Posting mode: Reply
[Return]

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 2048 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • Browsing/posting issues should be resolved. Otherwise, site should load faster than ever. If you are having any problems or see CloudFlare error pages, please e-mail moot@4chan.org. Thanks!
    Love, mootykins

    File : 1321953088.jpg-(95 KB, 600x400, pike.jpg)
    95 KB Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:11:28 No.364163974  
    HEY F­AGGOTS! THREE FACTS:

    1. The protests at UC Davis were entirely legal

    2. Telling the protesters to leave was a baseless unlawful order

    3. The pepper-spray was most definitely illegal.


    Don't agree with me? Read on, then. If you don't read then don't post. I'll be able to tell if you didn't.

    inb4 tl;dr, umad, combo breaker, op is a f­aggot, etc.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:11:48 No.364164004
    [part 1]

    >>They had no right to be there!

    Actually, they did. Look up the right to freedom of assembly, the right to freedom of association, and the right to freedom of speech.
    >>But it's private property!

    Actually, it's technically privately owned public space. So is Zuccotti Park, which is why you're legally allowed to protest there as well. If it's public space, your 1st amendment rights apply.

    [continued]
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:12:18 No.364164046
    [part 2]

    >>They still can't protest there. It's a private university!

    Yes, they can. The courts have established so.

    >In 1968, the Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that non-disruptive speech is permitted in public schools. However, this does not apply to private universities. In September, 2004, U.S. District Court Judge Sam Cummings struck down the free speech zone policy at Texas Tech University. "According to the opinion of the court, campus areas such as parks, sidewalks, streets and other areas are designated as public forums, regardless of whether the university has chosen to officially designate the areas as such. The university may open more of the campus as public forums for its students, but it cannot designate fewer areas... Not all places within the boundaries of the campus are public forums, according to Cummings' opinion. The court declared the university's policy unconstitutional to the extent that it regulates the content of student speech in areas of the campus that are public forums"

    -Lora, Meghann. 'Texas Tech coming closer to new free speech policy'. The University Daily. January 12, 2005. Retrieved from Lexis Nexis on December 20, 2006

    [continued]
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:12:54 No.364164108
    [part 3]

    >>It was for disrupting foot traffic. You can't just protest on a sidewalk!

    First off, it was 8 people in the middle of a mostly decorative sidewalk in an expansive park that few people use (Just fucking walk around it, why get an entire police force over that, Christ's sake). That barely counts as disrupting foot traffic. And even if you're going to argue semantics, yes, you can protest on the sidewalk regardless. It's still technically legal. I'll cite a specific quote from the aforementioned court case:

    >"According to the opinion of the court, campus areas such as parks, sidewalks, streets and other areas are designated as public forums [...]"

    >campus areas such as parks, sidewalks, streets

    >sidewalks

    That sidewalk was a free speech area, and they cannot be told to move off of it.

    [continued]
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:13:24 No.364164158
    OP is a massive candy-assgot backing up retarded hippie scum.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:13:33 No.364164175
    [part 4]

    >>They were making a disruption. They were threatening the cops and being unruly. They refused to cooperate!

    Okay, that is a flat-out lie. Both video evidence and eye-witness accounts show that the protest was completely peaceful. All of what you've heard about the protesters being unruly was a spin from the UC Davis police press release, which tried putting out a bullshit story saying that the cops were surrounded and couldn't get out of the circle of protesters.You can read about it in the following article:

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/igeneration/uc-davis-official-spin-crumbles-in-the-face-of-too-many-videos
    /13347

    [continued]
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:14:07 No.364164224
    [part 5]

    Here are ten things you should know about the event:

    >1. The protest at which UC Davis police officers used pepper spray and batons against unresisting demonstrators was an entirely nonviolent one.
    >2. The unauthorized tent encampment was dismantled before the pepper spraying began.

    >3. Students did not restrict the movement of police at any time during the demonstration.
    >4. Lt. Pike was not in fear for his safety when he sprayed the students.

    >5. University of California Police are not authorized to use pepper spray except in circumstances in which it is necessary to prevent physical injury to themselves or others.
    >6. UC police are not authorized to use physical force except to control violent offenders or keep suspects from escaping.

    >7. The UC Davis Police made no effort to remove the student demonstrators from the walkway peacefully before using pepper spray against them.
    >8. Use of pepper spray and other physical force continued after the students’ minimal obstruction of the area around the police ended.

