That's not how shadows work

Then you are dumb.

>>32165980
You mean in a looks-like-complete-shit-but-turns-out-pretty-good way?

>>32166003
It's metaphorical you jerk

>>32165980
really?

Shadows don't work like that.

Shadows don't work like that at all!

I thought First Class was pretty mediocre. So that's a bad sign.

>>32165980
And I think it'll turn out absolutely horrible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjAFBQYxVMk

occupy toby mcquiere

>The Untold Story

Nigga, are you serious?

>the untold story


But it's the second time we see this story.

>>32166288
this is what *really* happened, spiderman wasn't real like the first hulk movie

>>32166315
nah they just skipped his highschool years does he still die

and people have been thinking Arad was crazy

Executive producer Avi Arad says that ‘The Amazing Spider-Man’ will not be a complete reboot of the comic book franchise

Executive producer Avi Arad is saying that director Marc Webb’s upcoming take on Spidey won’t go the route of previous comic book reboots like Batman Begins and (to a lesser degree) The Incredible Hulk by essentially ignoring the existence of its predecessors.

>>32166288

his secret agent parents

>>32166448
if they make it within the continuity with huge retcons, it will be dumber that a standard reboot

GUYS

GUYS

The shadow is a spider.

>mind=blown

>>32166024
Right, because it's smarter to call it shit based on virtually nothing.

I can't wait for you guys to eat crow again.

>>32166003
I would have never guessed no shit sherlock

>>32166523
The trailer and every single set pictures made me want to vomit by how badong it looked.

I'm with the OP on this. I was pretty skeptical about this movie, but the more I see and hear the more I'm actually getting pretty hyped for it. It also helps that I went down to a stunt shoot one night and shit looked pretty cash, even without all the additions and touchups they'll do in post. I'm looking forward to seeing this.

>>32166546
The set pictures... Yeah, you're a fucking tard.

The first person teaser was silly I'll admit.

>>32166493

Dude. Like, holy shit

>>32166003
>laughing_Shikamaru.jpg

But first class was shit.

They should have called it "Xmen: Coach" or some shit.

>Implying even casuals don't know Spider-man's origins.

My father was a third-world asian and fucking knows the tale of Spider-man.

Unless...MILES SHOWS UP.

secret fact: lindsay lohan cast as MJ Watson with NPH as James Franco and Joe Rogan as Flash

This is what you get for watching non-Marvel Studios films.

>>32166657
>Neil patrick harris as james franko

What the balls?

>>32166631
>Your face when Peter dies at the end of the second movie and the last film is about Miles

>>32166631

If it is Miles with a cloned female version of Peter than I'm in.

>>32166671
>This is what you get for watching non-Marvel Studios films.

A good movie?

>>32166671
I'd put the first 2 spider-man films up against any Marvel studios film other than IM1.

The rest are far from perfect and are simply "good enough".

>>32166711

>>32166735
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahaha

>>32166024

What comic is this?
And don't try to tell me it's Bitches Love Spiderman.

>>32166739
Congratulations on having those two. But realize with them come the FF movies, Ghost Rider, Spider-Man 3 and even more piles of crap. Face it, the quality ratio is godawful.

>>32166920
Bitches Love Spider-Man

>>32166959
X1 and X2 were also good movies.

>>32166984
And the first two Blade movies.

>>32166920
Spider-Man loves Mary Jane.

>>32167040

Thanks.
Is it any good?

>>32167103
it's not horrible if you like filler

>>32167153
how can it be a filler, when it is not an adaptation of already existing story line?

>>32167012
That's six total, then. Seven if you count First Class. Out of, according to Wikipedia, 20.

Yeah...

>>32166671
>This is what you get for watching non-Marvel Studios films.

Marvel Studios films are like fast food. You're guaranteed a certain level of quality, but when compared to superior films they pale in comparison.

I am so fucking glad Marvel Studios doesn't have Spider-Man. I'd rather gamble on possible greatness than shove another Big Mac down my throat.

>>32165980
My hopes aren't up if there's no McAvoy.

Honestly, I was really excited about this to start with, but with everything new they release my hopes crash further towards the ground.

>>32167191
This, I loved some of the outcry this week when that female director was kicked off Thor 2. As if the director even matters. Marvel pumps these things out and give the directors little control. Most of their movies are good, not great.

Thor and CA didn't feel very inspired at all.

I love people pretend that Marvel Studios is some sort of watershed for quality superhero movies. I haven't forgotten about Iron Man 2 and Incredible Hulk.

You want to talk about ratios? How about 2 out of 5 being shit?

