>> |
01/15/09(Thu)22:18 No.771301>>771281 You
know, some of the people I've met who claim to have had that kind of
I.Q. when they were younger simply do not strike me as being that
bright. Tests are not an indication of success in the real world, they
are simply documents drawn up by other individuals who are lacking in
some ways and excellent in others.
Sure, if you have a higher
score, you're more *likely* to be brighter in *more traditional
academic areas* than other people, but a specific number isn't a great
indicator. An acquaintance of mine supposedly has a 130 I.Q., and yet I
can run circles around him in writing, memorization, concentration,
G.P.A., math, science, etc. (I have never been tested, but given my SAT
scores were only a few hundred more than average, I can't imagine it
would come back as high as his). If you can not unlock the potential
behind the "magic number," it is merely a number.
Sorry, I just had to get on my high horse and rant. |