    >9. Even after police began using unprovoked and unlawful violence against the students, they remained peaceful.
    >10. The students’ commitment to nonviolence extended to their use of language.

    You can read the details here:

    http://studentactivism.net/2011/11/20/ten-things-you-should-know-about-fridays-uc-davis-police-viole
    nce/

    [continued]
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:14:16 No.364164241
         File1321953256.jpg-(55 KB, 500x368, spidey.jpg)
    55 KB
    you forgot the most important inb4 of all
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:14:49 No.364164293
    [part 6]

    >>It was for reasons of public safety!

    Besides the fact that NO one was in danger, unless there is an imminent, unequivocal danger, you can't arrest them for having a peaceful protest. Look at the 1965 Supreme Court case Cox v. Louisiana, which ruled that police can't arrest people engaging in peaceful protests simply because the protest has the potential to incite violence.

    The constitutional rights of freedom of speech and assembly could not be denied because of hostility to their assertion or exercise. The Court noted that free speech protections serve perhaps their best purpose when they invite dispute, induce conditions of unrest, and even stir people to anger over prejudicial preconceptions. Any statute that is so broadly written as to stifle these freedoms shall be stuck down as repugnant to the Constitution.

    [continued]
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:15:21 No.364164334
    Wow you got trolled hard. Who ever said the protest was illegal? lol.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:15:30 No.364164352
    [part 7]

    >>Okay, they couldn't arrest them, but they could pepper-spray them.

    No, that is illegal as well. Pepper spray is illegal to use on non-violent people. Using force was okay, the medium was not.

    http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1332957.html

    >"...alleging that the officers' use of pepper spray on the activists' eyes and faces during three peaceful protests constituted an excessive use of force in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights." "...in light of Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001), in which the Supreme Court describes the way in which to proceed when state officials assert qualified immunity in a §1983 excessive force action. Having reviewed the facts and circumstances of this case in light of Saucier, this panel reaffirms its conclusion that Lewis and Philip are not entitled to qualified immunity."

    And even under the jurisdiction of the CAMPUS they weren't allowed to pepper-spray them. University of California Police are not authorized to use pepper spray except in circumstances in which it is necessary to prevent physical injury to themselves or others. There would have to be an imminent and clear reason to believe that they are protecting someone in order to justify the use of mace.

    [continued]
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:16:05 No.364164396
    [part 8]

    >>They told them to leave, but they didn't. They had to, they tried everything else. What else were they supposed to do?

    Nothing. They had a right to be there. As I said before, right to freedom of assembly, right to freedom of association, and the right to freedom of speech. A police officer's dictations aren't automatically the law. The order to disperse was unlawful.

    And EVEN IF they did try everything else (they didn't), and EVEN IF it was illegal for the protesters to be there (it wasn't illegal), the police still wouldn't legally be allowed to pepper-spray them. I've made multiple citations showing that. It's not illegal for them to use force, but the medium in which they did is illegal.

    And no, they didn't try everything else. From the above article for the list of ten:

    >The UC Davis Police made no effort to remove the student demonstrators from the walkway peacefully before using pepper spray against them.

    And even if they did, that wouldn't justify the use of pepper-spray.

    [continued]
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:16:14 No.364164418
         File1321953374.jpg-(185 KB, 925x674, the hills are alive with the s(...).jpg)
    185 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:16:50 No.364164480
    [part 9]

    >>He alerted them he was going to use pepper-spray

    So?

    That doesn't justify it or make it legal. So just because some man in a uniform tells you he doesn't want you to sit down in that spot and you refuse, he has the right to pepper spray your ass? Where do you draw the line? Should we just let the police tell people whatever they want otherwise they will pepper spray you? The police are citizens like everyone else, they don't have the right to do such things, yet most people are too stupid to question a man if he has on a badge and a helmet. Spraying students with mace is not the "job" of anybody, so people saying "They just did their job" have no concept of what Protect and Serve means.

    A police officer's job is to maintain and uphold the law, period. If they break the law in doing so, then there is a blatant conflict of interest. What they dictate does not always equate to the law.
    >>Those court cases do not apply. That was 40 years ago in a different place.

    Holy fucking shit you do -NOT- know how the judicial system and establishment of law work.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent

    For fuck's sake...

