>> |
11/05/08(Wed)10:08:52 No.95054476>>95054004
I
don't really need the insults. Public policy has to concern itself with
1000s of things, not just one thing. That's why pro-choice/pro-life,
pro-gun/anti-gun, etc, etc voters are so poisonous. Gay marriage is
just one thing, and excessive concern for it skew thinking.
I was simply pointing out that marriage is, at root, a system for codifying sexual relations, which seemed to be in dispute.
As
to your predictions, you could be wrong. Homosexuality has a genetic
component, and the fact that, historically, homosexuals often entered
(uncomfortably) traditional marriages allowed them to propogate. The
"gay movement" will tend to prevent that going forward, as they're much
less likely to breed. Standard darwinian stuff. |