Wolfram Alpha
bitch

>>356488316
42

Do your own homework.
Also >>356488377

>>356488430
LOL RETARD
its 7.4

x-8

>>356488533

I concur. x-8

the donkey hat is in way can someone tell what numbers are in it

roodypoo

nonfaghot answer

I'm ashamed of you fags
let this 14-year-old do his own homework

>>356490655
Surprisingly readable for notepad
High marks to you, sir

>>356491292
If you can resist a math problem, you gay. Mhmmmm...

x-8.

X is equal to 8

>>356492342
Only if the entire equation is equal to 0, candy-ass.

>>356491744
It's clearly

dy/dt = dx/dt + dy/dx + 3x^e^x + 3x*csc^2(x) + 9cos(w+at)^3

but you fags let me know how real maths works out for you

>>356490655
This looks 'shopped...

The first, if not the second too, can be divided out.

>>356492503
1st year calc babby bragging unironically ITT

Holy shit, what are you, all 16?
inb4lrn2math

>>356493364
you're point being? so maybe I am a little drunk. What do you want to bet I'm better at maths than you?

Reached limit of your intelligence on The Internet > Say you're drunk/high

>>356493566
>>356493364
Calculus is for losers. Discrete mathematics is where it is at.

"Say you're better at math than me in real life not on The Internet and see what happens."

I'll just leave this here http://shrt0.info/QG5AKT

>>356493754
>>356493775
>>356493872
I'm still here
What are you bitches proposing, because I'm completely serious

>>356493566
>you are point being?
>maths

>>356494079
Ignorant Americunt detected.

>>356494226

gah my bad i posted in the wrong thread

>>356494079
FYI, maths is short for mathematics.

>>356494226
It's either "mathematics" or "math."
Saying "maths" is a derangement of the English language.

>>356494543
No
'math' is being an americunt
shorthand for mathematics is maths

>>356488316

just derivate it

The English have always been terrible at slang.

>>implying

>>356494761
You call this 'slang'? You really are a moron.

>>356494543
Americunt suggesting the English are deranging their own language?

>>356494543
Besides
WHO THE FUCK DERIVED MODERN MATHS
NIGGER

just factor everything and multiply by reciprocal/cross cancel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Math_%28disambiguation%29

Only reference to the word "maths" on the entire page is in reference to a few retarded places.
No standard uses that word. It's purely vernacular.

>>356495106
Wikipedia is an American site.

>>356495106
I think you'll find they are refering to a couple of XML tags

both math and maths redirect to 'mathematics' on wikipedia

but still, you've been full retard and never recovered

your point is?

>>356494632
As in everything Americunt's (such as myself) think their way is the only way, or at least the best, and everyone else sees the more common way as the status quo and proof of their own superiority.

So we use slightly different words, get over it. The metric system rocks btw.

>>356495333
also (x - 8)

Well...

((10x^2 - 28x + 16) * (5x^2 - 41x + 8)) / ((2x - 4) * (25x^2 - 25x + 4))

(50x^4 - 550x^3 + 1308x^2 - 880x + 128) / (50x^3 - 50x^2 + 108x - 16)

I don't feel like going any further really...

>>356495333

>As in everything Americunt's (such as myself) think their way is the only way, or at least the best, and everyone else sees the more common way as the status quo and proof of their own superiority.
No, the "best" way has nothing to do with nationality and everything to do with consistency.
Mathfags are apparently shit at linguistics.

>So we use slightly different words, get over it. The metric system rocks btw.
Indeed, it does.

>>356495333
Yeah

Now, consider. WHO THE FUCK DERIVED MODERN MATHEMATICS.

Because it sure-as-fuck wasn't america

>>356490655

Fuck it's been a while since I've done this shit...

I knew I was doing something wrong by doing shit the long way...

>>356495911
That is the dumbest argument ever.
It is literally the typical Amerifag argument, but you're using it for England.

Eat a dick, all the best mathematicians were gay Englishmen and an Indian.

>>356495703
And have I even touched on how badly ameicunts fail at a establish a basic system of units?

Oh sure, we can derive everything from weight, length and time.

Derp. FUCKING RETARDS LRN2FUCKINGSCIENCE

>>356495661
>>356496005
I thought you were a trolling fairly well with that post.

>>356495703
Maths does make more sense, actually.

>>356496339
If you do this (I'm speaking to all the artards, about 60% of the Mechanical Engineers, and none of the Electrical Engineers in America)

FUCK YOU. GTFO of the educated world. You opinion is invalid

Go here next time

http://dis.4ch­an.org/sci/

>>356495911
That is the dumbest argument ever.
It is literally the typical Amerifag argument, but you're using it for England.