>>32167301
If you didn't think Thor felt inspired with Kenneth Branagh directing it, I dread to think what you'll think of Thor 2. He was literally the best person for the job.

>>32167371
most of the people dont really talk about the film's quality, but hot it respects the source material

it is pretty clear from the context

>>32167371

Still tired of people downing on Iron Man 2.

It wasn't bad! Who cares if Tony was being a prick - THAT'S WHAT HE DOES!

Incredible Hulk was, well. Boring. It had its moments, though. Pre-Abomination Blonksy vs. Hulk is still one of the coolest superhero fights to date.

>>32167374
Be honest, did it feel like a kenneth branagh movie?

>hating First Class

Apparently there's no limit to the shittiness of /co/'s taste.

>>32167443
YES

and Cap has a lot in him from Rocketeer and Indy

>>32167483
and Iron Man's conversatons are Favreauesque

the problem is that Marvel is cheap.

every film is baby's first blockbuster and it shows

>First class vibe?

What you mean better than the the previous film (3) even though the first two were greatly much better?


I thought First class was...'ok' but still had the same problems as the other x-men films

>>32167462
>Liking First Class
>Apparently there's no limit to the shittiness of /co/'s taste.

FTFY

>>32167658
Not at all. First Class was fun while the others took themselves too seriously.

I don't think this ASM movie looks fun at all, though.

>>32167483
We were talking about Thor.. kenneth did THOR.

>>32167588
Most of IM was fucking improved, RDJ should have a fucking producer credit.

>>32167658
I get what you mean, but I thought FC put some new life into the franchise and took a risk with the choice of mutants.

First Class was... I expected it to be good since so many people praised it but it was just really fucking weird. So many scenes were like "why the fuck is this character not *doing obvious course of action*". All the minorities died or turned evil and subplots were randomly dropped.

>yfw this is gonna be a movie version of Turn Off the Dark

>>32167848
yeah

>, did it feel like a kenneth branagh movie?
>YES

isn't that the venom suit's logo? because spider man 3 definitely does not count as telling that story.

>>32167909
>All the minorities died or turned evil

All two of them? What a pathetic complaint this is.

I didn't even notice until the racists pointed it out to me.

Awh crap... they're totally going to rehash the origin story for a good half an hour, aren't they?

I wouldn't worry about the tagline too much, pretty sure marketing departments choose them more or less at random.

Didn't they film A LOT of this in L.A.? (And I mean location shooting, not sets.)

That's like thee automatic strikes against a movie that's supposed to be set in New York.

>>32168020
>I didn't even notice until the racists pointed it out to me.
how do you point something out to yourself, though?

>>32166288
>>32166310
It's been a while since I watched the trailer, but aren't Pete's bio parents in the movie?

>I'm getting a First Class Vibe with this.

so it'll have a shitty villain plot that only seem I actually seem to be mad about while many people on /co/ will say its the best superhero movie of the year even though there are at least two that should be considered better?

>>32168228
Yes.

>>32168233
Explain how Shaw's plot was shitty.

I'm HOPING this will be good. But Peter is giving off emo Edward Cullen vibes from what I've seen. On the plus side though, I love the costume and I'm excited to see the lizard. I'm still gonna see it but I hope I'm not disappointed.

>The Untold Story

To who? Who doesn't know his story? Peter Parker gets Spider-Powers, uses it for personal gain, his Uncle dies because of it, he become Spider-Man.

Everybody fucking knows this. Not everything reboot has to start with an origin story.

>making spider-man look grim dark
I seriously hope you guys don't do this

So why exactly is anyone even considering giving this a chance when it was expressly made to emulate Twilight?

>>32168646
>expressly made to emulate Twilight

While I don't believe your wild-eyed accusations, I can respect the audacity required to make them.

>>32168408
>Explain how Shaw's plot was shitty.
He was Sebastian Shaw in name only.

Done!
(also, I'm not the person you were responding to)

>>32168573
I don't know who this "Spider-man". It's not like he's had seven different cartoons, three movies, comic books, and video games.

So.......you think they'll make an Avengers joke?
Or a black Spider-man joke?
Like how in the first one they had the men on the street and Jim Nortons all HE STINKS AND I DON'T LIKE HIM!

>>32168646
Except it wasn't. Just because a Spider-Man movie will actually take itself seriously for a change (and Lord knows we need that after SM3), doesn't mean we're going to see Peter cutting his wrist, sparkling in the sunlight, or listening to Arcade Fire.

The tone of the film will likely be close to the X-Men films or even Iron Man.

