Nick Clegg is a giant faggot

i was going to vote labour, i like nick clegg but the chances of the lib dems winning are slim, if they go up in the polls i will probably vote lib dem

OP Knows nothing about politics

Not going to vote for the fag, but definitely won himself some votes. Clegg won the debate hands down.

You guys should keep voting for the people who balloon your GDP/Debt ratio past 80%.

Fucking britfag morons.

ALEX WOOD SUCKS FIVE COCKS.

Being Popular =/= Going to get elected

Plus he is a gignatic faggot that says what people want to hear without having any knowledge or skill to bakc it up.

Shits gonna get conservative. Perhaps a Conservative Lib dem hung.

>>217172832
Your only going to vote if they become popular and not based on their policies?
>>217172872
Please tell me why.

is there a torrent for this?

I'm in america so I can't watch any of these.

and fuck cameron

Nick Clegg all the way
The other 2 have unclear manifesto's, and are not saying how they will change shit.

Clegg FTW

>>217173473
And the Dems clealy have no clue. Funny that.

>>217173209

This, only if Clegg holds up in the next two elections. Otherwise it'll be a Conservative victory.

>>217173303
A torrent? It happened like one second ago.

Clegg fucking rocked Brown was not great, Cam was fukken laughable

>>217173635

Oh no arguement here, the lib dems have some horrible economic policies. But in terms of "who won the debate" it's Clegg. Fucking genius used his non-existent party as a staging ground for attacking the other two.

Britfag here. Who the fuck is Nick Clegg?
Why is anyone in the uk bothering to vote? We basically have a two party system and there isn't much difference between them.
On the day of the general election I plan on supporting my country by having a lie in and a wank.

BNP ALL THE WAY

>>217173209
it frightens me how people are so taken in by the lib dems despite thier terrible terrible policies in everythign eccept welfare and the digital economy.

BNP don't want to let the Gurkhas stay

The UK public are quite fond of the Gurkhas

This along with multiple other footnukes have ensured that the BNP wont be taken seriously on the political stage for quite sometime

>>217174095

Fag didn't watch the motherfucking debate. Some serious shit went down. That being said, nobody knows who nick clegg is. He still won though.

>>217173264
no, i like their policies but there is no point in voting for someone who has no chance of winning.

>>217174018
lolo So true

>>217174352

I DON'T KNOW AND I DON'T CARE.

clegg wants to scrap the trident renewal
cameron wants to delay the trident renewel
brown wants to go ahead asap

the subs are built in my town, so lots of jobs (~10000) will be lost if brown doesnt win :(

next debate Clegg is going to get a bashing about his manifesto, i don't see how Cameron scored so highly in the polls he was shitting himself through alot of it.

>>217174277
Ending the war immediately
Heavy regulations of immigration which is killing the country
Creating more jobs in the UK by stopping the outsourcing of labour to China and India
Saying fuck you to the climate change scam

All of BNP's policies sound exactly like what I want in the country today.

>>217174807
Yell bounce back. Getting rid of trident will save a hueg amount of money that could be invested in further job ops.

>>217175003

Nationalising all businesses to assure they are "Doing the best for Britain"

Removal of all foreign specialists from all national services. Say goodbye to every single foreign nurse, soldier, teacher and worker.

Oh yeah, you've thought out your vote.

>>217174270

Seeing as 1/2 lib dem supporters think like you they are obviously not gonna win. I dont see why anyone would vote for someone who they personally think would do a less satisfactory job. If you think hes best then vote for him. At least raising the Lib Dem % of the votes would draw attention to the party and have people take them more seriously. They have some good policies, and Nick Clegg proved he can hold his own, so stop doubting.

Clegg just kept repeating the same points and making statements he couldn't back up about a government who hasn't been in Lib Dem power for over 60 years for a reason.
Pretty much anything Brown said was irrelevant since he's had 13 years to solve the problems and is only now coming up with some solutions the thr problems his own government created. Plus Clegg rejecting to gang up on the consevatives with him was laughable.
Cameron was the only one who made clear valid points he could back up, and tried to address the real issues instead of spending the whole debate slagging the other two parties off. Conservative will win by far.

>>217176048

ITT: Everyone else managing to make impartial observations regardless of their blatant political affiliations for Labour and Conservatives.

