He thinks it's a good idea to look for threads that have 10 to 20 images to go and spam them. He's so anal, that he'll actually fill the text posts of the thread as well, just to kill the thread.

COWARD! You never contribute to the actual thread and find your joy by spamming. I hope the mods ban you for life!

I don't get it, someone didn't like Faye decided to flood the thread? What? I'm confused.

But we should probably avoid meta.

He'll never know the fun of participating. He'll always be selfish and never learn the pleasure of social interaction.

Fortunately, his anti-social ways guarantee the the gene-pool will remain unsullied and his shall be the last of the line.

And yes, he hates _ALL_ women!

What part of image limit do you not understand OP?

And what is the attraction of ghost bumping a thread tht is full?

>>1832084
The only reason that the thread was bumped was due to you fag bumping it in the first place.

All through the threads life, you didn't contribute one picture to it. At the point that you were able to fag bump it to death, you did. At that point, you thought that was the end of the "hated" thread. You were wrong! ANONYMOUS NEVAR FORGETS!

Hater of decency! Destroyer of threads that offend thyself! Prepare for war!

(This message brought to you by the Groats(r) Cereal company. "Put some Groats(r) in every meal!")

Had you simply let the thread finish it's course of 15 plus more posts instead of fagging it to death, this would never had happened. Happy now? Probably, but for all the wrong reasons...

>>1832084

It becomes obvious that you're a sad little control freak. The proverbial "turd in the punchbowl".

This usually comes from too early potty training.

>>1832095
Wow. Such a newfag you don't even know politesaging when you see it.

>>1832408
Poor baby! Whatsamatta, snookums? Don't like it when someone challenges your made up authority? Didn't your mommy breast feed you for fifteen years to guard against that?

Who's an ass? It's you!
Who likes sucking on unmentionable things? It's you!

>>1832084
i have a theory that people consider a bump to be a sort of vote, a mark of appreciation, a "like". i know i enjoy seeing threads grow and soldier on for months, past any usefulness, secretly rooting for them. i might even post in them, because i believe a thread that lasts a long time is a good thread. i'm a firm believer in "let it be", the idea that threads can and do exist independently of my wishes, that is, when i go away the thread is still there. bad threads die, good threads live. /c/ is a world where there is a galaxy of threads that orbit and collide according to bizarre forces that an individual poster has nothing to do with. i think that's the real magic of /c/ and mucking about with the "physics" will cause it to collapse, so please at least listen to the op

>>1832652
I listened to
>>1831851
>>1831856
>>1832095
>>1832348
>>1832416
and came to the conclusion he's a whiny loser with a severe case of projection because everything he says of me is actually true of him.

>>1832915
My god! I am so glad that I'm not you! Your life must be a real total hell if you get your jollies by coming to a BBS and try to control and push around other people.

You total sad little fuck! I truly PITY you! Go in peace, etc. etc.

so let me get this straight, some thread hit the image limit and this guy proceeded to max out the text replies so no one else could post?

i agree that that's rude but who has the time to post hundreds of replies? i say that without having seen it of course

please just let threads die a natural death
let it be

>>1833005
Nope. That guy waited until the thread had 15 picture posts left in it and proceeded to sandbag it until it was full, then the OP of the thread proceeded to ghost bump it and that pissed off the guy that sandbagged it, so he filled in the text replies (300 plus!) to kill it.

He only killed that thread and no other. That means that he had an agenda. The OP is rightfully pissed that the person did that and I think he's in the right to call the fact that there's an anal retentive attempting to control the board.

Just my two cents...

who cares

>>1833246
You do. Otherwise you wouldn't be bothered to respond.

>>1833094
First, I didn't sandbag it. I posted enough pictures to reach the limit.

Second, whoever it was ghost bumped the thread for over two weeks.

Third, I've done the same last year to over a dozen threads that had reached the limit and were still being bumped months later. I allowed one thread to reach a year and seveal more would have if I had done nothing. I don't care about one or two bumps after the fact but refusing to let threads go is stupidity.

So no, OP is not rightly upset and he is the one trying to control anything by keeping threads around months after they reach their limit.

>>1833620
>First, I didn't sandbag it. I posted enough pictures to reach the limit.

You sandbagged it. Period.

>Third, I've done the same last year to over a dozen threads that had reached the limit ...

Who asked you to? You're not the moderator of /c/ or any other board. Learn your place.

>Third, I've done the same last year to over a dozen threads that had reached the limit ...

OP is rightly upset. See answer #1.

Did you fail to play nicely with all the kids in Kindergarten as well?

>>1833293
I'm responding only because of how ridiculously stupid it is to get so panty-rustled about this. God damn, get a life, all of you.
Make the thread again. "Continued from >>######" is not hard - nor is alt-click saving all the thumbs before they 404. /c/ is slow as hell.

Unrustle your striped pantsu and get on with your life.

>>1833881
The thread has been started again. This time to let the responsible party know just what vigilantism costs in the long run.

>>1833881
So, sit back and enjoy the ride.

>>1833620
>>1833620

but, why the hell you did that? what is the fucking problem with having 1 or more threads for months or years? why dont you just contribute whit posting images or making new threads, instead of waste time killing another one's threads? if you make new threads then the old ones and with less activity will disappear automatically to make room for the new ones, that's how this works, and it's ok.

so, what the hell do you want in this board, have it empty or what?

if you feel bored of watching the same threads in the board for months, then get the hell out of here, let our /c/omrades be in peace, and find another imageboard to troll or something.

Wow... Not my board but hey look cowboy bebop...♥

>>1836110
>>1833874
>post pictures of Faye in a Bebop thread
>get attacked
herp a fucking derp
And taking the side of ghost bumping threads that have reached the image limit? wtf am I reading?

I am just here for Faye.

>>1841108
speak like a child. ;P

>>1841108
>>1840819

oh look, it's our permanent troll thread again!

this thread is an self proclaimed TROLL thread, this alone makes it illegal in any forum. justified or not, it is clearly a childish personal attack on some anon.

the op bumps it with one image per day, and personally attacks anyone who disagrees with this thread, this proves it's intent as a troll thread. so sit back fellow citizens and watch this thread pop up for the next 100+ days, then what? another 250 text based bumps? where does it end?

my statements here are in no way intended as a troll but to bring attention to this illegal thread.

note to the op: i'm not the droid you are looking for, I have little doubt that you have mistaken me for someone else. I believe in excellence, quality and above all, silence. I do not believe in nor do I ever engage in personal attacks, or spamming for that matter. I never respond without an image, and one of the appropriate type for the thread, I will only ever bump a thread once from page 15 if I think it is worthy, and only if no other bumps have occurred. I only ever speak up when something egregious is happening, and the forum moderators choosing to ignore this illegal thread is just such a case.

The one time I visit another thread besides /k/ I encounter retardism.

comon not even /b/ gets this dumb.

Quality thread?
Quality thread.

>>1842872
But that's not what you posted before!

>>1843738
think maybe you left something out?
<- animated with more detail

op manufacturing evidence, presenting as if it were the 'complete picture'.

how much more proof do we need that this is nothing more than a troll thread, serving no other purpose.