    [continued]
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:16:55 No.364164487
         File1321953415.jpg-(194 KB, 435x327, spid.jpg)
    194 KB
    spidey thread? spidey thread.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:17:36 No.364164538
         File1321953456.png-(221 KB, 400x300, spiderman3234234.png)
    221 KB
    >>364164487
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:17:47 No.364164552
    [part 10 - final post]

    >>They're dirty hippie commies who deserve to be maced.

    Wow.

    Wow, you are a really poor troll.

    Hey, yeah, go against the grain. Be "edgy". Hate people just because you disagree with them. Dehumanize people and not give a fuck. That makes you so cool, especially on an online anonymous forum. Your e-dick must be mammoth. Being a sociopath is the how you get into the kool kids klub. awwww yeahhhh

    Come. On. You really think I can't see through that? And even if you truly think they deserved it, someone else probably thinks you deserve it as well. Might as well let police brutality go wild at that point. Who gives a fuck, so long as it's not you, right? You have no reason to complain about the dangers of being in a police state until you specifically get fucked in the ass.

    If you think being a sociopath is so awesome, then isn't it kind of contradictory to seek attention on this forum for that very reason? A real sociopath would be out taking advantage of people, not trolling a bunch of newf­ags.


    I thought most of /b/ wanted to fight against totalitarianism and abuse of power/authority. I thought that anonymous was distinct in that centralized power should be stripped down. You guys were the ones who even started OWS. wtf happened to you guys?
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:18:05 No.364164572
    bwahahahahahah california is beyond fucked. unbelievable the catastrophic damage to a once massive economy a retarded government can dish out. mad max is imminent.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:18:19 No.364164598
    ugh, enough of this bullshit

    i'm more concerned about the fitness of the police officers

    like what the hell
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:18:24 No.364164606
    >>364164334

    Plenty of people have been claiming that what the police did were perfectly legal. It wasn't.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:18:43 No.364164633
         File1321953523.jpg-(37 KB, 500x369, 1302401309591.jpg)
    37 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:19:26 No.364164692
    >>364163974

    hey asshole, they deserved to be sprayed because they are idiots

    get your facts straight before you post nonsense

    they are heroes now because some stupid cop underestimated equally idiotic media
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:19:27 No.364164694
         File1321953567.jpg-(64 KB, 544x400, RqEWZ.jpg)
    64 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:19:53 No.364164720
    God damnit not this shit again
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:20:07 No.364164743
    >>364164241

    etc. kind of implied spidey
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:20:25 No.364164765
         File1321953625.jpg-(68 KB, 500x357, aPfdOaBqaZtumblr_liunt5jlth1qd(...).jpg)
    68 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:20:42 No.364164792
    >>364164606
    you know what else is illegal? giving welfare and jobs to millions if illegal aliens. Want to fix this situation? Give that backwards shithole back to mexico.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:20:43 No.364164794
         File1321953643.gif-(142 KB, 500x466, ffe.gif)
    142 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:20:45 No.364164796
    >>364164692

    What makes them idiots?
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:21:22 No.364164841
         File1321953682.jpg-(17 KB, 400x294, 2drb4bb.jpg)
    17 KB
    >>364164743

    say spidey, or do not. there is no 'imply'
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:21:49 No.364164878
         File1321953709.jpg-(16 KB, 279x291, 1318200715502.jpg)
    16 KB
    >>364163974
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:21:52 No.364164891
    >>364164792

    Yeah, millions.

    What about the billions spent on corporate welfare and, probably the biggest welfare nipple being sucked dry of 'em all, the military?
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:22:21 No.364164936
    unlawful assembly is unlawful
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:22:23 No.364164938
    >>364164796
    retarded entitlement and a criminal lack of knowledge of what led to the economic collapse of the western world.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:22:43 No.364164970
         File1321953763.jpg-(26 KB, 323x293, 1317155968652.jpg)
    26 KB
    >>364163974

    mfw I link thinking this dumbass of a policeman has become a meme.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:22:50 No.364164982
    >>364164891

    Cut that, -trillions-
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:23:00 No.364164992
         File1321953780.jpg-(17 KB, 360x300, 1299612370503.jpg)
    17 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:23:10 No.364165012
         File1321953790.jpg-(39 KB, 500x356, 1320883881856.jpg)
    39 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:23:26 No.364165041
    >>364164938