>>217175915
THey are split down themiddle. In terms of Welfare and social aid they are excellent. As is thier record in civil rights. THey are utterly terrible at Buisness, International politics and the economy - Imean seriously bad, break the country bad. As such I woul dlike to see a conservative govermetn with dems close second to help push through reform on the digital economy bill and whatnot.

anyone who votes BNP. gtfo.
its all so backward and false.
voting labour btw, just to make sure that fucking slimy tory cunt don't get in.

Lib Dems ideas of social justice being punish the rich are so out of whack it is not even funny.

GORDON PLEASE JUST FUCK OFF

>>217177164

BNPfag here

You're all such hip faggots, just because Nick Clegg actually did the best you're all saying he's shit now. It was obvious he out classed the other too, with style and substance.

>>217174277

>BNP don't want the Gurkhas here.

HA HA HA. OH WOW.

you now all realise that nick clegg cannot win as he doesn't have enough seats.

aha

>>217177440
Read the policies fucktard. Even if he debates stylishly he is a retard at policy making and has NO experience. Not even as formal opposition.

>>217176938

Why must we gtfo? I was under the impression I could vote for whoever I wanted.

>>217174270

First 10,000 untaxed suits myself just fine, thats why I shall go lib dem

>>217177801
Indeed, my ancestors didn't die in the English civil war for nothing.

>>217178063
God you are stupid.

British politics. It's like being raped in the nostril.

>Nick Clegg looks like he may have a good chance at winning

Who?

oh yaeh, the Lib Dem guy

What does he look like again?

>>217179220

I thought his name was Rob Kennedy?

Clegg finally got a chance to talk. Most people probably didn't know who he was before the debate, but he came out the best of the 3.

>>217179538

Who? There was a 3rd person?

>>217179538
Thanks Captain Obvious.

David Cameron FTW

>>217177769

Better the inexperienced new guy than the elitist prick and the incompetent fool.

DERP DERP DERP.

CLEGGIO!

MY CLEGGY-WEGGY SCHNOOKY PIE

>>217172386

Whatever....as long as THIS doesn't happen again.....

>>217180712
I love how you choose based on class hatred. You are bad as you say they are. Which they are not.

>>217180712
>>217180712

word.

At the present time I believe that the best we can hope for is for the country to break roughly even. Until the global economy recovers to a sufficient degree, none of the First World countries are going to be able to do much to stop it. Thus, in the mean time, I'd prefer it if we voted in a party that wouldn't erase our civil liberties in the name of the economy (because the first people blamed when money gets tight are the immigrants and those of foreign descent. Never mind that their great grandparents were the ones who moved over here and they haven't moved outside of London since).

>>217181480

I voted Saxon, he can tick my box any time.

lib dems > anti digital economy bill

>>217181588

I'm a Left Libertarian by ideology (that's a variation of Marxism) so it's not too surprising that I'd dislike the people who pander to the upper classes.

>>217172386
there are two kinds of people in britland : lab-fags and con-fags ,just aswell there is only two or we would need a democracy or something

>>217182869

I admit it, I lol'd.

>>217182332

If I were to rape sixteen children on national television and then set them on fire. If I were to then use their ashes to smother my body and write the message "I'm coming for your babies next" and then I gave everyone cancer.

If I did all this and took the hate generated and turned it into fire, I would only have but a frigid ladies vagoo during a blizzard compared to the heat of the hate I feel for you.

The debate was on ITV - half of the viewer only watched it because they are too fat too reach the remote and put ITV 3 on to watch Cronation Street repeats. They will change their mind before the election and will go with whoever the Sun newspaper tells them to vote for - looks like were getting David Cameron then.

>>217175003
well goodbye to cheap products that you fuckwits take for granted.

and ending the war? britain's too far in to pull out now. it wasn't our war to start with but now that the damages done the decent thing would be to end it. if we pull out USA will hate us for not supporting and cause a massive fall out.

Britain ain't good enough/resourceful/have a good enough system to be self sufficient.
in fact, no country have/are.

>>217183655

>They will change their mind before the election and will go with whoever the Sun newspaper tells them to vote for

so true

People who don't vote for who they actually want because they think other people won't vote for who they want are fucking morons. It's self defeating.

>>217183510
Agreed

>>217183510

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Fuck You.