work.
>Belt match shoes
While you should always make your belt go with your shoes, it doesn't have to strictly match (as in same color/material)

>>3426815

The first guide is not meant to be taken seriously. Well, it might have been written that way, but taking it seriously would be a mistake. In fact, all guides should be taken with a grain of salt.

If only we were all as rich as OP's image suggests.

>>3426297

This is the best so far, I think.

>Shit tier shoes
>Keds

Is that true? I own this pair of chukkas and I think they are pretty plain and fairly durable..

>>3426946
I think keds are alright, not sure if I agree with that list

desreved bump

>>3426259

i disagree about the shit tier watches thing.

Ok, why in the hell are True Religions considered shit tier?

>>3428088

You're paying for almost nothing but branding and exclusivity, not quality of material, fit, or design.

>>3428093
If that is your logic, then I believe it only applies to men. Honestly, for slim female body types True Religions can be very flattering.

>>3428113

There are better jeans that either cost the same and are much better quality or are the same quality and cost much less, regardless of gender.

>>3428120
Would Jimmy Taverniti fall in the"better than" category? Or G-Star?

>>3428130

Same thing, especially with the awful patches and colorations.

Slightly better, though they can get over-designed. At least the denim's better quality and the fits are more flattering. Also, the apparel encompasses a wide range (including Correct Line) and isn't just all tees and hoodies with horseshoes and Buddhas slapped all over them.

Is there one of these for low cost (<200$) watches?

>>3426946
Most of my shoes are Keds and they look just fine to me

Why is Hitler Youth bad?

>>3428137
Hm. I'm a pretty big fan of Jimmy Taverniti. I have a very slender frame and they tend to fit me quite well without tailoring. That and I know a guy who works for them as a consultant, so I've never paid more than $100 for a pair.

>>3428088
because it looks like shit. gawdy U shaped logo on the pockets, a fat buddha and stupid designs all over it.

>>3428150

About $99 too much.

>>3426259
>Dress shirts should never be black

WHAT
Black shirts are the greatest thing of all time.
What is wrong with you people?

i disagree with rule #7. for the most part you should, however most higher end designer companies use movements from respectable watch companies. you merely pay a "tax" for the name.

If you like the design, and dont mind spending the extra money, then go for it.

>>3428226
>>3428225

OP's guideline has long since been rejected as overly narrow and whatever.

As stated earlier in the thread, guides should be taken only as seriously as you want to take them. They're just general prescriptions written by one person with one perspective and it would be unreasonable to expect everyone to abide by them as though they were law.

second question, wouldn't cufflinks be considered jewlry?

>>3428225
black dress shirts (especially with a tie, especially especially if the tie is pink, white, silver or other pastel) looks like a highschooler

FUCK YOUR RULE NUMBER ONE!

If I had a single angel wing I would dress like Sephiroth in a heartbeat and damn your rules!