    Do you even know what they were protesting?
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:23:36 No.364165056
    UNRELATED POST, but a busy thread.
    i'm looking for the vertical comic of the japan guy.
    it has that naked guy that has a brick and then it zooms in on the tourist guy and hes like hey, japan is a pretty cool place
    thanks in advance!
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:23:50 No.364165079
         File1321953830.jpg-(30 KB, 500x340, tumblr_lj424rJPYf1qdqk39o1_500.jpg)
    30 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:23:58 No.364165088
    >encircle cops, start shouting and flailing
    >peaceful

    This is what apologist hipsters actually believe. They should've fucking clubbed those fuckers.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:24:19 No.364165123
    >>364164936

    See

    >>364164108
    >>364164046
    >>364164004

    I see that you can't read.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:25:01 No.364165189
         File1321953901.jpg-(58 KB, 300x300, 1312203870673.jpg)
    58 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:25:10 No.364165208
         File1321953910.jpg-(3 KB, 126x85, 1318226843269.jpg)
    3 KB
    >>364164982
    mfw you think the economic problems we are now facing have anything at all to do with banks or bailouts.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:25:33 No.364165248
    >>364165088

    See

    >>364164224
    >>364164175

    I see that you are unable to read.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:25:40 No.364165259
         File1321953940.jpg-(21 KB, 360x269, 1301181983543.jpg)
    21 KB
    >> sage sage 11/22/11(Tue)04:26:38 No.364165355
    sage that shit
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:27:00 No.364165405
         File1321954020.gif-(204 KB, 500x652, cat-sir.gif)
    204 KB
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    everyone see this post
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:27:06 No.364165415
         File1321954026.jpg-(41 KB, 500x339, tumblr_lj442vooub1qgq0x0o1_500.jpg)
    41 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:27:16 No.364165426
    >>364165259
    spidey you don't have cancer you have a severe case of humorless retardation.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:28:29 No.364165533
         File1321954109.png-(154 KB, 472x268, 3334f.png)
    154 KB
    >>364165426
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:28:45 No.364165553
         File1321954125.jpg-(9 KB, 200x185, 1317207881765.jpg)
    9 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:29:29 No.364165614
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8Uj1cV97XQ&feature=player_embedded

    Pro-protester candy-asss sure love to cut straight to the spraying, can't have people realize that you've verbally assaulted the cops until they were forced to take action
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:29:34 No.364165623
         File1321954174.jpg-(131 KB, 331x459, MyNigga1..jpg)
    131 KB
    >>364163974

    HEY OP! You're totally spot on. Son I am proud.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:29:41 No.364165641
         File1321954181.jpg-(6 KB, 251x190, consider.jpg)
    6 KB
    The university said it has placed two police officers and the police chief on administrative leave in the wake of the incident, while officials investigate officers' use of pepper spray against protesters.

    Katehi saw the measure as "a necessary step toward restoring trust on our campus," she said.

    The chancellor was scheduled to create a task force Monday to review the incident and issue recommendations within 30 days.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:29:49 No.364165653
         File1321954189.jpg-(21 KB, 360x264, Ill-make-that-bitch-a-hammock-(...).jpg)
    21 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:29:49 No.364165655
         File1321954189.jpg-(95 KB, 400x266, 1319163998674.jpg)
    95 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:30:21 No.364165710
    Funny I could hear the peaceful protesters chanting "Fuck the police"
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:30:31 No.364165720
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    >>364165056
    someone gonna post? i know you have it.
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:31:05 No.364165784
    This is why /b/ is dead, beacuase it is slowly turning into reddit.
    White knights everywhere, destroying the very fabric of what /b/ used to be.
    We were devils, appluading the fact that some shithead is peppering more shitheads.
    What happened..srsly what happened..
    OP, there is a place for you, and its called reddit.
    GTFO my /b/
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:31:08 No.364165790
    it is against the law to obstruct a sidewalk or disobey a police officer. Both of which they were doing. When there is a large group of no compliance civilians it can be considered a riot. The use of pepper spray was justifiable and you are a candy-assgot

    /thread
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:31:25 No.364165820
         File1321954285.jpg-(34 KB, 500x500, 1317208010465.jpg)
    34 KB
    >> Anonymous 11/22/11(Tue)04:31:45 No.364165850
    Hey morons
    The idiots surrounded the police, made a human sheild and didn"t allow poilice to leave.

    Agression.

    Fucking morons



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]