Eat a dick, all the best mathematicians were gay Englishmen and an Indian.

356496339

>>356495703
>And have I even touched on how badly ameicunts fail at a establish a basic system of units?
You consider it a point against us for using your own system. lawl. Have fun mixing Imperial and metric while pretending you don't.
"How much do you weigh?" "7 Stone."
"The fuck? And how the fuck was that decided to not need pluralization. English..."

>>356496646
>Reads his own post
>Can't believe how retarded what he's reading is
>"Fuck you"

>>356496860
Only cunts still use stone as a unit.

>>356496860
LEARN TO FUCKING PHYSICS or ENGINEER AMERICUNT. because, if you had, you wouldn't be mad

>>356497027
>Only cunts still use stone as a unit.
The English: "cunts"
I'm ok with this.

>>356497205
>LEARN TO FUCKING PHYSICS or ENGINEER AMERICUNT. because, if you had, you wouldn't be mad
You literally don't have an argument. Also,
u mad

>>356497522
Oh really?
I am Mad. What do you do that involves a derivation of units? Because Americunts sure do fuck it up for educated world. Give me ONE [WLT] unit that is more useful than an [MLT] unit

Poor baby had to admit his dialect is stupid and is baaaawwwwwwing

>>356490655
This is the stupidest thing Ive ever seen you queers
If you need me Ill be busy getting another bitch pregnant

>>356497016
TheOnlyGoodPost

ITT: One badly asspained tripfag who thinks knowing some basic math is impressive. Get back to us when you develop your own theorems babby. Regurgitating information is something anyone can do, creating new information is something that is actually noteworthy.

>>356499975
wow. So I can more-than-basic-engineering-maths
And you are?

>>356499975
I am not sure who you are talking about.

>>356500464
>And you are?

A guy who doesn't rage on /b/ about knowing how to preform addition. That's who I am. I'm also a guy who hasn't embarrassed myself in front of everyone going on a rampage with a trip attached.

>>356500645
You may not have noticed, but I get pissed off about the imperial system of units, not some special American math (although i do hate 'tards)

You can't seriously be defending it?

>>356501059
You don't even know what you're arguing about.
I'm almost starting to believe you *are* drunk because you couldn't possibly be this stupid.

>>356501242
Oh non sequitur.
You either recognize that SI is the future, or you're fucking stupid.

You're choice is?

>>356501242
Nah, man, a lot of engineers are like that. They specialize too much for their work over years and get shitty at communication and logic applied to other things.

>>356501511
I am an Engineer. A lot of Americunt Engineers are like that, and as you say
> get shitty at communication and logic applied to other things.

>>356501493
>SI is the future

All systems of measurement are arbitrary, completely subjective.

>>356501493

>Oh non sequitur.
No, it isn't. Apparently, you've looked that term up, but forgot where it applies.
>You either recognize that SI is the future, or you're fucking stupid.
>You're choice is?
>My choice is realizing that you're the only person in this whole thread that is arguing about imperial vs metric system and thinks everyone is talking about that.
You're retarded. High-functioning, but retarded.
Note the correct usage of "you're."

>>356501821

And your re-derivation of every dimensional physical constant using what is?

>>356501821

>All systems of measurement are arbitrary, completely subjective.
Base-2 systems would be optimal for having the fewest number of factors, ensuring optimal conversion precision and best integration with computers.
Base-10 (metric) is optimal for humans as having a shared set of factors across all units.
Imperial is worst for having no common set of factors, least precision in conversion, and steepest learning curve.

>>356501888
> No.
non sequitur applies to your telling me I'm to drunk to not know what i'm talking about


>My choice is realizing that you're the only person in this whole thread that is arguing about imperial vs metric system and thinks everyone is talking about that.

read the fucking thread. sure the original argument was about something else, but someone else brought this up, so i'm going to finish it

>>356501888
FUCK YOU, I agree with SI being queen. Imperial can go fucking die, so can anyone who supports it.

>>356502010

The amount of monkey anuses it takes to light a fuse of course.

>>356502354

>non sequitur applies to your telling me I'm to drunk to not know what i'm talking about
No, it really doesn't. You're retarded.

>read the fucking thread. sure the original argument was about something else, but someone else brought this up, so i'm going to finish it
"Brought this up" > "mentioned" (probably you, if I were to check, anyway)
The only person ever *discussing* this in the thread has been you up until about 3 posts ago.
You literally have no idea as to what the discussion is and cannot follow it at all.