>>32168824
5 bucks on there being be some crack about organic web an 'ew'.

>>32167947

>movie version of Turn Off the Dark

WHERE DO I SIGN UP

>>32168408
Shaw's plan was to manipulate America and the Soviets so that they would nuke eachother and everyone else,
so that the few mutants who are probably powerful enough to survive nuclear explosions or the high amounts of radiation (which is easy to assume that number wouldn't be any higher than 5 figure number for the ENTIRE WORLD)

and with the world being of ash and practically unihabitable, the mutants will take over and name the guy who caused the world to be one giant Chernobyl THEIR GREAT LEADER

I thought First Class was awesome. So what if they don't "do the obvious", first off, maybe its because they're all younger and do things differently/carelessly? 2nd off, that's like 40 years ago. It would take them years to figure out a modern day computer. generations think differently, its proven. Like kids born past 2000 lack a lot of common sense and focus. And 3rd, you guys would be bitching even if they did do the obvious, you'd be like "wow, this movies so predictable". Quit whining and enjoy the movie OR shut up. I bet if the 90s Fantastic Four had been finished, you guys would eat that shit up. You McFucking KNOW it.

Emma Stone could have been the perfect Mary Jane

And for the record, ill only like the movie if he's the jokester he was in the comics.

I mean, imagine if they made a deadpool movie, andbitvwas 100% serious. god.

>>32168824
think there'll be some joke about Raimi's spider-man somewhere

i didn't like first class because Xavier and Magneto's relationship seemed to only last a few months when I was under the impression they were good friends for many years before the divide, also how Xavier seemed surprised in X-men 1 when magneto had his psychic-immunity helmet (that's a very nitpicky reason I admit), also how Magneto put on the crown of the lich king and just turned 100% evil too fast for me, also how the black guy never gave his full name and died first, I really thought we were beyond such lame cliches

>>32168928
In his defense it seemed like a join or die situation.
Shaw in that condition.....and frankly in his current condition were pretty hax.

>>32169030
>And for the record, ill only like the movie if he's the jokester he was in the comics.
>jokester
Silly sir, we can't have a fun joke-cracking hero. He needs to be brooding and angsty. How else can they appeal to the tween crowd

>In 3D

>>32169030
From what I heard about what was shown at Comic-Con, he was making jokes while fighting some criminals.

>>32165980

It just looks like it's trying too hard to be grim and gritty to me.

I hope I'm wrong, but it looks like they're trying to do the dark knight with spiderman.

>>32169079
well it's not like that was the only thing that was pretty wrong with the movie
there was also the writing and huge continuity issues

like how they let darwin join, despite it being right at the time of the civil rights movement
you'd think one guy would have had trouble working with a black man

and 75% of why Beast was there was for plot convenience
>writer 1: we need someone to pilot the ship
>writer 2: have beast do it
>writer 1: we need a way for prof x to find the other mutants
>writer 2: have cerebro, duh
>writer 1: but we don't have time for prof x and magneto to become big enough friends to built it together
>writer 2: let beast build it
>writer 1: but having magneto work with prof x to build the thing was a major plot point for X1 AND X2
>writer 2: we already have prof x getting into a wheelchair before he goes bald, despite his being bald but still walking in both X3 and wolverine origins. I'm sure nobody will even notice or care

Things i hate about this:

>Hipster Peter
>Robert Pattinson clone actor
>Basketball nike suit
>Suction cups boots
>Skateboard
>The fuckin hair
>Lizard looks like the bad guys from V
>NO.FUCKING.J.J.J.

Things i like:
>Emma Stone
>Grimdark (i hope in a good way)

I agree with OP to the extent that we haven't actually gotten a good reason to think it wont be good.

>>32169257
>like how they let darwin join, despite it being right at the time of the civil rights movement
>you'd think one guy would have had trouble working with a black man

1) This is not a continuity issue
2) Most people in the 60's were "soft racists". Klan members and lynchers were the extremely small minority.
3) If you're persecuted for being a mutant, you're probably more likely to sympathize with others who are persecuted based on physical appearance

And suggesting that plot points contradicting the first two X-Men movies makes First Class itself a bad film is such an asinine statement I won't validate it with a comment.

>>32169395
I thought superhero movies figured out by now that more time for minor comic characters is better for their movies?

I mean look at batman begins
it actually got a good jim gordon, and that movie was amazing

>>32169395
>Robert Pattinson clone actor
>doesn't know who Andrew fucking Garfield is

kill yourself

>>32169474
Yeah! Like Iron Man!