>>905984
I'll update the .rar, and include the now green Sakura - just as soon as you fix the gap between "has" and "haste". Also, does not need to be mythic now as she's no longer a planeswalker.

I'll look into some enchantments and landscapes bit later; saging until we kick /b/ out.

you cannot kill /b/

Anonymous will not leave

>>905999
link to rar file?

>>906356
Yes, yes, I was waiting for an updated Sakura but anyone who wants the file will probably save the cards anyway.

http://rapidshare.com/files/205009119/Areallygreatsandwich.zip

Set symbol included.

Commencing dump of 167 cards. I got another 20 that need some work on.

Most cards are finished, except for rarities (do that in the end) and possible Legendary status.

And some cards could probably use a little text clean up. But I value being able to play with people who can understand the card rather than get stuck up on conventions

I also modded the color theory a little bit because by Magic's standards, there would be very little black cards that are /c/ute

Also, I like Cardcaptor Sakura as all green. Nice choice!

General Color Conventions I used:
White: Law, Order, generally the "good guys" or goody-goodies, Innocence, Healing, Prevention of Damage, Police Officers (for the Lawful aspect), Dedicated to fighting evil (could be multi-colored)

Green: Nature, Healing, Mother Earth, Elves, Catgirls, Spirit Magic

Red: Chaos, War, Lots o' Hurt, Evocation Magic (DnD
reference), General Destruction

Blue: Intelligence, Illusion, Water (includes most water dwelling creatures), Air, all other DnD magic that isn't Necromancy or Evocation (or straight up summoning), Magical technology that isn't a straight artifact, Papermancers (see R.O.D.), Deception, Lying

Black: Death, Decay, Demons, Succubi, pretty much anything from the underworld in Disgaea (but could be multi-colored), Hatred without Fury, Emotionally Dead, Generally all around accepted Evil

I do have quite a few enchantments in here, though most are enchants for creatures and I have a couple for lands.

I can dump singles later after I get some more cards cleaned up

If you had shown up earlier I'd have included those in the .rar (which I just realised is a .zip because I was lazy).

Yeah, I'm somewhat inclined to put down my thinking cap at this point; you've practically built a set yourself.

>>906433
That was my original idea, to build a set that I could play with my friends. And I mean a full basic set, not an expansion set.

And I still have lots of ideas and lots of pictures, which don't include the /a/, /e/ or /h/ cards I could make.

Land, Neo-Tokyo
Sacrifice Neo-Tokyo, add two mana of your choice to your mana pool.

"Neo-Tokyo is about to explode!"

The only difficulties I am having with some wordings. Some seem to have changed in usage or meaning over time:
bury
send to graveyard
destroy
remove from game
sacrifice
leaves play

Also, you can tell I really like first strike, flanking and bushido

Thought I'd post my favorite card I made recently. Red for the hot chaotic passion or white for innocent love. The Original Dirty Pair would be right behind this one as my favorite.

With as much widespread destruction left in Kei and Yuri's wake, they scream red card with land destruction characteristics.

>>906451

Official wording tends to get more technical as time moves on.

>>906456

For example, should read "Sacrifice a land: The Original Dirty Pair gains Double Strike until end of turn.

Actually, I'd some clarification: are you contributing or just popping in to say hi? So I know whether or not we could use some of your cards.

Sweet cards. I think I'll print the lands and put them in my decks XD

>>906468
/c/ard has been here since thread one.

also recent cards do not use :, that is replaced with complete sentences.

>>906451
-bury (old term), send to graveyard. The card leaves play and is sent to the graveyard on of the three fields; Library, Graveyard, and removed from play.
-destroy. that card leaves play and is sent to the Graveyard.
-remove from game. This card is removed from the current game, as in it can no longer be used. however how it is sent there will change effects. forexample if it is in play it will trigger "When X leaves play" yet if it is removed from the game from a players hand, that kind of effect is not triggered.
-sacrifice. you can sacrifice a card to active an ability cost at any time you can play an instant. if you sacrifice during combat the damage is still sent to the creatures, you just sac'd it before the damage actually takes place.
-leaves play. If a car leaves play that means it is sent to any of these 4 places from the game board; The Library, Graveyard, Removed from the game, or the players hand.

also look at eventide cards for that effect thing you have going there. its also a bit too powerful.

>>906547
lol wall of text.
>>906456
Sacrifice a land, The Original Dirty Pair gains Double Strike until end of turn.

powerful card, but the last move seems a bit... selective. When would you NOT choose to deal 12 to destroy a petty land?