>>356502354
How would him telling you you're too drunk be a non sequitur? You said so yourself here...
>>356493566

In the scope of this conversation it is completely on point since you yourself opened the door for it.

I like to duh lots'a science

>>356502391

I use the imperial system, and i am from europe.

It's just what i was brought up with, and it makes more sense to me personally.

I also use units from before the imperial system for certain things, like ells, balls and firlots.

I think people being forced to use another system is like people being forced to use another language, as I am now.

>>356502653
So you're going to tell me what I meant to say in my own words are you? You telling me I'm to stupid to understand what my own argument is a damn logical fallacy, so I'm going to expose it as one

I started this argument by bagging the shit out of American mathematicians and their system of units. IREGRETNOTHING.jpg
>>356502857
wow. way to change the subject. And learn what a fucking logical fallacy is, since that point seems to be completely lost on you

>>356488316
14, i'm sure of it!

>>356503610

Precisely. The system you use honestly has little impact in the big picture. Mathematics isn't going to fall apart because of it. That's not to say certain systems don't have more merit to them but just that it is a completely retarded thing to argue over.

Here OP. Done in Maple 13.

x-8
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28%2810x%5E2-28x%2B16%29%2F%282x-4%29%29+%2F+%28%2825x%5E2-25x
%2B4%29%2F%285x%5E2-41x%2B8%29%29

>>356503871
Fair enough

Just remember what that the people who defined the world used SI

>>356503653
Hey, friend-o, if you're the only one arguing about something, and yelling at everyone about it, you're about as smart as some homeless crazy ranting on the street corner.

You're also quoting another guy who referred to the other person you're quoting in the 3rd person (so it was obviously not him) and accusing him of changing the subject.
You must be a shitty-as-fuck engineer if you can't understand reference.

Also, you're about as handy with "logical fallacy" as you are with "non sequitur" so I'd leave those phrases in your past where you probably once knew how to use them.

>>356503653

Are you a child? You argue like one. Your pathetic attempts at sophistry won't save you, you're just not that good at it. Trying to constantly shift between arguments and shades of meaning is making you look like a bigger fool than you apparently are. You've been caught by your own words now by multiple people. You bring up that you're drunk while arguing your point and even allude to it perhaps affecting your judgement and yet turn around and say that no one should then bring up what you said because it isn't relevant.

So this either means one of three things:

1. The most likely. You're stupid.

2. That you being drunk has no importance in this conversation and thus since you were the one to originally bring up this fact you've shown that you're raising non-issues to obscure the discussion.

3. That you being drunk has affected your ability to think logically and that you should be ignored.

Regardless of which of the three it is: You being stupid, you being a liar, or you being drunk. The end result is the same, no one should listen to you.

>>356502317
>Base-2 systems would be optimal for having the fewest number of factors, ensuring optimal conversion precision and best integration with computers.
>Base-10 (metric) is optimal for humans as having a shared set of factors across all units.
>Imperial is worst for having no common set of factors, least precision in conversion, and steepest learning curve.

A well-reasoned argument for something.

>>356504300
>Fair enough

>Just remember what that the people who defined the world used SI
OMFG you are stupid.
Appeal to authority and some Argumentum ad populum.
You have the right answer, but not the faculties to understand why it's the right answer.

>>356504434
Wow. Did you even read what I said?

get a fucking scientific education, because attacking you're opponent does not discredit their argument. something you ought to know. NON SEQUITUR.

Tomorrow, I'll be sober, and tomorrow, the SI system will still be the almost universally system for the derivation of scientific units, while the imperial system will be the bastard child of illiterate americans, left to die in the wilderness, with no actuall use

>>356505395
You are Don Quixote fighting windmills that are supporting the imperial system of units.
Tomorrow you might be sober, but I think your retardation goes deeper than that.

>>356505395
>get a fucking scientific education, because attacking you're opponent does not discredit their argument

Implying that science and philosophy are even close to the same thing.

Whose attacked you? Better yet what makes you think you're anyone's opponent?

The post you responded to addressed a core issue: Namely your credibility. Simply put: Why argue with a fool? You've said you're inebriated so that would have a direct impact upon your ability to craft a cogent argument. Why even address the argument when it is clear that its source is flawed or in your case drunk.

>while the imperial system will be the bastard child of illiterate americans
wut
lrn2history
I think people are on to something when they say you're retarded.
That's "you're retarded," not "your retarded," btw.

Simplify. M'kay.

It's a math problem.

Next please.