>>906468
You can use these cards.
Like I stated in the first two threads, I am making cards for my own set to play. But you can use these or take ideas from from them.

so then...
Sacrifice means place X card you own in your graveyard?
Destroy means place Y card your opponent owns in graveyard?
Remove from game means no longer able to play cards that would bring it back into the game?
Search is the verb used for looking through your library?
(just wanting clarification)

I have no problem fixing my cards to read the "if : effect" setup
Although a couple like Konata's ability have more than one step so those don't fit the "if : effect" setup

.>>906482
I am still looking for more lands. I would like to have four or five land cards or each basic type.

Another thing, what is the commonly accepted wording for limiting the number of times an ability can be used?
Right now I have "You may use this ability up to Z times per turn."
Is there a standardized wording for that?

>>906559
"You may only use this ability X times per turn." also if you want to limit it more you can add "use at any time you can play a sorcery."

>>906547
did my post here help you with the terms?

>>906451

Bushido IS flanking. WotC, recycling old card mechanics to make them look new.

>>906449

I made The Geofront.

>>906563
Yeah, those explanations helped.

And I don't see how that card is too powerful.

>>906600
oh wait, playing more than one per turn would be rather abusive.

>>906554
Sacrifice means that you place a permanent you control in its owner's graveyard. It can't be regenerated.
Destroy means that whatever permanent is placed in its owner's graveyard. It can be regenerated unless the destroying spell/ability says otherwise
"Bury X" has been Oracled to "Destroy X. It can't be regenerated."
"Remove from game" means that the card is placed in the removed-from-game zone. For a long while, nothing (except Ring of Ma'ruf) could retrieve a card that was RFG, but now there are the Wishes and others.

>>906586
I really like the card idea.
But how is that /c/?

It would be great for an /a/ deck. Also be cool to see some card that represents the re-routing of power to fire the big gun.

Also, "tokens" are things that stand in for permanents, like creature tokens. Markers that you put on cards are "counters."

>>906617
Thanks for that clarification too.

>>906624
That was one that I messed up on early on. I was using the terms backwards until I did some digging online.

>>906547
And so have I; however /c/ split to make his/her own set, and for various reasons I'd assumed we weren't going to be sharing (/c/ used old card styles, for example).

>>906554
Again, just wanted clarification.

Don't think I'll be participating as much from this point though; apparently the rules templating has changed (again) and I'm pretty much out of ideas. Have fun.

>>906631
I said I was going to make a set with the older style but could easy change over to the new style (like I have here in this thread).

But when multiple people were ignoring what I was contributing, I didn't see a reason to keep dropping cards in at that time. So I said forget it at that point.

I got a lot more done and realized I could still these to guys if you wanted them. So here they are.

>>906553
I thought double strike only worked when blocked.

If that isn't the case then I will take out the double strike

>>906649
if you have a creature that has double strike it basically has First Strike and Regular combat damage. if a 1/1 blocks the creature it will die, but the regular damage will not carry over to the opponent unless that creature has trampling. it hits twice on the player, since it does first and regular.

>>906586
... i... dont... wat.

>>906913
Ok, I'll either make them first strike or give them a power bonus when blocked.

Been ages since I posted this. I've redone it, along with the other nekos I created

sorry for the delay, finally have the OP card fixed up. also changed the creature type for flavor reasons.

wording help on other cards is coming up.

Hello webmaster
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru

>>906451
I would word the card like this:
Prevent all combat damage that would be dealt by target attacking creature.
Gain life equal to that creature's power if R was spent and gain life equal to that creature's toughness is W was spent. (do both if RW was spent)

That's what you're trying to do, I beleive. the "can only play one per turn" shouldn't be an issue, maybe bump the mana cost to 2 R/W

bump, any requests or anything?

>>906391
well...these are a mixed bag. some of them could fit right in, others would require a huge overhaul. All in all I like the ideas that have been put in, I think we can use them.

Still looking for mountain pics and working on non-basic lands.

>>907464
take what you want, just ask that you have my name on the creator part is all

>>907464
Also I do believe in what I've heard fa/tg/uys call "color bleeding" to an extent. For instance I can see people complaining about the Phoenix Rebirth spell, saying it should be white or green but I am going with the fire idea and you have to pay a lot more for it than a white or green version of it.

Land: Air?

>>907510
don't worry, I'm a firm believer of giving credit where it's due.

the land needs a slight wording cleanup but I don't think it's bad.

>>907692
air/wind is green or white, depending on which way you want to take it. personal preference is to put it in white. but a land that can give creatures flying for a turn might be interesting to work up...

>>907177
Does the ability trigger when the enchantment comes into play? Whenever the controller feels like it?
If it's a CIP ability, there's not a lot of point in making it an enchantment, 'cause it'd just sit around after that, doing nothing. If it's an activated ability, it needs an activation cost.

I'm gonna make a random /c/ card, so bumping this in the meantime

here's the card, I was really just working off imagination.

suggest comments if you have them, just because I started the idea doesn't mean I'm perfect.